The mixed heritage of federal intellectual property law and ramifications for statutory interpretation

Intellectual Property and the Common Law

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 63-88

  Menell, Peter S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925589385     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139013550.005     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. Shyamkrishna Balganesh, The Pragmatic Incrementalism ofCommon Law Intellectual Property, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 1543 (2010)
2. Edward Walterscheid, Understanding the Copyright Act of 1790: The Issue of Common Law Copyright in America and the Modern Interpretation of the Copyright Power, 53 J. Copyright Soc’y 313 (2006)
3. Eaton Sylvester Drone, A Treatise on the Law of Property in Intellectual Productions in Great Britain and the United States (1879)
4. J. F. Clerk & W. H. B. Lindell, The Law of Torts 587 (2d ed. 1896).
5. George Ticknor Curtis, A Treatise on the Law of Copyright 240 (1847)
6. Catherine L. Fisk, Authors at Work: The Origins of the Work-for-Hire Doctrine, 15 Yale J.L. & Human 1 (2003)
7. Zechariah Chafee, Equitable Servitudes on Chattels, 41 Harv. L. Rev. 945 (1928)
8. Steven Lubar, The Transformation of Antebellum Patent Law, 32 Tech. & Culture (Special Issue) 932, 936 (1991).
9. Craig Allen Nard, Legal Forms and the Common Law of Patents, 90 B.U. L. Rev. 51 (2010).
10. Edward C. Walterscheid, To Promote the Progress of Useful Arts: American Patent Law and Administration, 1787–1836 (Part 1), 79 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc’y 61 (1997)
11. Frank D. Prager, The Influence of Mr. Justice Story on American Patent Law, 5 Am. J. Leg.Hist. 254 n.1 (1961).
12. Joshua D. Sarnoff, The Historic and Modern Doctrines of Equivalents and Claiming the Future, Part I (1790–1870), 87 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc’y 371, 384 (2005)
13. N.J. Brumbaugh, History and Purpose of Claims in United States Patent Law, 14 J. Pat. Off. Soc’y 273, 276 (1932)
14. Lawrence M. Friedman, A History of American Law 380 (1973).
15. Harlan Fiske Stone, The Common Law in the United States, 50 Harv. L. Rev. 4 (1936)
16. George Ticknor Curtis, A Treatise on the Law of Copyright 240 (1847).
17. R. Kent Newmyer, Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story: Statesman of the Old Republic 321 (1985).
18. William C. Robinson, The Law of Patents for Useful Inventions 15 n.3 (1890)
19. O. W. Holmes, The Common Law 5 (1881)
20. Benjamin N. Cardozo, The Growth of the Law 117–20 (1924)
21. Benjamin N. Cardozo, The Nature of the Judicial Process 112 (1921)
22. Ralph H. Dwan & Ernest R. Feidler, The Federal Statutes – Their History and Use, 22 Minn. L. Rev. 1008 (1938).
23. Peter S. Menell, Forty Years of Wondering in the Wilderness and No Closer to the Promised Land: Bilski’s Superficial Textualism and the Missed Opportunity to Return Patent Law to its Technology Mooring, 63 Stan. L. Rev. 1289, 1296–97 (2011)
24. Sidney A. Shapiro and Robert L. Glicksman, Congress, the Supreme Court, and the Quiet Revolution in Administrative Law, 1988 Duke L.J. 819, 819 (1988)
25. Peter S. Menell, An Epitaph for Traditional Copyright Protection of Network Features of Computer Software, 43 Antitrust Bull. 651 (1998).
26. Peter S. Menell, Envisioning Copyright Law’s Digital Future, 46 N.Y. L. Sch. L. Rev. 63 (2002).
27. Peter S. Menell, An Analysis of the Scope of Copyright Protection for Application Programs, 41 Stan. L. Rev. 1045 (1989)
28. Peter S. Menell, Tailoring Legal Protection for Computer Software, 39 Stan. L. Rev. 1329 (1987).
29. Dennis S. Karjala & Peter S. Menell, Applying Fundamental Copyright Principles to Lotus Development Corp. v. Borland Int’l, Inc., 10 High Tech. L.J. 177 (1995).
30. Peter S. Menell & David Nimmer, Legal Realism in Action: Indirect Copyright Liability’s Continuing Tort Framework and Sony’s De Facto Demise, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 143 (2007).
31. R. Anthony Reese, The Relationship Between ISP Safe Harbors and Ordinary Rules of Copyright Liability, 32 Colum. J.L. & Arts 427, 429 (2009).
32. Peter S. Menell, In Search of Copyright’s Lost Ark: Interpreting the Right to Distribute in the Internet Age, 59 J. Copyright Society 1 (2011).
33. Rochelle Dreyfuss, The Federal Circuit: A Case Study in Specialized Courts, 64 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1 (1989).
34. William M. Landes & Richard A. Posner, An Empirical Analysis of the Patent Court, 71 U. Chi. L. Rev. 111, 112 (2004).
35. Ryan Vacca, Acting Like an Administrative Agency: The Federal Circuit En Banc, 76 Missouri L. Rev. 733 (2011)
36. Tony Dutra, Lawyers, Judges at “Bench & Bar” Conference Explore Mutual Role in Spurring Innovation, BNA’s Patent, Trademark, & Copyright Journal No. 128 (July 5, 2011)
37. Adam B. Jaffe & Josh Lerner, Innovation and Its Discontents (2004).
38. Dan L. Burk & Mark A. Lemley, The Patent Crisis and How the Courts Can Solve It 100–02 (2009).
39. Edmund W. Kitch, Graham v. John Deere Co.: New Standards for Patents, 1966 Sup. Ct. Rev. 293, 303–04 (1966).
40. David Nimmer, Codifying Copyright Comprehensibly, 51 UCLA L. Rev. 1233 (2004).
41. John F. Manning, Second-Generation Textualism, 98 Cal. L. Rev. 1287 (2010)
42. Philip P. Frickey, Interpretive-Regime Change, 38 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 1971 (2005).
43. Frank H. Easterbrook, Statutes’ Domains, 50 U. Chi. L. Rev. 533, 544 (1983)
44. Shyamkrishna Balganesh, Debunking Blackstonian Copyright, 118 Yale L.J. 1126, 1167 (2008)