Electronic monitoring and the community supervision of offenders

Alternatives to Prison: Options for an Insecure Society

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 224-247

  Nellis, Mike ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925732244     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781843925743     Document Type: Chapter

References (93)

1. Airs, J., Elliot, R. and Conrad, E. (2000) Electronically Monitored Curfews as a Condition of Bail ‒ report of the pilot (London: Home Office).
2. Bagaric, M. (2000) ‘Home truths about home detention’, The Journal of Criminal Law, 66(5), 425‒442.
3. Ball, K. and Webster, F. (2003) ‘The intensification of surveillance’, in K. Ball and F. Webster (eds) The Intensification of Surveillance: Crime, terrorism and warfare in the information age (London: Pluto).
4. Bonta, J., Rooney, J. and Wallace-Capreta, S. (1999) Electronic Monitoring in Canada(Canada: Public Works and Government Services).
5. Bottomley, K., Hucklesby, A. and Mair, G. (2004) ‘The new uses of electronic monitoring: findings from the implementation phase’, Unpublished report (Hull: University of Hull Department of Criminology).
6. Bottoms, A. E. (1995a) Intensive Community Supervision for Young Offenders: Outcomes, process and cost (Cambridge: Institute of Criminology).
7. Bottoms, A. E. (1995b) ‘The philosophy and politics of punishment and sentencing’, in C. Clarkson and R. Morgan (eds) The Politics of Sentencing Reform(Oxford: Clarendon Press).
8. Bottoms, A. E. (2000) ‘Compliance and community penalties’ in A. Bottoms, L. Gelsthorpe and S. Rex (eds) Community Penalties; Change and challenges (Cullompton: Willan).
9. Bottoms, A. E. (2002) ‘Morality, compliance and public policy’, in A. E. Bottoms and M. Tonry (eds) Ideology, Crime and Criminal Justice: Essays in honour of Leon Radzinowicz (Cullompton: Willan).
10. Bottoms, A. E. and Haines, K. (1993) ‘Aspects of the delivery on intermediate treatment services’, in A. E. Bottoms (ed.) Community Penalties for Young Offenders: final report to the Department of Health from Phase Two of the Intermediate Treatment Evaluation Project (Cambridge: Institute of Criminology, unpublished).
11. Bryant, M. (1978) ‘Sentenced to social work?’, Probation Journal, 25(4), 110‒114.
12. Burney, E. (1985) Sentencing Young People: What went wrong with the Criminal Justice Act 1982? (Aldershot: Gower).
13. Carlsson, K. (2003) ‘Intensive supervision with electronic monitoring in Sweden’, in M. Mayer, R. Haverkamp and R. Levy (eds) Will Electronic Monitoring Have a Future in Europe? (Freiburg: Max Planck Institute).
14. Carter, P. (2003) Managing Offenders, Reducing Crime: a new approach (London: Cabinet Office, The Correctional Services Review).
15. Conference Permanente Européenne de la Probation (CEP) (2003) ‘Electronic monitoring in Europe: report of the CEP workshop’, Egmond Aan Zee, Netherlands 8–10 May (Utrecht: Conference Permanente Europeenne de la Probation).
16. Dodgson, K. and Mortimer, K. (2000) Home Detention Curfew – The first year of operation, Research Findings 110 (London: Home Office).
17. Dodgson, et al. (2001) Electronic Monitoring of Released Prisoners: An Evaluation of the Home Detention Curfew Scheme, Research Study 222 (London: Home Office).
18. Elliot, R., Airs, J., Easton, C. and Lewis, R. (2000) Electronically Monitored Curfew for 10 to 15 Year Olds – Report of the pilot (London: Home Office).
19. Elliot, R., Airs, J. and Webb, S. (1999) Community Penalties for Fine Default and Persistent Petty Offending, Research Findings 98 (London: Home Office).
20. Ely, P., Swift, A. and Sutherland, A. (1987) Control Without Custody? Non-custodial control of juvenile offenders (Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press).
21. Errington, J. (1985) ‘In defence of tracking’, Letters, Social Work Today (21 January 1985), 3.
22. Feeley, M. and Simon, J. (1994) ‘Actuarial justice: the emerging new criminal law’, in D. Nelken (ed.) The Futures of Criminology (London: Sage).
23. Fionda, J. (2000) ‘New managerialism, credibility and sanitisation of criminal justice’, in P. Green and P. Rutherford (eds) Criminal Policy in Transition (Oxford: Hart Publishing)
24. Friel, C. M. Vaughn, J. B. and del Carman, R. (1997) Electronic Monitoring and Correctional Policy: The technology and its application, Research Report (Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice).
25. Gainey, R. R. and Payne, B. K. (2000) ‘Understanding the experience of house arrest with electronic monitoring: an analysis of quantitative and qualitative data’, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 44(1), 84–96.
26. Gibbs, A. and King, D. (2002) The Electronic Ball and Chain? The development, operation and impact of home detention in New Zealand (Dunedin, NZ: University of Otago).
27. Haverkamp, R. (2002) Implementing Electronic Monitoring: A comparative study of attitudes towards the measure in Lower Saxony/Germany and Sweden (Freiburg: Max Planck Institute).
28. Hebenton, B. and Thomas, T. (1996) ‘Tracking sex offenders’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 35(2), 97–112.
29. Hedderman, C. (2003) ‘Enforcing supervision and encouraging compliance’, in W.-H. Chui and M. Nellis (eds) Moving Probation Forward: Evidence, arguments, practice (Harlow: Longman).
30. Home Office (1988) Punishment, Custody and the Community, Cm. 424 (London: Home Office).
31. Home Office (1990) Crime, Justice and Protecting the Public, Cm. 965 (London: Home Office).
32. Home Office (1997) ‘Electronic monitoring – the future of community punishment’, Press Release, 12 September.
33. Home Office (2002) Justice For All, Cm. 5563 (London: The Stationery Office).
34. Home Office (2004a) Reducing Crime, Changing Lives: The government’s plans for transforming the management of offenders (London: Home Office).
35. Home Office (2004b) Confident Communities in a Secure Britain: the Home Office Strategic Plan 2004–08, Cm. 6287 (London: Home Office).
36. Hurd, D. (2003) Memoirs (London: Little Brown).
37. Jones, A. (2003) ‘The Real Tag Team’, B.A. Unpublished dissertation (Birmingham: University of Birmingham, Community Justice).
38. Kemshall, H. and Maguire, H. (2001) ‘Public protection, partnership and risk penality: the multi-agency risk management of sexual and violent offenders’, Punishment and Society, 3(2), 237–264.
39. Kensey, A., Pitoun, A., Levy, R. and Tournier, P. (2003) Sous Surveillance Electronique: la mise en place du ‘bracelet electronique’ en France (Paris: Direction de L’adminstration Penitentiare/Centre de Recherches Sociologiques sur la Droit et les Institutions Penales)[the national evaluation of EM, in French only].
40. Lilly, J. R. (2003) ‘From an American point of view: does electronic monitoring have a future in Europe?’, in M. Mayer, R. Haverkamp and R. Levy R (eds) Will Electronic Monitoring Have a Future in Europe? (Freiburg: Max Planck Institute).
41. Lilly, J. R., Whitfield, D. and Levy, R. (2003) ‘Electronic monitoring in Europe: momentum and caution’, Journal of Offender Monitoring, 16(2), 10–16.
42. Lobley, D. and Smith, D. (2000) Evaluation of Electronically Monitored Restriction of Liberty Orders (Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Central Research Unit).
43. Lyon, D. (2001) Surveillance Society: Monitoring everyday life (Buckingham: Open University Press).
44. Lyon, D. (2003) Surveillance after September 11th 2001 (Cambridge: Polity Press).
45. Lyttle, W. (1980) ‘Discussion of tracking and its background’, Unpublished paper presented at meeting of Social Services personnel at Kensington Town Hall, 19 February.
46. Mair, G. (1988) Probation Day Centres (London: Home Office).
47. Mair, G. and Nee, C. (1990) Electronic Monitoring: The trials and their results, Home Office Research Study 120 (London: Home Office).
48. Mair, G. and Mortimer, E. (1996) Curfew Orders and Electronic Monitoring, Home Office Research Study 163 (London: Home Office).
49. Mayer, M., Haverkamp, R. and Levy, R. (eds) (2003) Will Electronic Monitoring Have a Future in Europe? (Freiburg: Max Planck Institute).
50. McVicar, J. (1989) ‘The Damocles detective’, Criminal Justice: the Magazine of the Howard League, 5(2), 4–5.
51. Melbin, M. (1987) Night as Frontier: Colonising the world after dark (New York: The Free Press).
52. Morgan, R. (2003) ‘Thinking about the demand for probation services’, Probation Journal, 50(1), 7–19.
53. Mortimer, E. and May, C. (1997) Electronic Monitoring in Practice: The second year of the trials of the curfew orders, Home Office Research Study 177 (London: Home Office).
54. Mortimer, E., Pereira, E. and Walter, I. (1999) Making the Tag Fit: Further analysis from the first two years of the trials of curfew orders, Research Findings 105 (London: Home Office).
55. Narey, M. (2004) ‘My emerging vision for NOMS’, Unpublished paper, May 2004 (London: Prison Service).
56. Nellis, M. (1991) ‘The electronic monitoring of offenders in England and Wales: recent developments and future prospects’, British Journal of Criminology, 31(2), 165–185.
57. Nellis, M. (2000) ‘Law and order: the electronic monitoring of offenders’, in D. Dolowitz, Hulme, R., Nellis, M. and O’Neal, F. (eds) Policy Transfer and British Social Policy: Learning from the USA? (Buckingham: Open University Press).
58. Nellis, M. (2003a) ‘News media and popular cultural representations of electronic monitoring in England and Wales’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(1), 1–31.
59. Nellis, M. (2003b) ‘Electronic monitoring and the future of the Probation Service’, in W.-H. Chui and M. Nellis (eds) Moving Probation Forward; evidence arguments and practice (Harlow: Longman).
60. Nellis, M. (2003c) ‘“They don’t even know we’re there”: the electronic monitoring of offenders in England and Wales’, in K. Ball and F. Webster (eds) The Intensification of Surveillance: Crime, terrorism and warfare in the information age(London: Pluto).
61. Nellis, M. (2004a) ‘The “tracking” controversy: the roots of mentoring and electronic monitoring’, Youth Justice, 4(2), forthcoming.
62. Nellis, M. (2004b) “‘I know where you live”: electronic monitoring and penal policy in England and Wales 1999–2004’, British Journal of Community Justice, 2(3), 33–59.
63. Newburn, T. (2002) ‘Atlantic crossing: “policy transfer” and crime control in the USA and Britain’, Punishment and Society, 4(2), 165–194.
64. Olkiewicz, E. (2003) ‘The evaluation of a three year project on electronic monitoring in Sweden’, in M. Mayer, R. Haverkamp and R. Levy R (eds) Will Electronic Monitoring Have a Future in Europe? (Freiburg: Max Planck Institute).
65. Payne, B. K. and Gainey, R. R. (1998) ‘A qualitative assessment of the pains experienced on electronic monitoring’, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 42(2), 149–163.
66. Petersilia, J. (2003) When Prisoners Come Home: Parole and prisoner re-entry (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
67. Renzema, M. (1992) ‘Home confinement programmes: development, implementation and impact’, in J. Byrne, A. L. Lurigio and J. Petersilia J (eds) Smart Sentencing: The emergence of intermediate sanctions (London: Sage).
68. Renzema, M. (1998a) ‘GPS: is now the time to adopt?’, Journal of Offender Monitoring, Spring 1998, 5.
69. Renzema, M. (1998b) ‘Satellite monitoring of offenders: a report from the field’, Journal of Offender Monitoring, Spring 1998, 7–11.
70. Renzema, M. (1999) ‘GPS users report positive experiences’, Journal of Offender Monitoring, Summer 1999, 5–7.
71. Renzema, M. (2000) ‘Tracking GPS: a third look’, Journal of Offender Monitoring, Spring 2000, 5–7/27.
72. Renzema, M. (2003a) ‘Where’s the research?’, Journal of Offender Monitoring, 16(2), 6.
73. Renzema, M. (2003b) ‘Electronic monitoring’s impact on offending’ [www.aic.gov.au/campmbellcj].
74. Richardson, F. (1999) ‘Electronic tagging of offenders: trials in England’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(2), 158–172.
75. Richardson F. (2002) ‘A personal experience of tagging’, Prison Service Journal, 142, 39–42.
76. Riley, D. and Shaw, M. (1980) Parental Supervision and Juvenile Delinquency(London: Home Office).
77. Scheerer, S. (2000) ‘Three trends into the new millennium: the managerial, the populist and the road towards global justice’, in P. Green and P. Rutherford (eds) Criminal Policy in Transition (Oxford: Hart Publishing).
78. Schmidt, A. (1991) ‘Electronic monitors – realistically, what can be expected?’, Federal Probation, June 1991, 47–53.
79. Schmidt, A. (1998) ‘Electronic monitoring: what does the literature tell us?’, Federal Probation, December 1998, 10–19.
80. Scottish Executive (2000) Tagging Offenders: The role of electronic monitoring in the Scottish criminal justice system (Edinburgh: Scottish Executive).
81. Smith, D. (2001) ‘Electronic monitoring of offenders: the Scottish Experience’, Criminal Justice, 1(2), 201–214.
82. Smith, D. (2003) ‘Comparative criminal justice: north and south of the border’, Vista: Perspectives on Probation, 8(1), 2–8.
83. Stacey, T. (1989) ‘Why tagging should be used to reduce incarceration’, Social Work Today, 20 April 1989, 18–19.
84. Sugg, D., Moore, L. and Howard, P. (2001) Electronic Monitoring and Offending Behaviour – Reconviction results for the second year of trials of curfew orders, Findings 141 (London: Home Office).
85. Tildesley, W. M. and Bullock, W. F. (1983) ‘Curfew orders: the arguments for’, Probation Journal, 30(4), 139–142.
86. Tonry, M. (2003) ‘Evidence, elections and ideology in the making of criminal justice policy’, in M. Tonry (ed.) Confronting Crime: Crime control policy under New Labour (Cullompton: Willan).
87. Toon, J. (2003) ‘Electronic monitoring’, Paper presented at the British Society of Criminology Conference Too Many Prisoners, London, 7 November.
88. Wallis, E. (2003) interviewed on ‘Law in Action’ BBC Radio 4, 25 October.
89. Walter, I. Sugg, D. and Moore, L. (2001) A Year on the Tag: Interviews with criminal justice practitioners and electronic monitoring staff about curfew orders, Home Office Research Findings 140 (London: Home Office).
90. Waters, I., Moore, R., Roberts, C., Merrington, S. and Gray, E. (2003) Intensive Supervision and Surveillance Programmes for Persistent Young Offenders in England and Wales: Interim national findings (London: Youth Justice Board/University of Oxford).
91. Whitfield, D. (1997) Tackling the Tag: The electronic monitoring of offenders (Winchester: Waterside Press).
92. Whitfield, D. (2001) The Magic Bracelet: Technology and offender supervision (Winchester: Waterside Press).
93. Youth Justice Board (2003) Mentoring: Key elements of effective practice (London: Youth Justice Board).