Rhetoric, dialectic, and the functions of argument

Considering Pragma-Dialectics: A Festschrift for Frans H. Van Eemeren on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 199-209

  Leff, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925813150     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410614155     Document Type: Chapter

References (12)

1. Braunschwig, J. (1996). Aristotle’s rhetoric as ‘counterpart’ to dialectic. In A. O. Rorty (Ed.), Essays on Aristotle's rhetoric (pp. 34-55). Berkeley: University of California Press.
2. Eemeren, F. H. van, & Houtlosser, P. (1998). William the Silent’s argumentative discourse. In F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair, & C. W. Willard (Eds.), Proceedings of the fourth international conference of the international society for the study of argumentation (pp. 163-67). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
3. Eemeren, F. H. van, & Houtlosser, P. (1999). Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Discourse Studies, 1, 479-497.
4. Eemeren, F. H. van, & Houtlosser, P. (2000). Rhetorical analysis within a pragma-dialectical framework. Argumentation, 14, 293-305.
5. Eemeren, F. H. van, & Houtlosser, P. (2002). Strategic maneuvering: Maintaining a delicate balance. In F. H. van Eemeren, & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), Dialectic and rhetoric: The warp and woof of argumentation analysis (pp. 131-160). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
6. Hitchcock, D. (2002). Aristotle’s theory of argument. In K. Boudouris, & J. Poulakos (Eds.), Greek philosophyof communication, vol. 1 (pp. 73-91). Athens: International Center for Greek Philosophy and Culture.
7. Leff, M. C. (1998). Cicero’s Pro Murena and the strong case for rhetoric. Rhetoric and Public Affairs, 1, 61-87.
8. Sloane, T. (1997). On the contrary: The protocol of traditional rhetoric. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.
9. Smith, P. R. (1996). ‘A self-indulgent misuse of leisure and writing’? How not to write philosophy: Did Cicero get it right? In J. G. F. Powell (Ed.), Cicero the philosopher (pp. 301-24). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
10. Tindale, C. W. (1999). Acts of arguing: A rhetorical model of argument. Albany: SUNY Press.
11. Weaver, R. M. (1953). Rhetoric and dialectic in Dayton, Tennessee. In R. M. Weaver, The ethics of rhetoric (pp. 27-54). Chicago: Regnery.
12. Wenzel, J. (1990). Three perspectives on argument. In R. Trapp, & J. Schuetz (Eds.), Perspectives on argumentation: Essays in honor of Wayne Brockriede (pp. 27-54). Denver: Waveland.