Caring communities, paradigm polemics, design debates

Evaluation

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 73-90

  Pawson, Ray ^a   Tilley, Nick ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b NOTTINGHAM TRENT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 17444362370     PISSN: 13563890     EISSN: 14617153     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/13563899822208400     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Bell, C. and H. Newby (eds) (1972) Community Studies. London: Unwin.
2. Bennett, T. (1996) "What's New in Evaluation Research?", British Journal of Criminology36: 567-573.
3. Chen, H. (1990). Theory-Driven Evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
4. Connell, J., A. Kubish, L. Schorr and C. Weiss (eds) (1995) New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives. New York: The Aspen Institute.
5. Cook, T. D. and D. T. Campbell (1979) Quasi-Experimentation. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
6. Farrell, G., C. Phillips and K. Pease (1995) "Taking Like Candy", British Journal of Criminology35: 384-399.
7. Farrington, D. (1997) "Evaluating a Community Crime Prevention Program", Evaluation3(2): 157-173.
8. Hollister, R. and J. Hill (1995) "Problems in the Evaluation of Community-Wide Initiatives", in J. Connell, A. Kubish, L. Schorr and C. Weiss (eds) New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives. New York: The Aspen Institute.
9. Pawson, R. and N. Tilley (1994) "What Works in Evaluation Research?", British Journal of Criminology34: 291-306.
10. Pawson, R. and N. Tilley (1997) Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage.
11. Peterson, P., J. Hawkins and R. Catalano (1992) "Evaluating Comprehensive Community Drug Risk Reduction Interventions", Evaluation Review16: 579-602.
12. Weiss, C. (1995) "Nothing as Practical as a Good Theory: Exploring Theory-Based Evaluation for Comprehensive Community Initiatives for Children and Families", in J. Connell, A. Kubish, L. Schorr and C. Weiss (eds) New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives. New York: The Aspen Institute.