Pragma-dialectics and self-advocacy in physician-patient interactions

Considering Pragma-Dialectics: A Festschrift for Frans H. Van Eemeren on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 23-34

  Peterson, Jennifer ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925719904     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410614155     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Ainsworth-Vaughn, N. (1998). Claiming power in doctor-patient talk. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Brashers, D. E., Haas, S. M., Klingle, R. S., & Neidig, J. L. (2000). Collective AIDS activism and individual’s perceived self-advocacy in physician-patient communication. Human Communication Research, 26, 372-402.
3. Brashers, D. E., Haas, S. M., & Neidig, J. L. (1999). The patient self-advocacy scale (PSAS): Measuring involvement in health care decision making. Health Communication, 11, 97-122.
4. Brashers, D. E., Haas, S. M., & Neidig, J. L. (2002). Satisfying the argumentative requirements of self advocacy. In. F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Advances in pragma-dialectics (pp. 291-308). Newport News, VA: Vale Press.
5. Brashers, D. E., Haas, S. M., Neidig, J. L., & Rintamaki, L. S. (2002). Social activism, self-advocacy, and coping with HIV illness. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 113-133.
6. Brashers, D. E., & Jackson, S. (1991). “Politically savvy sick people”: Public penetration of the technical sphere. In D. W. Parson (Ed.), Argument in controversy: Proceedings of the Seventh SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation (pp. 284-288). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
7. Brashers, D. E, Neidig, J. L„ Cardillo, L. W„ Dobbs, L. K„ Russell, J. A., & Haas, S. M. (1999). “In an important way I did die:” Uncertainty and revival in persons living with HIV and AIDS. AIDS Care, 11, 201-220.
8. Brashers, D. E., Neidig, J. L., & Goldsmith, D. J. (2004). Social support and the management of uncertainty for people living with HIV or AIDS. Health Communication, 16, 305-332.
9. Brashers, D. E., Neidig, J. L., Russell, J. A., Cardillo, L. W., Haas, S. M., Dobbs, L. K., Garland, M., McCartney, B., & Nemeth, S. (2003). The medical, personal, and social causes of uncertainty in HIV illness. Issues In Mental Health Nursing, 24, 497-522.
10. Broom, A. (2005). Virtually he@lthy: The impact of internet use on disease experience and the doctor-patient relationship. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 325-345.
11. Brownfield. E. D., Bernhardt, J. M., Phan, J. L., Williams, M. V, & Parker, R. M. (2004). Direct- to-consumer drug advertisements on network television: An exploration of quantity, frequency, and placement. Journal of Health Communication, 9, 491-497.
12. Elster, J. (1990). Selfishness and altruism. In J. J. Mansbridge (Ed.), Beyond self-interest (pp. 44-52). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Eemeren, F. H. van, & Grootendorst, R. (1992). Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Eemeren, F. H. van, Grootendorst, R., Jackson, S., & Jacobs, S. (1993). Reconstructing argumentative discourse. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
15. Eemeren, F. H. van, & Houtlosser, P. (1997). Rhetorical rationales for dialectical moves: Justifying pragma-dialectical reconstructions. In J. F. Klumpp (Ed.), Argument in a time of change: Definitions, frameworks, and critiques (pp. 51-56). Annandale, VA: National Communication Association.
16. Eemeren, F. H. van, & Houtlosser, P. (2002). Strategic maneuvering with the burden of proof. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Advances in pragma-dialectics (pp. 13-28). Newport News, VA: Vale Press.
17. Epstein, S. (1996). Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.
18. Fabj, V, & Sobnosky, M. J. (1995). AIDS activism and the rejuvenation of the public sphere. Argumentation and Advocacy, 31, 163-184.
19. Fielding, S. L. (1999). The practice of uncertainty: Voices of physicians and patients in medical malpractice claims. Westport, CT: Auburn House.
20. Goldsmith, D. J. (2001). A normative approach to the study of uncertainty and communication. Journal of Communication, 51, 514-533.
21. Hitchcock, D. L. (2003). Critical review: Advances in pragma-dialectics ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren. Informal Logic: Reasoning and Argumentation in Theory and Practice, 23.
22. Houtlosser, P. (1994). The speech act “advancing a standpoint.” In F. H. van Eemeren, & R. Grootendorst (Eds.), Studies in pragma-dialectics (pp. 165-171). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
23. Huh, J., & Cude, B. J. (2004). Is the information “fair and balanced” in direct-to-consumer prescription drug websites. Journal of Health Communication, 9, 529-540.
24. Illes, J., Kann, D., Karetsky, K., Letourneau, P., Raffin, T. A., Schraedly-Desmond, P., Koenig, B. A., & Atlas, S. W. (2004). Advertising, patient decision making, and self-referral for computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging. Archives of Internal Medicine, 164, 2415-2419.
25. Jackson, S. (2002). Designing argumentation protocols for the classroom. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Advances in pragma-dialectics (pp. 105-119). Newport News, VA: Vale.
26. Jacobs, S. (1999). Argumentation as normative pragmatics. In F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair, & C. A. Willard (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 397-403). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
27. Jacobs, S. (2000). Rhetoric and dialectic from the standpoint of normative pragmatics. Argumentation, 14, 261-286.
28. Janoff-Bulman, R., & Wade, M. B. (1996). The dilemma of self-advocacy for women: Another case of blaming the victim? Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 15,143-152.
29. Kravitz, R. L., Epstein, R. M., Feldman, M. D., Franz, C. E., Azari, R., Wilkes, M. S., Hinton, L., & Franks, P. (2005). Influence of patients’ request for direct-to-consumer advertised depressants: A randomized controlled trial.JAMA, 293,1995-2002.
30. Macias, W., & Lewis, L. S. (2003). A content analysis of direct-to-consumer advertising (DTC) prescription web sites. Journal of Advertising, 32, 43-56.
31. McLellan, F. (2001). U.S. House passes patient’s bill of rights. Lancet, 358, 480.
32. Meyers, R. A., & Brashers, D. E. (2002). Rethinking traditional approaches to argument in groups. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), New directions in group communication (pp. 141-158). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33. Rees, A. van (2002). A new approach to problem-solving discussions. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Advances in pragma-dialectics (pp. 83-92). Newport News, VA: Vale.
34. Ratzan, S. C. (1993). Health communication as negotiation: The COAST model and AIDS. In S. C. Ratzan (Ed.), AIDS: Effective health communication for the 90s (pp. 37-51). Washington, DC: Taylor and Francis.