Incorporating quality function deployment with modularity for the end-of-life of a product family

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 87, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 423-430

  Yu, Suiran ^a   Yang, Qingyan ^a   Tao, Jing ^a   Xu, Xun ^b  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

End of life; Modularity; Product family; QFD

Indexed keywords

FUZZY CLUSTERING; LIFE CYCLE; QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT; DESIGN;

END OF LIVES; FUZZY CLUSTERING METHOD; MODULAR METHODS; MODULARITY; PRODUCT FAMILIES; PRODUCT FAMILY DESIGN; PRODUCT VARIETY; QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENTS (QFD); QFD;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 84925340306     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.037     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Aizawa, H., Yoshida, H., Sakai, S.I., 2008. Current results and future perspectives for Japanese recycling of home electrical appliances. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 52 (12), 1399-1410.
2. Akao, Y., 1990. Quality Function Deployment QFD: Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design. Productivity Press, Cambridge.
3. Chinese WEEE, 2010. http://ncswm.mep.gov.cn/wwwroot/250197.html.
4. Fan, S.K.S., Fan, C., Yang, J.H., Liu, K.F.R., 2013. Disassembly and recycling cost analysis of waste notebook and the efficiency improvement by re-design process. J. Clean. Prod. 39, 209-219.
5. Fu, G., 1997. An algorithm for calculating the global optimal fuzzy equivalent matrix of a fuzzy similarity matrix. Fuzzy Set. Syst. 2, 47-48.
6. Gershenson, J.K., Prasad, G.J., Zhang, Y., 2003. Product modularity: definitions and benefits. J. Eng. Des. 14 (3), 295-313.
7. Gu, P., Sosale, S., 1999. Product modularization for life cycle engineering. Robot. Cim. Int. Manuf. 15 (5), 387-401.
8. Hsiao, S.-W., Liu, E., 2004. A structural component-based approach for designing product family. Comput. Ind. 56 (1), 13-28.
9. Huang, C.C., Liang, W.Y., Chuang, H.F., Chang, Z.Y., 2012. A novel approach to product modularity and product disassembly with the consideration of 3R-abilities. Comput. Ind. Eng 62 (1), 96-107.
10. Jiao, J., Simpson, T.W., Siddique, Z., 2007. Product family design and platform-based product development: A state-of-the-art review. J. Intell. Manuf. 18 (1), 5-29.
11. Kim, K., Chhajed, D., 2000. Commonality in product design: cost saving, valuation change and cannibalization. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 125, 602-621.
12. Kuo, T., Wu, H., Shieh, J., 2009. Integration of environmental considerations in quality function deployment by using fuzzy logic. Expert. Syst. Appl. 36 (3), 7148-7156.
13. Lee, S.G., Lye, S.W., Khoo, M.K., 2001. A multi-objective methodology for evaluating product end-of-life options and disassembly. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. 18 (2), 148-156.
14. Martin, M.V., Ishii, K., 2002. Design for variety: developing standardized and modularized product platform architectures. Res. Eng. Des. 13, 213-235.
15. Masui, K., Sakao, T., Aizamw, T., Inaba, A., 2000. Design for environment in early stage of product development using Quality Function Deployment. In: Joint International Congress and Exhibition, Electronics Goes Green 2000+, pp. 197-202.
16. Newcomb, P.J., Bras, B., Rosen, D.W., 1998. Implications of modularity on product design for the life cycle. J. Mech. Des. 120 (3), 483-490.
17. Park, J., Shin, D., Insun, P., Hyemi, H., 2008. A product platform concept development method. J. Eng. Des. 19 (6), 515-532.
18. Tseng, H.E., Chang, C.C., Cheng, C.J., 2010. Disassembly-oriented assessment methodology for product modularity. Int. J. Prod. Res. 48 (14), 4297-4320.
19. Xu, X., Chen, L.Q., Xie, S., 2006. Framework of a product lifecycle costing system. Trans. ASME. J. Comput. Inform. Sci. Eng. 6, 69-77.
20. Yu, S., Yang, Q., Tao, J., Tian, X., Yin, F., 2011. Product modular design incorporating life cycle issues-Group Genetic Algorithm (GGA) based method. J. Clean. Prod. 19, 1016-1032.
21. Zhang, Y., 1999. Green QFD-II: A life cycle approach for environmentally conscious manufacturing by integrating LCA and LCC into QFD matrices. Int. J. Prod. Res. 37 (5), 1075-1091.