Practical guidelines for reporting results in single- and multi-component analytical calibration: A tutorial

Analytica Chimica Acta

Volumn 868, Issue , 2015, Pages 10-22

  Olivieri, Alejandro C ^a  

^a Universidad Nacional de Rosario   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Analytical calibration; First order multivariate calibration; Reporting results; Univariate calibration

Indexed keywords

ESTIMATION;

ACCURACY AND PRECISION; ANALYTICAL CALIBRATION; ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGY; AVERAGE PREDICTION ERROR; LIMITS OF DETECTION AND QUANTITATION; MULTIVARIATE CALIBRATION; REPORTING RESULTS; UNIVARIATE;

CALIBRATION;

ACCURACY; ANALYTIC METHOD; CALIBRATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIMIT OF DETECTION; LIMIT OF QUANTITATION; LINEAR SYSTEM; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MATHEMATICAL VARIABLE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REVIEW; STANDARD ADDITION; UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PROCEDURES; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

CALIBRATION; CHEMISTRY TECHNIQUES, ANALYTICAL; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; RESEARCH DESIGN; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84925306369     PISSN: 00032670     EISSN: 18734324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2015.01.017     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Danzer K., Currie L.A. Guidelines for calibration in analytical chemistry. Part 1. Fundamentals and single component calibration. Pure Appl. Chem. 1998, 70:993-1014.
2. Massart D.L., Vandeginste B.G.M., Buydens L.M.C., De Jong S., Lewi P.J., Smeyers- Verbeke J. Handbook of Chemometrics and Qualimetrics, Part A 1997, Elsevier, Amsterdam, (Chapter 36).
3. Olivieri A.C., Escandar G.M. Practical Three-way Calibration 2014, Elsevier, Waltham, MA, USA.
4. ASTM E29, American Society for Testing and Materials, Standard Practice for Using Significant Digits in Test Data to Determine Conformance with Specifications, January (1) (1967).
5. Cuadros Rodríguez L., García Campaña A.M., Jiménez Linares C., Román Ceba M. Estimation of performance characteristics of an analytical method using the data set of the calibration experiment. Anal. Lett. 1993, 26:1243-1258.
6. Comprehensive Chemometrics 2009, 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam, (Chapters 1.09-1.20).
7. Leardi R. Experimental design in chemistry: a tutorial. Anal. Chim. Acta 2009, 652:161-172.
8. Vera-Candioti L., Olivieri A.C., Goicoechea H.C. Simultaneous multiresponse optimization applied to epinastine determination in human serum by using capillary electrophoresis. Anal. Chim. Acta 2007, 595:310-318.
9. Derringer G., Suich R. Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. J. Qual. Technol. 1980, 12:214-219.
10. M.C. Ortiz, M.S. Sánchez, L.A. Sarabia, Quality of analytical measurements: univariate regression, 1, 127-169 (Chapter 1.05).
11. Analytical Methods Committee Is my calibration linear?. Analyst 1994, 119:2363-2366.
12. Currie L.A. Recommendations in evaluation of analytical methods including detection and quantification capabilities. Pure Appl. Chem. 1995, 67:1699-1723.
13. Olivieri A.C. Analytical figures of merit: from univariate to multiway calibration. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114:5358-5378.
14. MATLAB, The Mathworks, Natick, Massachussets.
15. European Commission, Decision 2002/657/EC, implementing Council Directive 96/23/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results, OJ L221, 17.8.2002, 8-36.
16. Castells R.C., Castillo M.A. Systematic errors: detection and correction by means of standard calibration, Youden calibration and standard additions method in conjunction with a method response model. Anal. Chim. Acta 2000, 423:179-185.
17. Andrade J.M., Estévez-Pérez M.G. Statistical comparison of the slopes of two regression lines: a tutorial. Anal. Chim. Acta 2014, 838:1-12.
18. Lozano V.A., Tauler R., Ibañez G.A., Olivieri A.C. Standard addition analysis of fluoroquinolones in human serum in the presence of the interferent salicylate using lanthanide-sensitized excitation-time decay luminescence data and multivariate curve resolution. Talanta 2009, 77:1715-1723.
19. van der Voet H. Comparing the predictive accuracy of models using a simple randomization test. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1994, 25:313-323.
20. Miller J.N., Miller J.C. Statistics Chemometrics for Analytical Chemistry 2000, Prentice-Hall, Harlow, UK. fourth ed.
21. González A.G., Herrador M.A. A practical guide to analytical method validation, including measurement uncertainty and accuracy profiles. Trends Anal. Chem. 2007, 26:227-238.
22. González A.G., Herrador M.A., Asuero A.G. Intra-laboratory testing of method accuracy from recovery assays. Talanta 1999, 48:729-736.
23. Riu J., Rius F.X. Assessing the accuracy of analyical methods using linear regression with errors in both axes. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68:1851-1857.
24. Franco V., Mantovani V.E., Goicoechea H.C., Olivieri A.C. Teaching chemometrics with a bioprocess: analytical methods comparison using bivariate linear regression. Chem. Edu. 2002, 7:265-269.
25. Wold S., Sjöström M., Eriksson L. PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2001, 58:109-130.
26. Wentzell P.D., Vega Montoto L. Comparison of principal components regression and partial least squares regression through generic simulations of complex mixtures. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2003, 65:257-279.
27. Zhang G.-C., Li Z., Yan X.-M., Cheng C.-G., Zhou P., Lin G.-L., Zhou C.-J., Liu N., Han X.-R. Rapid analysis of apple leaf nitrogen using near infrared spectroscopy and multiple linear regression. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2012, 43:1768-1772.
28. Haaland D.M., Thomas E.V. Partial least-squares methods for spectral analyses. 1. Relation to other quantitative calibration methods and the extraction of qualitative information. Anal. Chem. 1988, 60:1193-1202.
29. Fernández-Pierna J.A., Abbas O., Lecler B., Hogrel P., Dardenne P., Baeten V. NIR fingerprint screening for early control of non-conformity at feed mills. Food Chem. 2014, (in press). 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.09.105.
30. Mehmood T., Liland K.H., Snipen L., Sæbø S. A review of variable selection methods in partial least squares regression. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2012, 118:62-69.
31. Ugulino Araújo M.C., Bezerra Saldanha T.C., Kawakami Harrop Galvão R., Yoneyama T., Caldas Chame H., Visani V. The successive projections algorithm for variable selection in spectroscopic multicomponent analysis. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2001, 57:65-73.
32. Manne R. Analysis of two PLS algorithms for multivariate calibration. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1987, 2:187-197.
33. Garrido-Frenich A., Jouan-Rimbaud D., Massart D.L., Kuttatharmmakul S., Martínez- Galera M., Martínez-Vidal J.L. Wavelength selection method for multicomponent spectrophotometric determinations using partial least squares. Analyst 1995, 120:2787-2792.
34. Centner V., Massart D.L., de Noord O.E., de Jong S., Vandeginste B.M., Sterna C. Elimination of uninformative variables in multivariate calibration. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68:3851-3858.
35. Chong I.-G., Jun C.-H. Performance of some variable selection methods when multicollinearity is present. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2005, 78:103-112.
36. Brown C.D., Green R.L. Critical factors limiting the interpretation of regression vectors in multivariate calibration. Trends Anal. Chem. 2009, 28:506-514.
37. Seasholtz M.B., Kowalski B.R. Qualitative information for multivariate calibration models. Appl. Spectrosc. 1990, 44:1337-1348.
38. Burnham A.J., MacGregor J.F., Viveros R. Interpretation of regression coefficients under a latent variable regression model. J. Chemometr. 2001, 15:265-284.
39. Kvalheim O.M., Karstaag T.V. Interpretation of latent- variable regression models. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1989, 7:39-51.
40. Despagne F., Massart D.L. Neural networks in multivariate calibration. Analyst 1998, 123:157R-178R.
41. Haykin S. Neural Networks. A Comprehensive Foundation 1999, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA. second ed.
42. Czekaj T., Wu W., Walczak B. About kernel latent variable approaches and SVM. J. Chemometr. 2005, 19:341-354.
43. de Souza S.V.C., Junqueira R.G. A procedure to assess linearity by ordinary least squares method. Anal. Chim. Acta 2005, 552:25-35.
44. Centner V., de Noord O.E., Massart D.L. Detection of nonlinearity in multivariate calibration. Anal. Chim. Acta 1998, 376:153-168.
45. Durbin J., Watson G.S. Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression I. Biometrika 1959, 37:409-428.
46. Geladi P., MacDougall D., Martens H. Linearization and scatter-correction for near-infrared reflectance spectra of meat. Appl. Spectrosc. 1985, 39:491-500.
47. Barnes R.J., Dhanoa M.S., Lister S.J. Standard normal variate transformation and detrending of near-infrared diffuse reflectance spectra. Appl. Spectrosc. 1989, 43:772-777.
48. Brown C.D. Rational Approaches to Data Preprocessing in Multivariate Calibration, Ph.D. Thesis 2000, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
49. Wold S., Antti H., Lindgren F., Öhman J. Orthogonal signal correction of near-infrared spectra. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1998, 44:175-185.
50. Fearn T. On orthogonal signal correction. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2000, 50:47-52.
51. Lestander T.A., Lindeberg J., Eriksson D., Bergsten U. Prediction of Pinus sylvestris clearwood properties using NIR spectroscopy and biorthogonal partial least squares regression. Can. J. For. Res. 2008, 38:2052-2062.
52. Brown C.D., Wentzell P. Hazards of digital smoothing filters as a preprocessing tool in multivariate calibration. J. Chemometr. 1999, 13:133-152.
53. Ortiz M.C., Sarabia L.A., Sánchez M.S. Tutorial on evaluation of type I and type II errors in chemical analyses: from the analytical detection to authentication of products and process control. Anal. Chim. Acta 2010, 674:123-142.
54. Boque R., Larrechi M.S., Rius F.X. Multivariate detection limits with fixed probabilities of error. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1999, 45:397-408.
55. Allegrini F., Olivieri A.C. IUPAC-consistent approach to the limit of detection in partial least-squares calibration. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86:7858-7866.
56. Olivieri A.C., Goicoechea H.C., Iñón F.A. MVC1: an integrated Matlab toolbox for firstorder multivariate calibration. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2004, 73:189-197.
57. Vessman J., Stefan R.I., van Staden J.F., Danzer K., Lindner W., Burns D.T., Fajgelj A., Müller H. Selectivity in analytical chemistry (IUPAC recommendations 2001). Pure Appl. Chem. 2001, 73:1381-1386.
58. Saxberg B.E.H., Kowalski B.R. Generalized standard addition method. Anal. Chem. 1979, 51:1031-1038.
59. Lozano V.A., Tauler R., Ibañez G.A., Olivieri A.C. Standard addition analysis of fluoroquinolones in human serum in the presence of the interferent salicylate using lanthanide-sensitized excitation-time decay luminescence data and multivariate curve resolution. Talanta 2009, 77:1715-1723.
60. Rubio S., Gomez-Hens A., Valcarcel M. Analytical applications of synchronous fluorescence spectroscopy. Talanta 1986, 33:633-640.
61. Olivieri A.C. Analytical advantages of multivariate data processing. One, two, three, infinity?. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80:5713-5720.
62. Boeris V., Arancibia J.A., Olivieri A.C. Determination of five pesticides in juice, fruit and vegetable samples by means of liquid chromatography combined with multivariate curve resolution. Anal. Chim. Acta 2014, 814:23-30.