Multi-modal ultra-high resolution structural 7-Tesla MRI data repository

Scientific Data

Volumn 1, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Forstmann, Birte U ^a,b   Keuken, Max C ^a,b   Schafer, Andreas ^b   Bazin, Pierre Louis ^b   Alkemade, Anneke ^a   Turner, Robert ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; BASAL GANGLION; BRAIN; BRAIN STEM; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; BASAL GANGLIA; BRAIN; BRAIN STEM; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 84925593422     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20524463     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2014.50     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Biswal, B. B. et al. Toward discovery science of human brain function. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 107, 4734-4739 (2010).
2. Sporns, O., Tononi, G. & Kötter, R. The Human Connectome: A structural description of the human brain. PLoS Comp. Biol. 1, e42 (2005).
3. Van Essen, D. C. et al. The Human Connectome Project: A data acquisition perspective. NeuroImage 62, 2222-2231 (2012).
4. Evans, A. C., Janke, A. L., Collins, D. L. & Baillet, S. Brain templates and atlases. NeuroImage 62, 911-922 (2012).
5. Alkemade, A., Keuken, M. C. & Forstmann, B. U. A perspective on terra incognita: uncovering the neuroanatomy of the human subcortex. Frontiers in Neuroanatomy 7, 40 (2013).
6. Federative Committee on Anatomical Terminology. Terminologia Anatomica 1-292 (Thieme Stuttgart, 1998).
7. Lenglet, C. et al. Comprehensive in vivo mapping of the human basal ganglia and thalamic connectome in individuals using 7T MRI. PloS one 7, e29153 (2012).
8. Keuken, M. C. et al. Quantifying inter-individual anatomical variability in the subcortex using 7T structural MRI. NeuroImage 94, 1-7 (2014).
9. Cho, Z. H. et al. New brain atlas - Mapping the human brain in vivo with 7.0 T MRI and comparison with postmortem histology: Will these images change modern medicine? Int. J. Imag. Syst. Tech. 18, 2-8 (2008).
10. Turner, R. in High-Field MR Imaging (Springer, 2011).
11. Bazin, P.-L. et al. A computational framework for ultra-high resolution cortical segmentation at 7Tesla. NeuroImage 1-9 (2013).
12. Beisteiner, R. et al. Clinical fMRI: Evidence for a 7T benefit over 3T. NeuroImage 57, 1015-1021 (2011).
13. Cho, Z. H. et al. Direct visualization of deep brain stimulation targets in Parkinson disease with the use of 7-tesla magnetic resonance imaging. J. Neurosurg. 113, 1-9 (2010).
14. Abosch, A., Yacoub, E., Ugurbil, K. & Harel, N. An assessment of current brain targets for deep brain stimulation surgery with susceptibility-weighted imaging at 7-tesla. Neurosurgery 67, 1745-1756 (2010).
15. Oldfield, R. C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9, 97-113 (1971).
16. Hurley, A. C. et al. Tailored RF pulse for magnetization inversion at ultrahigh field. Magn. Reson. Med. 63, 51-58 (2009).
17. Marques, J. P. et al. MP2RAGE, a self bias-field corrected sequence for improved segmentation and T1-mapping at high field. NeuroImage 49, 1271-1281 (2010).
18. Haase, A., Frahm, J., Matthaei, D., Hanicke, W. & Merboldt, K. D. FLASH imaging. Rapid NMR imaging using low flipangle pulses. J. Magn. Reson. 67, 258-266 (1986).
19. Deistung, A. et al. Toward in vivo histology: A comparison of quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) with magnitude-, phase-, and R2∗-imaging at ultra-high magnetic field strength. NeuroImage 65, 299-314 (2013).
20. Hanke, M. et al. A high-resolution 7-Tesla fMRI dataset from complex natural stimulation with an audio movie. Sci. Data 1, 140003 (2014).
21. Gedamu, E. L., Collins, D. L. & Arnold, D. L. Automated quality control of brain MR images. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 28, 308-319 (2008).
22. Gudbjartsson, H. & Patz, S. The Rician distribution of noisy MRI data. Magn. Reson. Med. 34, 910-914 (1995).