The ten rules of pragma-dialectics and validity in argumentation

Considering Pragma-Dialectics: A Festschrift for Frans H. Van Eemeren on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 313-323

  Zarefsky, David ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925763897     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410614155     Document Type: Chapter

References (13)

1. Eemeren, F. H. van, Grootendorst, R., & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2002). Argumentation: Analysis, evaluation, presentation.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Eemeren, F. H. van, & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma- dialectical approach.New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Ehninger, D.(1968). Validity as moral obligation. Southern Speech Journal, 23,215-222.
4. Mc Kerrow, R. E.(1977). Rhetorical validity: An analysis of three perspectives on the justification of rhetorical argument. Argumentation and Advocacy, 13,133-141.
5. Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L.(1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation(J. Wilkinson & P. Weaver, Trans.).Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
6. Toulmin, S. E.(1958). The uses of argument.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
7. Walton, D. N.(1995). A pragmatic theory of fallacy.Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
8. Zarefsky, D.(1982). Persistent questions in the theory of argument fields. Argumentation and Advocacy, 18,191-203.
9. Zarefsky, D.(1983). Self-sealing rhetoric of John Foster Dulles. Paper presented at the convention of the Speech Communication Association, Washington, DC.
10. Zarefsky, D. (1990). Lincoln, Douglas, and slavery: In the crucible of public debate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Zarefsky, D.(1997). Definitions. In J. F. Klumpp (Ed.), Argument in a Time of Change. Proceedings of the Wh Biennial NCA/ALA Summer Conference on Argumentation(pp. 1-11). Annandale, VA.: National Communication Association.
12. Zarefsky, D.(2004). George W. Bush discovers rhetoric: September 20, 2001 and the U.S. response to terrorism. In M. J. Hyde (Ed.), The ethos of rhetoric(pp. 136-155). Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
13. Zarefsky, D.(2005). Terrorism and the argument from ignorance. Paper presented at the 14"' Biennial NCA/AFA Summer Conference on Argumentation, Alta, Utah.