Sodium magnetic resonance imaging of ankle joint in cadaver specimens, volunteers, and patients after different cartilage repair techniques at 7 T initial results

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 246-254

  Zbýň, Štefan ^a   Brix, Martin O ^a   Juras, Vladimir ^a,b   Domayer, Stephan E ^a   Walzer, Sonja M ^a   Mlynarik, Vladimir ^a   Apprich, Sebastian ^a   Buckenmaier, Kai ^c   Windhager, Reinhard ^a   Trattnig, Siegfried ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b INSTITUTE OF MEASUREMENT SCIENCE   (Slovakia)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

7 T; Ankle joint; Cartilage repair; Glycosaminoglycan content; Sodium MRI

Indexed keywords

SODIUM;

ADULT; ANKLE; ARTICLE; AUTOTRANSPLANTATION; CADAVER; CARTILAGE; CARTILAGE REPAIR TECHNIQUE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MATRIX ASSOCIATED AUTOLOGOUS CHONDROCYTE TRANSPLANTATION; MICROFRACTURE ASSOCIATED AUTOLOGOUS CHONDROCYTE TRANSPLANTATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM; SODIUM MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SUBTALAR JOINT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TISSUE REPAIR; VOLUNTEER; ARTICULAR CARTILAGE; CARTILAGE CELL; METABOLISM; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SURGERY; WOUND HEALING; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ANKLE JOINT; CADAVER; CARTILAGE, ARTICULAR; CHONDROCYTES; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SODIUM; TRANSPLANTATION, AUTOLOGOUS; WOUND HEALING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84925271434     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: 15360210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000117     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Ronga M, Grassi FA, Montoli C, et al. Treatment of deep cartilage defects of the ankle with matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI). Foot Ankle Surg. 2005;11:29-33.
2. Zengerink M, Struijs PA, Tol JL, et al. Treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18:238-246.
3. Giannini S, Battaglia M, Buda R, et al. Surgical treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus by open-field autologous chondrocyte implantation: a 10-year follow-up clinical and magnetic resonance imaging T2-mapping evaluation. Am J Sports Med . 2009;37:112S-118S.
4. Giannini S, Buda R, Vannini F, et al. Arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation in osteochondral lesions of the talus: surgical technique and results. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:873-880.
5. Knutsen G, Drogset JO, Engebretsen L, et al. A randomized trial comparing autologous chondrocyte implantation with microfracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89A:2105-2112.
6. Saris DB, Vanlauwe J, Victor J, et al. Characterized chondrocyte implantation results in better structural repair when treating symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee in a randomized controlled trial versus microfracture. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:235-246.
7. Kuettner KE, Cole AA. Cartilage degeneration in different human joints. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005;13:93-103.
8. Trattnig S, Mamisch TC, Pinker K, et al. Differentiating normal hyaline cartilage from post-surgical repair tissue using fast gradient echo imaging in delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI (dGEMRIC) at 3 tesla. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:1251-1259.
9. Trattnig S, Burstein D, Szomolanyi P, et al. T1(Gd) gives comparable information as Delta T1 relaxation rate in dGEMRIC evaluation of cartilage repair tissue. Invest Radiol. 2009;44:598-602.
10. Schmitt B, Zbyn S, Stelzeneder D, et al. Cartilage quality assessment by using glycosaminoglycan chemical exchange saturation transfer and (23)Na MR imaging at 7 T. Radiology. 2011;260:257-264.
11. Keenan KE, Besier TF, Pauly JM, et al. Prediction of glycosaminoglycan content in human cartilage by age, T1rho and T2 MRI. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011;19:171-179.
12. Wheaton AJ, Borthakur A, Shapiro EM, et al. Proteoglycan loss in human knee cartilage: quantitation with sodium MR imaging - feasibility study. Radiology. 2004;231:900-905.
13. Zbyn S, Mlynarik V, Juras V, et al. Sodium MR imaging of articular cartilage pathologies. Curr Radiol Rep. 2014;2:41.
14. Mankin HJ. Biochemical and metabolic aspects of osteoarthritis. Orthop Clin North Am. 1971;2:19-31.
15. Borthakur A, Mellon E, Niyogi S, et al. Sodium and T1rho MRI for molecular and diagnostic imaging of articular cartilage. NMR Biomed. 2006;19:781-821.
16. Trattnig S, Welsch GH, Juras V, et al. 23 Na MR imaging at 7 T after knee matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation preliminary results. Radiology. 2010;257:175-184.
17. Chang G, Madelin G, Sherman OH, et al. Improved assessment of cartilage repair tissue using fluid-suppressed Na inversion recovery MRI at 7 Tesla: preliminary results. Eur Radiol . 2012;22:1341-1349.
18. Zbyn S, Stelzeneder D, Welsch GH, et al. Evaluation of native hyaline cartilage and repair tissue after two cartilage repair surgery techniques with 23Na MR imaging at 7 T: initial experience. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012;20:837-845.
19. Borthakur A, Shapiro EM, Akella SV, et al. Quantifying sodium in the human wrist in vivo by using MR imaging. Radiology. 2002;224:598-602.
20. Steadman JR, Rodkey WG, Rodrigo JJ. Microfracture: surgical technique and rehabilitation to treat chondral defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;391:S362-S369.
21. Grigolo B, Lisignoli G, Piacentini A, et al. Evidence for redifferentiation of human chondrocytes grown on a hyaluronan-based biomaterial (HYAff 11): molecular, immunohistochemical and ultrastructural analysis. Biomaterials. 2002;23:1187-1195.
22. Saxena A, Eakin C. Articular talar injuries in athletes: results of microfracture and autogenous bone graft. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:1680-1687.
23. Noyes FR, Barber SD, Mooar LA. A rationale for assessing sports activity levels and limitations in knee disorders. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;246:238-249.
24. Marlovits S, Singer P, Zeller P, et al. Magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) for the evaluation of autologous chondrocyte transplantation: determination of interobserver variability and correlation to clinical outcome after 2 years. Eur J Radiol. 2006;57:16-23.
25. Shapiro EM, Borthakur A, Dandora R, et al. Sodium visibility and quantitation in intact bovine articular cartilage using high field (23)Na MRI and MRS. J Magn Reson. 2000;142:24-31.
26. Madelin G, Jerschow A, Regatte RR. Sodium relaxation times in the knee joint in vivo at 7 T. NMR Biomed. 2012;25:530-537.
27. Treppo S, Koepp H, Quan EC, et al. Comparison of biomechanical and biochemical properties of cartilage from human knee and ankle pairs. J Orthop Res. 2000;18:739-748.
28. Pietila K, Kantomaa T, Pirttiniemi P, et al. Comparison of amounts and properties of collagen and proteoglycans in condylar, costal and nasal cartilages. Cells Tissues Organs. 1999;164:30-36.
29. Notohamiprodjo M, Kuschel B, Horng A, et al. 3D-MRI of the ankle with optimized 3D-SPACE. Invest Radiol. 2012;47:231-239.
30. Battaglia M, Vannini F, Buda R, et al. Arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation in osteochondral lesions of the talus: mid-term T2-mapping MRI evaluation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19:1376-1384.
31. Domayer SE, Apprich S, Stelzeneder D, et al. Cartilage repair of the ankle: first results of T2 mapping at 7.0 T after microfracture and matrix associated autologous cartilage transplantation. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012;20:829-836.
32. Andreisek G, Weiger M. T2∗ mapping of articular cartilage: current status of research and first clinical applications. Invest Radiol. 2014;49:57-62.
33. Apprich S, Trattnig S, Welsch GH, et al. Assessment of articular cartilage repair tissue after matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation or the microfracture technique in the ankle joint using diffusion-weighted imaging at 3 tesla. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012;20:703-711.
34. Wiewiorski M, Miska M, Kretzschmar M, et al. Delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage of the ankle joint: results after autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC)-aided reconstruction of osteochondral lesions of the talus. Clin Radiol. 2013;68:1031-1038.
35. Becher C, Driessen A, Hess T, et al. Microfracture for chondral defects of the talus: maintenance of early results at midterm follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18:656-663.
36. Kuni B, Schmitt H, Chloridis D, et al. Clinical and MRI results after microfracture of osteochondral lesions of the talus. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012;132:1765-1771.
37. Aurich M, Bedi HS, Smith PJ, et al. Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral lesions of the ankle with matrix-associated chondrocyte implantation: early clinical and magnetic resonance imaging results. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39:311-319.
38. Brix M, Chiari C, Nehrer S, et al. Cartilage repair of the ankle with microfracturing or autologous chondrocyte implantation/matrix associated autologous chondrocyte implantation: follow up from 1 to 14 years. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012;20:S130-S131.
39. Welsch GH, Trattnig S, Domayer S, et al. Multimodal approach in the use of clinical scoring, morphological MRI and biochemical T2-mapping and diffusion-weighted imaging in their ability to assess differences between cartilage repair tissue after microfracture therapy and matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation: a pilot study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009;17:1219-1227.
40. Welsch GH, Mamisch TC, Domayer SE, et al. Cartilage T2 assessment at 3-TMR imaging: in vivo differentiation of normal hyaline cartilage from reparative tissue after two cartilage repair procedures - Initial experience. Radiology. 2008;247:154-161.
41. Sugimoto K, Takakura Y, Tohno Y, et al. Cartilage thickness of the talar dome. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:401-404.