Psychological thought and practice: Historical and interdisciplinary perspectives

Psychology's Territories: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives from Different Disciplines

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1-27

  Ash, Mitchell G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925707198     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203936658     Document Type: Editorial

References (76)

1. Abbot, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert la-bor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Ash, M. G. (1992). Historicizing mind science: Discourse, practice, subjectivity. Science in Context, 5, 193-208.
3. Ash, M. G. (1995). Gestalt psychology in German culture 1890-1967: Holism and the quest for objectivity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. Ash, M. G. (1999). Psychologie in Deutschland um 1900: Reflexiver Diskurs des Bildungsburgertums, Teilgebiet der Philosophie, akademische Disziplin Psychology in Germany around 1900: Reflexive discourse of the educated middle class, subdiscipline of philosophy, academic discipline.
5. In C. Konig & E. Lammert (Eds.), Konkurrenten in der Fakultat. Kulturwissenschaften um 1900 (pp. 78-93). Frankfürt am Main: Fischer Verlag.
6. Ash, M. G. (2001). Arbeitsgruppe Psychologisches Denken und psychologische Praxis inwissenschaftshistorischer und interdisziplinarer Perspektive Working group “Psychological Thought and Practice in historical and interdisciplinary perspective”. Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Jahrbuch 2000 (pp. 283-290). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
7. Ash, M. G. (2002). Psychologie. Psychology. In F.-R. Hausmann (Ed.), Die Rolle der Geisteswissenschaften im Nationalsozialismus (pp. 229-264). Munchen: Oldenbourg Verlag.
8. Ash, M. G. (2003). Psychology. In D. Ross & T. Porter (Eds.), Cambridge history of science, Vol. 7: The modern social sciences (pp. 251-274). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
9. Ash, M. G., & Sturm, T. (2002). Arbeitsgruppe Psychologisches Denkenund psych-ologische Praxis in wissenschaftshistorischer und interdisziplinarer Perspektive Working group “Psychological Thought and Practice in historical and interdisciplinary perspective”. Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Jahrbuch2001 (pp. 299-314). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 2002.
10. Ash, M. G., & Sturm, T. (2003). Arbeitsgruppe Psychologisches Denkenund psych-ologische Praxis in wissenschaftshistorischer und interdisziplinarer Perspektive Working group “Psychological Thought and Practice in historical and interdisciplinary perspective”. Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissen-schaften, Jahrbuch 2002 (pp. 267-280). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
11. Ash, M. G., & Sturm, T. (2004a). Die Psychologie in praktischen Kontexten-Einfuhrende Bemerkungen Psychology in practical contexts-introductory remarks. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 202, 177-182.
12. Ash, M. G., & Sturm, T. (2004b). Arbeitsgruppe Psychologisches Denken und psy-chologische Praxis in wissenschaftshistorischer und interdisziplinarer Perspektive Working group “Psychological Thought and Practice in historical and interdisciplinary perspective”. Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Jahrbuch 2003 (pp. 262-265). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
13. Assmann, A. (1997). Erinnerungsraume. Formen und Wandlungen des kulturel-len Gedachtnisses Spaces of remembrance: Forms and changes of cultural memory. Munich: C. H. Beck.
14. Beck, U., Bonss, W, Lau, C. (2003). The theory of reflexive modernization: Problematic, hypotheses and research programme. Theory, Culture and Society, 20, 1-33.
15. Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive modernization. Politics, tradition, and aesthetics in the modern social order. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
16. Benschop, R., Draaisma, D. (2000). In pursuit of precision: The calibration of minds and machines inlate nineteenth-century psychology. Annals of Science, 57, 1-25.
17. Bowler, R. (2005). Sentient nature and human economy: The “human science” of early Nationalokonomie. History of the Human Sciences, 18, 23-54.
18. Carson, J. (1993). Army alpha, army brass and the search for army intelligence,” Isis, 84, 278-309.
19. Crary, J. (1990). Techniques of the observer. On vision and modernity in the nine-teenth century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Crary, J. (2000). Suspensions of perception. Attention, spectacle, and modern cul-ture (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the mind: How psychology found its language. London: Sage.
23. Danziger, K. (2001). Sealing off the discipline: Wilhelm Wundt and the psychology of memory. In C. G. Green & T. Teo (Eds.), The transformation of psychology: Influences of nineteenth-century philosophy, technology and natural science (pp. 45-63). Washington, DC: American Psychological Assocition.
24. Daston, L. (1992). Objectivity and the escape from perspective. Social Studies of Science, 22, 597-618.
25. Daston, L. (1995). The moral economy of science. In A. Thackray (Ed.), Constructing knowledge in the history of science (Vol. 10; pp. 1-27). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26. Daston, L. (Ed.) (2000). Biographies of scientific objects. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Daston, L. (Ed.) (2004). Things that talk: Object lessons from art and science. Brooklyn, NY: Zone Books.
28. Draaisma, D. (2000). Metaphors of memory. A history of ideas about the mind (P Vincent, Trans.) Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
29. Egighian, G. (2004). The psychologization of the socialist self: East German forensic psychology and its deviants, 1945-1975. German History, 22,181-205.
30. Galison, P. (2004). Image of self. In L. Daston (Ed.), Things that talk: Object lessons from art and science (pp. 257-294). Brooklyn, NY: Zone Books.
31. Geuter, U. (1992/1984). The professionalization of psychology in Nazi Germany. (R. Holmes, trans.). New York: Cambridge University Press. (Originalwork published 1984)
32. Gieryn, T (1999). Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33. Gigerenzer, G. (1992). From tools to theories: Discovery in cognitive psychology. Science in Context, 5, 329-350.
34. Gigerenzer, G. (Ed.). (2001). Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996). Mind as computer: Birth of a metaphor. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 131-144.
36. Hacking, I. (1992). The self-vindication of the laboratory sciences. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 29-64). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37. Hagner, M. (1996). Der GeistbeiderArbeit: ÜberlegungenzurvisuellenRepresentation cerebraler Prozesse The mind at work: Considerations on the visual representation of cerebral processes. In C. Borck (Ed.), Anatomien medizinischen Wissens (pp. 259-286). Frankfürt am Main: Fischer.
38. Hau, M. (2003). The cult of health and beauty in Germany: A social history, 1890-1930. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39. Hau, M., & Ash, M. G. (2000). Der normale Korper, seelisch erblickt. The normal body, viewed from the soul. In S. Gilman & C. Schmolders (Eds.), Gesichter der Weimarer Republik. Einephysiognomische Kulturgeschichte (pp. 12-31). Cologne: DuMont.
40. Herman, E. (1996). The romance of American psychology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
41. Herman, E. (2003). Psychologism and the child. In T. M. Porter & D. Ross (Eds.), The Modern social sciences: The Cambridge history of science (Vol. 7, pp. 649-662). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
42. Hoffmann, C. (2001). Haut und Zirkel, ein Entstehungsherd: Ernst Heinrich Webers Untersuchungen “Über den Tastsinn.” Skin and compass, a place of origin: Ernst Heinrich Weber's study “On the sense of touch”. In M. Hagner (Ed.), Ansichten der Wissenschaftsgeschichte (pp. 191-226). Frankfürt am Main: Fischer.
43. Hudson, L. (1972). The cult ofthe fact: Apsychologist's autobiographical critique of his discipline. New York: Harper & Row.
44. Hult, J. (2005). The re-emergence of memory recovery: Return of seduction theory and birth of survivorship. History of the Human Sciences, 18, 127-142.
45. Kirchgassner, G. (1991). Homo oeconomicus: Das okonomischeModell individu-ellen Verhaltens und seine Anwendung in den Wirtschafts-und Sozialwissen-schaften Economic man: The economic model of individual behaviour and its application in the economic and social sciences. Tubingen: Mohr.
46. Koshar, R. (1998). Germany's transient pasts: Preservation and national memory in the twentieth century. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
47. Kusch, M. (1999). Psychological knowledge: A social history and philosophy. Lon-don: Routledge.
48. Moritz, K. P., Pockels, K. F., & Maimon, S. (Eds.). (1783-1793).Gnothi sauton magazin für Erfahrungsseelenkunde (Vols. 1-10). Berlin: A. MyLius.
49. Moscowitz, E. (2001). In therapy we trust: America's obsession with self-fulfillment. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
50. Nora, P. (Ed.) (2001). Rethinking France: Les lieux des memoire, Vol. 1: The state.(M. S. Trouille, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
51. Perkin, H. (1996). The third revolution: Professional elites in the modern world. London: Routledge.
52. Porter, T. M. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
53. Prinz, W (1996). Freiheit oder Wissenschaft? Freedom or science? In M. von Cranach & K. Foppa (Eds.), Freiheit desEntscheidens undHandelns. Ein Problem der nomologischen Psychologie (pp. 86-103). Heidelberg: Asanger.
54. Rheinberger, H.-J. (1997a). Pladoyer für eine Wissenschaftsgeschichte des Experiments Argument for a scientific history of the experiment. Theory Bioscience, 116, 11-31.
55. Rheinberger, H.-J. (1997b). Toward a history of epistemic things: Synthesizing proteins in the test tube. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
56. Richards, G. (2002). The psychology of psychology. A historically grounded sketch. Theory and Psychology, 12, 7-36.
57. Rosler, F. (2005). From single-channel recordings to brain-mapping devices: The impact of electroencephelography on experimental psychology. History of Psychology, 8, 95-117.
58. Rose, N. (1990). Governing the soul. London: Routledge.
59. Rose, N. (1996). Inventing our selves: Psychology, power andpersonhood. New York: Cambridge University Press.
60. Rothschild, E. (2003). Economic Sentiments: Adam Smith, Condorcet, andtheEn-lightenment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
61. Schmidgen, H. (2005). Physics, ballistics, and psychology: A History of the chrono-scope in/as context, 1845-1890. History of Psychology, 8, 46-78.
62. Schonpflug, W (1992). Applied psychology: Newcomer with a long tradition. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 42, 5-30.
63. Schonpflug, W (2004). Geschichte und Systematik der Psychologie: Ein Lehrbuch für das Grundstudium (2nd, Rev. ed.). History and systematic account of psychology: An introductory textbook. Weinheim: Beltz.
64. Schultz, J. H. (1991/1932). Das Autogene Training: Konzentrierte Selbstentspan-nung. Versuch einer klinisch-praktischen Darstellung. Stuttgart: Thieme. (Original work published 1932)
65. Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism, democracy. New York: Harper.
66. Shamdasani, S. (2005). “Psychotherapy”: The invention of a word. History of the Human Sciences, 18, 1-22.
67. Simon, H. (1997). Models of bounded rationality: Empirically grounded economic reason. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
68. Slater, L. (2004). Opening Skinner's box: Great psychological experiments of the twentieth century. London: Bloomsbury Press.
69. Smith, A. (2000/1776). The wealth of nations. New York: The Modern Library.. (Original work published 1776)
70. Smith, R. (1998). The Norton history of the human sciences. New York: W W Norton.
71. Stichweh, R. (1994). Wissenschaft, Universitat, Professionen: Soziologische Analysen. Frankfürt am Main: Suhrkamp.
72. Sturm, T., & Ash, M. G. (2005). The roles of instruments in psychological research. History ofPsychology, 8, 3-34.
73. von Mises, L. (1981/1933). Epistemological problems of economics (G. Reisman, Trans.). New York: NewYork University Press. Original work published 1933
74. von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1980/1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1944)
75. Wundt, W (1907/1908). Logik. Eine Untersuchung der Prinzipien der Erkenntnis und der Methoden wissenschaftlicher Forschung. (3rd ed., Vols. 1-3). Logic: A study of the principles of knowledge and the methods of scientific research. Stuttgart: Enke.
76. Zenderland, L. (1998). Measuring minds. Henry Herbert Goddard and the origins of American intelligence testing. New York: Cambridge University Press.