Erratum: Integrated climate and land use change scenarios for California rangeland ecosystem services: wildlife habitat, soil carbon, and water supply[Landscape Ecol, 10.1007/s10980-015-0159-7];Integrated climate and land use change scenarios for California rangeland ecosystem services: wildlife habitat, soil carbon, and water supply

Landscape Ecology

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 729-750

  Byrd, Kristin B ^a   Flint, Lorraine E ^b   Alvarez, Pelayo ^c   Casey, Clyde F ^b   Sleeter, Benjamin M ^a   Soulard, Christopher E ^a   Flint, Alan L ^b   Sohl, Terry L ^d  

^a U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^b U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^c California Rangeland Coalition   (United States)

^d EARTH RESOURCES OBSERVATION AND SCIENCE EROS CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Climate change adaptation; Downscaled global climate models; Ecosystem services; Grassland; Land use land cover change scenarios; Rangeland; Soil carbon; Water supply

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925541732     PISSN: 09212973     EISSN: 15729761     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-015-0180-x     Document Type: Erratum

References (71)

1. Ash A, Thornton P, Stokes C, Togtohyn C (2012) Is proactive adaptation to climate change necessary in grazed rangelands? Rangel Ecol Manag 65(6):563–568
2. Bierwagen BG, Theobald DM, Pyke CR, Choate A, Groth P, Thomas JV, Morefield P (2010) National housing and impervious surface scenarios for integrated climate impact assessments. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(49):20887–20892
3. Bliss NB (2003) Soil organic carbon on lands of the Department of the Interior, USGS open-file report 03-304. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA. http://egsc.usgs.gov/isb/pubs/openfile/OFR03-304.pdf. Accessed January 2013
4. Booker K, Huntsinger L, Bartolome JW, Sayre NF, Stewart W (2013) What can ecological science tell us about opportunities for carbon sequestration on arid rangelands in the United States? Global Environ Change-Hum Policy Dimens 23(1):240–251
5. Brown J, MacLeod N (2011) A site-based approach to delivering rangeland ecosystem services. Rangel J 33(2):99–108
6. Brunson MW, Huntsinger L (2008) Ranching as a conservation strategy: can old ranchers save the new west? Rangel Ecol Manag 61(2):137–147
7. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Fire and Resource Assessment Program (2003) Changing California: forest and range 2003 assessment. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Sacramento. http://frap.fire.ca.gov/assessment/index.php. Accessed February 2014
8. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Fire and Resource Assessment Program (2010) California’s Forests and Rangelands: 2010 Assessment. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Sacramento. http://frap.fire.ca.gov/assessment/index.php. Accessed February 2014
9. Cameron DR, Marty J, Holland RF (2014) Whither the rangeland?: protection and conversion in california’s rangeland ecosystems. PLoS One 9(8):e103468
10. Charbonneau R, Kondolf GM (1993) Land use change in California, USA: nonpoint source water quality impacts. Environ Manag 17(4):453–460
11. Chen Y, Day SD, Wick AF, Strahm BD, Wiseman PE, Daniels WL (2013) Changes in soil carbon pools and microbial biomass from urban land development and subsequent post-development soil rehabilitation. Soil Biol Biochem 66:38–44
12. Connell-Buck C, Medellín-Azuara J, Lund J, Madani K (2011) Adapting California’s water system to warm vs. dry climates. Clim Change 109(1):133–149
13. Daly C, Halbleib M, Smith JI, Gibson WP, Doggett MK, Taylor GH, Curtis J, Pasteris PP (2008) Physiographically sensitive mapping of climatological temperature and precipitation across the conterminous United States. Int J Climatol 28(15):2031–2064
14. de Chazal J, Rounsevell MDA (2009) Land-use and climate change within assessments of biodiversity change: a review. Global Environ Change-Hum Policy Dimens 19(2):306–315
15. Flint L, Flint A (2012) Downscaling future climate scenarios to fine scales for hydrologic and ecological modeling and analysis. Ecol Process 1(1):2
16. Flint L, Flint A, Thorne J, Boynton R (2013) Fine-scale hydrologic modeling for regional landscape applications: the California Basin characterization model development and performance. Ecol Process 2(1):25
17. Flint LE, Flint AL (2014) California Basin characterization model: a dataset of historical and future hydrologic response to climate change. U.S. Geological Survey Dataset Release. doi:10.5066/F76T0JPB
18. Follett RF, Kimble JM, Lal R (2001) The potential of US. grazing lands to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect. CRC, Boca Raton
19. Gaman T, Firman J (2006) Oaks 2040. California Oaks Foundation, Oakland. http://www.californiaoaks.org/Oaks2040. Accessed February 2014
20. Garrison GA, Bjugstad AJ, Duncan DA, Lewis ME, Smith DR (1977) Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range ecosystems, vol 475., Agriculture HandbookDepartment of Agriculture Forest Service, Washington, DC, p 168
21. Golubiewski NE (2006) Urbanization increases grassland carbon pools: effects of landscaping in Colorado’s front range. Ecol Appl 16(2):555–571
22. GreenInfo Network (2011) California protected areas database version 1.7. http://www.calands.org/data. Accessed January 2012
23. Havstad KM, Peters DPC, Skaggs R, Brown J, Bestelmeyer B, Fredrickson E, Herrick J, Wright J (2007) Ecological services to and from rangelands of the United States. Ecol Econ 64(2):261–268
24. He M, Hogue TS (2012) Integrating hydrologic modeling and land use projections for evaluation of hydrologic response and regional water supply impacts in semi-arid environments. Environ Earth Sci 65(6):1671–1685
25. Herrick JE, Brown JR, Bestelmeyer BT, Andrews SS, Baldi G, Davies J, Duniway M, Havstad KM, Karl JW, Karlen DL, Peters DPC, Quinton JN, Riginos C, Shaver PL, Steinaker D, Twomlow S (2012) Revolutionary land use change in the 21st century: is (rangeland) science relevant? Rangel Ecol Manag 65(6):590–598
26. Homer C, Dewitz J, Fry J, Coan M, Hossain N, Larson CR, Herold N, McKerrow A, van Driel N, Wickham J (2007) Completion of the 2001 national land cover database for the conterminous United States. Photogrammetr Eng Remote Sens 73(4):337–341
27. Howard J, Merrifield M (2010) Mapping groundwater dependent ecosystems in California. PLoS ONE 5(6):e11249
28. Jantz PA, Preusser BFL, Fujikawa JK, Kuhn JA, Bersbach CJ, Gelbard JL, Davis FW (2007) Regulatory protection and conservation. In: Stromberg MR, Corbin JD, D’Antonio CM (eds) California grasslands: ecology and management. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 297–318
29. Jongsomjit D, Stralberg D, Gardali T, Salas L, Wiens J (2013) Between a rock and a hard place: the impacts of climate change and housing development on breeding birds in California. Landscape Ecol 28(2):187–200
30. Kroeger T, Casey F, Alvarez P, Cheatum M, Tavassoli L (2009) An economic analysis of the benefits of habitat conservation on California rangelands. Conservation economics white paper. Defenders of Wildlife, Washington, DC
31. Kroodsma DA, Field CB (2006) Carbon sequestration in California agriculture, 1980–2000. Ecol Appl 16(5):1975–1985
32. Lal R (2002) Soil carbon dynamics in cropland and rangeland. Environ Pollut 116(3):353–362
33. Liu S, Liu J, Young CJ, Werner JM, Wu Y, Li Z, Dahal D, Oeding J, Schmidt GL, Sohl TL, Hawbaker TJ, Sleeter BM (2012) Chapter 5. Baseline carbon storage, carbon sequestration, and greenhouse-gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems of the Western United States. In: Zhu Z, Reed BC (eds) Baseline and projected future carbon storage and greenhouse-gas fluxes in ecosystems of the Western United States. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1797, pp 1–20
34. Loveland TR, Sohl TL, Stehman SV, Gallant AL, Sayler KL, Napton DE (2002) A strategy for estimating the rates of recent United States land-cover changes. Photogrammetr Eng Remote Sens 68(10):1091–1099
35. Major J (1977) California climate in relation to vegetation. In: Barbour MG, Major J (eds) Terrestrial vegetation of California. Wiley, New York
36. Medellín-Azuara J, Howitt R, MacEwan D, Lund J (2011) Economic impacts of climate-related changes to California agriculture. Clim Change 109(1):387–405
37. Meehl GA, Covey C, Taylor KE, Delworth T, Stouffer RJ, Latif M, McAveney B, Mitchell JFB (2007) The WCRP CMIP3 multimodel dataset: a new era in climate change research. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 88(9):1383–1394. doi:10.1175/BAMS-88-9-1383
38. Melillo JM, Richmond TC, Yohe GW (eds) (2014) Climate change impacts in the United States: the third national climate assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program
39. Merenlender A, Deitch M, Feirer S (2008) Decision support tool seeks to aid stream-flow recovery and enhance water security. Calif Agric 62(4):148–155
40. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island, Washington, DC
41. Moss RH, Edmonds JA, Hibbard KA, Manning MR, Rose SK, van Vuuren DP, Carter TR, Emori S, Kainuma M, Kram T, Meehl GA, Mitchell JFB, Nakicenovic N, Riahi K, Smith SJ, Stouffer RJ, Thomson AM, Weyant JP, Wilbanks TJ (2010) The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463(7282):747–756
42. Nakicenovic N, Swart R (eds) (2000) Special report on emissions scenarios: a special report of working group III of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
43. Natural Resources Conservation Service (2006) U.S. general soil map (SSURGO/STATSGO2). http://www.ftw.nrcs.usda.gov/stat_data.html, http://soils.usda.gov/survey/geography/statsgo/description.html. Accessed October 2, 2014
44. Polade SD, Pierce DW, Cayan DR, Gershunov A, Dettinger MD (2014) The key role of dry days in changing regional climate and precipitation regimes. Nat Sci Rep 4:4364
45. Potthoff M, Jackson LE, Steenwerth KL, Ramirez I, Stromberg MR, Rolston DE (2005) Soil biological and chemical properties in restored perennial grassland in California. Restor Ecol 13(1):61–73
46. Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
47. Radeloff VC, Nelson E, Plantinga AJ, Lewis DJ, Helmers D, Lawler JJ, Withey JC, Beaudry F, Martinuzzi S, Butsic V, Lonsdorf E, White D, Polasky S (2012) Economic-based projections of future land use in the conterminous United States under alternative policy scenarios. Ecol Appl 22(3):1036–1049
48. SAS Institute Inc. (2002–2010) SAS 9.3. Cary, NC
49. Scanlon BR, Reedy RC, Stonestrom DA, Prudic DE, Dennehy KF (2005) Impact of land use and land cover change on groundwater recharge and quality in the southwestern US. Glob Change Biol 11(10):1577–1593
50. Shaw MR, Pendleton L, Cameron DR, Morris B, Bachelet D, Klausmeyer K, MacKenzie J, Conklin DR, Bratman GN, Lenihan J, Haunreiter E, Daly C, Roehrdanz PR (2009) The impact of climate change on California’s ecosystem services. California Energy Commission Scenarios Report. CEC-500-2009-025-D
51. Shaw MR, Pendleton L, Cameron DR, Morris B, Bachelet D, Klausmeyer K, MacKenzie J, Conklin DR, Bratman GN, Lenihan J, Haunreiter E, Daly C, Roehrdanz PR (2011) The impact of climate change on California’s ecosystem services. Climatic Change 109(1):465–484
52. Silver WL, Ryals R, Eviner V (2010) Soil carbon pools in California’s annual grassland ecosystems. Rangel Ecol Manag 63(1):128–136
53. Sleeter BM (2008) Late 20th century land change in the Central California Valley ecoregion. Calif Geographer 48:27–60
54. Sleeter BM, Wilson TS, Soulard CE, Liu J (2011) Estimation of late twentieth century land-cover change in California. Environ Monit Assess 173(1–4):251–266
55. Sleeter BM, Sohl TL, Bouchard MA, Reker RR, Soulard CE, Acevedo W, Griffith G, Sleeter RR, Auch RF, Sayler KL, Prisley S, Zhu Z (2012) Scenarios of land use and land cover change in the conterminous United States: utilizing the special report on emission scenarios at ecoregional scales. Glob Environ Change 22(4):896–914
56. Society for Range Management (1998) Glossary of terms used in range management (4th edn). https://globalrangelands.org/rangelandswest/glossary/i?order=title&sort=desc&term=. Accessed October 2, 2014 (edited by Glossary Update Task Group, Thomas E. Bedell, Chairman)
57. Sohl TL, Sleeter BM, Zhu Z, Sayler KL, Bennett S, Bouchard M, Reker R, Hawbaker T, Wein A, Liu S, Kanengieter R, Acevedo W (2012) A land-use and land-cover modeling strategy to support a national assessment of carbon stocks and fluxes. Appl Geogr 34:111–124
58. Sohl TL, Sayler KL, Bouchard MA, Reker RR, Friesz AM, Bennett SL, Sleeter BM, Sleeter RR, Wilson T, Soulard C, Knuppe M, Van Hofwegen T (2014) Spatially explicit modeling of 1992 to 2100 land cover and forest stand age for the conterminous United States. Ecol Appl 24(5):1015–1036
59. Soulard CE, Wilson TS (2015) Recent land-use/land-cover change in the Central California Valley. J Land Use Sci 10(1):59–80
60. StataCorp LP (1985–2011) Stata/SE 12.1. StataCorp LP, College Station
61. State of California Department of Finance (2013) Report P-1 (County): State and County Total Population Projections, 2010–2060. Sacramento. http://www.dof.ca.gov/research/demographic/reports/projections/p-1/. Accessed January 2014
62. Strengers B, Leemans R, Eickhout B, Vries B, Bouwman L (2004) The land-use projections and resulting emissions in the IPCC SRES scenarios as simulated by the IMAGE 2.2 model. GeoJournal 61(4):381–393
63. The Nature Conservancy (2007) California rangeland conservation coalition biological prioritization of rangelands: approach and methods. http://www.carangeland.org/images/Appraoch_and_Methods.pdf. Accessed January 2012
64. Theobald DM (2005) Landscape patterns of exurban growth in the USA from 1980 to 2020. Ecol Soc 10(1):32
65. U.S. Endowment for Forestry and Communities (2011) National conservation easement database. http://conservationeasement.us/. Accessed January 2012
66. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2009) Land-use scenarios: national-scale housing-density scenarios consistent with climate change storylines (final report). EPA/600/R-08/076f. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
67. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2013) Primary distinguishing characteristics of level III ecoregions of the continental United States. http://www.epa.gov/wed/pages/ecoregions/level_iii_iv.htm. Accessed March 2014
68. Vogelmann JE, Howard SM, Yang L, Larson CR, Wylie BK, van Driel N (2001) Completion of the 1990s national land cover data set for the conterminous United States. Photogrammetr Eng Remote Sens 67(6):650–652
69. Vuuren D, Edmonds J, Kainuma M, Riahi K, Thomson A, Hibbard K, Hurtt G, Kram T, Krey V, Lamarque J-F, Masui T, Meinshausen M, Nakicenovic N, Smith S, Rose S (2011) The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Clim Change 109(1–2):5–31
70. Weltz MA, Jolley L, Goodrich D, Boykin K, Nearing M, Stone J, Guertin P, Hernandez M, Spaeth K, Pierson F, Morris C, Kepner B (2011) Techniques for assessing the environmental outcomes of conservation practices applied to rangeland watersheds. J Soil Water Conserv 66(5):154A–162A
71. Zhu Z, Reed BC (2012) Baseline and projected future carbon storage and greenhouse-gas fluxes in ecosystems of the Western United States. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1797. http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/1797/. Accessed February 2014