-
1
-
-
2342475760
-
A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer
-
Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med.2004;350:2050–9.
-
(2004)
N Engl J Med
, vol.350
, pp. 2050-2059
-
-
Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group1
-
2
-
-
21344468396
-
Laparoscopic surgery vs. open surgery for colon cancer: shortterm outcomes of a randomised trial
-
PID: 15992696
-
Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, et al. Laparoscopic surgery vs. open surgery for colon cancer: shortterm outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol.2005;6:477–84.
-
(2005)
Lancet Oncol
, vol.6
, pp. 477-484
-
-
Veldkamp, R.1
Kuhry, E.2
Hop, W.C.3
Jeekel, J.4
Kazemier, G.5
Bonjer, H.J.6
-
3
-
-
19344368841
-
Short-term endpoints of conventional vs. laparoscopic assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRCCLASSIC trial): multicenter, randomised controlled trial
-
PID: 15894098
-
Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional vs. laparoscopic assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRCCLASSIC trial): multicenter, randomised controlled trial. Lancet.2005;365:1718–26.
-
(2005)
Lancet.
, vol.365
, pp. 1718-1726
-
-
Guillou, P.J.1
Quirke, P.2
Thorpe, H.3
Walker, J.4
Jayne, D.G.5
Smith, A.M.6
-
4
-
-
60549108220
-
The uptake of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in Great Britain and Ireland: a questionnaire survey of consultant members of the ACPGBI
-
COI: 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1M7nslCmsA%3D%3D, PID: 18573117
-
Schwab KE, Dowson HM, Van Dellen J, et al. The uptake of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in Great Britain and Ireland: a questionnaire survey of consultant members of the ACPGBI. Colorectal Dis. 2009; 11:318–322.
-
(2009)
Colorectal Dis.
, vol.11
, pp. 318-322
-
-
Schwab, K.E.1
Dowson, H.M.2
Van Dellen, J.3
-
5
-
-
0019977792
-
The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence?
-
COI: 1:STN:280:DyaL3s%2Fitl2nsw%3D%3D, PID: 6751457
-
Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 1982;69:613–6.
-
(1982)
Br J Surg
, vol.69
, pp. 613-616
-
-
Heald, R.J.1
Husband, E.M.2
Ryall, R.D.3
-
6
-
-
24044439177
-
Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: outcomes in 194 patients and review of the literature
-
PID: 15868256
-
Bärlehner E, Benhidjeb T, Anders S, Schicke B. Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: outcomes in 194 patients and review of the literature. Surg Endosc 2005;19:757–766
-
(2005)
Surg Endosc
, vol.19
, pp. 757-766
-
-
Bärlehner, E.1
Benhidjeb, T.2
Anders, S.3
Schicke, B.4
-
7
-
-
24644489032
-
The oncological safety of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with sphincter preservation for rectal carcinoma
-
Bretagnol F, Lelong B, Laurent C, Moutardier V, Rullier A, Monges G, Delpero JR, Rullier E. The oncological safety of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with sphincter preservation for rectal carcinoma. Surg Endosc 19:892–896
-
Surg Endosc
, vol.19
, pp. 892-896
-
-
Bretagnol, F.1
Lelong, B.2
Laurent, C.3
Moutardier, V.4
Rullier, A.5
Monges, G.6
Delpero, J.R.7
Rullier, E.8
-
8
-
-
34547695782
-
Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma:3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group
-
PID: 17634484
-
Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Quirke P, Copeland J, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM; UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma:3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 2007;25(21):3061–3068.
-
(2007)
J Clin Oncol
, vol.25
, Issue.21
, pp. 3061-3068
-
-
Jayne, D.G.1
Guillou, P.J.2
Thorpe, H.3
Quirke, P.4
Copeland, J.5
Smith, A.M.6
Heath, R.M.7
Brown, J.M.8
UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group9
-
9
-
-
1542289131
-
Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer surgery: long-term outcomes
-
COI: 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c7kvFeluw%3D%3D, PID: 14691716
-
Leroy J, Jamali F, Forbes L, Smith M, Rubino F, Mutter D, Marescaux J. Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer surgery: long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 2004;18:281–289
-
(2004)
Surg Endosc
, vol.18
, pp. 281-289
-
-
Leroy, J.1
Jamali, F.2
Forbes, L.3
Smith, M.4
Rubino, F.5
Mutter, D.6
Marescaux, J.7
-
10
-
-
27944456499
-
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for extraperitoneal rectal cancer: a prospective comparative study
-
COI: 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MnkslCjsw%3D%3D, PID: 16206013
-
Morino M, Allaix ME, Giraudo G, Corno F, Garrone C. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for extraperitoneal rectal cancer: a prospective comparative study. Surg Endosc 2005;19:1460–1467
-
(2005)
Surg Endosc
, vol.19
, pp. 1460-1467
-
-
Morino, M.1
Allaix, M.E.2
Giraudo, G.3
Corno, F.4
Garrone, C.5
-
11
-
-
77954034104
-
Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial
-
PID: 20610322
-
Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, Nam BH, Choi HS, Kim DW, et al.Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2010;11:637–645
-
(2010)
Lancet Oncol
, vol.11
, pp. 637-645
-
-
Kang, S.B.1
Park, J.W.2
Jeong, S.Y.3
Nam, B.H.4
Choi, H.S.5
Kim, D.W.6
-
12
-
-
3543038158
-
Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer
-
PID: 15457380
-
Zhou ZG, Hu M, Li Y, Lei WZ, Yu YY, Cheng Z, et al. Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2004;18:1211–1215
-
(2004)
Surg Endosc
, vol.18
, pp. 1211-1215
-
-
Zhou, Z.G.1
Hu, M.2
Li, Y.3
Lei, W.Z.4
Yu, Y.Y.5
Cheng, Z.6
-
13
-
-
84876297927
-
Laparoscopy for rectal cancer reduces short-term mortality and morbidity: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis
-
PID: 23183871
-
Arezzo A, Passera R, Scozzari G, Verra M, Morino M. Laparoscopy for rectal cancer reduces short-term mortality and morbidity: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(5):1485–502.
-
(2013)
Surg Endosc
, vol.27
, Issue.5
, pp. 1485-1502
-
-
Arezzo, A.1
Passera, R.2
Scozzari, G.3
Verra, M.4
Morino, M.5
-
14
-
-
84874392362
-
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies comparing laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer
-
COI: 1:STN:280:DC%2BC38bltVynug%3D%3D, PID: 22958456
-
Ahmad NZ, Racheva G, Elmusharaf H. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies comparing laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15(3):269–77.
-
(2013)
Colorectal Dis
, vol.15
, Issue.3
, pp. 269-277
-
-
Ahmad, N.Z.1
Racheva, G.2
Elmusharaf, H.3
-
15
-
-
84867016877
-
Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for middle and low rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of results of randomized controlled trials
-
PID: 22881123
-
Xiong B, Ma L, Zhang C. Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for middle and low rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of results of randomized controlled trials. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012;22(7):674–84.
-
(2012)
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A
, vol.22
, Issue.7
, pp. 674-684
-
-
Xiong, B.1
Ma, L.2
Zhang, C.3
-
16
-
-
84860769276
-
Laparoscopic vs open resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
-
COI: 1:STN:280:DC%2BC38vivVygtA%3D%3D, PID: 22330061
-
Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, Listorti C, Cavaliere D, Avenia N, Gullà N, Giustozzi G, Sciannameo F, Noya G, Boselli C. Laparoscopic vs open resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Colorectal Dis.2012;14(6):e277-96.
-
(2012)
Colorectal Dis
, vol.14
, Issue.6
, pp. 277-296
-
-
Trastulli, S.1
Cirocchi, R.2
Listorti, C.3
Cavaliere, D.4
Avenia, N.5
Gullà, N.6
Giustozzi, G.7
Sciannameo, F.8
Noya, G.9
Boselli, C.10
-
17
-
-
79960835736
-
Ameta-analysis of the short- and long-term results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopy-assisted and conventional open surgery for rectal cancer
-
PID: 21557014
-
Ohtani H, Tamamori Y, Azuma T, Mori Y, Nishiguchi Y, Maeda K, Hirakawa K. Ameta-analysis of the short- and long-term results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopy-assisted and conventional open surgery for rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15(8):1375–85.
-
(2011)
J Gastrointest Surg
, vol.15
, Issue.8
, pp. 1375-1385
-
-
Ohtani, H.1
Tamamori, Y.2
Azuma, T.3
Mori, Y.4
Nishiguchi, Y.5
Maeda, K.6
Hirakawa, K.7
-
18
-
-
79960133150
-
Laparoscopic-assisted versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on oncologic adequacy of resection and long-term oncologic outcomes
-
PID: 21174107
-
Huang MJ, Liang JL, Wang H, Kang L, Deng YH, Wang JP. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on oncologic adequacy of resection and long-term oncologic outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26(4):415–21.
-
(2011)
Int J Colorectal Dis
, vol.26
, Issue.4
, pp. 415-421
-
-
Huang, M.J.1
Liang, J.L.2
Wang, H.3
Kang, L.4
Deng, Y.H.5
Wang, J.P.6
-
19
-
-
33749015222
-
Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer
-
PID: 16463181
-
Gao F, Cao YF, Chen LS. Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2006;21(7):652–6.
-
(2006)
Int J Colorectal Dis
, vol.21
, Issue.7
, pp. 652-656
-
-
Gao, F.1
Cao, Y.F.2
Chen, L.S.3
-
20
-
-
32844469297
-
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis
-
PID: 16450220
-
Aziz O, Constantinides V, Tekkis PP, Athanasiou T, Purkayastha S, Paraskeva P, Darzi AW, Heriot AG. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13(3):413–24.
-
(2006)
Ann Surg Oncol
, vol.13
, Issue.3
, pp. 413-424
-
-
Aziz, O.1
Constantinides, V.2
Tekkis, P.P.3
Athanasiou, T.4
Purkayastha, S.5
Paraskeva, P.6
Darzi, A.W.7
Heriot, A.G.8
-
21
-
-
65249097696
-
The current status of robotic pelvic surgery: results of a multinational interdisciplinary consensus conference
-
PID: 19037694
-
Wexner SD, Bergamaschi R, Lacy A, Udo J, Bro¨lmann H, Kennedy RH, John H. The current status of robotic pelvic surgery: results of a multinational interdisciplinary consensus conference. Surg Endosc 2009;23:438–443
-
(2009)
Surg Endosc
, vol.23
, pp. 438-443
-
-
Wexner, S.D.1
Bergamaschi, R.2
Lacy, A.3
Udo, J.4
Bro¨lmann, H.5
Kennedy, R.H.6
John, H.7
-
22
-
-
33748995409
-
Robotic assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer
-
COI: 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28rmtlCmsg%3D%3D, PID: 16897284
-
Pigazzi A, Ellenhorn JD, Ballantyne GH, Paz IB.Robotic assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2006; 20:1521–1525
-
(2006)
Surg Endosc
, vol.20
, pp. 1521-1525
-
-
Pigazzi, A.1
Ellenhorn, J.D.2
Ballantyne, G.H.3
Paz, I.B.4
-
23
-
-
84867877645
-
Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of short outcomes
-
PID: 22789391
-
Xiong BH, Ma L, Zhang CQ. Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of short outcomes. Surg Oncol. 2012;21(4):274–80.
-
(2012)
Surg Oncol
, vol.21
, Issue.4
, pp. 274-280
-
-
Xiong, B.H.1
Ma, L.2
Zhang, C.Q.3
-
24
-
-
0034685429
-
Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Metaanalysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group
-
COI: 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3kvVGgsA%3D%3D, PID: 10789670
-
Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Metaanalysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283: 2008–12.
-
(2000)
JAMA.
, vol.283
, pp. 2008-2012
-
-
Stroup, D.F.1
Berlin, J.A.2
Morton, S.C.3
-
25
-
-
85100415918
-
Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.1.0. Updated March 2011
-
Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.1.0. Updated March 2011. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. http://www.cochrane-handbook.org.
-
(2011)
The Cochrane Collaboration
-
-
Higgins, J.P.T.1
Green, S.2
-
26
-
-
84905036433
-
-
GA Wells, B Shea, D O’Connell, J Peterson, V Welch, M Losos, P Tugwell
-
GA Wells, B Shea, D O’Connell, J Peterson, V Welch, M Losos, P Tugwell. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses.http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp
-
The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses.
-
-
-
27
-
-
0037098199
-
Quantifying heterogeneity in a metaanalysis
-
PID: 12111919
-
Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a metaanalysis. Stat Med. 2002;21:1539–58.
-
(2002)
Stat Med.
, vol.21
, pp. 1539-1558
-
-
Higgins, J.P.1
Thompson, S.G.2
-
28
-
-
0022992740
-
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
-
COI: 1:STN:280:DyaL2s7gsVamtA%3D%3D, PID: 3802833
-
DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7:177–88.
-
(1986)
Control Clin Trials.
, vol.7
, pp. 177-188
-
-
DerSimonian, R.1
Laird, N.2
-
29
-
-
51749125563
-
Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial
-
COI: 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1czmvVWhsQ%3D%3D, PID: 18270772
-
Baik SH, Ko YT, Kang CM, et al. Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1601–8.
-
(2008)
Surg Endosc.
, vol.22
, pp. 1601-1608
-
-
Baik, S.H.1
Ko, Y.T.2
Kang, C.M.3
-
30
-
-
67349091700
-
Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study
-
PID: 19290486
-
Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16: 1480–7
-
(2009)
Ann Surg Oncol.
, vol.16
, pp. 1480-1487
-
-
Baik, S.H.1
Kwon, H.Y.2
Kim, J.S.3
-
31
-
-
79551680102
-
Optimal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: the Role of Robotic Surgery from an Expert’s View
-
PID: 21221237
-
Kim NK, Kang J. Optimal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: the Role of Robotic Surgery from an Expert’s View. J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26(6):377–87.
-
(2010)
J Korean Soc Coloproctol
, vol.26
, Issue.6
, pp. 377-387
-
-
Kim, N.K.1
Kang, J.2
-
32
-
-
84864999318
-
A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery
-
PID: 22434245
-
Kim JY, Kim NK, Lee KY, Hur H, Min BS, Kim JH. A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol.2012;19(8):2485–93.
-
(2012)
Ann Surg Oncol
, vol.19
, Issue.8
, pp. 2485-2493
-
-
Kim, J.Y.1
Kim, N.K.2
Lee, K.Y.3
Hur, H.4
Min, B.S.5
Kim, J.H.6
-
33
-
-
84867866386
-
The learning curve for robot-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer
-
PID: 23047381
-
Kim YW, Lee HM, Kim NK, Min BS, Lee KY. The learning curve for robot-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012;22(5):400–5.
-
(2012)
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech
, vol.22
, Issue.5
, pp. 400-405
-
-
Kim, Y.W.1
Lee, H.M.2
Kim, N.K.3
Min, B.S.4
Lee, K.Y.5
-
34
-
-
84892809686
-
May 25
-
Baek SJ, Al-Asari S, Jeong DH, Hur H, Min BS, Baik SH, Kim NK. Robotic versus laparoscopic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2013 May 25. [Epub ahead of print]
-
(2013)
[Epub ahead of print]
-
-
Baek, S.J.1
Al-Asari, S.2
Jeong, D.H.3
Hur, H.4
Min, B.S.5
Baik, S.H.6
-
35
-
-
84871612052
-
The impact of robotic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer: a case-matched analysis of a 3-arm comparison—open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery
-
PID: 23059496
-
Kang J, Yoon KJ, Min BS, Hur H, Baik SH, Kim NK, Lee KY. The impact of robotic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer: a case-matched analysis of a 3-arm comparison—open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery. Ann Surg. 2013;257(1):95–101.
-
(2013)
Ann Surg
, vol.257
, Issue.1
, pp. 95-101
-
-
Kang, J.1
Yoon, K.J.2
Min, B.S.3
Hur, H.4
Baik, S.H.5
Kim, N.K.6
Lee, K.Y.7
-
36
-
-
78650976043
-
Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer: case-matched analysis of short-term outcomes
-
PID: 20589436
-
Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, Jang YS, Jun SH. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer: case-matched analysis of short-term outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(12):3195–202.
-
(2010)
Ann Surg Oncol
, vol.17
, Issue.12
, pp. 3195-3202
-
-
Park, J.S.1
Choi, G.S.2
Lim, K.H.3
Jang, Y.S.4
Jun, S.H.5
-
37
-
-
84871959509
-
Short-term clinical outcome of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a retrospective comparison with conventional laparoscopy
-
PID: 22752275
-
Park SY, Choi GS, Park JS, Kim HJ, Ryuk JP. Short-term clinical outcome of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a retrospective comparison with conventional laparoscopy. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(1):48–55.
-
(2013)
Surg Endosc
, vol.27
, Issue.1
, pp. 48-55
-
-
Park, S.Y.1
Choi, G.S.2
Park, J.S.3
Kim, H.J.4
Ryuk, J.P.5
-
38
-
-
79251626834
-
S052: a comparison of robot assisted, laparoscopic, and open surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer
-
PID: 20552367
-
Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, et al. S052: a comparison of robot assisted, laparoscopic, and open surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:240–8.
-
(2011)
Surg Endosc.
, vol.25
, pp. 240-248
-
-
Park, J.S.1
Choi, G.S.2
Lim, K.H.3
-
39
-
-
78651410155
-
Robotic vs laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcomes of a case-control study
-
PID: 21228661
-
Kwak JM, Kim SH, Kim J, Son DN, Baek SJ, Cho JS. Robotic vs laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcomes of a case-control study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(2):151–6.
-
(2011)
Dis Colon Rectum
, vol.54
, Issue.2
, pp. 151-156
-
-
Kwak, J.M.1
Kim, S.H.2
Kim, J.3
Son, D.N.4
Baek, S.J.5
Cho, J.S.6
-
40
-
-
84867850723
-
Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a cost analysis from a single institute in Korea
-
PID: 22855217
-
Baek SJ, Kim SH, Cho JS, Shin JW, Kim J. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a cost analysis from a single institute in Korea. World J Surg. 2012;36(11):2722–9
-
(2012)
World J Surg
, vol.36
, Issue.11
, pp. 2722-2729
-
-
Baek, S.J.1
Kim, S.H.2
Cho, J.S.3
Shin, J.W.4
Kim, J.5
-
41
-
-
79954604169
-
Robotic and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a case-matched study
-
PID: 20607559
-
Baek JH, Pastor C, Pigazzi A. Robotic and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a case-matched study. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:521–5.
-
(2011)
Surg Endosc.
, vol.25
, pp. 521-525
-
-
Baek, J.H.1
Pastor, C.2
Pigazzi, A.3
-
42
-
-
69849101026
-
Short- and medium-term outcome of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic rectal resection
-
PID: 19660212
-
Patriti A, Ceccarelli G, Bartoli A, Spaziani A, Biancafarina A, Casciola L. Short- and medium-term outcome of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic rectal resection. JSLS 2009; 13: 176–183
-
(2009)
JSLS
, vol.13
, pp. 176-183
-
-
Patriti, A.1
Ceccarelli, G.2
Bartoli, A.3
Spaziani, A.4
Biancafarina, A.5
Casciola, L.6
-
43
-
-
78650220966
-
Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes
-
COI: 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3cfpslKiuw%3D%3D, PID: 20526623
-
Bianchi PP, Ceriani C, Locatelli A, Spinoglio G, Zampino MG, Sonzogni A, Crosta C, Andreoni B. Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 2888–2894
-
(2010)
Surg Endosc
, vol.24
, pp. 2888-2894
-
-
Bianchi, P.P.1
Ceriani, C.2
Locatelli, A.3
Spinoglio, G.4
Zampino, M.G.5
Sonzogni, A.6
Crosta, C.7
Andreoni, B.8
-
44
-
-
79952109373
-
The minimally invasive approach, laparoscopic and robotic, in rectal resection for cancer. A single center experience
-
COI: 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3cbmt1eqtg%3D%3D, PID: 21066980
-
Popescu I, Vasilescu C, Tomulescu V, Vasile S, Sgarbura O. The minimally invasive approach, laparoscopic and robotic, in rectal resection for cancer. A single center experience. Acta Chir Iugosl 2010; 57: 29–35
-
(2010)
Acta Chir Iugosl
, vol.57
, pp. 29-35
-
-
Popescu, I.1
Vasilescu, C.2
Tomulescu, V.3
Vasile, S.4
Sgarbura, O.5
-
45
-
-
84884479249
-
Total mesorectal excision: a comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer
-
PID: 23292566
-
D’Annibale A, Pernazza G, Monsellato I, Pende V, Lucandri G, Mazzocchi P, Alfano G.Total mesorectal excision: a comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(6):1887–95.
-
(2013)
Surg Endosc
, vol.27
, Issue.6
, pp. 1887-1895
-
-
D’Annibale, A.1
Pernazza, G.2
Monsellato, I.3
Pende, V.4
Lucandri, G.5
Mazzocchi, P.6
Alfano, G.7
-
46
-
-
0036902996
-
Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease
-
PID: 12473897
-
Weber PA, Merola S, Wasielewski A, Ballantyne GH.Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 1689–94
-
(2002)
Dis Colon Rectum
, vol.45
, pp. 1689-1694
-
-
Weber, P.A.1
Merola, S.2
Wasielewski, A.3
Ballantyne, G.H.4
-
47
-
-
84878821035
-
Robotic colorectal surgery: a systematic review
-
PID: 22655207
-
Alasari S, Min BS. Robotic colorectal surgery: a systematic review. ISRN Surg. 2012;2012: 293894.
-
(2012)
ISRN Surg.
, vol.2012
, pp. 293894
-
-
Alasari, S.1
Min, B.S.2
-
48
-
-
35348851354
-
Shortterm outcomes after robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer
-
PID: 17763911
-
Hellan M, Anderson C, Ellenhorn JD, Paz B, Pigazzi A. Shortterm outcomes after robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:3168–3173.
-
(2007)
Ann Surg Oncol.
, vol.14
, pp. 3168-3173
-
-
Hellan, M.1
Anderson, C.2
Ellenhorn, J.D.3
Paz, B.4
Pigazzi, A.5
-
49
-
-
33745095869
-
Modern management of rectal cancer: a 2006 update
-
PID: 16718838
-
Balch GC, De Meo A, Guillem JG. Modern management of rectal cancer: a 2006 update. World J Gastroenterol 2006;12: 3186–3195
-
(2006)
World J Gastroenterol
, vol.12
, pp. 3186-3195
-
-
Balch, G.C.1
De Meo, A.2
Guillem, J.G.3
-
50
-
-
10944263639
-
Surgical issues in rectal cancer: a 2004 update
-
PID: 15555204
-
Chessin DB, Guillem JG. Surgical issues in rectal cancer: a 2004 update. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2004;4:233–240
-
(2004)
Clin Colorectal Cancer
, vol.4
, pp. 233-240
-
-
Chessin, D.B.1
Guillem, J.G.2
-
51
-
-
0141656847
-
Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999
-
COI: 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czptVKrug%3D%3D, PID: 10888773
-
Compton CC, Fielding LP, Burgart LJ, Conley B, Cooper HS, Hamilton SR, et al. Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000;124:979–94.
-
(2000)
Arch Pathol Lab Med
, vol.124
, pp. 979-994
-
-
Compton, C.C.1
Fielding, L.P.2
Burgart, L.J.3
Conley, B.4
Cooper, H.S.5
Hamilton, S.R.6
-
52
-
-
0036533877
-
Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control
-
PID: 11919228
-
Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ, van der Worp E, Kapiteijn E, Quirke P, van Krieken JH. Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20:1729–1734
-
(2002)
J Clin Oncol
, vol.20
, pp. 1729-1734
-
-
Nagtegaal, I.D.1
van de Velde, C.J.2
van der Worp, E.3
Kapiteijn, E.4
Quirke, P.5
van Krieken, J.H.6
-
53
-
-
58149242762
-
Resection margins in modern rectal cancer surgery
-
PID: 19072854
-
Wasserberg N, Gutman H. Resection margins in modern rectal cancer surgery. J Surg Oncol 2008;98:611–615
-
(2008)
J Surg Oncol
, vol.98
, pp. 611-615
-
-
Wasserberg, N.1
Gutman, H.2
-
54
-
-
0022466378
-
Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection: histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision
-
COI: 1:STN:280:DyaL2s%2FjvVeksw%3D%3D, PID: 2430152
-
Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, Williams NS. Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection: histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet 1986;2:996–999
-
(1986)
Lancet
, vol.2
, pp. 996-999
-
-
Quirke, P.1
Durdey, P.2
Dixon, M.F.3
Williams, N.S.4
-
55
-
-
77954956047
-
Adequate length of the distal resection margin in rectal cancer: from the oncological point of view
-
PID: 20143273
-
Park IJ, Kim JC.Adequate length of the distal resection margin in rectal cancer: from the oncological point of view.J Gastrointest Surg 2010; 14:1331–1337
-
(2010)
J Gastrointest Surg
, vol.14
, pp. 1331-1337
-
-
Park, I.J.1
Kim, J.C.2
-
56
-
-
70350107704
-
The influence of circumferential resection margins on long-term outcomes following rectal cancer surgery
-
PID: 19966604
-
Tilney HS, Rasheed S, Northover JM, Tekkis PP.The influence of circumferential resection margins on long-term outcomes following rectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2009; 52:1723–1729
-
(2009)
Dis Colon Rectum
, vol.52
, pp. 1723-1729
-
-
Tilney, H.S.1
Rasheed, S.2
Northover, J.M.3
Tekkis, P.P.4
-
57
-
-
28844474532
-
The circumferential resection margin in rectal carcinoma surgery
-
COI: 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MnmtVOgtg%3D%3D, PID: 16328130
-
Hermanek P, Junginger T. The circumferential resection margin in rectal carcinoma surgery. Tech Coloproctol 2005;9:193–199
-
(2005)
Tech Coloproctol
, vol.9
, pp. 193-199
-
-
Hermanek, P.1
Junginger, T.2
-
58
-
-
0036224267
-
The role of pathologists in the quality control of diagnosis and treatment of rectal cancer—an overview
-
COI: 1:STN:280:DC%2BD383ktVyqsQ%3D%3D, PID: 11978521
-
Nagtegaal ID, van Krieken JHJM. The role of pathologists in the quality control of diagnosis and treatment of rectal cancer—an overview. Eur J Cancer 2002; 38:964–972
-
(2002)
Eur J Cancer
, vol.38
, pp. 964-972
-
-
Nagtegaal, I.D.1
van Krieken, J.H.J.M.2
-
59
-
-
0036190416
-
Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit
-
PID: 11859207
-
Nagtegaal ID, Marijnen CA, Kranenbarg EK, van de Velde CJ, van Krieken JH. Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit. Am J Surg Pathol 2002;26:350–357
-
(2002)
Am J Surg Pathol
, vol.26
, pp. 350-357
-
-
Nagtegaal, I.D.1
Marijnen, C.A.2
Kranenbarg, E.K.3
van de Velde, C.J.4
van Krieken, J.H.5
-
60
-
-
0029073653
-
Distal spread of rectal cancer and optimal distal margin of resection for sphincter preserving surgery
-
COI: 1:STN:280:DyaK283itlSnsw%3D%3D, PID: 8625118
-
Shirouzu K, Isomoto H, Kakegawa T. Distal spread of rectal cancer and optimal distal margin of resection for sphincter preserving surgery. Cancer 1995; 76:388–392
-
(1995)
Cancer
, vol.76
, pp. 388-392
-
-
Shirouzu, K.1
Isomoto, H.2
Kakegawa, T.3
-
62
-
-
0034532967
-
A systematic review of comparisons of effect sizes derived from randomised and non-randomised studies
-
COI: 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FpsVCisg%3D%3D, PID: 11134917
-
MacLehose RR, Reeves BC, Harvey IM, Sheldon TA, Russell IT, Black AM. A systematic review of comparisons of effect sizes derived from randomised and non-randomised studies. Health Technol Assess 2000;4:1–154.
-
(2000)
Health Technol Assess
, vol.4
, pp. 1-154
-
-
MacLehose, R.R.1
Reeves, B.C.2
Harvey, I.M.3
Sheldon, T.A.4
Russell, I.T.5
Black, A.M.6
-
63
-
-
76049101224
-
Meta-analysis of well-designed nonrandomized comparative studies of surgical procedures is as good as randomized controlled trials
-
PID: 19716267
-
Abraham NS, Byrne CJ, Young JM, Solomon MJ. Meta-analysis of well-designed nonrandomized comparative studies of surgical procedures is as good as randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:238–245.
-
(2010)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.63
, pp. 238-245
-
-
Abraham, N.S.1
Byrne, C.J.2
Young, J.M.3
Solomon, M.J.4
-
64
-
-
84857053117
-
An international, multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, unblinded, parallel-group trial of robotic-assisted versus standard laparoscopic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer
-
PID: 21912876
-
Collinson FJ, Jayne DG, Pigazzi A, Tsang C, Barrie JM, Edlin R, Garbett C, Guillou P, Holloway I, Howard H, Marshall H, McCabe C, Pavitt S, Quirke P, Rivers CS, Brown JM. An international, multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, unblinded, parallel-group trial of robotic-assisted versus standard laparoscopic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012;27:233–41.
-
(2012)
Int J Colorectal Dis.
, vol.27
, pp. 233-241
-
-
Collinson, F.J.1
Jayne, D.G.2
Pigazzi, A.3
Tsang, C.4
Barrie, J.M.5
Edlin, R.6
Garbett, C.7
Guillou, P.8
Holloway, I.9
Howard, H.10
Marshall, H.11
McCabe, C.12
Pavitt, S.13
Quirke, P.14
Rivers, C.S.15
Brown, J.M.16
|