Benefits and detriments of integrating statistics and research methods

Best Practices for Teaching Statistics and Research Methods in the Behavioral Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 187-200

  Christopher, Andrew N ^a   Walter, Mark I ^a   Horton, Robert S ^b   Marek, Pam ^c  

^a ALBION COLLEGE   (United States)

^b WABASH COLLEGE   (United States)

^c KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925763205     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203936603     Document Type: Chapter

References (10)

1. Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Behavior, 11, 717-726.
2. Davis, S. F., & Smith, R. A. (2005). An introduction to statistics and research methods: Becoming a psychological detective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice-Hall.
3. Fisher, R. P., Geiselman, R. E., & Amados, M. (1989). Field test of the cognitive interview: Enhancing the recollection of actual victims and witnesses of crime. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 722-727.
4. Furlong, N., Lovelace, E., & Lovelace, K. (2000). Research methods and statistics: An integrated approach. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace.
5. Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 306-355.
6. Halonen, J. (2001, August). Beyond sages & guides: A postmodern teacher's typology. Harry Kirke Wolfe Lecture at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.
7. Heiman, G. W. (2001). Understanding research methods and statistics: An integrated introduction for psychology (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
8. Jackson, S. L. (2006). Research methods and statistics: A critical thinking approach Second Edition 6. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
9. Nisbett, R. E., Krantz, D. H., Jepson, C., & Kunda, Z. (1983). The use of statistical heuristics in everyday inductive reasoning. Psychological Review, 90, 339-363.
10. Novick, L. R. (1988). Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 510-520.