One-To-One ways of promoting desistance: In search of an evidence base

What Works in Probation and Youth Justice: Developing Evidence-Based Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 180-197

  Burnett, Ros ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925703805     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781843924937     Document Type: Chapter

References (53)

1. Bailey, R. (1995) ‘Helping offenders as an element in justice’, in D. Ward and M. Lacey (eds), Probation: Working for Justice, 1st edn. London: Whiting & Birch.
2. Bandura, A. (2001) ‘Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective’, Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.
3. Biestek, F.P. (1961) The Casework Relationship. London: Unwin University Books.
4. Brown, I. (1998) ‘Successful probation practice’, in D. Faulkner and A. Gibbs (eds), New Politics, New Probation? Probation Studies Unit Report 6. Oxford: Centre for Criminological Research, University of Oxford.
5. Burnett, R. (1996) Fitting Supervision to Offenders: Assessment and Allocation in the Probation Service, Home Office Research Study 153. London: Home Office.
6. Burnett, R. (2002) ‘The case for counselling as a method for working with offenders’, Vista, 7 (3), 216–226.
7. Burnett, R. (2004) ‘To re-offend or not to re-offend? the ambivalence of convicted property offenders’, in S. Maruna and R. Immarigeon (eds), After Crime and Punishment: Pathways to Offender Reintegration. Cullompton: Willan.
8. Burnett, R. and Appleton, C. (2004) ‘Joined-up services to tackle youth crime: a case-study in England’, British Journal of Criminology, 44, 34–54.
9. Farrall, S. (2002) Rethinking What Works with Offenders: Probation, Social Context and Desistance from Crime. Cullompton: Willan.
10. Farrall, S. (2004) ‘Supervision, motivation and social context: what matters most when probationers desist?’, in G. Mair (ed.), What Matters in Probation. Cullompton: Willan.
11. Folkard, M.S., Smith, D.E. and Smith, D.D. (1976) IMPACT Intensive Matched Probation and After-Care Treatment. Volume II. The Results of the Experiment, Home Office Research Study 36. London: HMSO.
12. Folkard, M.S., Fowles, A.J., McWilliams, B.C., McWilliams, W., Smith, D.E., Smith, D.D. and Walmsley, G.R. (1974) IMPACT Intensive Matched Probation and After-Care Treatment. Volume I. The Design of the Probation Experiment and an Evaluation, Home Office Research Study 24. London: HMSO.
13. Henggeler, S.W., Schoenwald, S., Borduin, C., Rowland, M. and Cunningham, P. (1998) Multi-Systemic Treatment of Anti-social Behavior. New York: Guildford Press.
14. Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Probation (2003) Annual Report 2002/2003. London: Home Office.
15. Home Office (1999) What Works: Reducing Re-offending. London: Home Office Communication Directorate.
16. Kelly, E.W. (1997) ‘Relationship-centered counseling: a humanistic model of integration’. Journal of Counseling and Development, 75, 337–345.
17. Kemshall, H. and Canton, R. with Bailey, R., Dominey, J., Simpkin, B. and Yates, S. (2002) The Effective Management of Programme Attrition: A Report for the National Probation Service (Welsh Region). Leicester: De Montfort University Community and Criminal Justice Unit.
18. Leibrich, J. (1991) A Study of the Probation Division’s Perception of Its Role in Reducing Re-offending. Wellington: Department of Justice, New Zealand.
19. Leibrich, J. (1993) Straight to the Point: Angles on Giving up Crime. Otago, New Zealand: University of Otago Press.
20. Lipsey, M.W. and Wilson, D.B. (1998) ‘Effective interventions for serious juvenile offenders’, in R. Loeber and D.P. Farrington (eds), Serious and Violent Juvenile Offenders: Risk Factors and Successful Interventions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Lipton, D.S., Pearson, F.S., Cleland, C.M. and Yee, D. (2002) ‘The effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural treatment methods on offender recidivism’, in J. McGuire (ed.), Offender Rehabilitation and Treatment: Effective Programmes and Policies to Reduce Re-offending. Chichester: Wiley & Sons.
22. López-Viets, V., Walker, D.D. and Miller, W.R. (2002) ‘What is motivation to change? A scientific analysis’, in M. McMurran (ed.), Motivating Offenders to Change: A Guide to Enhancing Engagement in Therapy. Chichester: Wiley.
23. Lösel, F. (2001) ‘Evaluating the effectiveness of correctional treatment: a review and synthesis of meta-evaluations’, in G.A. Bernfeld, D.P. Farrington and A.W. Leschied (eds), Offender Rehabilitation in Practice: Implementing and Evaluating Effective Programs. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
24. Mann, R.E., Ginsburg, J.I.D. and Weekes, J.R. (2002), ‘Motivational interviewing with offenders’, in M. McMurran (ed.), Motivating Offenders to Change: A Guide to Enhancing Engagement in Therapy. Chichester: Wiley.
25. McCord, J. (2001) ‘Crime prevention: a cautionary tale’, Third International Interdisciplinary Evidence-Based Policies and Indicator Systems Conference, July.
26. McCord, J. (2003) ‘Cures that harm: unanticipated outcomes of crime prevention programs’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 587, 16–30.
27. McGuire, J. (2002a) ‘Integrating findings from research reviews’, in J. McGuire (ed.), Offender Rehabilitation and Treatment: Effective programmes and Policies to Reduce Re-offending. Chichester: Wiley & Sons.
28. McGuire, J. (2002b) ‘Motivation for what? Effective programmes for motivated offenders’, in M. McMurran (ed.), Motivating Offenders to Change: A Guide to Enhancing Engagement in Therapy. Chichester: Wiley & Sons.
29. McIvor, G. (1990) Sanctions for Serious or Persistent Offender: A Review of the Literature. Stirling: University of Stirling Social Research Centre.
30. McMurran, M. (2002) ‘Future directions’, in M. McMurran (ed.), Motivating Offenders to Change: A Guide to Enhancing Engagement in Therapy. Chichester: Wiley.
31. McNeill, F. (2003) ‘Desistance-focused probation practice’, in W. Hong Chui and M. Nellis (eds.), Moving Probation Forward: Evidence, Arguments and Practice. Harlow: Pearson Longman.
32. Maruna, S. (2000) ‘Desistance from crime and offender rehabilitation: a tale of two research literatures’, Offender Programs Report, 4, 1–13.
33. Maruna, S. (2001) Making Good: How Ex-convicts Reform and Rebuild their Lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
34. Mead, G.H. (1934) Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35. Miller, W.R. and Rollnick, S. (eds) (1995) Motivational Interviewing, 2nd edn. New York: Guilford.
36. Monger, M. (1964) Casework in Probation. London: Butterworth.
37. Morgan, R. (2003) ‘Foreword’, in HMIP, Annual Report 2002/2003. London: Home Office.
38. Priestley, P. (2003) Personal communication.
39. Raynor, P. (1985) Social Work, Justice and Control. Oxford: Blackwell.
40. Raynor, P. and Vanstone, M. (2002) Understanding Community Penalties: Probation, Policy and Social Change. Buckingham: Open University.
41. Raynor, P., Smith, D. and Vanstone, M. (1994) Effective Probation Practice. London: Macmillan.
42. Rex, S. (1999) ‘Desistance from offending: experiences of probation’, Howard Journal, 38 (4), 366–383.
43. Rex, S. (2002) ‘Re-inventing community penalties: the role of communication’, in S.A. Rex and M. Tonry (eds), Reform and Punishment: The Future of Sentencing. Cullompton: Willan.
44. Rollnick, S. and Miller, W.R. (1995) ‘What is motivational interviewing?’, Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 23, 325–334.
45. Taxman, F.S. (2002) ‘Supervision – exploring the dimensions of effectiveness’, Federal Probation, Special Issue: What Works in Corrections, September, 14–27.
46. Trotter, C. (1996) ‘The impact of different supervision practices on community corrections’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 28 (2), 29–46.
47. Trotter, C. (2000) ‘Social work education, pro-social modelling and effective probation practice’, Probation Journal, 47, 256–261.
48. Vennard, J. and Hedderman, C. (1998) ‘Effective interventions with offenders’, in P. Goldblatt and C. Lewis (eds), Reducing Offending: An Assessment of Research Evidence on Ways of Dealing with Offending Behaviour. Home Office Research Study 187. London: Home Office.
49. Vennard, J., Sugg, D. and Hedderman, C. (1997) Changing Offenders’ Attitudes and Behaviour: What Works?, Home Office Research Study 171. London: Home Office.
50. Wells-Parker, E., Bangert-Drowns, R., McMillen, R. and Williams, M. (1995) ‘Final results from a meta-analysis of drink/drive offenders’, Addiction, 90, 907–926.
51. Williams, B. (1995) ‘Introduction’, in B. Williams (ed.), Probation Values. Birmingham: Venture Press.
52. Willis, A. (1983) ‘The balance between care and control in probation: a research note’, British Journal of Social Work, 13, 339–346.
53. Worrall, A. (1997) Punishment in the Community: the Future of Criminal Justice. London: Longman.