Vision-related quality-of-life assessment using NEI VFQ-25 in patients after Boston keratoprosthesis implantation

Cornea

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 160-164

  Cortina, Maria S ^a   Hallak, Joelle A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS   (United States)

^b Quantitative Scientific Solutions LLC   (United States)

Author keywords

Boston keratoprosthesis; VFQ 25; Vision related quality of life

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BOSTON KERATOPROSTHESIS; CAR DRIVING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLOR VISION; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DEPENDENT PERSONALITY DISORDER; EYE PAIN; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KERATOPROSTHESIS; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE VISUAL FUNCTION QUESTIONNAIRE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERIPHERAL VISION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; ROLE STRESS; SOCIAL INTERACTION; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY; ARTIFICIAL ORGAN; CORNEA; CORNEAL DISEASES; MIDDLE AGED; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; UNITED STATES;

ARTIFICIAL ORGANS; CORNEA; CORNEAL DISEASES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE (U.S.); PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; UNITED STATES; VISION, OCULAR; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 84925724701     PISSN: 02773740     EISSN: 15364798     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000310     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Sivaraman KR, Hou JH, Allemann N, et al. Retroprosthetic membrane and risk of sterile keratolysis in patients with type I Boston keratoprosthesis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;155:814-822.
2. Traish AS, Chodosh J. Expanding application of the Boston type I keratoprosthesis due to advances in design and improved post-operative therapeutic strategies. Semin Ophthalmol. 2010;25:239-243.
3. Jašinskas V, Rudalevičius P, Miliauskas A, et al. Keratoprosthesis surgery as an alternative to keratoplasty. Medicina (Kaunas). 2013;49:291-299.
4. Dunlap K, Chak G, Aquavella JV, et al. Short-term visual outcomes of Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis implantation. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:687-692.
5. Srikumaran D, Munoz B, Aldave AJ, et al. Long-term Outcomes of Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis Implantation: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort. Ophthalmology. 2014 Jul. 11. pii: S0161-6420 (14) 00494-1. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.030. [epub ahead of print].
6. Ament JD, Stryjewski TP, Pujari S, et al. Cost effectiveness of the type II Boston keratoprosthesis. Eye (Lond). 2011;25:342-349.
7. Ament JD, Stryjewski TP, Ciolino JB, et al. Cost-effectiveness of the Boston keratoprosthesis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;149:221-228.
8. Banitt M. Evaluation and management of glaucoma after keratoprosthesis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2011;22:133-136.
9. Robert MC, Moussally K, Harissi-Dagher M. Review of endophthalmitis following Boston keratoprosthesis type 1. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96:776-780.
10. Ciolino JB, Belin MW, Todani A, et al; Boston Keratoprosthesis Type 1 Study Group. Retention of the Boston keratoprosthesis type 1: multicenter study results. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:1195-1200.
11. Zerbe BL, Belin MW, Ciolino JB; Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis Study Group. Results from the multicenter Boston type 1 Keratoprosthesis Study. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:1779.e1-1779.e7.
12. Margolis MK, Coyne K, Kennedy-Martin T, et al. Vision-specific instruments for the assessment of health-related quality of life and visual functioning: a literature review. Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20:791-812.
13. Kirwan C, Lanigan B, O'Keefe M. Vision-related quality of life assessment using the NEI-VFQ-25 in adolescents and young adults with a history of congenital cataract. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2012;49:26-31.
14. Zhang F, Sugar A, Jacobsen G, et al. Visual function and spectacle independence after cataract surgery: bilateral diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses versus monovision pseudophakia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:853-858.
15. Lisboa R, Chun YS, Zangwill LM, et al. Association between rates of binocular visual field loss and vision-related quality of life in patients with glaucoma. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131:486-494.
16. Submacular Surgery Trials Research Group. Health- and vision-related quality of life among patients with ocular histoplasmosis or idiopathic choroidal neovascularization at enrollment in a randomized trial of submacular surgery: Submacular Surgery Trials Report No. 5. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:78-88.
17. Yildiz EH, Cohen EJ, Virdi AS, et al. Quality of life in keratoconus patients after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;149:416-422.e1-2.
18. van den Biggelaar FJ, Cheng YY, Nuijts RM, et al. Economic evaluation of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in The Netherlands. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151:449-459.e2.
19. Magione CM. NEI VFQ-25 composite scores were calculated using the scoring algorithm as outlined by the National Eye Institute. Available at: http://www.nei.nih.gov/resources/visionfunction/manual-cm2000.pdf. Accessed August 15, 2014.
20. Stein JD. Disparities between ophthalmologists and their patients in estimating quality of life. Curr Opin Ophhtalmol. 2004;15:238-243.
21. Mangione MD, Lee PP, Pitts J, et al. Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ). NEIVFQ Field Test Investigators. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:1496-1504.
22. Mangione CM, Lee PP, Gutierrez PR, et al. National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire Field Test Investigators. Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:1050-1058.
23. Trousdale ER, Hodge DO, Baratz KH, et al. Vision-related Quality of Life Before and After Keratoplasty for Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy. Ophthalmology. 2014 Jul. 9. pii: S0161-6420 (14) 00400-X. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.04.046. [epub ahead of print].
24. Mak ST, Wong AC. Vision related quality of life in corneal graft recipients. Eye (Lond). 2012:26; 1249-1255.
25. Kang JJ, de la Cruz J, Cortina MS. Visual outcomes of Boston keratoprosthesis implantation as the primary penetrating corneal procedure. Cornea. 2012;31:1436-1440.
26. Aldave JA, Kamal KM, Vo RC, et al. The Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis: improving outcomes and expanding indications. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:640-651.
27. Pineles SL, Ela-Dalman N, Rosenbaum AL, et al. Binocular visual function in patients with Boston type I keratoprostheses. Cornea. 2010;29:1397-1400.
28. Rahi J, Cumberland PM, Peckham CS. Visual impairment and vision related quality of life in working-age adults: findings in the 1958 British birth cohort. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:270-274.