When reasons matter most: Pragma-dialectics and the problem of informed consent

Considering Pragma-Dialectics: A Festschrift for Frans H. Van Eemeren on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 75-85

  Goodnight, G Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925790623     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410614155     Document Type: Chapter

References (9)

1. Consumer bill of rights. (1998). Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection and Quality in the Health Care Industry, http://www.hcqualitycommission.gov/cborr/chap4.html Accessed 08/01/2005
2. Eemeren, F. H. van, & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma- dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Faden, R. R., & Beauchamp, T. L. (1986). A history and theory of informed consent. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Howard, M. L. Informed consent. E-Medicine: Instant Access to the Minds of Medicine. www.emedicine.com/ent/topic 181.html Accessed 7/26/2005
5. Lashley, M., Talley, W., Lands, L. C., & Keyserling, E. W. (2000, March). Informed proxy consent: Communication between pediatric surgeons and surrogates about surgery. Pediatrics, 105, 591- 597.
6. Rawls, J. (1955). “Two concepts of rules.” The Philosophical Review, 64, 3-32.
7. Savulexcu, J., & Momeyer, R. W. (1997). Should informed consent be based on rational beliefs? Journal of Medical Ethics, 23, 282-288.
8. Wear, S. (1993). Informed consent: Patient autonomy and physician beneficence within clinical medicine. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
9. White, B. C. (1994). Competence to consent. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.