Problem-oriented evaluation? Evaluating problem-oriented policing initiatives

Crime Reduction and Problem-Oriented Policing

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 183-216

  Matassa, Mario ^a   Newburn, Tim ^b  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

^b LSE ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925788901     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781843924357     Document Type: Chapter

References (40)

1. ACPO (2000) Guide to Identifying and Combatting Hate Crime: Breaking the Power of Fear and Hate. London: Association of Chief Police Officers.
2. Bowling, B. (1999) Violent Racism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
3. Brewer, J.D. (1993) ‘Sensitivity as a problem in field research’, in C.M. Renzetti and R.M. Lee (eds) Researching Sensitive Topics. London: Sage.
4. Cain, M. (1973) The Policeman in the Community. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
5. Chelimsky, E. (1997) ‘Thoughts for a new evaluation society’, Evaluation, 3(1): 97–118.
6. Cope, N. (forthcoming) ‘Intelligence led policing or policing led intelligence: integrating volume crime analysis into policing, British Journal of Criminology.
7. Crawford, A. (1998) Crime Prevention and Community Safety. Harlow: Longman.
8. Crawford, A. and Newburn, T. (2003) Youth Offending and Restorative Justice: Implementing Reform in Youth Justice. Cullompton: Willan.
9. Elias, N. (1987) Involvement and Detachment. Oxford: Blackwell.
10. Farrington, D.P. (1997) ‘Evaluating a community crime prevention program’, Evaluation, 3(2): 157–173.
11. Farrington, D.P. (1998) ‘Evaluating “communities that care”: realistic scientific considerations’, Evaluation, 4(2): 204–210.
12. Goffman, E. (1971) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
13. Goldstein, H. (1979) ‘Improving policing: a problem-oriented approach’, Crime and Delinquency, 25(2): 234–258.
14. Goldstein, H. (1990) Problem-oriented Policing. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
15. Grimshaw, R. and Jefferson, T. (1987) Interpreting Policework: Policy and Practice in Forms of Beat Policing. London: Allen & Unwin.
16. HM Treasury (1997) Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government: ‘The Green Book’. London: HM Treasury.
17. Home Office (1998) Targeted Policing: Prospectus for Developmental Projects. London: Home Office.
18. Home Office (1999a) Reducing Crime and Tackling its Causes: A Briefing Note on the Crime Reduction Programme. London: Home Office.
19. Home Office (1999b) Programmes for Offenders: Guidance for Evaluators. Crime Reduction Programme – Guidance Note 2. London: Home Office.
20. Hope, T. and Murphy, D. (1983) ‘Problems of implementing crime prevention: the experience of a demonstration project’, Howard Journal, 22(1): 38–50.
21. Leigh, A., Read, T. and Tilley, N. (1996) Problem-oriented Policing: Brit Pop. Crime Prevention and Detection Series Paper 75. London: Home Office.
22. Leigh, A., Read, T. and Tilley, N. (1998) Brit Pop II: Problem-oriented Policing in Practice. Police Research Series Paper 93. London: Home Office.
23. Lincoln, Y.S. (1991) ‘The arts and sciences of program evaluation’, Evaluation Practice, 12(1): 1–7.
24. Macpherson, Lord Justice (1999) The Stephen Lawrence Inquiry. Report of an Inquiry by Sir William Macpherson of Cluny. Advised by Tom Cook, The Right Reverend Dr John Sentamu and Dr Richard Stone. Cm 4262-1. London: HMSO.
25. Morgan, R. (2000) ‘The politics of criminological research’, in R. D. King and E. Wincup (eds) Doing Research on Crime and Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Newburn, T. (2001) ‘What do we mean by evaluation?’, Children and Society, 15: 5–13.
27. Oakley, A. (2000) Experiments in Knowing. Cambridge: Polity Press.
28. Owen, J.M. and Rogers, P.J. (1999) Program Evaluation: Forms and Approaches. St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
29. Patton, M.Q. (1997) Utilization-focused Evaluation. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage.
30. Pawson, R. (2002) ‘Evidence-based policy: in search of a method, Evaluation, 8(2): 157–181.
31. Pawson, R. and Tilley, N. (1997) Realistic Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32. Pawson, R. and Tilley, N. (1998a) ‘Caring communities, paradigm polemics, design debates’, Evaluation, 4(1): 73–90.
33. Pawson, R. and Tilley, N. (1998b) ‘Cook-book methods and disastrous recipes: a rejoinder to Farrington’, Evaluation, 4(2): 211–213.
34. Read, T. and Tilley, N. (2000) Not Rocket Science? Problem-solving and Crime Reduction. Crime Reduction Research Series Paper 6. London: Home Office.
35. Reiner, R. (1985) The Politics of the Police. Brighton: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
36. Rosenbaum, D.P. (2002) ‘Evaluating multi-agency anti-crime projects: theory, design and measurement issues’, in N. Tilley (ed.) Evaluation for Crime Prevention. Crime Prevention Studies. Vol. 14, Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
37. Sibbitt, R. (1997) The Perpetrators of Racial Harassment and Racial Violence. Home Office Research Study 176. London: Home Office.
38. Skolnick, J. (1966) Justice without Trial: Law Enforcement in a Democratic Society. New York, NY: Wiley.
39. Weiss, C.H. (1998) Evaluation(2nd edn). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
40. Young, M. (1991) An Inside Job: Policing and Police Culture in Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.