Neural substrates underlying stimulation-enhanced motor skill learning after stroke

Brain

Volumn 138, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 149-163

  Lefebvre, Stéphanie ^a   Dricot, Laurence ^a   Laloux, Patrice ^a   Gradkowski, Wojciech ^b,c   Desfontaines, Philippe ^d   Evrard, Frédéric ^e   Peeters, André ^f   Jamart, Jacques ^g   Vandermeeren, Yves ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^b Imagilys   (Belgium)

^c WARSAW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^d Centre Hospitalier Chretien   (Belgium)

^e Clinique Saint Pierre of Ottignies   (Belgium)

^f CLINIQUES UNIVERSITAIRES SAINT LUC   (Belgium)

^g UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF MONT GODINNE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

OXYGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BOLD SIGNAL; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; LEARNING; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; OXYGEN BLOOD LEVEL; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURDUE PEGBOARD TEST; SHAM PROCEDURE; STROKE PATIENT; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BLOOD; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPLICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR CORTEX; MOTOR SKILLS DISORDERS; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STROKE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VASCULARIZATION; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN MAPPING; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LEARNING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR CORTEX; MOTOR SKILLS DISORDERS; OXYGEN; STROKE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84925354599     PISSN: 00068950     EISSN: 14602156     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awu336     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Boggio PS, Nunes A, Rigonatti SP, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A, Fregni F. Repeated sessions of noninvasive brain DC stimulation is associated with motor function improvement in stroke patients. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2007; 25: 123-9.
2. Bolognini N, Vallar G, Casati C, Latif LA, El-Nazer R, Williams J, et al. Neurophysiological and behavioral effects of tDCS combined with constraint-induced movement therapy in poststroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011; 25: 819-29.
3. Bonita R, Beaglehole R. Recovery of motor function after stroke. Stroke 1988; 19: 1497-500.
4. Bosnell RA, Kincses T, Stagg CJ, Tomassini V, Kischka U, Jbabdi S, et al. Motor practice promotes increased activity in brain regions structurally disconnected after subcortical stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011; 25: 607-16.
5. Boyd LA, Vidoni ED, Wessel BD. Motor learning after stroke: is skill acquisition a prerequisite for contralesional neuroplastic change? Neurosci Lett 2010; 482: 21-5.
6. Bradnam LV, Stinear CM, Barber PA, Byblow WD. Contralesional hemisphere control of the proximal paretic upper limb following stroke. Cereb Cortex 2012; 22: 2662-71.
7. Caimmi M, Carda S, Giovanzana C, Maini ES, Sabatini AM, Smania N, et al. Using kinematic analysis to evaluate constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008; 22: 31-9.
8. Carey JR, Kimberley TJ, Lewis SM, Auerbach EJ, Dorsey L, Rundquist P, et al. Analysis of fMRI and finger tracking training in subjects with chronic stroke. Brain 2002; 125: 773-88.
9. Contreras-Vidal JL, Buch ER. Effects of Parkinson's disease on visuomotor adaptation. Exp Brain Res 2003; 150: 25-32.
10. Dayan E, Cohen LG. Neuroplasticity subserving motor skill learning. Neuron 2011; 72: 443-54.
11. Dipietro L, Krebs HI, Volpe BT, Stein J, Bever C, Mernoff ST, et al. Learning, not adaptation, characterizes stroke motor recovery: evidence from kinematic changes induced by robot-assisted therapy in trained and untrained task in the same workspace. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2012; 20: 48-57.
12. Halsband U, Lange RK. Motor learning in man: a review of functional and clinical studies. J Physiol Paris 2006; 99: 414-24.
13. Hardwick RM, Rottschy C, Miall RC, Eickhoff SB. A quantitative meta-analysis and review of motor learning in the human brain. Neuroimage 2013; 67: 283-97.
14. Hummel FC, Cohen LG. Non-invasive brain stimulation: a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke? Lancet Neurol 2006; 5: 708-12.
15. Hummel FC, Voller B, Celnik P, Floel A, Giraux P, Gerloff C, et al. Effects of brain polarization on reaction times and pinch force in chronic stroke. BMC Neurosci 2006; 7: 73.
16. Karni A, Meyer G, Jezzard P, Adams MM, Turner R, Ungerleider LG. Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning. Nature 1995; 377: 155-8.
17. Kasner SE. Clinical interpretation and use of stroke scales. Lancet Neurol 2006; 5: 603-12.
18. Kasner SE, Chalela JA, Luciano JM, Cucchiara BL, Raps EC, Mcgarvey ML, et al. Reliability and validity of estimating the NIH stroke scale score from medical records. Stroke 1999; 30: 1534-7.
19. Kitago T, Krakauer JW. Motor learning principles for neurorehabilitation. Handb Clin Neurol 2013; 110: 93-103.
20. Krakauer JW. Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol 2006; 19: 84-90.
21. Krakauer JW, Mazzoni P. Human sensorimotor learning: adaptation, skill, and beyond. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2011; 21: 636-44.
22. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Van Der Grond J, Prevo AJ. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke 2003; 34: 2181-6.
23. Lai SM, Studenski S, Duncan PW, Perera S. Persisting consequences of stroke measured by the stroke impact scale. Stroke 2002; 33: 1840-4.
24. Lefebvre S, Dricot L, Gradkowski W, Laloux P, Vandermeeren Y. Brain activations underlying different patterns of performance improvement during early motor skill learning. Neuroimage 2012; 62: 290-9.
25. Lefebvre S, Laloux P, Peeters A, Desfontaines P, Jamart J, Vandermeeren Y. Dual-tDCS enhances online motor skill learning and long-term retention in chronic stroke patients. Front Human Neurosci 2013a; 6: 343.
26. Lefebvre S, Thonnard JL, Laloux P, Peeters A, Jamart J, Vandermeeren Y. Single session of dual-tDCS transiently improves precision grip and dexterity of the paretic hand after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2013b; 28: 100-10.
27. Lindenberg R, Nachtigall L, Meinzer M, Sieg MM, Floel A. Differential effects of dual and unihemispheric motor cortex stimulation in older adults. J Neurosci 2013; 33: 9176-83.
28. Lindenberg R, Renga V, Zhu LL, Nair D, Schlaug G. Bihemispheric brain stimulation facilitates motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Neurology 2010; 75: 2176-84.
29. Madhavan S, Shah B. Enhancing motor skill learning with transcranial direct current stimulation - a concise review with applications to stroke. Front Psychiatry 2012; 3: 66.
30. Mai J, Paxinos G, Voss T. Atlas of the Human Brain. 3rd edn. 2007.
31. Matthews PM, Johansen-Berg H, Reddy H. Non-invasive mapping of brain functions and brain recovery: applying lessons from cognitive neuroscience to neurorehabilitation. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2004; 22: 245-60.
32. Meehan SK, Dao E, Linsdell MA, Boyd LA. Continuous theta burst stimulation over the contralesional sensory and motor cortex enhances motor learning post-stroke. Neurosci Lett 2011a; 500: 26-30.
33. Meehan SK, Randhawa B, Wessel B, Boyd LA. Implicit sequence-specific motor learning after subcortical stroke is associated with increased prefrontal brain activations: an fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp 2011b; 32: 290-303.
34. Murase N, Duque J, Mazzocchio R, Cohen LG. Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke. Ann Neurol 2004; 55: 400-9.
35. Nair DG, Renga V, Lindenberg R, Zhu L, Schlaug G. Optimizing recovery potential through simultaneous occupational therapy and non-invasive brain-stimulation using tDCS. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2011; 29: 411-20.
36. O'shea J, Boudrias MH, Stagg CJ, Bachtiar V, Kischka U, Blicher JU, et al. Predicting behavioural response to TDCS in chronic motor stroke. Neuroimage 2014; 85 (Pt 3): 924-33.
37. Penta M, Tesio L, Arnould C, Zancan A, Thonnard JL. The ABILHAND questionnaire as a measure of manual ability in chronic stroke patients: rasch-based validation and relationship to upper limb impairment. Stroke 2001; 32: 1627-34.
38. Picard N, Strick PL. Imaging the premotor areas. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2001; 11: 663-72.
39. Reis J, Schambra HM, Cohen LG, Buch ER, Fritsch B, Zarahn E, et al. Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106: 1590-5.
40. Rosso C, Valabregue R, Attal Y, Vargas P, Gaudron M, Baronnet F, et al. Contribution of corticospinal tract and functional connectivity in hand motor impairment after stroke. PLoS One 2013; 8: e73164.
41. Sehm B, Kipping J, Schafer A, Villringer A, Ragert PA. Comparison between Uni- and bilateral tDCS effects on functional connectivity of the human motor cortex. Front Hum Neurosci 2013; 7: 183.
42. Stagg CJ, Bachtiar V, O'shea J, Allman C, Bosnell RA, Kischka U, et al. Cortical activation changes underlying stimulation-induced behavioural gains in chronic stroke. Brain 2012; 135: 276-84.
43. Stagg CJ, Nitsche MA. Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroscientist 2011; 17: 37-53.
44. Talairach JTP. Co-planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain. 3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging. Stuttgart: Thieme Verlag; 1988.
45. Tiffin J, Asher EJ. The purdue pegboard; norms and studies of reliability and validity. J Appl Psychol 1948; 32: 234-47.
46. Vines BW, Cerruti C, Schlaug G. Dual-hemisphere tDCS facilitates greater improvements for healthy subjects' non-dominant hand compared to uni-hemisphere stimulation. BMC Neurosci 2008; 9: 103.
47. Waters-Metenier S, Husain M, Wiestler T, Diedrichsen J. Bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation enhances effector-independent representations of motor synergy and sequence learning. J Neurosci 2014; 34: 1037-50.
48. Yamada N, Kakuda W, Kondo T, Shimizu M, Mitani S, Abo M. Bihemispheric repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with intensive occupational therapy for upper limb hemiparesis after stroke: a preliminary study. Int J Rehabil Res 2013; 36: 323-9.
49. Zhu LL, Lindenberg R, Alexander MP, Schlaug G. Lesion load of the corticospinal tract predicts motor impairment in chronic stroke. Stroke 2010; 41: 910-5.
50. Zimerman M, Heise KF, Hoppe J, Cohen LG, Gerloff C, Hummel FC. Modulation of training by single-session transcranial direct current stimulation to the intact motor cortex enhances motor skill acquisition of the paretic hand. Stroke 2012; 43: 2185-91.