Multi-Criteria Analysis Framework for Potential Flood Prone Areas Mapping

Water Resources Management

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 399-418

  Papaioannou, G ^a   Vasiliades, L ^a   Loukas, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THESSALY   (Greece)

Author keywords

AHP; Clustering techniques; Flood prone areas; Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP); GIS

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ROBOTS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DATA ACQUISITION; DISASTER PREVENTION; DISASTERS; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; FLOOD CONTROL; FUZZY LOGIC; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; LAND USE; MAGNETIC LOGIC DEVICES; MAPPING;

CLUSTERING TECHNIQUES; FLOOD PRONE AREA; FUZZY ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; FUZZY ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESSES (AHP); HYDROLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS; MULTI-CRITERIA ANALYSIS; MULTI-CRITERIA EVALUATION; TRANSPORTATION NETWORK;

FLOODS;

EID: 84925488211     PISSN: 09204741     EISSN: 15731650     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-014-0817-6     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. AghaKouchak A, Easterling D, Hsu K, Schubert S, Sorooshian S (eds) (2013) Extremes in a changing climate: Detection, analysis and uncertainty. water science and technology library, vol 65. Springer, Netherlands
2. Alata M, Molhim M, Ramini A (2008) Optimizing of fuzzy C-means clustering algorithm using GA. World Acad Sci, Eng Technol, Int Sci 2(3):204–210
3. Anane M, Bouziri L, Limam A, Jellali S (2012) Ranking suitable sites for irrigation with reclaimed water in the Nabeul-Hammamet region (Tunisia) using GIS and AHP-multicriteria decision analysis. Resour Conserv Recycl 65:36–46. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.05.006
4. Babaei H, Araghinejad S, Hoorfar A (2013) Developing a new method for spatial assessment of drought vulnerability (case study: Zayandeh-Rood river basin in Iran). Water Environ J 27(1):50–57. doi:10.1111/j.1747-6593.2012.00326.x
5. Bezdec JC (1981) Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms. Plenum Press, New York
6. Bishop MC (2007) Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer
7. Boehner J, Koethe R, Conrad O, Gross J, Ringeler A, Selige T (2002) Soil regionalisation by means of terrain analysis and process parameterisation. In: Micheli E, Nachtergaele F, Montanarella L (eds) Soil classification 2001. European Soil Bureau, Luxembourg, pp 213–222, Research Report No. 7, EUR 20398 EN
8. Boroushaki S, Malczewski J (2010) Using the fuzzy majority approach for GIS-based multicriteria group decision-making. Comput Geosci 36(3):302–312. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2009.05.011
9. Buckley JJ (1985) Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 17(3):233–247. doi:10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9
10. Bulut E, Duru O, Kececi T, Yoshida S (2012) Use of consistency index, expert prioritization and direct numerical inputs for generic fuzzy-AHP modeling: a process model for shipping asset management. Expert Syst Appl 39(2):1911–1923. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.056
11. Chandio IA, Matori ANB, WanYusof KB, Talpur MAH, Balogun AL, Lawal DU (2013) GIS-based analytic hierarchy process as a multicriteria decision analysis instrument: a review. Arab J Geosci 6(8):3059–3066. doi:10.1007/s12517-012-0568-8
12. Chang DY (1996) Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. Eur J Oper Res 95(3):649–655. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2
13. Chang TH, Wang TC (2009) Using the fuzzy multicriteria decision making approach for measuring the possibility of successful knowledge management. Inf Sci 179(13):2294–2295. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2009.02.012
14. Chen YR, Yeh CH, Yu BF (2011) Integrated application of the analytic hierarchy process and the geographic information system for flood risk assessment and flood plain management in Taiwan. Nat Hazards 59(3):1261–1276. doi:10.1007/s11069-011-9831-7
15. Chowdary VM, Chakraborthy D, Jeyaram A, Murthy YVNK, Sharma JR, Dadhwal VK (2013) Multi-criteria decision making approach for watershed prioritization using analytic hierarchy process technique and GIS. Water Resour Manag 27(10):3555–357. doi:10.1007/s11269-013-0364-6
16. de Moel H, van Alphen J, Aerts JCJH (2009) Flood maps in Europe—methods, availability and use. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9(2):289–301. doi:10.5194/nhess-9-289-2009
17. Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB (1977) Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the em algorithm. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol 39(1):1–38
18. Erensal YC, Öncan T, Demircan ML (2006) Determining key capabilities in technology management using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: a case study of Turkey. Inf Sci 176(18):2755–2770. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2005.11.004
19. European Environment Agency (EEA) (2010) Mapping the impacts of natural hazards and technological accidents in Europe: An overview of the last decade. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, European Environment Agency (EEA), Report 13/2010
20. Feizizadeh B, Blaschke T (2013) GIS-multicriteria decision analysis for landslide susceptibility mapping: comparing three methods for the Urmia lake basin, Iran. Nat Hazards 65(3):2105–2128. doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0463-3
21. Harats N, Ziv B, Yair Y, Kotroni V, Dayan U (2010) Lightning and rain dynamic indices as predictors for flash floods events in the Mediterranean. Adv Geosci 23:57–64. doi:10.5194/adgeo-23-57-2010
22. Huang PH, Tsai JS, Lin WT (2010) Using multiple-criteria decision-making techniques for eco-environmental vulnerability assessment: a case study on the Chi-Jia-Wan Stream watershed, Taiwan. Environ Monit Assess 168(1–4):141–158. doi:10.1007/s10661-009-1098-z
23. Jeefoo P, Tripathi NK (2011) Dengue risk zone index (DRZI) for mapping dengue risk areas. Int J Geoinformatics 7(1):53–62
24. Jenks GF (1967) The data model concept in statistical mapping. Int Yearb Cartogr 7:186–190
25. Kaufman L, Rousseeuw PJ (1986) Clustering large data sets (with discussion). In: Gelsema ES, Kanal LN (eds) Pattern recognition in practice II. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 425–437
26. Kaufman L, Rousseeuw PJ (1990) Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis. Wiley, New York
27. Kirkby MJ (1975) Hydrograph modelling strategies. In: Peel RF, Chisholm MD, Haggett P (eds) Progress in physical and human geography. Heinemann, London, pp 69–90
28. Kourgialas NN, Karatzas GP (2011) Flood management and a GIS modelling method to assess flood-hazard areas - a case study. Hydrol Sci J - J Sci Hydrol 56(2):212–225. doi:10.1080/02626667.2011.555836
29. Lee CM (2010) The analytic hierarchy and the network process in multicriteria decision making: Performance evaluation and selecting key performance indicators based on ANP model. Convergence and hybrid information technologies, Marius C. (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-307-068-1
30. Lee AHI, Chen WC, Chang CJ (2008) A fuzzy AHP and BSC approach for evaluating performance of IT department in the manufacturing industry in Taiwan. Expert Syst Appl 34(1):96–107. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2006.08.022
31. Machiwal D, Jha MK, Mal BC (2011) Assessment of groundwater potential in a semi-arid region of india using remote sensing, GIS and MCDM techniques. Water Resour Manag 25(5):1359–1386. doi:10.1007/s11269-010-9749-y
32. Madhuri B, Aniruddha G, Rahul R (2013) Identification and classification of flood prone areas using AHP, GIS and GPS. Disaster Adv 6(11):120–131
33. Malczewski J (2006) GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 20(7):703–726. doi:10.1080/13658810600661508
34. Manfreda S, Di Leo M, Sole A (2011) Detection of flood-prone areas using digital elevation models, 2011. J Hydrol Eng 16(10):781–790. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000367
35. MathWorks (2013) Statistics toolbox user’s guide. MATLAB
36. Meyer V, Scheuer S, Haase D (2009) A multicriteria approach for flood risk mapping exemplified at the Mulde river, Germany. Nat Hazards 48:17–39
37. Mikhailov L (2003) Deriving priorities from fuzzy pairwise comparison judgments. Fuzzy Sets Syst 134(3):365–385. doi:10.1016/S0165-0114(02)00383-4
38. Miliani F, Ravazzani G, Mancini M (2011) Adaptation of precipitation index for the estimation of antecedent moisture condition in large mountainous basins. J Hydrol Eng 16(3):218–227. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000307
39. Morgan RPC (2005) Soil erosion and conservation. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford
40. Negi P, Jain K (2008) Spatial multicriteria analysis for siting groundwater polluting industries. J Environ Inf 12(1):54–63. doi:10.3808/jci.200800124
41. Nock R, Nielsen F (2006) On weighting clustering. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 28(8):1–13. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2006.168
42. Noman NS, Nelson EJ, Zundel AK (2001) A review of automated flood plain delineation from digital terrain models. ASCE J Water Resour Plan Manag 127(6):394–402. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2001)127:6(394)
43. Olaya V (2004) A gentle introduction to SAGA GIS, Revised by Javier Pineda and Victor Olaya, Edition 1.1
44. Pal I, Nath SK, Shukla K, Pal DK, Raj A, Thingbaijam KKS, Bansal BK (2008) Earthquake hazard zonation of Sikkim Himalaya using a GIS platform. Nat Hazards 45(3):333–377. doi:10.1007/s11069-007-9173-7
45. Papaioannou G, Loukas A, Vasiliades L, Aronica GT (2011) Flood prone areas mapping through GIS and multi-criteria analysis, EGU Leonardo Conference, Bratislava, Slovakia. Papaioannou G, Loukas A, Georgiadis Ch (2013) The effect of riverine terrain spatial resolution on flood modeling and mapping, Proc. SPIE 8795, First International Conference on Remote Sensing and Geoinformation of the Environment (RSCy2013), 87951H; doi:10.1117/12.2028218
46. Park S, Choi C, Kim B, Kim J (2013) Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, analytic hierarchy process, logistic regression, and artificial neural network methods at the Inje area, Korea. Environ Earth Sci 68(5):1443–1464. doi:10.1007/s12665-012-1842-5
47. Parker D, Tapsell S, McCarthy S (2007) Enhancing the human benefits of flood warnings. Nat Hazards 43(3):397–414. doi:10.1007/s11069-007-9137-y
48. Pawattana C, Tripathi NK (2008) Analytical hierarchical process (AHP) - based flood water retention planning in Thailand. GISci Remote Sens 45(3):343–355. doi:10.2747/1548-1603.45.3.343
49. Quinn P, Beven K, Chevallier P, Planchon O (1991) The prediction of hillslope flow paths for distributed hydrological modeling using digital terrain models. Hydrolog Process 5(1):59–79. doi:10.1002/hyp.3360050106
50. Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York
51. Saaty TL, Vargas LG (1991) Prediction, projection and forecasting. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
52. Stefanidis S, Stathis D (2013) Assessment of flood hazard based on natural and anthropogenic factors using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Nat Hazards 68:569–585. doi:10.1007/s11069-013-0639-5
53. Tagil S, Jenness J (2008) GIS-based automated classification and topographic, landcover and geologic attributes of landforms around the Yazoren Polje, Turkey. J Appl Sci 8(6):910–921. doi:10.3923/jas.2008.910.921
54. Tehrany SM, Pradhan B, Jebur NM (2013) Spatial prediction of flood susceptible areas using rule based decision tree (DT) and a novel ensemble bivariate and multivariate statistical models in GIS. J Hydrol 504:69–79. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.09.034
55. van Laarhoven PJM, Pedrycz W (1983) A fuzzy extention of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 11(1–3):229–241. doi:10.1016/S0165-0114(83)80082-7
56. Yair Y, Lynn B, Price C, Kotroni V, Lagouvardos K, Morin E, Mugnai A, Llasat MD (2010) Predicting the potential for lightning activity in Mediterranean storms based on the weather research and forecasting (WRF) model dynamic and microphysical fields. J Geophys Res 115:D04205. doi:10.1029/2008JD010868
57. Yalcin A, Bulut F (2007) Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and digital photogrammetric techniques: a case study from Ardesen (NE-Turkey). Nat Hazards 41(1):201–226. doi:10.1007/s11069-006-9030-0
58. Yang Y, Huang S (2007) Image segmentation by fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm with a novel penalty term. Comput Inf 26(1):17–31
59. Zhou X (2012) MATLAB - A fundamental tool for scientific computing and engineering applications - Volume 3. Edited by Vasilios N. Katsikis, InTech.
60. Zou Q, Zhou JZ, Zhou C, Song LX, Guo J (2013) Comprehensive flood risk assessment based on set pair analysis-variable fuzzy sets model and fuzzy AHP. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 27(2):525–546. doi:10.1007/s00477-012-0598-5