Stapled versus handsewn intestinal anastomosis in emergency laparotomy: A systemic review and meta-analysis

Surgery (United States)

Volumn 157, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 609-618

  Naumann, David N ^a,b   Bhangu, Aneel ^a   Kelly, Michael ^a   Bowley, Douglas M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS BIRMINGHAM NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN ELIZABETH HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSCESS; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ANASTOMOTIC FAILURE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; EMERGENCY SURGERY; ENTEROCUTANEOUS FISTULA; HANDSEWN ANASTOMOSIS; HUMAN; INTESTINE ANASTOMOSIS; LAPAROTOMY; META ANALYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL STAPLING; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; ABDOMINAL ABSCESS; ANASTOMOSIS; ANASTOMOTIC LEAK; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EMERGENCY; INTESTINAL FISTULA; INTESTINE; PROCEDURES; RISK; STATISTICAL MODEL; SURGERY; SUTURING METHOD;

ABDOMINAL ABSCESS; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; ANASTOMOTIC LEAK; EMERGENCIES; HUMANS; INTESTINAL FISTULA; INTESTINES; LAPAROTOMY; MODELS, STATISTICAL; ODDS RATIO; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); SURGICAL STAPLING; SUTURE TECHNIQUES;

EID: 84925373669     PISSN: 00396060     EISSN: 15327361     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.09.030     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. C.B. Neutzling, S.A. Lustosa, I.M. Proenca, E.M. da Silva, and D. Matos Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012 CD003144
2. P.Y. Choy, I.P. Bissett, J.G. Docherty, B.R. Parry, A. Merrie, and A. Fitzgerald Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011 CD004320
3. S.I. Brundage, G.J. Jurkovich, D.B. Hoyt, N.Y. Patel, S.E. Ross, and R. Marburger WTA Multi-institutional Study Group. Western Trauma Association. Stapled versus sutured gastrointestinal anastomoses in the trauma patient: a multicenter trial J Trauma 51 2001 1054 1061
4. A.W. Kirkpatrick, K.A. Baxter, R.K. Simons, E. Germann, C.E. Lucas, and A.M. Ledgerwood Intra-abdominal complications after surgical repair of small bowel injuries: an international review J Trauma 55 2003 399 406
5. J.P. Farrah, C.W. Lauer, M.S. Bray, J.M. McCartt, M.C. Chang, and J.W. Meredith Stapled versus hand-sewn anastomoses in emergency general surgery: a retrospective review of outcomes in a unique patient population J Trauma Acute Care Surg 74 2013 1187 1192
6. D. Demetriades, J.A. Murray, L.S. Chan, C. Ordoñez, D. Bowley, and K.K. Nagy Handsewn versus stapled anastomosis in penetrating colon injuries requiring resection: a multicenter study J Trauma 52 2001 117 121
7. Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses [cited 2014 May 10]. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. Available from: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical-epidemiology/oxford.asp.
8. J.P. Higgins, D.G. Altman, P.C. Gøtzsche, P. Jüni, D. Moher, A.D. Oxman Cochrane Bias Methods Group Cochrane Statistical Methods Group The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials BMJ 18 2011 343
9. D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D.G. Altman PRISMA Group Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement Int J Surg 8 2010 336 341
10. R. DerSimonian, and N. Laird Meta-analysis in clinical trials Control Clin Trials 7 1986 177 188
11. S.I. Brundage, G.J. Jurkovich, D.C. Grossman, W.C. Tong, C.D. Mack, and R.V. Maier Stapled versus sutured gastrointestinal anastomoses in the trauma patient J Trauma 47 1999 500 507
12. J.D. Witzke, J.J. Kraatz, J.M. Morken, A.L. Ney, M.A. West, and J.M. Van Camp Stapled versus hand sewn anastomoses in patients with small bowel injury: a changing perspective J Trauma 49 2000 660 665
13. J.L. Kashuk, C.C. Cothren, E.E. Moore, J.L. Johnson, W.L. Biffl, and C.C. Barnett Primary repair of civilian colon injuries is safe in the damage control scenario Surgery 146 2009 663 668
14. F. Catena, M. La Donna, S. Gagliardi, A. Avanzolini, and M. Taffurelli Stapled versus hand-sewn anastomoses in emergency intestinal surgery: results of a prospective randomized study Surg Today 34 2004 123 126
15. H.M. MacRae, and R.S. McLeod Handsewn vs. stapled anastomoses in colon and rectal surgery: a meta-analysis Dis Colon Rectum 41 1998 180 189
16. S.A. Lustosa, D. Matos, A.N. Atallah, and A.A. Castro Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001 CD003144
17. S.A. Lustosa, D. Matos, A.N. Atallah, and A.A. Castro Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials Sao Paulo Med J 120 2002 132 136
18. P.Y. Choy, I.P. Bissett, J.G. Docherty, B.R. Parry, and A.E. Merrie Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007 CD004320
19. K. Hemming, T. Pinkney, K. Futaba, M. Pennant, D.G. Morton, and R.J. Lilford A systematic review of systematic reviews and panoramic meta-analysis: staples versus sutures for surgical procedures PLoS One 8 2013 e75132
20. P.R. Rosenbaum, and D.B. Rubin The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects Biometrika 70 1983 41 55
21. R.S. McLeod, B.G. Wolff, S. Ross, R. Parkes, M. McKenzie Investigators of the CAST Trial Recurrence of Crohn's disease after ileocolic resection is not affected by anastomotic type: results of a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial Dis Colon Rectum 52 2009 919 927
22. A. Khan, L. Hsee, S. Mathur, and I. Civil Damage-control laparotomy in non trauma patients: review of indications and outcomes J Trauma Acute Care Surg 75 2013 365 368
23. J. Gong, Z. Guo, Y. Li, L. Gu, W. Zhu, and J. Li Stapled vs hand suture closure of loop ileostomy: a meta-analysis Colorectal Dis 1 2013 e561 e568
24. R.N. Whistance, R.O. Forsythe, A.G. McNair, S.T. Brookes, K.N. Avery, A.M. Pullyblank Core Outcomes and iNformation SEts iN SUrgical Studies - ColoRectal Cancer Working Group A systematic review of outcome reporting in colorectal cancer surgery Colorectal Dis 15 2013 e548 e560
25. A. Bhangu, A.G. Kolias, T. Pinkney, N.J. Hall, and J.E. Fitzgerald Surgical research collaboratives in the UK Lancet 382 2013 1091 1092