Measuring the benefits of the Intangible Cultural Heritage Hall in Jeonju Korea: Results of a Contingent Valuation Survey

Journal of Cultural Heritage

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 236-238

  Lee, Joo Suk ^a  

^a Hoseo University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Contingent valuation; Intangible Cultural Heritage; Jeonju, Korea; Spike model

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925374310     PISSN: 12962074     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2014.05.001     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Kriström B. Spike models in contingent valuation. Am J Agr Econ 1997, 79:1013-1023.
2. Navrud S., Ready R. Valuing cultural heritage 2000, Edward Elgar, UK.
3. Sanz J., Herrero L., Bedate A. Contingent valuation and semiparametric methods: a case study of the National Museum of Sculpture in Valladolid Spain. J Cult Econ 2003, 27(3):241-257.
4. Throsby D. Determining the value of cultural goods: how much (or how little) does contingent valuation tell us?. J Cult Econ 2003, 27(3):275-285.
5. Del Saz Salazar S., Montagud Marques J. Valuing cultural heritage: the social benefits of restoring and old Arab tower. J Cult Herit 2005, 6(1):69-77.
6. Tuan T., Navrud S. Capturing the benefits of preserving cultural heritage. J Cult Herit 2008, 9(3):326-337.
7. Báez A., Herrero L. Using contingent valuation and cost-benefit analysis to design a policy for restoring cultural heritage. J Cult Herit 2012, 13(3):235-245.
8. Arrow K., Solow R., Portney P., Leamer E., Radner R., Schuman E. Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Federal Register 1993, 58(10).