A survey of assessment research on mediation and conferencing

Repositioning Restorative Justice

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 67-120

  McCold, Paul ^a  

^a International Institute for Restorative Practices   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925801378     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781843924791     Document Type: Chapter

References (142)

1. Aertsen, I. (2000) ‘Victim-Offender Mediation in Belgium’, in the European Forum for Victim-Offender Mediation and Restorative Justice (ed.) Victim-Offender Mediation in Europe: Making Restorative Justice Work. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
2. American Bar Association. (1990) Dispute Resolution Programme Directory 1990. Washington, DC: American Bar Association Standing Committee on Dispute Resolution.
3. Bae, I. (1992) ‘A Survey on Public Acceptance of Restitution as an Alternative to Incarceration for Property Offenders in Hennepin County, Minnesota, USA’, in H. Messmer, and H.-U. Otto, (eds) Restorative Justice on Trial: Pitfalls and Potentials of Victim-Offender Mediation - International Research Perspectives. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
4. Bannenberg, B. (2000) ‘Victim-Offender Mediation in Germany’, in the European Forum for Victim-Offender Mediation and Restorative Justice (ed.) Victim- Offender Mediation in Europe: Making Restorative Justice Work. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
5. Bilsky, W., Pfeiffer, H. and Trenczek, T. (1991) ‘New Forms of Conflict Management in Juvenile Law: A Comparative Evaluation of the Brunswick Victim-Offender Reconciliation Programme’, in G. Kaiser (eds) Victims and Criminal Justice: Legal Protection, Restitution and Support. Criminological Research Reports 51. Saarbrucken: Max-Planck Institute.
6. Bouwman, J. (1997) ‘Sparwood Youth Assistance Programme.‘Paper presented to ‘Dawn or Dusk in Sentencing’, CIAJ national conference, Montreal, 24-26, April.
7. Braithwaite, J. (1989) Crime, Shame and Reintegration. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
8. Braithwaite, J. (2002) Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
9. Braithwaite, J. and Mugford, S. (1994) ‘Conditions of Successful Reintegration Ceremonies’, British Journal of Criminology, 34(2): 139-71.
10. Burford, G. and Hudson, J. (eds) (2000) Family Group Conferencing in Child Welfare. Monsey, NY: Willow Tree Press.
11. Calhoun, A. (2000a) Calgary Community Conferencing: Participant Satisfaction: 19982000. Calgary: Calgary Community Conferencing, Youth Probation Services [www.calgary communityconferencing.com/rande/satisfaction.html].
12. Calhoun, A. (2000b) Calgary Community Conferencing: Activities and Outputs: January 1998 - July 2000. Calgary: Calgary Community Conferencing, Youth Probation Services.
13. Chatterjee, J. (1999) A Report on the Evaluation of RCMP Restorative Justice Initiative: Community Justice Forum as Seen by Participants. Ottawa: Research and Evaluation Branch, Community Contract and Aboriginal Policing Services, Royal Canadian Mounted Police.
14. Citizens’ Action on Crime (1980) Waste, Delay and Ineffectiveness: An Economic Analysis of New York City's Criminal Justice System. New York, NY: Citizens' Action on Crime.
15. Claassen, R. and Zehr, H. (1989) VORP Organizing: A Foundation in the Church. Elkhart, IN: Mennonite Central Committee, Office of Criminal Justice.
16. Coates, R. (1985) Victim Meets Offender: An Evaluation of Victim-Offender Reconciliation Programmes. Valparaiso, IN: PACT Institute of Justice.
17. Coates, R. (1990) ‘Victim-Offender Reconciliation Programmes in North America: An Assessment’, in G. Galaway and J. Hudson (eds) Criminal Justice, Restitution, and Reconciliation. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
18. Coates, R. and Gehm, J. (1989) ‘An Empirical Assessment’, in M. Wright and B. Galaway (eds) Mediation and Criminal Justice. London: Sage.
19. Cook, R., Roehl, J. and Sheppard, D. (1980) Neighborhood Justice Centers Field Test: Final Evaluation Report. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
20. Cordella, J. (1991) ‘Reconciliation and the Mutualist Model of Community’, in H. Pepinsky, and R. Quinney, (eds) Criminology as Peacemaking. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
21. Couture, J., Parker, T., Couture, R. and Baboucane, P. (2001) A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Hollow Water's Community Holistic Circle Healing Process. Native Counseling Services of Alberta.
22. Czarnecka-Dzialuk, B. and Wojcik, D. (2000) ‘Victim-Offender Mediation in Poland’, in the European Forum for Victim-Offender Mediation and Restorative Justice (ed.) Victim-Offender Mediation in Europe: Making Restorative Justice Work. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
23. Daly, K. (2000) ‘Ideals Meet Reality: Research results on Youth Justice Conferences in South Australia.' Paper presented to the fourth international conference on restorative justice for juveniles, Tuebingen, Germany, 1-4 October.
24. Daly, K. (2001a) ‘Conferencing in Australia and New Zealand: Variations, Research Findings, and Prospects,' in A. Morris and G. Maxwell (eds). Restorative Justice for Juveniles: Conferencing, Mediation and Circles. Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.
25. Daly, K. (2001b) Research on Conferencing. Technical Report 2. South Australia Juvenile Justice.
26. Davis, G., Boucherat, J. and Watson, D. (1987) A Preliminary Study of Victim- Offender Mediation and Reparation Schemes in England and Wales. Research and Planning Unit Paper 42. London: Home Office.
27. Davis, R. (1982) ‘Mediation: The Brooklyn Experiment’, in R. Tomasic and M. Feeley (eds) Neighborhood Justice - Assessment of an Emerging Idea. New York, NY: Longman.
28. Davis, R., Tichane, M. and Grayson, D. (1980) Mediation and Arbitration as Alternatives to Prosecution in Felony Arrest Cases: An Evaluation of the Brooklyn Dispute Resolution Center. New York, NY: Vera Institute of Justice.
29. de Jong, W. (2001) ‘Neighborhood-centered conflict mediation in the Netherlands: An Instrument for Social Cohesion - Part II’, Contemporary Justice Review, 4(1): 49-58.
30. Dignan, J. (1990) Repairing the Damage: An Evaluation of an Experimental Adult Reparation Scheme in Kettering, Northamptonshire. Centre for Criminological and Legal Research, University of Sheffield.
31. Dignan, J. (1992) ‘Repairing the Damage: Can Reparation be Made to Work in the Service of Diversion?’, British Journal of Criminology 32: 453-72.
32. Dunkel, F. and Rossner, D. (1989) ‘Law and Practice of Victim/Offender Agreements’, in M. Wright and B. Galaway (eds) Mediation and Criminal Justice: Victims, Offenders and Community. London: Sage.
33. Evaluation Group (1980) An Evaluation Report on the Suffolk County Community Mediation Center. Glendale, NY: Evaluation Group, Inc.
34. Evje, A. and Cushman, R. (2000) A Summary of the Evaluations of Six California Victim-Offender Reconciliation Programs. Report to the California Legislature. The Judicial Council of California, Administrative Office of the Courts, Center for Families, Children and the Courts, May.
35. Felstiner, W. and Williams, L. (1980) Community Mediation in Dorchester, Massachusetts. Washington, DC: US Government Print Office.
36. Fercello, C. and Umbreit, M. (1998) Client Evaluation of Family Group Conferencing in 12 Sites in the 1st Judicial District of Minnesota. St Paul, MN: Center for Restorative Justice and Mediation.
37. Francey, C., Palenski, J.E., Roehl, J. and Jacobs, N. (1983) ‘Evaluating Dispute Resolution Programmes’, in M.R. Volpe et al. (eds) Mediation in the Justice System - Conference Proceedings. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association Special Committee on Resolution of Minor Disputes.
38. Galaway, B. (1984) ‘A Survey of Public Acceptance of Restitution as an Alternative to Imprisonment for Property Offenders’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 17(2): 108-17.
39. Gallup Organisation, Inc. (2000) Reported in the Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics Albany, NY: University at Albany (www.albany.edu/sourcebook/).
40. Garofalo, J. and Connelly, K. (1980a) ‘Dispute Resolution Centers. Part I. Major Features and Processes’, Criminal Justice Abstracts, September: 416-39.
41. Garofalo, J. and Connelly, K. (1980b) ‘Dispute Resolution Centers. Part II. Outcomes, Issues, and Future Directions’, Criminal Justice Abstracts, December: 576-611.
42. Gehm, J.R. (1990) ‘Mediated Victim-Offender Restitution Agreements: An Exploratory Analysis of Factors Related to Victim Participation’, in B. Galaway, and J. Hudson (eds) Criminal Justice, Restitution and Reconciliation. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
43. Gronfors, M. (1989a) ‘Ideals and Reality in Community Mediation’, in M. Wright, and B. Galaway (eds) Mediation and Criminal Justice: Victims, Offenders and Community. London: Sage.
44. Gronfors, M. (1989b) ‘Mediation - Experiment in Finland’, in P. Albrecht and O. Backes (eds) Crime Prevention and Intervention: Legal and Ethical Problems. New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter.
45. Gronfors, M. (1992) ‘Mediation: A Romantic Ideal or a Workable Alternative?’, in H. Messmer and H.-U. Otto (eds) Restorative Justice on Trial: Pitfalls and Potentials of Victim-Offender Mediation - International Research Perspectives. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
46. Hartmann, A. (1992) ‘Victim-Offender Reconciliation: Programme and Outcomes’, in H. Messmer and H.-U. Otto (eds) Restorative Justice on Trial: Pitfalls and Potentials of Victim-Offender Mediation - International Research Perspectives. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
47. Hassall, I. (1996) ‘Origin and Development of Family Group Conferences' in J. Hudson, et al. (eds) Family Group Conferences: Perspectives on Policy and Practice. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
48. Hayes, H. and Prinzler, T. (1998) Making Amends: Final Evaluation of the Queensland- Community Conferencing Pilot. Brisbane: Department of Justice.
49. Henry, M. (1982) ‘The New York Experience: The Community Dispute Resolution Centers Programme’, in M. Volpe et al. (eds) Mediation in the Criminal Justice System Conference Proceedings, May 20-21. New York, NY: John Jay College of Criminal Justice.
50. Hudson, J. and Galaway, B. (1974) ‘Undoing the wrong’, Social Work, 19(3): 313-18.
51. Hughes, S. and Schneider, A. (1989) ‘Victim-Offender Mediation: A Survey of Programme Characteristics and Perceptions of Effectiveness’, Crime and Delinquency, 35: 2, 217-33.
52. Hughes, S. and Schneider, A. (1990) Victim-Offender Mediation in the Juvenile Justice System. Washington, DC: US Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
53. Iivari, J. (2000) ‘Victim-Offender Mediation in Finland’, in the European Forum for Victim-Offender Mediation and Restorative Justice (ed.) Victim-Offender Mediation in Europe: Making Restorative Justice Work. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
54. Jullion, D. (2000) ‘Victim Offender Mediation in France’, in the European Forum for Victim-Offender Mediation and Restorative Justice (ed.) Victim-Offender Mediation in Europe: Making Restorative Justice Work. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
55. Karmen, A. (1990) Crime Victims: An Introduction to Victimology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
56. Kerlinger, F. (1973) Foundations of Behavioral Research. (2nd edn). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
57. Kressel, K. and Pruitt, D. (1985) ‘The Mediation of Social Conflict’, Journal of Social Issues, 41(2), 179-19.
58. Kressel, K. et al. (1989) ‘Conclusion: A Research Perspective on the Mediation of Social Conflict’, in K. Kressel et al. (eds) Mediation Research: The Process and Effectiveness of Third-party Intervention. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
59. Loschnig-Gspandl, M. and Kilchling, M. (1997) ‘Victim/Offender Mediation and Victim Compensation in Austria and Germany - Stocktaking and Perspectives for Future Research’, European Journal of Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 5(1): 58-78.
60. MacWillie, J. (1981) The Price of Justice: The Cost of Arresting and Prosecuting Three Robbery Cases in Manhattan. New York, NY: New York City Criminal Justice Coordinating Council.
61. Marshall, T. (1990) ‘Results of Research from British Experiments in Restorative Justice’, in B. Galaway and J. Hudson (eds) Criminal Justice, Restitution, and Reconciliation. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
62. Marshal, T. and Merry, S. (1990) Crime and Accountability. London: Home Office.
63. Maxwell, G. (1993) ‘Family Decision-making in Youth Justice: The New Zealand Model’, in L. Atkinson and S.-A. Gerull (eds) National Conference on Juvenile Justice. Conference Proceedings No. 22. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
64. Maxwell, G. and Morris, A. (1993) Family, Victims and Culture: Youth Justice in New Zealand. Wellington: Institute of Criminology, Victoria University of Wellington.
65. Maxwell, G. and Morris, A. (1994) ‘The New Zealand Model of Family Group Conferences’, in C. Alder and J. Wundersitz (eds) Family Conferencing and Juvenile Justice: The Way Forward or Misplaced Optimism?. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
66. Maxwell, G. and Morris, A. (1999) Understanding Reoffending. Wellington: Institute of Criminology, Vicoria University of Wellington.
67. Maxwell, G. and Morris, A. (2001) ‘Family Group Conferences and Reoffending’, in A. Morris and G. Maxwell (eds) Restorative Justice for Juveniles: Conferencing, Mediation and Circles. Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.
68. McCold, P. (1999) Virginia Conferencing Project: Evaluation Results. Pipersville, PA: Community Service Foundation.
69. McCold, P. (2000) ‘Toward a Mid-range Theory of Restorative Criminal Justice: A Reply to the Maximalist Model’, Contemporary Justice Review, 3(4): 357-414.
70. McCold, P. (2001) ‘Primary Restorative Justice Practices’, in A. Morris, A. and G. Maxwell, (eds), Restorative Justice for Juveniles: Conferencing, Mediation and Circles. Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.
71. McCold, P. and Wachtel, B. (1998) Restorative Policing Experiment: The Bethlehem Pennsylvania Police Family Group Conferencing Project. Washington, DC: US Printing Office.
72. McCold, P. and Wachtel, T. (2000) ‘Restorative Justice Theory Validation.' Paper presented at the fourth international conference on restorative justice for juveniles, Tubingen, Germany, 1-4 October.
73. McEwen, C. and Maiman, R. (1982) ‘Mediation and Arbitration: Their Promise and Performance as Alternatives to Courts’, in P. Dubois (ed.) The Analysis of Judicial Reform. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
74. McGarrell, E., Olivares, K., Crawford, K. and Kroovand, N. (2000) Returning to the Community: The Indianapolis Juvenile Restorative Justice Experiment. Indianapolis, IN: Hudson Institute Crime Control Policy Center.
75. McGillis, D. and Mullen, J. (1997) Neighborhood Justice Centers: An Analysis of Potential Models. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
76. Merry, S.E. and Milner, N. (eds) (1995) The Possibility of Popular Justice: A Case Study of Community Mediation in the United States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
77. Miers, D. (2001) An International Review of Restorative Justice. Crime Reduction Research Series Paper 10. London: Home Office.
78. Moore, D.B. (1995) A New Approach to Juvenile Justice: An Evaluation of Family Conferencing’, in A Report to the Criminology Research Council. Wagga Wagga: Centre for Rural Social Research, Charles Sturt University-Riverina.
79. Morris, A. and Maxwell, G. (1993) ‘Juvenile Justice in New Zealand: A new paradigm,' Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 26: 72-90.
80. Morris, A. and Maxwell, G. (1998) ‘Restorative Justice in New Zealand: Family
81. Group Conferences as a Case Study’, Western Criminology Review 1(1) (http://wcr.sonoma.edu/v1n1/morris.html).
82. Morris, A., Maxwell, G. and Robertson, J. (1993) ‘Giving Victims a Voice: A New Zealand Experiment’, The Howard Journal, 32(4): 304-21.
83. Mott McDonald Associates, Inc. (1979) The Cost of Justice: An Analysis of Case Processing Costs in the Bronx. Washington, DC: Criminal Justice System.
84. Netzig, L. and Trenczek, T. (1996) ‘Restorative Justice as Participation: Theory, Law, Experience and Research’, in B. Galaway and J. Hudson (eds) Restorative Justice: International Perspectives. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
85. New York State Unified Court System (1985) The Community Dispute Resolution Centers Program: A Progress Report: January 1,1984 to March 31,1985. Albany, NY: New York State Unified Court System.
86. New York State Unified Court System (1999) Dispute Resolution Centers Program. Annual Report for the Fiscal Year 1998-1999. Albany, NY: Office of Alternative Dispute Resolution, Division of Court Operations, New York State Unified Court System.
87. Northey, W. (1989) ‘Biblical/Theological Works Contributing to Restorative Justice: A Bibliographic Essay’, in New Perspectives on Crime and Justice. 8. Akron, PA: Mennonite Central Committee Office of Criminal Justice.
88. Nugent, W. and Paddock, J. (1995) ‘The Effect of Victim-Offender Mediation on Severity of Reoffence’, Mediation Quarterly, 12(4), 353-67.
89. O'Connell, T. (1998) ‘From Wagga Wagga to Minnesota’, in Conferencing: A New Response to Wrongdoing. Proceedings of the First North American Conference on Conferencing. Bethlehem, PA: Real Justice.
90. O'Connell, T., Wachtel, B. and Wachtel, T. (1999) Conferencing Handbook: The New Real Justice Training Manual. Pipersville, PA: The Piper's Press.
91. Olsen, T., Maxwell, G. and Morris, A. (1995) ‘Maori and Youth Justice in New Zealand’, in K. Hazlehurst, (ed.) Popular Justice and Community Regeneration. London: Praeger.
92. Palk, G., Hayes, H. and Prenzler, T. (1998) ‘Restorative Justice and Community Conferencing: Summary of Findings from a Pilot Study’, Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 10(2), 138-55.
93. Pate, K. (1990) ‘Victim-Young Offender Reconciliation as Alternative Measures Programmes in Canada’, in B. Galaway and J. Hudson (eds) Criminal Justice, Restitution, and Reconciliation. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
94. Paus, K. (2000) ‘Victim-Offender Mediation in Norway’, in the European Forum for Victim-Offender Mediation and Restorative Justice (ed.) Victim-Offender Mediation in Europe: Making Restorative Justice Work. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
95. Pearson, J. and Thoennes, N. (1982) ‘Mediation and Divorce: The Benefits Outweigh the Costs’, The Family Advocate, 4: 26-32.
96. Pearson, J. and Thoennes, N. (1984) ‘A Preliminary Portrait of Client Reactions to Three Court Mediation Programmes’, Mediation Quarterly, 3: 21-40.
97. Pearson, J., Thoennes, N. and Vanderkooi, L. (1982) ‘The Decision to Mediate: Profiles of Individuals who Accept and Reject the Opportunity to Mediate Contested Child Custody and Visitation Issues’, Journal of Divorce, 6: 17-35.
98. Pelikan, C. (2001) ‘Victim-Offender Mediation in Austria’, in the European Forum for Victim-Offender Mediation and Restorative Justice (ed.) Victim-Offender Mediation in Europe: Making Restorative Justice Work. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
99. Pratt, J. (1996) ‘Colonization, Power and Silence: A History of Indigenous Justice in New Zealand Society’, in B. Galaway and J. Hudson (eds) Restorative Justice: International Perspectives. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
100. Ray, L. (1979) Intake and the Night Prosecutor's Programme - The Year in Review 1978'. in US House, Subcommittee on Courts, Civil Liberties, and the Administration of Justice, Committee on the Judiciary, and Subcommittee on Consumer Protection and Finance, Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce (Joint Hearings), Resolution of Minor Disputes. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
101. Roehl, J. and Cook, R. (1982) ‘Neighborhood Justice Centers Field Test’, in R. Tomasic and M.M. Feeley (eds) Neighborhood Justice - Assessment of an Emerging Idea. New York, NY: Longman.
102. Roehl, J. and Cook, R. (1989) ‘Mediation in interpersonal disputes: Effectiveness and Limitations’, in K. Kressel, D. Pruit and Associates (eds) Mediation Research: The Process and Effectiveness of Third-party Intervention. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
103. Rossner, D. (1996) ‘Situation, Ethical Grounds and Criminal Political Perspective of Victim-Offender Reconciliation in Community’, in B. Galaway and J. Hudson (eds) Restorative Justice: International Perspectives. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
104. Roy, S. (1993a) ‘Perspectives on Juvenile Delinquency’, Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 9(2): 81-167.
105. Roy, S. (1993b) ‘Two Types of Juvenile Restitution programmes in two Midwestern Counties: A Comparative Study’, Federal Probation, 57(4): 48-53.
106. Roy, S. (1994) ‘Victim-Offender Reconciliation Programme for Juveniles in Elkhart County, Indiana: An exploratory study’, Justice Professional, (8)2: 23-35.
107. Schoch, H. and Bannenberg, B. (1991) ‘Victim-Offender Reconciliation in Germany: Stocktaking and Criminal Political Consequences' in G. Kaiser et al. (eds) Victims and Criminal Justice: Legal Protection, Restitution and Support. Criminological Research Reports 51. Saarbrucken: Max-Planck Institute.
108. Schulman, Ronca and Bucuvalas, Inc. (1999) What Do we Want (and What are we Getting) from the Criminal Justice System? Comparing the General Public's Expectations and Perceptions with Crime Victims' Experiences. Conducted for Council of State Governments Eastern Regional Conference, August 10. New York, NY: Schulman, Ronca and Bucuvalas, Inc.
109. Sessar, K. (1999) ‘Punitive Attitudes of the Public: Reality and Myth,' in G. Bazemore, G. and L. Walgrave (eds) Restorative Juvenile Justice: Reparing the Harm of Youth Crime. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
110. Sherman, L., Strang, H., Barnes, G., Braithwaite, J., Inkpen, N. and The, M.M. (1998) Experiments in Restorative Policing. A Progress Report on the Canberra ReIntegrative Shaming Experiments (RISE) to the National Police Research Unit. Australian National University, June (www.aic.gov.au/rjustice/rise/).
111. Sherman, L., Strang, H., Barnes, G., Braithwaite, J., Inkpen, J. and The, M.M. (1999) Experiments in Restorative Policing. A Progress Report on the Canberra ReIntegrative Shaming Experiments (RISE) to the National Police Research Unit. Australian National University, July (www.aic.gov.au/rjustice/rise/).
112. Sherman, L., Strang, H. and Woods, D. (2000) Recidivism Patterns in the Canberra ReIntegrative Shaming Experiments (RISE). Centre for Restorative Justice, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University, November (www.aic.gov.au/rjustice/rise/).
113. Stead, D.G. (1986) ‘The effectiveness of Criminal Mediation: An Alternative to Court Proceedings in a Canadian City. Dissertation, University of Denver. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International.
114. Strang, H. (1999) Restorative Justice: Current Developments and Research findings. Paper presented at the third National Outlook ‘Symposium on crime in Australia: Mapping the Boundaries of Australia's Criminal Justice System’, Canberra, 22-23 March (www.aic.gov.au/rjustice/rise/).
115. Timboli, L. (2000) An Evaluation of the New South Wales Youth Justice Conferencing Scheme. Sidney: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and
116. Research, Attorney General's Department (www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/ bocsar1.nsf/pages/reports_new).
117. Trenczek, T. (1990) ‘A Review and Assessment of Victim-Offender Reconciliation Programming in West Germany' in B. Galaway and J. Hudson (eds) Criminal Justice, Restitution, and Reconciliation. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
118. Umbreit, M. (1993) ‘Juvenile Offenders Meet their Victims: The Impact of Mediation in Albuquerque, New Mexico,' Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 31(1): 90-100.
119. Umbreit, M. (1994a) ‘Crime Victims Confront their Offenders: The Impact of a Minneapolis Mediation Programme’, Journal of Research on Social Work Practice, 4(4), 436-47.
120. Umbreit, M. (1994b) Victim Meets Offender: The Impact of Restorative Justice and Mediation. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
121. Umbreit, M. (1995) ‘The Effects of Victim-Offender Mediation’, in M. Tonry and K. Hamilton (eds) Intermediate Sanctions in Over-crowded Times. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
122. Umbreit, M. (1996a) ‘A Humanistic Mediation Model: Moving to a Higher Plane,' VOMA Quarterly 7(3).
123. Umbreit, M. (1996b) ‘Restorative Justice through Mediation: The Impact of Offenders Facing their Victims in Oakland’, Law and Social Work, 5(1): 1-13.
124. Umbreit, M. (1996c) ‘Restorative Justice through Mediation: The Impact of Programmes in Four Canadian Provinces’, in B. Galaway and J. Hudson (eds) Restorative Justice: International Perspectives. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
125. Umbreit, M. (1997) ‘Humanistic Mediation: A Transformative Journey of Peacemaking’, Mediation Quarterly, 14(3), 201-13.
126. Umbreit, M. (1998) ‘Restorative Justice through Victim-Offender Mediation: A Multi-site Assessment, Western Criminology Review, 1(1): 1-29.
127. Umbreit, M. and Coates, R. (1992) Victim-Offender Mediation: An Analysis of Programmes in Four States of the US. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota Citizens' Council on Crime and Justice.
128. Umbreit, M., Coates, R., Kalanj, B., Lipkin, B. and Petros, G. (1995) Mediation of Criminal Conflict: An Assessment of Programmes in Four Canadian Provinces. Executive Summary Report. St. Paul, MN: Center for Restorative Justice and Mediation, University of Minnesota.
129. Umbreit, M. and Fercello, C. (1997) Woodbury Police Department's Restorative Justice Community Conferencing Programme: An Initial Assessment of Client Satisfaction. St. Paul, MN: Center for Restorative Justice and Mediation, University of Minnesota.
130. Umbreit, M. and Warner Roberts, A. (1996) Mediation of Criminal Conflict in England: An Assessment of Services In Coventry and Leeds. Minneapolis, MN: Center for Restorative Justice and Mediation, School of Social Work, University of Minnesota.
131. Victim-Offender Reconciliation Resource Center (1984) The VORP Book: An Organisational and Operation Manual. Valparaiso, IN: PACT Institute of Justice.
132. Walker, J. (1992) ‘Mediation in Divorce: Does the Process Match the Rhetoric?' in H. Messmer and H.-U. Otto (eds) Restorative Justice on Trial: Pitfalls and Potentials of Victim-Offender Mediation - International Research Perspectives. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
133. Walker, L. (2001) ‘Conferencing: A New Approach for Juvenile Justice in Honolulu.' Unpublished paper, Hawaii Friends of Civic and Law Related Education, Waialua, Hawaii.
134. Wandrey, M. (1992) ‘Organisational Demands on Mediation Programmes: Problems of Realisation’, in H. Messmer and H.-U. Otto (eds) Restorative Justice on Trial: Pitfalls and Potentials of Victim-Offender Mediation - International Research Perspectives. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
135. Warner, S. (1992) ‘Reparation, Mediation and Scottish Criminal Justice’, in H. Messmer, H. and H.-U. Otto (eds) Restorative Justice on Trial: Pitfalls and Potentials of Victim-Offender Mediation - International Research Perspectives. Dordrecht, NETH: Kluwer Academic.
136. Warner, S., Knapp, M. and A. Netten, A. (1992) Making Amends: Justice for Victims and Offenders: An Evaluation of the SACRO Reparation and Mediation Project. Aldershot: Ashgate.
137. Warner-Roberts, A. and Masters, G. (1999) Group Conferencing: Restorative Justice in Practice. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Center for RJ and Mediation, School of Social Work.
138. Weitekamp, E. (2000) ‘Research on Victim-Offender Mediation: Findings and Needs for the Future’, in the European Forum for Victim-Offender Mediation and Restorative Justice (ed.) Victim-Offender Mediation in Europe: Making Restorative Justice Work. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
139. Wright, M. (1996) Justice for Victims and Offenders: A Restorative Response to Crime. (2nd edn). Winchester: Waterside Press.
140. Wundersitz, J. and Hetzel, S. (1996) ‘Family Conferencing for Young Offenders: The South Australian Experience' in J. Hudson, J. et al. (eds) Family Group Conferences: Perspectives on Policy and Practice. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
141. Wynne, J. (1996) ‘Leeds Mediation and Reparation Service: Ten Years' Experience with Victim-Offender Mediation’, in B. Galaway and J. Hudson (eds) Restorative Justice: International Perspectives. Monsey NY: Criminal Justice Press.
142. Yarn, D. (1999) Dictionary of Conflict Resolution. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Zehr, H. and Umbreit, M. (1982) ‘Victim-Offender Reconciliation: An Incarceration Substitute?’ Federal Probation, 46(4): 63-8.