Dissecting explanatory power

Philosophical Studies

Volumn 148, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 201-219

  Ylikoski, Petri ^a   Kuorikoski, Jaakko ^b  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Explanation; Explanatory power; Inference to the best explanation; Understanding

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949282499     PISSN: 00318116     EISSN: 15730883     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11098-008-9324-z     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Baker, G. P., & Hacker, P. M. S. (2005). Wittgenstein: Understanding and meaning, part I: Essays (2nd rev. ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
2. Garfinkel, A. (1981). Forms of explanation. New Haven: Yale University Press.
3. Green, D. P., & Shapiro, I. (1994). Pathologies of rational choice theory: A critique of applications in political science. New Haven: Yale University Press.
4. Hitchcock, C., & Woodward, J. (2003). Explanatory generalizations, part II: Plumbing explanatory depth. Nous (Detroit, Michigan), 37, 181-199. doi: 10. 1111/1468-0068. 00435.
5. Humphreys, P. (1993). Greater unification equals greater understanding? Analysis, 53(3), 183-188. doi: 10. 2307/3328470.
6. Jones, M. R. (2005). Idealization and abstraction: A framework. In M. R. Jones & N. Cartwright (Eds.), Idealization XII: Correcting the model. Poznan studies in the philosophy of sciences and the humanities (Vol. 86, pp. 173-217). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
7. Kitcher, P. (1989). Explanatory unification and the causal structure of the world. In P. Kitcher & W. C. Salmon (Eds.), Scientific explanation. Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. XIII, pp. 410-505). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
8. Kuorikoski, J. (2007). Explaining with equilibria. In J. Persson & P. Ylikoski (Eds.), Rethinking explanation (pp. 149-162). Dordrecht: Springer.
9. Lipton, P. (2004). Inference to the best explanation (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
10. Miller, R. W. (1987). Fact and method. Explanation, confirmation and reality in the natural and the social sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
11. Morton, A. (2002). The importance of being understood: Folk psychology as ethics. London: Routledge.
12. Pearl, J. (2000). Causality-models, reasoning and inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Salmon, W. (1998). Causality and explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Schaffer, J. (2005). Contrastive causation. The Philosophical Review, 114, 297-328. doi: 10. 1215/00318108-114-3-327.
15. Sober, E. (1988). Apportioning causal responsibility. The Journal of Philosophy, 85, 303-318. doi: 10. 2307/2026721.
16. Weber, E., & van Bouwel, J. (2007). Assessing the explanatory power of causal explanations. In J. Persson & P. Ylikoski (Eds.), Rethinking explanation (pp. 109-118). Dordrecht: Springer.
17. Wittgenstein, L. (1953/1997). Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.
18. Woodward, J. (2003). Making things happen. A theory of causal explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Woodward, J. (2006). Sensitive and insensitive causation. The Philosophical Review, 115, 1-50. doi: 10. 1215/00318108-115-1-1.
20. Ylikoski, P. (2007). The idea of contrastive explanandum. In J. Persson & P. Ylikoski (Eds.), Rethinking explanation (pp. 27-42). Dordrecht: Springer.
21. Ylikoski, P. (2009). Illusions in scientific understanding. In H. W. De Regt, S. Leonelli, & K. Eigner (Eds.), Scientific understanding: Philosophical perspectives. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press (forthcoming).