Stapled vs hand suture closure of loop ileostomy: A meta-analysis

Colorectal Disease

Volumn 15, Issue 10, 2013, Pages

  Gong, J ^a   Guo, Z ^a   Li, Y ^a   Gu, L ^a   Zhu, W ^a   Li, J ^a   Li, N ^a  

^a MEDICAL SCHOOL OF NANJING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Closure; Complications; Loop ileostomy; Stapled; Sutured

Indexed keywords

ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ARTICLE; COCHRANE LIBRARY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBASE; FEVER; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; ILEOSTOMY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTESTINE LOOP; LENGTH OF STAY; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SMALL INTESTINE OBSTRUCTION; SURGICAL STAPLING; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SUTURING METHOD; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; WOUND INFECTION;

CLOSURE; COMPLICATIONS; LOOP ILEOSTOMY; STAPLED; SUTURED;

ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; HUMANS; ILEOSTOMY; INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION; INTESTINE, SMALL; LENGTH OF STAY; OPERATIVE TIME; SURGICAL STAPLING; SUTURE TECHNIQUES;

EID: 84886243280     PISSN: 14628910     EISSN: 14631318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/codi.12388     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Senapati A, Nicholls RJ, Ritchie JK, Tibbs CJ, Hawley PR. Temporary loop ileostomy for restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 1993; 80: 628-30.
2. Sharma A, Deeb AP, Rickles AS, Iannuzzi JC, Monson JR, Fleming FJ. Closure of defunctioning loop ileostomy is associated with considerable morbidity. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15: 458-62.
3. Chow A, Tilney HS, Paraskeva P, Jeyarajah S, Zacharakis E, Purkayastha S. The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6, 107 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009; 24: 711-23.
4. Kaidar-Person O, Person B, Wexner SD. Complications of construction and closure of temporary loop ileostomy. J Am Coll Surg 2005; 201: 759-73.
5. Berry DP, Scholefield JH. Closure of loop ileostomy. Br J Surg 1997; 84: 524.
6. Leung TT, MacLean AR, Buie WD, Dixon E. Comparison of stapled versus handsewn loop ileostomy closure: a meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2008; 12: 939-44.
7. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996; 17: 1-12.
8. Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality if nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Available from: URL: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.htm (accessed January 2013).
9. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 327: 557-60.
10. Feinberg SM, McLeod RS, Cohen Z. Complications of loop ileostomy. Am J Surg 1987; 153: 102-7.
11. Bain IM, Patel R, Keighley MR. Comparison of sutured and stapled closure of loop ileostomy after restorative proctocolectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1996; 78: 555-6.
12. Hull TL, Kobe I, Fazio VW. Comparison of handsewn with stapled loop ileostomy closures. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39: 1086-9.
13. Phang PT, Hain JM, Perez-Ramirez JJ, Madoff RD, Gemlo BT. Techniques and complications of ileostomy takedown. Am J Surg 1999; 177: 463-6.
14. Hasegawa H, Radley S, Morton DG, Keighley MR. Stapled versus sutured closure of loop ileostomy: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2000; 231: 202-4.
15. García-Botello SA, García-Armengol J, García-Granero E et al. A prospective audit of the complications of loop ileostomy construction and takedown. Dig Surg 2004; 6: 440-6.
16. Wong KS, Remzi FH, Gorgun E et al. Loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy: outcome in 1, 504 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 243-50.
17. Shelygin YA, Chernyshov SV, Rybakov EG. Stapled ileostomy closure results in reduction of postoperative morbidity. Tech Coloproctol 2010; 14: 19-23.
18. Horisberger K, Beldi G, Candinas D. Loop ileostomy closure: comparison of cost effectiveness between suture and stapler. World J Surg 2010; 34: 2867-71.
19. Balik E, Eren T, Bugra D, Buyukuncu Y, Akyuz A, Yamaner S. Revisiting stapled and handsewn loop ileostomy closures: a large retrospective series. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2011; 66: 1935-41.
20. Luglio G, Pendlimari R, Holubar SD, Cima RR, Nelson H. Loop ileostomy reversal after colon and rectal surgery: a single institutional 5-year experience in 944 patients. Arch Surg 2011; 146: 1191-6.
21. Faunø L, Rasmussen C, Sloth KK, Sloth AM, Tøttrup A. Low complication rate after stoma closure. Consultants attended 90% of the operations. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14: e499-505.
22. Gustavsson K, Gunnarsson U, Jestin P. Postoperative complications after closure of a diverting ileostoma-differences according to closure technique. Int J Colorectal Dis 2012; 27: 55-8.
23. Löffler T, Rossion I, Bruckner T et al. HAnd Suture Versus STApling for Closure of Loop Ileostomy (HASTA Trial): results of a multicenter randomized trial (DRKS00000040). Ann Surg 2012; 256: 828-35.
24. Sajja SB, Schein M. Early postoperative small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 683-91.
25. Camacho-Mauries D, Rodriguez-Díaz JL, Salgado-Nesme N, González QH, Vergara-Fernández O. Randomized clinical trial of intestinal ostomy takedown comparing pursestring wound closure vs conventional closure to eliminate the risk of wound infection. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56: 205-11.
26. Lahat G, Tulchinsky H, Goldman G, Klauzner JM, Rabau M. Wound infection after ileostomy closure: a prospective randomized study comparing primary vs. delayed primary closure techniques. Tech Coloproctol 2005; 9: 206-8.