Evolution of a flexible rule for foraging that copes with environmental variation

Current Zoology

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 303-312

  Higginson, Andrew D ^a   Fawcett, Tim W ^a   Houston, Alasdair I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Behavioural mechanisms; Fat storage; Fluctuating environments; Generalisation; Obesity; Rule of thumb

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

EID: 84925443146     PISSN: 16745507     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/czoolo/61.2.303     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Brodin A, 2007. Theoretical models of adaptive energy manage-ment in small wintering birds. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B. 362: 1857-1871.
2. Clark CW, Mangel M, 2000. Dynamic State Variable Models in Ecology. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
3. Collins EJ, McNamara JM, Ramsey DM, 2006. Learning rules for optimal selection in a varying environment: Mate choice revi-sited. Behav. Ecol. 17: 799-809.
4. DeWitt TJ, Sih A, Wilson DS, 1998. Costs and limits of phenoty-pic plasticity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 77-81.
5. Enquist M, Johnstone RA, 1997. Generalization and the evolution of symmetry preferences. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B. 264: 1345- 1348.
6. Fawcett TW, Hamblin S, Giraldeau L-A, 2013. Exposing the behavioral gambit: The evolution of learning and decision rules. Behav. Ecol. 24: 2-11.
7. Fawcett TW, Fallenstein B, Higginson AD, Houston AI, Mallpress DEW et al., 2014. The evolution of decision rules in complex environments. Trends Cogn Sci. 18: 153-161.
8. Friedman JM, 2009. Obesity: Causes and control of excess body fat. Nature 459: 340-342.
9. Ghirlanda S, Enquist M, 2007. How training and testing histories affect generalization: A test of simple neural networks. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B. 362: 449-454.
10. Giske J, Eliassen S, Fiksen Ø, Jakobsen PJ, Aksnes DL et al., 2013. Effects of the emotion system on adaptive behavior. Am. Nat. 182: 689-703.
11. Giske J, Eliassen S, Fiksen Ø, Jakobsen PJ, Aksnes DL et al., 2014. The emotion system promotes diversity and evolvability. Proc. Biol. Sci. 281: 20141096.
12. Grimm V, Berger U, Bastiansen F, Eliassen S, Ginot V et al., 2006. A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models. Ecological Modelling 198: 115-126.
13. Gosler AG, Greenwood JJD, Perrins C, 1995. Predation risk and the cost of being fat. Nature 377: 621-623.
14. Hamblin S, 2013. On the practical usage of genetic algorithms in ecology and evolution. Methods Ecol. Evol. 4: 184-194.
15. Heymsfield SB, Harp JB, Reitman ML, Beetsch JW, Schoeller DA et al., 2007. Why do obese patients not lose more weight when treated with low-calorie diets? A mechanistic perspective. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 85: 346-354.
16. Houston AI, McNamara JM, 1999. Models of Adaptive Behaviour. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
17. Houston AI, McNamara JM, Hutchinson JMC, 1993. General results concerning the trade-off between gaining energy and avoiding predation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B-Biological Sci. 341: 375-397.
18. Houston AI, McNamara JM, 1993. A theoretical investigation of the fat reserves and mortality levels of small birds in winter. Ornis Scand. 24: 205-219.
19. Houston AI, McNamara JM, Thompson WA, 1992. On the need for a sensitive analysis of optimization models, or, this simula-tion is not as the former. Oikos 63: 513-517.
20. Hutchinson JMC, Gigerenzer G, 2005. Simple heuristics and rules of thumb: Where psychologists and behavioural biologists might meet. Behav. Processes 69: 97-124.
21. Krams I, Cirule D, Suraka V, Krama T, Rantala MJ et al., 2010. Fattening strategies of wintering great tits support the optimal body mass hypothesis under conditions of extremely low am-bient temperature. Funct. Ecol. 24: 172-177.
22. Lee SJ, Witter MS, Cuthill IC, Goldsmith AR, 1996. Reduction in escape performance as a cost of reproduction in gravid starl-ings Sturnus vulgaris. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B-Biological Sci. 263: 619-623.
23. Lima SL, 1986. Predation risk and unpredictable feeding condi-tions: Determinants of body-mass in birds. Ecology 67: 377- 385.
24. McNamara JM, 1990. The policy which maximizes long-term survival of an animal faced with the risks of starvation and predation. Adv. Appl. Probab. 22: 295-308.
25. McNamara JM, Houston AI, 1986 The common currency for behavioral decisions. Am. Nat. 127: 358-378.
26. McNamara JM, Houston AI. 1990. The value of fat reserves and the tradeoff between starvation and predation. Acta Biotheor. 38: 37-61.
27. McNamara JM, Houston AI, 1997. Currencies for foraging based on energetic gain. Am. Nat. 150: 603-17.
28. McNamara JM, Houston AI, 2009. Integrating function and me-chanism. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24: 670-675.
29. McNamara JM, Merad S, Houston AI, 1991. A model of risk-sensitive foraging for a reproducing animal. Anim. Behav. 41: 787-792.
30. Meijer T, Mohring FJ, Trillmich F, 1994. Annual and daily varia-tion in body mass and fat of starlings Sturnus vulgaris. J. Avian Biol. 25: 98-104.
31. O’Dea K, 1992. Obesity and diabetes in “the land of milk and honey.”. Diabetes / Metab Rev. 8: 373-388.
32. Prentice AM, 2001. Obesity and its potential mechanistic basis. Br. Med. Bull. 60: 51-67.
33. Speakman JR, 2007. A nonadaptive scenario explaining the ge-netic predisposition to obesity: The “Predation release” hypo-thesis. Cell Metab. 6: 5-12.
34. Wells JCK, 2006. The evolution of human fatness and susceptibi-lity to obesity: An ethological approach. Biol. Rev. 81: 183- 205.
35. Witter MS, Cuthill IC, 1993. The ecological costs of avian fat storage. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 340: 73-92.
36. Witter MS, Cuthill IC, Bonser RHC, 1994. Experimental investi-gation of mass-dependent predation risk in European starlings Sturnus vulgaris. Anim. Behav. 48: 201-222.