General recognition theory with individual differences: a new method for examining perceptual and decisional interactions with an application to face perception

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 88-111

  Soto, Fabian A ^a   Vucovich, Lauren ^a   Musgrave, Robert ^a   Ashby, F Gregory ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Face perception and recognition; Mathematical models; Perceptual categorization and identification; Signal detection theory

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; EMOTION; FACIAL RECOGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; RECOGNITION; YOUNG ADULT;

ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; EMOTIONS; FACIAL RECOGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84925383452     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0661-y     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Akaike, H. (1974). A New Look at the Statistical Model Identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716–723.
2. Ashby, F. G., & Lee, W. W. (1991). Predicting similarity and categorization from identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120(2), 150.
3. Ashby, F. G., & Maddox, W. T. (1994). A response time theory of separability and integrality in speeded classification. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 38(4), 423–466.
4. Ashby, F. G., & Soto, F. A. (2014). Multidimensional signal detection theory. In J. R. Busemeyer, J. T. Townsend, Z. Wang, & A. Eidels (Eds.), Oxford handbook of computational and mathematical psychology. New York: Oxford University Press (in press).
5. Ashby, F. G., & Townsend, J. T. (1986). Varieties of perceptual independence. Psychological Review, 93(2), 154–179.
6. Ashby, F. G., Waldron, E. M., Lee, W. W., & Berkman, A. (2001). Suboptimality in human categorization and identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(1), 77.
7. Baudouin, J. Y., Martin, F., Tiberghien, G., Verlut, I., & Franck, N. (2002). Selective attention to facial emotion and identity in schizophrenia. Neuropsychologia, 40(5), 503–511.
8. Billingsley, P. (2012). Probability and Measure. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons
9. Blais, C., Arguin, M., & Marleau, I. (2009). Orientation invariance in visual shape perception. Journal of Vision, 9(2), 1–23.
10. Borg, I., & Groenen, P. (2005). Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications. New York: Springer.
11. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 433–436.
12. Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77(3), 305–327.
13. Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2004). Multimodel inference understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods and Research, 33(2), 261–304.
14. Carroll, J. D., & Chang, J. J. (1970). Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an N-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition. Psychometrika, 35(3), 283–319.
15. Cornes, K., Donnelly, N., Godwin, H., & Wenger, M. J. (2011). Perceptual and decisional factors influencing the discrimination of inversion in the Thatcher illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(3), 645.
16. D’Errico, J. (2006). Adaptive robust numerical differentiation. MATLAB Central File Exchange. Retrieved April 19, 2014, from http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/file_infos/13490-adaptive-robust-numerical-differentiation
17. Dailey, M., Cottrell, G. W., & Reilly, J. (2001). California facial expressions, CAFE. Unpublished digital images, University of California, San Diego, Computer Science and Engineering Department.
18. de Beeck, H. P. O., Haushofer, J., & Kanwisher, N. G. (2008). Interpreting fMRI data: maps, modules and dimensions. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(2), 123–135.
19. Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., & Hager, J. (1978). The Facial Action Coding System (FACS): A technique for the measurement of facial action Palo Alto. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists.
20. Ellamil, M., Susskind, J. M., & Anderson, A. K. (2008). Examinations of identity invariance in facial expression adaptation. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 8(3), 273.
21. Ennis, D. M., & Ashby, F. G. (2003). Fitting the decision bound models to identification categorization data. Santa Barbara: University of California.
22. Etcoff, N. L. (1984). Selective attention to facial identity and facial emotion. Neuropsychologia, 22(3), 281–295.
23. Fitousi, D., & Wenger, M. J. (2013). Variants of independence in the perception of facial identity and expression. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(1), 133–155.
24. Fox, C. J., & Barton, J. J. S. (2007). What is adapted in face adaptation? The neural representations of expression in the human visual system. Brain Research, 1127, 80–89.
25. Fox, C. J., Oruç, I., & Barton, J. J. S. (2008). It doesn’t matter how you feel. The facial identity aftereffect is invariant to changes in facial expression. Journal of Vision, 8(3), 11.
26. Ganel, T., & Goshen-Gottstein, Y. (2004). Effects of familiarity on the perceptual integrality of the identity and expression of faces: The parallel-route hypothesis revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(3), 583–596.
27. Ganel, T., Valyear, K. F., Goshen-Gottstein, Y., & Goodale, M. A. (2005). The involvement of the “fusiform face area” in processing facial expression. Neuropsychologia, 43(11), 1645–1654.
28. Garner, W. R. (1974). The processing of information and structure. New York: Erlbaum.
29. Hartigan, J. A., & Hartigan, P. M. (1985). The dip test of unimodality. The Annals of Statistics, 70–84.
30. Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., & Gobbini, M. I. (2000). The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(6), 223–232.
31. Kadlec, H., & Townsend, J. T. (1992a). Signal detection analysis of multidimensional interactions. In F. G. Ashby (Ed.), Multidimensional Models of Perception and Cognition (pp. 181–231). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Kadlec, H., & Townsend, J. T. (1992b). Implications of marginal and conditional detection parameters for the separabilities and independence of perceptual dimensions. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 36(3), 325–374.
33. Kanwisher, N. (2000). Domain specificity in face perception. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 759–763.
34. Lee, M. D., & Wetzels, R. (2010). Individual differences in attention during category learning. In: R. Catrambone & S. Ohlsson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 387–392). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
35. Lehky, S. R. (2000). Fine discrimination of faces can be performed rapidly. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(5), 848–855.
36. Mack, M. L., Richler, J. J., Gauthier, I., & Palmeri, T. J. (2011). Indecision on decisional separability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(1), 1–9.
37. Maddox, W. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1996). Perceptual separability, decisional separability, and the identification- speeded classification relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 795–817
38. Maddox, W. T., Ashby, F. G., & Waldron, E. M. (2002). Multiple attention systems in perceptual categorization. Memory and Cognition, 30, 325–339.
39. Mestry, N., Wenger, M. J., & Donnelly, N. (2012). Identifying sources of configurality in three face processing tasks. Frontiers in Perception Science, 3, 456.
40. Navarro, D. J., Griffiths, T. L., Steyvers, M., & Lee, M. D. (2006). Modeling individual differences using Dirichlet processes. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 50(2), 101–122.
41. Pell, P. J., & Richards, A. (2013). Overlapping facial expression representations are identity-dependent. Vision Research, 79(7), 1–7.
42. Preacher, K. J., & Merkle, E. C. (2012). The problem of model selection uncertainty in structural equation modeling. Psychological Methods, 17(1), 1.
43. Richler, J. J., Gauthier, I., Wenger, M. J., & Palmeri, T. J. (2008). Holistic Processing of Faces: Perceptual & Decisional Components. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(2), 328–342.
44. Schweinberger, S. R., Burton, A. M., & Kelly, S. W. (1999). Asymmetric dependencies in perceiving identity and emotion: Experiments with morphed faces. Perception & Psychophysics, 61(6), 1102–1115.
45. Schweinberger, S. R., & Soukup, G. R. (1998). Asymmetric relationships among perceptions of facial identity, emotion, and facial speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(6), 1748–1765.
46. Silbert, N. H. (2012). Syllable structure and integration of voicing and manner of articulation information in labial consonant identification. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(5), 4076–4086.
47. Silbert, N. H., & Thomas, R. (2013). Decisional separability, model identification, and statistical inference in the general recognition theory framework. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(1), 1–20.
48. Soto, F. A., & Wasserman, E. A. (2011). Asymmetrical interactions in the perception of face identity and emotional expression are not unique to the primate visual system. Journal of Vision, 11(3).
49. Stankiewicz, B. J. (2002). Empirical evidence for independent dimensions in the visual representation of three-dimensional shape. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(4), 913–932.
50. Thomas, R. (2001). Perceptual interactions of facial dimensions in speeded classification and identification. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 63(4), 625–650.
51. Thomas, R. D., & Silbert, N. H. (2014). Technical clarification to Silbert and Thomas (2013): “Decisional separability, model identification, and statistical inference in the general recognition theory framework”. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(2), 574–575.
52. Ungerleider, L. G., & Haxby, J. V. (1994). “What” and “where” in the human brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 4(2), 157–165.
53. Vogels, R., Biederman, I., Bar, M., & Lorincz, A. (2001). Inferior temporal neurons show greater sensitivity to nonaccidental than to metric shape differences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13(4), 444–453.
54. Wald, A. (1943). Tests of statistical hypotheses concerning several parameters when the number of observations is large. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 54(3), 426–482.
55. Yankouskaya, A., Booth, D. A., & Humphreys, G. (2012). Interactions between facial emotion and identity in face processing: Evidence based on redundancy gains. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 74(8), 1692–1711.