Effects of Vowel Auditory Training on Concurrent Speech Segregation in Hearing Impaired Children

Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology

Volumn 124, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 13-20

  Talebi, Hossein ^a   Moossavi, Abdollah ^b   Lotfi, Yones ^a   Faghihzadeh, Soghrat ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND REHABILITATION SCIENCES   (Iran)

^b IRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^c ZANJAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

ASA; auditory scene analysis; concurrent speech segregation; hearing impaired children; vowel auditory training

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY RESPONSE; AUDITORY SCREENING; BEHAVIOR; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROL GROUP; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEARING AID; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; INFORMATION; MALE; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SPEECH; VOWEL; AUDITORY REHABILITATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; EVOKED RESPONSE; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHONETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; REACTION TIME; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COHORT STUDIES; CORRECTION OF HEARING IMPAIRMENT; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; MALE; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 84925546275     PISSN: 00034894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0003489414540604     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Bregman AS, ed. Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press; 1990.
2. Ritter W, Sussman E, Molholm S,. Evidence that the mismatch negativity system works on the basis of objects. Neuroreport. 2000; 11: 61-63.
3. Sussman E, Ritter W, Vaughan HG Jr., Attention affects the organization of auditory input associated with the mismatch negativity system. Brain Res. 1998; 789: 130-138.
4. Sussman E, Ritter W, Vaughan HG Jr., An investigation of the auditory streaming effect using event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology. 1999; 36: 22-34.
5. Demany L,. Auditory stream segregation in infancy. Infant Behav Dev. 1982; 5: 261-276.
6. Sussman E, Ceponiene R, Shestakova A, Naatanen R, Winkler I,. Auditory stream segregation processes operate similarly in school-aged children and adults. Hear Res. 2001; 153: 108-114.
7. Winkler I, Kushnerenko E, Horváth J, et al. Newborn infants can organize the auditory world. PNAS. 2003; 100: 11812-11815.
8. Leslie AM, Xu F, Tremoulet PD, Scholl BJ,. Trends Cognit Sci. 1998; 2: 10-18.
9. Bregman AS,. Auditory scene analysis. In: Dallos P, Oertel D, eds. The Senses: A Comprehensive Reference. San Diego, CA: Elsevier; 2008: 861-870.
10. Katz J, Medwetsky L, Burkard R, Hood LJ,. Handbook of Clinical Audiology. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009.
11. Tye-Murray N,. Foundations of Aural Rehabilitation: Children, Adults, and Their Family Members. 2nd ed. Clifton Park, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning; 2004.
12. Martin BA, Sigal A, Kurtzberg D, Stapells DR,. The effects of decreased audibility produced by high-pass noise masking on cortical event-related potentials to speech sounds /ba/ and /da/. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997; 101: 1585-1599.
13. Ostroff JM, Martin BA, Boothroyd A,. Cortical evoked response to acoustic change within a syllable. Ear Hear. 1998; 19: 290-297.
14. Sharma A, Dorman M,. Cortical auditory evoked potential correlates of categorical perception of voice-onset time. J Acoust Soc Am. 1999; 106: 1078-1083.
15. Sharma A, Dorman M,. Neurophysiologic correlates of cross-language phonetic perception. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000; 107: 2697-2703.
16. Whiting KA, Martin BA, Stapells DR,. The effects of broadband noise masking on cortical event-related potentials to speech sounds /ba/ and /da/. Ear Hear. 1998; 19: 218-231.
17. Vaughan HG Jr, Ritter W,. The sources of auditory evoked responses recorded from the human scalp. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1970; 28: 360-367.
18. Naatanen R, Picton T,. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology. 1987; 24: 375-425.
19. Wolpaw JR, Penry JK,. A temporal component of the auditory evoked response. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1975; 39: 609-620.
20. Woods D,. The component structure of the N1 wave of the human auditory evoked potential. In: Karmos G, Molnar M, Csepe V, Czigler I, Desmedt J, eds. Perspectives of Event-Related Potentials Research. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 1995: 102-109.
21. Korczak PA, Kurtzberg D, Stapells DR,. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss and personal hearing AIDS on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing. Ear Hear. 2005; 26 (2): 165-185.
22. Tremblay KL, Billings CJ, Friesen LM, Souza PE,. Neural representation of amplified speech sounds. Ear Hear. 2006; 27 (2): 93-103.
23. Tremblay KL, Kraus N,. Beyond the ear: central auditory plasticity. Otorhinolaryngologia. 2002; 52 (3): 93-100.
24. Tremblay K, Kraus N, McGee T, Ponton C, Otis B,. Central auditory plasticity: changes in the N1-P2 complex after speech-sound training. Ear Hear. 2001; 22: 79-90.
25. Hayes E, Warrier CM, Nicol T, Zecker SG, Kraus N,. Neural plasticity following auditory training in children with learning problems. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003; 114: 673-684.
26. Hebb DO,. Organization of Behavior. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1949.
27. McGee T, Kraus N, Nicol T,. Is it really a mismatch negativity? An assessment of methods for determining response validity in individual subjects. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997; 104: 359-368.
28. Ponton C, Don M, Eggermont JJ, Kwong B,. Integrated mismatch negativity (MMNi): a noise free representation of evoked responses allowing single point distribution-free statistical tests. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997; 104: 381-382.
29. Hall JW,. New Handbook of Auditory Evoked Responses. Boston, MA: Pearson; 2006.
30. Kraus N, McGee T, Carrell T, King C, Tremblay K, Nicol T,. Central auditory system plasticity associated with speech discrimination training. J Cogn Neurosci. 1995; 7: 25-32.
31. Tremblay K, Kraus N, Carrell T, McGee T,. Central auditory system plasticity: generalization to novel stimuli following listening training. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997; 102: 3762-3773.
32. Tremblay K, Kraus N, McGee T,. The time course of auditory perceptual learning: neurophysiologic changes during speech-sound training. Neuroreport. 1998; 9: 3557-3560.
33. Reinke KS, He Y, Wang C, Alain C,. Perceptual learning modulates sensory evoked response during vowel segregation. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003; 17 (3): 781-791.
34. Snyder JS, Alain C,. Age-related changes in neural activity associated with concurrent vowel segregation. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005; 24: 492-499.
35. Divenyi PL, Haupt KM,. Audiological correlates of speech understanding deficits in elderly listeners with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. I. Age and lateral asymmetry effects. Ear Hear. 1997; 18 (1): 42-61.
36. Divenyi PL, Haupt KM,. Audiological correlates of speech understanding deficits in elderly listeners with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. II. Correlation analysis. Ear Hear. 1997; 18 (2): 100-113.
37. Divenyi PL, Haupt KM,. Audiological correlates of speech understanding deficits in elderly listeners with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. III. Factor representation. Ear Hear. 1997; 18 (3): 189-201.
38. Grimault N, Micheyl C, Carlyon RP, Anhaud P, Collet L,. Perceptual auditory stream segregation of sequences of complex sounds in subjects with normal and impaired hearing. Br J Audiol. 2001; 35 (3): 173-182.
39. Atienza M, Cantero JL, Dominguez-Marin E,. The time course of neural changes underlying auditory perceptual learning. Learn Mem. 2002; 9: 138-150.
40. Courchesne E,. Neurophysiological correlates of cognitive development: changes in long-latency event-related potentials from childhood to adulthood. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1978; 45: 468-482.
41. Ponton CW, Don M, Eggermont JJ, Waring MD, Masuda A,. Auditory system plasticity in children after long periods of complete deafness. Neuroreport. 1996; 8: 61-65.
42. Ponton CW, Don M, Eggermont JJ, Waring MD, Masuda A,. Maturation of human cortical auditory function: differences between normal hearing and cochlear implant children. Ear Hear. 1996; 17: 430-437.
43. Ponton CW, Eggermont JJ, Kwong B, Don M,. Maturation of human central auditory system activity: evidence from multi-channel evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2000; 111: 220-236.
44. Martin BA, Boothroyd A,. Cortical, auditory, event-related potentials in response to periodic and aperiodic stimuli with the same spectral envelope. Ear Hear. 1999; 20 (1): 33-44.
45. Martin BA, Tremblay KL, Stapells DR,. Principles and applications of cortical auditory evoked potentials. In: Burkard R, Don M, Eggermont J, eds. Auditory Evoked Potentials. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007: 482-507.
46. Sommers MS, Humes LE,. Auditory filter shapes in normal-hearing, noise-masked normal, and elderly listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 1993; 93: 2903-2914.