Correcting transcription factor gene sets for copy number and promoter methylation variations

Drug Development Research

Volumn 75, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 343-347

  Rathi, Komal S ^a   Gaykalova, Daria A ^b   Hennessey, Patrick ^c,d   Califano, Joseph A ^b   Ochs, Michael F ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b DEPARTMENT OF PATHOLOGY   (United States)

^c Mid Michigan Ear Nose and Throat PC ^*  (United States)

^d GREATER BALTIMORE MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e The College of New Jersey   (United States)

Author keywords

copy number variations; gene set analysis; promoter methylation; simulated dataset; transcription factor gene sets

Indexed keywords

TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

ARTICLE; COPY NUMBER VARIATION; DNA METHYLATION; EPIGENETICS; EUKARYOTE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE LOSS; GENE NUMBER; GENE SILENCING; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HETEROZYGOSITY LOSS; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; NOISE; PROBABILITY; PROMOTER REGION; REGULATORY MECHANISM; SIMULATION; BIOLOGY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; GENE DOSAGE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC EPIGENESIS; GENETICS; NEOPLASM; PROCEDURES;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DNA METHYLATION; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; GENE DOSAGE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, NEOPLASTIC; HUMANS; NEOPLASMS; PROMOTER REGIONS, GENETIC; SOFTWARE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

EID: 84925584441     PISSN: 02724391     EISSN: 10982299     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ddr.21220     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Coombes KR, Baggerly KA, Stivers DN, Wang J, Gold D, Sung HG, Lee SJ,. 2002. Biology-driven clustering of microarray data: applications to the NCI60 data set. In:, Johnson K, Lin S, editors. Methods of microarray data analysis II. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. p 65-79.
2. Draghici S, Khatri P, Bhavsar P, Shah A, Krawetz SA, Tainsky MA,. 2003. Onto-tools, the toolkit of the modern biologist: onto-express, onto-compare, onto-design and onto-translate. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 3775-3781.
3. Geman D, d'Avignon C, Naiman DQ, Winslow RL,. 2004. Classifying gene expression profiles from pairwise mRNA comparison. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 3: 19.
4. MacDonald JW, Ghosh D,. 2006. COPA-cancer outlier profile analysis. Bioinformatics 22: 2950-2951.
5. Matys V, Kel-Margoulis OV, Fricke E, Liebich I, Land S, Barre-Dirrie A, Reuter I, Chekmenev D, Krull M, Hornischer K, et al. 2006. TRANSFAC and its module TRANSCompel: transcriptional gene regulation in eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 34: D108-D110. (Database issue).
6. Mootha VK, Lindgren CM, Eriksson KF, Subramanian A, Sihag S, Lehar J, Puigserver P, Carlsson E, Ridderstrale M, Laurila E, et al. 2003. PGC-1alpha-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes. Nat Genet 34: 267-273.
7. Ochs MF, Rink L, Tarn C, Mburu S, Taguchi T, Eisenberg B, Godwin AK,. 2009. Detection of treatment-induced changes in signaling pathways in gastrointestinal stromal tumors using transcriptomic data. Cancer Res 69: 9125-9132.
8. Ochs MF, Farrar JE, Considine M, Wei Y, Meshinchi S, Arceci RJ, 2013. Outlier analysis and top scoring pair for integrated data analysis and biomarker discovery. IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics / IEEE, ACM.
9. Smyth GK,. 2004. Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 3. Article3.
10. Smyth GK,. 2005. Limma: linear models for microarray data. In:, Gentleman R, Carey RV, Dudoit S, Irizarry R, Huber W, editors. Bioinformatics and computational biology solutions using R and BioConductor. New York: Springer. p 397-420.
11. Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, Paulovich A, Pomeroy SL, Golub TR, Lander ES, et al. 2005. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 15545-15550.
12. Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G,. 2001. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 5116-5121.