What drives environmental practices of SMEs?

Small Business Economics

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 759-781

  Hoogendoorn, Brigitte ^a   Guerra, Daniela ^b   van der Zwan, Peter ^a  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TÉCNICO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Corporate social responsibility; Environmental practice; Eurobarometer; SME; Stakeholder theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925541293     PISSN: 0921898X     EISSN: 15730913     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11187-014-9618-9     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Almazan, A., Suarez, J., & Titman, S. (2009). Firms’ stakeholders and the costs of transparency. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy,18(3), 871–900.
2. Ancona, D. G., Okhuysen, G. A., & Perlow, L. A. (2001). Taking time to integrate temporal research. Academy of Management Review,26(4), 512–529.
3. Ang, J. S. (1991). Small business uniqueness and the theory of financial management. Journal of Small Business Finance,1(1), 1–13.
4. Aragón-Correa, J. A., Hurtado-Torres, N., Sharma, S., & García-Morales, V. J. (2008). Environmental strategy and performance in small firms: A resource-based perspective. Journal of Environmental Management,86(1), 88–103.
5. Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2003). A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Academy of Management Review,28(1), 71–88.
6. Baden, D. A., Harwood, I. A., & Woodward, D. G. (2009). The effect of buyer pressure on suppliers in SMEs to demonstrate CSR practices: An added incentive or counterproductive? European Management Journal,27(6), 429–441.
7. Bansal, P., & Hoffman, A. J. (2012). The Oxford handbook of business and the natural environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. (1998). The economics of small business finance: The roles of private equity and debt markets in the financial growth cycle. Journal of Banking & Finance,22(6), 613–673.
9. Bianchi, R., & Noci, G. (1998). Greening SMEs’ competitiveness. Small Business Economics,11, 269–281.
10. Block, J. H., & Wagner, M. (2014). The effect of family ownership on different dimensions of corporate social responsibility: Evidence from large US firms. Business Strategy and the Environment,23, 475–492.
11. Bradford, J., & Fraser, E. D. G. (2008). Local authorities, climate change and small and medium enterprises: Identifying effective policy instruments to reduce energy use and carbon emissions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environment Management,15(3), 156–172.
12. Brand, M. J., & Dam, L. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in small firms—illusion or big business? Empirical evidence from the Netherlands. RENT 2009 conference, Budapest, Hungary.
13. Brant, R. (1990). Assessing proportionality in the proportional odds model for ordinal logistic regression. Biometrics,46, 1171–1178.
14. Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal,24(5), 453–470.
15. Buzzelli, D. T. (1991). Time to structure an environmental policy strategy. Journal of Business Strategy,12(2), 17–20.
16. Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review,32(3), 946–967.
17. Carrington, M. J., Neville, B. A., & Whitwell, G. J. (2010). Why ethical consumers don’t walk their talk: Towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers. Journal of Business Ethics,97(1), 139–158.
18. Chen, M. J., & Hambrick, D. C. (1995). Speed, stealth, and selective attack: How small firms differ from large firms in competitive behavior. Academy of Management Journal,38(2), 453–482.
19. Child, J. (1972). Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology,6(1), 1–22.
20. Child, J. (1997). Strategic choice in the analysis of action, structure, organizations and environment: Retrospect and prospect. Organization Studies,18(1), 43–76.
21. Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review,20(1), 92–117.
22. Coglianese, C., & Anderson, A. (2012). Business and environmental law. In P. Bansal & A. J. Hoffman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of business and the natural environment (pp. 140–157). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Cohen, B., & Winn, M. I. (2007). Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing,22(1), 29–49.
24. Côté, R., Booth, A., & Louis, B. (2006). Eco-efficiency and SMEs in Nova Scotia, Canada. Journal of Cleaner Production,14(6), 542–550.
25. Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology,24(4), 349.
26. Dacin, P. A., Dacin, M. T., & Matear, M. (2010). Social entrepreneurship: Why we don’t need a new theory and how we move forward from here. Academy of Management Perspectives,24(2), 36–56.
27. Dean, T. J., & McMullen, J. S. (2007). Toward a theory of sustainable entrepreneurship: Reducing environmental degradation through entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing,22(1), 50–76.
28. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review,20(1), 65–91.
29. European Commission. (2010). SMEs and the Environment in the European Union. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
30. European Commission. (2012a). Evaluation of the SME definition. UK: Center for Strategy & Evaluation Services.
31. European Commission. (2012b). Green public procurement. A collection of good practices. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
32. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic planning: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
33. Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine.
34. Gadenne, D. L., Kennedy, J., & McKeiver, C. (2009). An empirical study of environmental awareness and practices in SMEs. Journal of Business Ethics,84(1), 45–63.
35. Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics,53(1–2), 51–71.
36. Gershoff, A. D., & Irwin, J. R. (2012). Why not choose green? Consumer decision making for environmentally friendly products. In P. Bansal & A. J. Hoffman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of business and the natural environment (pp. 366–383). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. Graafland, J., Van de Ven, B., & Stoffele, N. (2003). Strategies and instruments for organizing CSR by small and large businesses in the Netherlands. Journal of Business Ethics,47(1), 45–60.
38. Halme, M., & Laurila, J. (2009). Philanthropy, integration or innovation? Exploring the financial and societal outcomes of different types of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics,84(3), 325–339.
39. Harwood, I., & Humby, S. (2008). Embedding corporate responsibility into supply: A snapshot of progress. European Management Journal,26(3), 166–174.
40. Hill, R. C., & Adkins, L. C. (2001). Collinearity. In B. Baltagi (Ed.), A companion to theoretical econometrics (pp. 256–278). UK: Blackwell Publishing.
41. Hockerts, K., & Wüstenhagen, R. (2010). Greening Goliaths versus emerging Davids—Theorizing about the role of incumbents and new entrants in sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing,25(5), 481–492.
42. Horbach, J. (2008). Determinants of environmental innovation—new evidence from German panel data sources. Research Policy,37(1), 163–173.
43. Jamali, D. (2008). A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility: A fresh perspective into theory and practice. Journal of Business Ethics,82(1), 213–231.
44. Jenkins, H. (2006). Small business champions for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics,67(3), 241–256.
45. Jensen, M. C. (1988). Takeovers: Their causes and consequences. The Journal of Economic Perspectives,2(1), 21–48.
46. Kaenzig, J., & Wüstenhagen, R. (2010). The effect of life cycle cost information on consumer investment decisions regarding eco-innovation. Journal of Industrial Ecology,14(1), 121–136.
47. Kassinis, G. (2012). The value of managing stakeholders. In P. Bansal & A. J. Hoffman (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Business and the Natural Environment (pp. 83–100). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48. Lee, K. S., Lim, G. H., & Tan, S. J. (1999). Dealing with resource disadvantage: Generic strategies for SMEs. Small Business Economics,12(4), 299–311.
49. Lepoutre, J. M., & Heene, A. (2006). Investigating the impact of firm size on small business social responsibility: A critical review. Journal of Business Ethics,67(3), 257–273.
50. Lepoutre, J. M., & Valente, M. (2012). Fools breaking out: The role of symbolic and material immunity in explaining institutional nonconformity. Academy of Management Journal,55(2), 285–313.
51. Lescure, M. (1999). Small- and medium-size industrial enterprises in France, 1900–1975. In K. Odaka & M. Sawai (Eds.), Small firms, large concerns: The development of small business in comparative perspective (pp. 140–167). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52. Lindeboom, M., & Van Doorslaer, E. (2004). Cut-point shift and index shift in self-reported health. Journal of Health Economics, 23(6), 1083–1099.
53. Mair, J., & Martí, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business,41(1), 36–44.
54. Manderson, E., & Kneller, R. (2012). Environmental regulations, outward FDI and heterogeneous firms: Are countries used as pollution havens? Environmental & Resource Economics,51(3), 317–352.
55. Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H. A., & Walsh, J. P. (2007). Does it pay to be good? A meta-analysis and redirection of research on the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Ann Arbor,1001, 48109.
56. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review,26(1), 117–127.
57. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review,22(4), 853–886.
58. Nederhof, A. J. (1985). Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. European Journal of Social Psychology,15(3), 263–280.
59. Neubaum, D., Mitchell, M., & Schminke, M. (2004). Firm newness, entrepreneurial orientation, and ethical climate. Journal of Business Ethics,52(4), 335–347.
60. Nidumolu, R., Prahalad, C. K., & Rangaswami, M. R. (2009). Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. Harvard Business Review,87(9), 56–64.
61. Ogden, S., & Watson, R. (1999). Corporate performance and stakeholder management: Balancing shareholder and customer interests in the UK privatized water industry. Academy of Management Journal,42(5), 526–538.
62. Orsato, R. J. (2006). Competitive environmental strategies: When does it pay to be green? California Management Review,48(2), 127–143.
63. Pacheco, D. F., Dean, T. J., & Payne, D. S. (2010). Escaping the green prison: Entrepreneurship and the creation of opportunities for sustainable development. Journal of Business Venturing,25(5), 464–480.
64. Perrini, F. (2006). SMEs and CSR theory: Evidence and implications from an Italian perspective. Journal of Business Ethics,67(3), 305–316.
65. Perrini, F., Russo, A., & Tencati, A. (2007). CSR strategies of SMEs and large firms. Evidence from Italy. Journal of Business Ethics,74(3), 285–300.
66. Pimenova, P., & van der Vorst, R. (2004). The role of support programmes and policies in improving SMEs environmental performance in developed and transition economies. Journal of Cleaner Production,12(6), 549–559.
67. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. (2006). Strategy and society. Harvard Business Review,84(12), 78–92.
68. Porter, M. E., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. The Journal of Economic Perspectives,9(4), 97–118.
69. Quinn, J. J. (1997). Personal ethics and business ethics: The ethical attitudes of owner/managers of small business. Journal of Business Ethics,16(2), 119–127.
70. Roberts, S., Lawson, R., & Nicholls, J. (2006). Generating regional-scale improvements in SME corporate responsibility performance: Lessons from responsibility Northwest. Journal of Business Ethics,67, 275–286.
71. Rodriguez, P., Siegel, D. S., Hillman, A., & Eden, L. (2006). Three lenses on the multinational enterprise: Politics, corruption, and corporate social responsibility. Journal of International Business Studies,37(6), 733–746.
72. Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal,40(3), 534–559.
73. Russo, A., & Perrini, F. (2010). Investigating stakeholder theory and social capital: CSR in large firms and SMEs. Journal of Business Ethics,91(2), 207–221.
74. Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review,25(1), 217–226.
75. Sharma, S., & Henriques, I. (2005). Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strategic Management Journal,26(2), 159–180.
76. Simpson, M., Taylor, N., & Barker, K. (2004). Environmental responsibility in SMEs: Does it deliver competitive advantage? Business Strategy and the Environment,13(3), 156–171.
77. Sine, W. D., & Lee, B. H. (2009). Tilting at windmills? The environmental movement and the emergence of the US wind energy sector. Administrative Science Quarterly,54(1), 123–155.
78. Spence, L. J. (1999). Does size matter? The state of the art in small business ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review, 8(3), 163–174.
79. Spence, L. J., & Rutherfoord, R. (2003). Small business and empirical perspectives in business ethics: Editorial. Journal of Business Ethics,47(1), 1–5.
80. Storey, D. J., & Greene, F. J. (2010). Small business and entrepreneurship. Harlow, UK: Financial Times Prentice Hall.
81. Strike, V. M., Gao, J., & Bansal, P. (2006). Being good while being bad: Social responsibility and the international diversification of US firms. Journal of International Business Studies,37(6), 850–862.
82. Tilley, F. J. (1999). Small-firm environmental strategy: The UK experience. In Greener management international spring, pp 1–14.
83. Uhlaner, L. M., Berent-Braun, M. M., Jeurissen, R. J., & de Wit, G. (2012). Beyond size: Predicting engagement in environmental management practices of Dutch SMEs. Journal of Business Ethics,109(4), 411–429.
84. United Nations (2012). UNEP annual report 2005.
85. van Marrewijk, M. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics,44(2–3), 95–105.
86. Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2006). Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer “attitude–behavioral intention” gap. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics,19(2), 169–194.
87. WCED: World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future (the Brundtlandt report). New York: Oxford University Press.
88. Weber, K., Heinze, K. L., & DeSoucey, M. (2008). Forage for thought: Mobilizing codes in the movement for grass-fed meat and dairy products. Administrative Science Quarterly,53(3), 529–567.
89. Williamson, O. E. (1991). Strategizing, economizing, and economic organization. Strategic Management Journal,12(S2), 75–94.
90. Williamson, D., Lynch-Wood, G., & Ramsay, J. (2006). Drivers of environmental behavior in manufacturing SMEs and the implications for CSR. Journal of Business Ethics,67(3), 317–330.
91. Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review,16(4), 691–718.
92. York, J. G., & Venkataraman, S. (2010). The entrepreneur-environment nexus: Uncertainty, innovation, and allocation. Journal of Business Venturing,25(5), 449–463.
93. Zahra, S. A., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D. O., & Shulman, J. M. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing,24(5), 519–532.