Understanding and Modulating Motor Learning with Cerebellar Stimulation

Cerebellum

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 171-174

  Celnik, Pablo ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cerebellar plasticity; Cerebellum; Motor learning; Non invasive brain stimulation

Indexed keywords

BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COGNITION; CONNECTOME; DYSTONIA; HUMAN; LEARNING; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR COORDINATION; MOTOR CORTEX; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NEUROIMAGING; NEUROMODULATION; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; ANIMAL; CEREBELLUM; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

ANIMALS; CEREBELLUM; HUMANS; LEARNING; NEURONAL PLASTICITY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

EID: 84925495803     PISSN: 14734222     EISSN: 14734230     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12311-014-0607-y     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Ugawa Y, Day BL, Rothwell JC, Thompson PD, Merton PA, Marsden CD. Modulation of motor cortical excitability by electrical stimulation over the cerebellum in man. J Physiol Lond. 1991;441:57–72.
2. Ugawa Y, Uesaka Y, Terao Y, Hanajima R, Kanazawa I. Magnetic stimulation over the cerebellum in humans. Ann Neurol. 1995;37:703–13.
3. Pinto AD, Chen R. Suppression of the motor cortex by magnetic stimulation of the cerebellum. Exp Brain Res. 2001;140:505–10.
4. Werhahn KJ, Taylor J, Ridding M, Meyer BU, Rothwell JC. Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation over the cerebellum on the excitability of human motor cortex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996;101:58–66.
5. Jayaram G, Galea JM, Bastian AJ, Celnik PA. Human locomotor adaptive ability is proportional to depression of cerebellar excitability. Cereb Cortex. 2011;21(8):1901–9.
6. Morton SM, Bastian AJ. Cerebellar contributions to locomotor adaptations during splitbelt treadmill walking. J Neurosci. 2006;26(36):9107–16.
7. Reisman DS, Wityk R, Silver K, Bastian AJ. Locomotor adaptation on a split-belt treadmill can improve walking symmetry post-stroke. Brain. 2007;130(pt 7):1861–72.
8. Yanagihara D, Kondo I. Nitric oxide plays a key role in adaptive control of locomotion in cat. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:13292–7.
9. Schlerf JE, Galea JM, Bastian AJ, Celnik P. Dynamic modulation of cerebellar excitability for abrupt, but not gradual, visuomotor adaptation. J Neurosci. 2012;32(34):11610–7.
10. Ito M. Cerebellar control of the vestibulo-ocular reflex—around the flocculus hypothesis. Ann Rev Neurosci. 1982;5:275–97.
11. Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol Lond. 2000;527(Pt 3):633–9.
12. Huang YZ, Edwards MJ, Rounis E, Bhatia KP, Rothwell JC. Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron. 2005;45(2):201–6.
13. Chen R, Classen J, Gerloff C, Celnik P, Wassermann EM, Hallett M, et al. Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology. 1997;48(5):1398–403.
14. Fitzgerald PB, Fountain S, Daskalakis ZJ. A comprehensive review of the effects of rTMS on motor cortical excitability and inhibition. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117(12):2584–96.
15. Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Transcranial direct current stimulation-update 2011. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2011;29(6):463–92.
16. Fritsch B, Reis J, Martinowich K, Schambra HM, Ji Y, Cohen LG, et al. Direct current stimulation promotes BDNF-dependent synaptic plasticity: potential implications for motor learing. Neuron. 2010;66(2):198–204.
17. Galea JM, Jayaram G, Ajagbe L, Celnik P. Modulation of cerebellar excitability by polarity-specific noninvasive direct current stimulation. J Neurosci. 2009;29(28):9115–22.
18. Rampersad SM, Janssen AM, Lucka F, Aydin U, Lanfer B, Lew S, et al. Simulating transcranial direct current stimulation with a detailed anisotropic human head model. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2014;22(3):441–52.
19. Popa T, Russo M, Meunier S. Long-lasting inhibition of cerebellar output. Brain Stimul. 2010;3(3):161–9.
20. Grimaldi G, Argyropoulos GP, Boehringer A, Celnik P, Edwards MJ, Ferrucci R, et al. Cerebellum. 2014;13(1):121–38.
21. Galea JM, Vazquez A, Pasricha N, de Xivry JJ O, Celnik P. Dissociating the roles of the cerebellum and motor cortex during adaptive learning: the motor cortex retains what the cerebellum learns. Cereb Cortex. 2011;21:1761–70.
22. Reis J, Schambra HM, Cohen LG, Buch ER, Fritsch B, Zarahn E, et al. Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(5):1590–5.
23. Jayaram G, Tang B, Pallegadda R, Vasudevan EV, Celnik P, Bastian A. Modulating locomotor adaptation with cerebellar stimulation. J Neurophysiol. 2012;107(11):2950–7.
24. Herzfeld DJ, Pastor D, Haith AM, Rossetti Y, Shadmehr R, O′Shea J. Contributions of the cerebellum and the motor cortex to acquisition and retention of motor memories. NeuroImage. 2014;98:147–58.
25. Hardwick RM, Celnik PA. Cerebellar direct current stimulation enhances motor learning in older adults. Neurobiol Aging. 2014;S0197–4580(14):00288–7.
26. Block HJ, Celnik P. Can cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation become a valuable neurorehabilitation intervention? Expert Rev Neurother. 2012;12:1275–7.
27. Hoffland BS, Bologna M, Kassavetis P, Teo JT, Rothwell JC, Yeo CH, et al. Cerebellar theta burst stimulation impairs eyeblink classical conditioning. J Physiol. 2012;590(Pt 4):887–97.
28. Bonnì S, Ponzo V, Caltagirone C, Koch G. Cerebellar theta burst stimulation in stroke patients with ataxia. Funct Neurol. 2014;7:1–5.
29. Koch G, Porcacchia P, Ponzo V, Carrillo F, Cáceres-Redondo MT, Brusa L, et al. Effects of Two Weeks of Cerebellar Theta Burst Stimulation in Cervical Dystonia Patients. Brain Stimul. 2014 May 9. pii: S1935-861X (14) 00172–7.