-
3
-
-
0038829675
-
How does it work? Versus ‘what are the laws?’: Two conceptions of psychological explanation,”
-
F.C. Keil and R.A. Wilson (eds.), Cambridge: MIT Press
-
Cummins, Robert. 2000. “‘How does it work?’ versus ‘what are the laws?’: two conceptions of psychological explanation,” in F.C. Keil and R.A. Wilson (eds.), Explanation and Cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press, 117–44.
-
(2000)
Explanation and Cognition
, pp. 117-144
-
-
Cummins, R.1
-
5
-
-
0038898810
-
Explanation as orgasm and the drive for causal knowledge: The function, evolution, and phenomenology of the theory formation system
-
Keil and Wilson (eds.), Cambridge: MIT Press
-
Gopnik, Alison. 2000. “Explanation as orgasm and the drive for causal knowledge: the function, evolution, and phenomenology of the theory formation system,” in Keil and Wilson (eds.), Explanation and Cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press, 299–324.
-
(2000)
Explanation and Cognition
, pp. 299-324
-
-
Gopnik, A.1
-
8
-
-
0142114105
-
Explaining differences and weighting causes
-
Hesslow, Germund. 1983. “Explaining differences and weighting causes,” Theoria 49: 87–111.
-
(1983)
Theoria
, vol.49
, pp. 87-111
-
-
Hesslow, G.1
-
9
-
-
0042597180
-
Discussion: Salmon on explanatory relevance
-
Hitchcock, Christopher C. 1995. “Discussion: Salmon on explanatory relevance,” Philosophy of Science 62: 304–20.
-
(1995)
Philosophy of Science
, vol.62
, pp. 304-320
-
-
Hitchcock, C.C.1
-
10
-
-
0036746332
-
The misunderstood limits of folk science: An illusion of explanatory depth
-
Rozenblit, Leonid and Frank C. Keil. 2002. “The misunderstood limits of folk science: an illusion of explanatory depth,” Cognitive Science 26: 521–62.
-
(2002)
Cognitive Science
, vol.26
, pp. 521-562
-
-
Rozenblit, L.1
Keil, F.C.2
-
12
-
-
77950024425
-
Contrastive causation
-
Schaffer, Jonathan. 2005. “Contrastive causation,” The Philosophical Review114: 297–328.
-
(2005)
The Philosophical Review
, vol.114
, pp. 297-328
-
-
Schaffer, J.1
-
13
-
-
0000973595
-
Childrens theories and the drive to explain,”
-
Schwitzgebel, Eric. 1999. “Children’s theories and the drive to explain,” Science & Education 8: 457–88.
-
(1999)
Science & Education
, vol.8
, pp. 457-488
-
-
Schwitzgebel, E.1
-
14
-
-
33750476345
-
Methodological individualism, explanation, and invariance
-
Steel, Daniel. 2006. “Methodological individualism, explanation, and invariance,” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36: 440–63.
-
(2006)
Philosophy of the Social Sciences
, vol.36
, pp. 440-463
-
-
Steel, D.1
-
18
-
-
0012061153
-
-
PhD thesis. University of Helsinki, May 2001
-
Ylikoski, Petri. 2001. Understanding Interests and Causal Explanation. PhD thesis. University of Helsinki, May 2001. Available at: http://ethesis.helsinki. fi/julkaisut/val/kayta/vk/ylikoski.
-
(2001)
Understanding Interests and Causal Explanation
-
-
Ylikoski, P.1
-
19
-
-
77949290816
-
The idea of contrastive Explanandum
-
J. Persson and P. Ylikoski (eds.), Dordrecht: Springer
-
Ylikoski, Petri. 2007. “The idea of contrastive Explanandum,” in J. Persson and P. Ylikoski (eds.), Rethinking Explanation. Dordrecht: Springer, 27–42.
-
(2007)
Rethinking Explanation
, pp. 27-42
-
-
Ylikoski, P.1
-
20
-
-
77953682155
-
The illusion of depth of understanding in science
-
H. de Regt, S. Leonelli and K. Eigner (eds.), Pittsburgh University Press
-
Ylikoski, Petri. 2009. “The Illusion of Depth of Understanding in Science,” in H. de Regt, S. Leonelli and K. Eigner (eds.) Scientific Understanding: Philosophical Perspectives. Pittsburgh University Press, 100–119.
-
(2009)
Scientific Understanding: Philosophical Perspectives
, pp. 100-119
-
-
Ylikoski, P.1
|