Visual outcomes of Boston keratoprosthesis implantation as the primary penetrating corneal procedure

Cornea

Volumn 31, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 1436-1440

  Kang, Joann J ^a   De La Cruz, Jose ^a   Cortina, Maria Soledad ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Boston keratoprosthesis; limbal stem cell deficiency; penetrating keratoplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANIRIDIA; BOSTON KERATOPROSTHESIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; ENDOPHTHALMITIS; EYE BURN; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; KERATOPROSTHESIS; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; PERCEPTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA MACULA CYSTOID EDEMA; RETROPROSTHETIC MEMBRANE FORMATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; STEVENS JOHNSON SYNDROME; TREATMENT DURATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTIFICIAL ORGANS; CORNEA; CORNEAL DISEASES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 84870240110     PISSN: 02773740     EISSN: 15364798     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31823f7765     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Dohlman CH, Harissi-Dagher M, Khan BF, et al. Introduction to the use of the Boston keratoprosthesis. Expert Rev Ophthalmol. 2006;1:41-48.
2. Harissi-Dagher M, Khan BF, Schaumberg DA, et al. Importance of nutrition to corneal grafts when used as a carrier of the Boston keratoprosthesis. Cornea. 2007;26:564-568. (Pubitemid 47164715)
3. Dohlman CH, Dudenhoefer EJ, Khan BF, et al. Protection of the ocular surface after keratoprosthesis surgery: the role of soft contact lenses. CLAO J. 2002;28:72-74. (Pubitemid 41646458)
4. Khan BF, Harissi-Dagher M, Khan DM, et al. Advances in Boston keratoprosthesis: enhancing retention and prevention of infection and inflammation. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2007;47:61-71. (Pubitemid 46725804)
5. Zerbe BL, Belin MW, Ciolino JB. Results from the multicenter Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis Study. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:1779. e1771-e1777.
6. Dunlap K, Chak G, Aquavella JV, et al. Short-term visual outcomes of Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis implantation. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:687-692.
7. Aldave AJ, Kamal KM, Vo RC, et al. The Boston type I keratoprosthesis: improving outcomes and expanding indications. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:640-651.
8. Chew HF, Ayres BD, Hammersmith KM, et al. Boston keratoprosthesis outcomes and complications. Cornea. 2009;28:989-996.
9. Greiner MA, Li JY, Mannis MJ. Longer-term vision outcomes and complications with the Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis at the University of California, Davis. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:1543-1550.
10. Robert MC, Harissi-Dagher M. Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis: the CHUM experience. Can J Ophthalmol. 2011;46:164-168.
11. Yaghouti F, Nouri M, Abad JC, et al. Keratoprosthesis: preoperative prognostic categories. Cornea. 2001;20:19-23. (Pubitemid 32038149)
12. Stacy RC, Jakobiec FA, Michaud NA, et al. Characterization of retrokeratoprosthetic membranes in the Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011;129:310-316.
13. Netland PA, Terada H, Dohlman CH. Glaucoma associated with keratoprosthesis. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:751-757. (Pubitemid 28180230)
14. Bradley JC, Hernandez EG, Schwab IR, et al. Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis: the University of California Davis experience. Cornea. 2009;28:321-327.
15. Nouri M, Terada H, Alfonso EC, et al. Endophthalmitis after keratoprosthesis: incidence, bacterial causes, and risk factors. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:484-489. (Pubitemid 32293568)
16. The collaborative corneal transplantation studies (CCTS). Effectiveness of histocompatibility matching in high-risk corneal transplantation. The Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies Research Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110:1392-1403.
17. Maguire MG, Stark WJ, Gottsch JD, et al. Risk factors for corneal graft failure and rejection in the collaborative corneal transplantation studies. Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies Research Group. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1536-1547. (Pubitemid 24347052)
18. Kremer I, Rajpal RK, Rapuano CJ, et al. Results of penetrating keratoplasty in aniridia. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;115:317-320. (Pubitemid 23081071)
19. Tugal-Tutkun I, Akova YA, Foster CS. Penetrating keratoplasty in cicatrizing conjunctival diseases. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:576-585.
20. Shimazaki J, Hida T, Inoue M, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with familial subepithelial amyloidosis of the cornea. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:139-144.
21. Ilari L, Daya SM. Long-term outcomes of keratolimbal allograft for the treatment of severe ocular surface disorders. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1278-1284. (Pubitemid 34700918)
22. Solomon A, Ellies P, Anderson DF, et al. Long-term outcome of keratolimbal allograft with or without penetrating keratoplasty for total limbal stem cell deficiency. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1159-1166. (Pubitemid 34546927)
23. Shimazaki J, Shimmura S, Tsubota K. Donor source affects the outcome of ocular surface reconstruction in chemical or thermal burns of the cornea. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:38-44. (Pubitemid 38032208)
24. Holland EJ, Djalilian AR, Schwartz GS. Management of aniridic keratopathy with keratolimbal allograft: a limbal stem cell transplantation technique. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:125-130. (Pubitemid 36068737)
25. Shimazaki J, Shimmura S, Tsubota K. Limbal stem cell transplantation for the treatment of subepithelial amyloidosis of the cornea (gelatinous drop-like dystrophy). Cornea. 2002;21:177-180. (Pubitemid 34188786)