Cross-cultural meta-analysis

Cross-Cultural Research Methods in Psychology

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 348-378

  Van Hemert, Dianne A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925590261     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511779381.017     Document Type: Chapter

References (67)

1. Berry, J. W. (1976). Human ecology and cognitive style: Comparative studies in cultural and psychological adaptation. New York: Sage/Halsted.
2. Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., Segall, M. H., & Dasen, P. R. (2002).Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Bolger, D. J., Perfetti, C. A., & Schneider, W. (2005). Cross-cultural effect on the brain revisited: Universal structures plus writing system variation. Human Brain Mapping, 25, 92–104.
4. Bond, M. H, & Van De Vijver, F. J. R.. (2007). Making scientific sense of cultural differences in psychological outcomes: Unpackaging the magnum mysteriosum. In D. Matsumoto & F. J. R. Van de Vijver (Eds.), Cross-cultural research methods in psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. Bond, R., & Smith, P. B. (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta–analysis of studies using Asch’s (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 111–137.
6. Born, M. Ph., Bleichrodt, N., & Van Der Flier, H. (1987).Cross-cultural comparison of sex-related differences on intelligence tests: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18,283–314.
7. Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments.In W. J. Lonner& J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (137–164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Brouwers, S. A., Van Hemert, D. A., Breugelmans, S. M., & Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2004). A historical analysis of empirical studies published in the Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 251–262.
9. Cohen, C., Nisbett, R. E., Bowdle, B. F., & Schwarz, N. (1996). Insult, aggression, and the southern culture of honor: An “experimental ethnography.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 945–960.
10. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer.Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
11. Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (Eds.). (1994). The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
12. De Leeuw, E. D., & Hox, J. J. (2002).The use of meta-analysis in cross-national studies. In J. A. Harkness, F. J. R. van de Vijver, &P. P. Mohler (Eds.), Cross-cultural survey methods (327–344). New York: Wiley.
13. Diener, E., Diener, M., & Diener, C. (1995).Factors predicting subjective well-being of nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 851–864.
14. Eagly, A. H., Karau, S., & Makhijani, M. (1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta–analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 125–145.
15. Elfenbein, H. A., & Ambady, N. (2002). On the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 203–235.
16. Elfenbein, H. A., & Ambady, N. (2003). Cultural similarity’s consequences: A distance perspective on cross-cultural differences in emotion recognition. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 34, 92–109.
17. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975).Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
18. Faucheux, C. (1976). Cross-cultural research in experimental social psychology.European Journal of Social Psychology, 6, 269–322.
19. Ford, J. K., Kraiger, K., & Schechtman, S. L. (1986). Study of race effects in objective indices and subjective evaluations of performance: A meta-analysis of performance criteria. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 330–337.
20. Georgas, J., & Berry, J. W. (1995).An ecocultural taxonomy for cross-cultural psychology. Cross-Cultural Research, 29,121–157.
21. Georgas, J., Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Berry, J. W. (2004).The ecocultural framework, ecosocial indices, and psychological variables in cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 74–96.
22. Gray-Little, B., & Hafdahl, A. R. (2000). Factors influencing racial comparisons of self–esteem: A quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 26–54.
23. Hall, J. A., Tickle-Degnen, L., Rosenthal, R., & Mosteller, F. (1994).Hypotheses and problems in research synthesis. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (17–28). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
24. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985).Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
25. Heine, S. J., & Hamamura, T. (2007).In search of East Asian self-enhancement.Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 4–27.
26. Helms-Lorenz, M., Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Poortinga, Y. H. (2003). Cross-cultural differences in cognitive performance and Spearman’s hypothesis: g or c? Intelligence, 31, 9–29.
27. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
28. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences. Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990).Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30. Inglehart, R. (1993). World values survey 1990–1991. WVS Program. J.D. Systems, S.L. ASEP S.A.
31. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization.Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 countries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32. Johnson, B. T., & Eagly, A. H. (2000).Quantitative synthesis of social psychological research. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (496–528). New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681– 706.
34. Khaleque, A., & Rohner, R. P. (2002). Reliability of measures assessing the pancultural association between perceived parental acceptance-rejection and psychological adjustment: A meta-analysis of cross-cultural and intracultural studies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 87–99.
35. LaFrance, M., Hecht, M. A., & Paluck, E. L. (2003). The contingent smile: A meta-analysis of sex differences in smiling. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 305–334.
36. Leung, K., & Bond, M. H. (2004). Social axioms: A model of social beliefs in multi-cultural perspective. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 36, 119–197). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
37. Leung, K., Bond, M. H., Reimel de Carrasquel, S., Munoz, C., Hernández, M., Murakami, F., et al. (2002). Social axioms: The search for universal dimensions of general beliefs about how the world functions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 286–302.
38. Lipsey, M. W. (1994). Identifying potentially interesting variables and analysis opportunities. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (111–123). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
39. Lipsey, M. W. (1997). What can you build with thousands of bricks? Musings on the cumulation of knowledge in program evaluation.New Directions for Evaluation, 76, 7–23.
40. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001).Applied social research methods series: Vol. 49.Practical meta–analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41. Lonner, W. J., & Adamopoulos, J. (1997).Culture as antecedent behavior. In J. W. Berry, Y. H. Poortinga, & J. Pandey (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Volume 1. Theory and method (43–83). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
42. McCrae, R. R. (2002). NEO-PI-R data from 36 cultures. In A. J. Marsella (Series Ed.), R. R. McCrae, & J. Allik (Eds.), The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures, (105–125). New York: Kluwer Academic.
43. Mezulis, A. H., Abramson, L.Y., Hyde, J. S., & Hankin, B. L. (2004). Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias.Psychological Bulletin, 130, 711–747.
44. Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002).Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses.Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3–72.
45. Poortinga, Y. H. (1989). Equivalence of cross-cultural data: An overview of basic issues. International Journal of Psychology, 24, 737–756.
46. Poortinga, Y. H., Van de Vijver, F. J. R., Joe, R. C., & Van de Koppel, J. M. H. (1987). Peeling the onion called culture: A synopsis. In C. Kağitçibaši (Ed.), Growth and progress in cross–cultural psychology (22–34).Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
47. Ronen, S., & Shenkar, O. (1985).Clustering countries on attitudinal dimensions: A review and synthesis. Academy of Management Review, 10, 435–454.
48. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
49. Roth, P. L., Huffcutt, A. I., &Bobko, P. (2003). Ethnic group differences in measures of job performance: A new meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 694–706.
50. Saroglou, V., Delpierre, V., & Dernelle, R. (2004). Values and religiosity: A meta-analysis of studies using Schwartz’s model. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 721–734.
51. Sedikides, C., Gaertner, L., & Vevea, J. L. (2007).Inclusion of theory-relevant moderators yield the same conclusions as Sedikides, Gaertner, and Vevea (2005): Ameta–analytical reply to Heine, Kitayama, andHamamura (2007). Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 10,59–67.
52. Smith, P. B., Bond, M. H., &Kagitcibasi, C. (2006).Understanding social psychology across cultures: Living and working in a changing world. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53. Twenge, J.M., & Campbell, W. K. (2002). Self–esteem and socioeconomic status: A meta–analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 59–71.
54. Twenge, J. M., & Crocker, J. (2002). Race and self–esteem: Meta–analyses comparing Whites, Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and American Indians and comment on Gray– Little and Hafdahl (2000). Psychological Bulletin, 128, 371–408.
55. Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (1997). Meta–analysis of cross–cultural comparisons of cognitive test performance.Journal of Cross–Cultural Psychology, 28, 678–709.
56. Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997).Methods and data analysis for cross–cultural research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
57. Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (2000). Methodological issues in psychological research on culture. Journal of Cross–Cultural Psychology, 31, 33–51.
58. Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (2007).Equivalence and bias.In D. Matsumoto &F. J. R. van de Vijver (Eds.), Cross–cultural research methods in psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
59. Van Hemert, D. A. (2003). Cross–cultural meta–analyses. In W. J. Lonner, D. L. Dinnel, S. A. Hayes, &D. N. Sattler (Eds.), Online readings in psychology and culture (Unit 2, Chapter 13). Bellingham: Center for Cross–Cultural Research, Western Washington University, Washington USA. Retrieved from http://www.wwu.edu/~culture on May 20, 2010.
60. Van Hemert, D. A., Poortinga, Y. H., & Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2007). Emotion and culture: A meta–analysis. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 913–943.
61. Van Hemert, D. A., Van de Vijver, F. J. R., &Poortinga, Y. H. (2002). The Beck Depression Inventory as a measure of subjective well–being: A cross–national study. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 257–286.
62. Van Hemert, D. A., Van de Vijver, F. J. R., &Poortinga, Y. H. (2006).Evaluating frameworks of cross–cultural differences and similarities: A meta–analysis.Unpublished manuscript. Tilburg, Netherlands: Tilburg University.
63. Watkins, D. (2001). Correlates of approaches to learning: A cross–cultural metaanalysis. In R. Sternberg & L. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning and cognitive styles (pp. 165–195). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
64. Wolf, F. M. (1986). Meta–analysis: Quantitative methods for research synthesis.BeverlyHills, CA: Sage.
65. World Bank.(1999). World development report 1998/1999. New York: Oxford University Press.
66. Wortman, P. M. (1994). Judging research quality. In H. Cooper &L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 98–109). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
67. Ziv, A., &Shauber, H. (1969).Contribution to a cross–cultural study of manifest anxiety in children.Human Development, 12,178–191.