The oncological safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy - A Swedish matched cohort study

European Journal of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 40, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 1209-1215

  Adam, H ^a   Bygdeson, M ^a   De Boniface, J ^a,b  

^a KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Breast reconstruction; Local recurrence; Nipple sparing mastectomy; Oncological safety; Survival

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER ADJUVANT THERAPY; CANCER HORMONE THERAPY; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER SPECIFIC SURVIVAL; CANCER SURGERY; CANCER SURVIVAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMMUNOTHERAPY; LOCAL RECURRENCE FREE SURVIVAL; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; MULTIMODALITY CANCER THERAPY; NIPPLE SPARING MASTECTOMY; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CARCINOMA, LOBULAR; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; MIDDLE AGED; NIPPLE; PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SWEDEN; TUMOR RECURRENCE; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CARCINOMA, LOBULAR; COHORT STUDIES; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMAPLASTY; MASTECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NIPPLES; ORGAN SPARING TREATMENTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SWEDEN; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84925227280     PISSN: 07487983     EISSN: 15322157     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.07.037     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. A. Jemal, F. Bray, M.M. Center, J. Ferlay, E. Ward, and D. Forman Global cancer statistics CA Cancer J Clin 61 2011 69 90
2. A.E. Dragun, B. Huang, T.C. Tucker, and W.J. Spanos Increasing mastectomy rates among all age groups for early stage breast cancer: a 10-year study of surgical choice Breast J 18 2012 318 325
3. S. Reefy, N. Patani, A. Anderson, G. Burgoyne, H. Osman, and K. Mokbel Oncological outcome and patient satisfaction with skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective observational study BMC Cancer 10 2010 171
4. C. Eriksen, J. Frisell, M. Wickman, E. Lidbrink, K. Krawiec, and K. Sandelin Immediate reconstruction with implants in women with invasive breast cancer does not affect oncological safety in a matched cohort study Breast Cancer Res Treat 127 2011 439 446
5. S.S. Kroll, A. Khoo, and S.E. Singletary et al. Local recurrence risk after skin-sparing and conventional mastectomy: a 6-year follow-up Plast Reconstr Surg 104 1999 421 425
6. R.M. Simmons, S.K. Fish, and L. Gayle et al. Local and distant recurrence rates in skin-sparing mastectomies compared with non-skin-sparing mastectomies Ann Surg Oncol 6 1999 676 681
7. J. Horiguchi, J.H.Y. Iino, and H. Takei et al. A comparative study of subcutaneous mastectomy with radical mastectomy Anticancer Res 21 2001 2963 2967
8. A.K. Schecter, M.B. Freeman, D. Giri, E. Sabo, and J. Weinzweig Applicability of the nipple-areola complex-sparing mastectomy: a prediction model using mammography to estimate risk of nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients Ann Plast Surg 56 2006 498 504 discussion 504
9. B. Gerber, A. Krause, and T. Reimer et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure Ann Surg 238 2003 120 127
10. R.M. Simmons, M. Brennan, P. Christos, V. King, and M. Osborne Analysis of nipple/areolar involvement with mastectomy: can the areola be preserved? Ann Surg Oncol 9 2002 165 168
11. E.F. Brachtel, J.E. Rusby, and J.S. Michaelson et al. Occult nipple involvement in breast cancer: clinicopathologic findings in 316 consecutive mastectomy specimens J Clin Oncol 27 2009 4948 4954
12. J.J. Vyas, R.F. Chinoy, and J.S. Vaidya Prediction of nipple and areola involvement in breast cancer Eur J Surg Oncol 24 1998 15 16
13. U. Wertheim, and L. Ozzello Neoplastic involvement of nipple and skin flap in carcinoma of the breast Am J Surg Pathol 4 1980 543 549
14. V. Sacchini, J.A. Pinotti, and A.C. Barros et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk reduction: oncologic or technical problem? J Am Coll Surg 203 2006 704 714
15. J.Y. Petit, U. Veronesi, and P. Rey et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: risk of nipple-areolar recurrences in a series of 579 cases Breast Cancer Res Treat 114 2009 97 101
16. K.P. Benediktsson, and L. Perbeck Survival in breast cancer after nipple-sparing subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with implants: a prospective trial with 13 years median follow-up in 216 patients Eur J Surg Oncol 34 2008 143 148
17. B. Gerber, A. Krause, M. Dieterich, G. Kundt, and T. Reimer The oncological safety of skin sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction: an extended follow-up study Ann Surg 249 2009 461 468
18. T. Sakurai, N. Zhang, T. Suzuma, T. Umemura, G. Yoshimura, and Q. Yang Long-term follow-up of nipple-sparing mastectomy without radiotherapy: a single center study at a Japanese institution Med Oncol 30 2013 481
19. S. Paepke, R. Schmid, and S. Fleckner et al. Subcutaneous mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola skin: broadening the indications Ann Surg 250 2009 288 292
20. P. de Alcantara Filho, D. Capko, J.M. Barry, M. Morrow, A. Pusic, and V.S. Sacchini Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk-reducing surgery: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience Ann Surg Oncol 18 2011 3117 3122
21. Z. Stanec, R. Zic, and S. Budi et al. Skin and nipple-areola complex sparing mastectomy in breast cancer patients: 15-year experience Ann Plast Surg 2013 Dec 25 [Epub ahead of print]
22. S.B. Coopey, R. Tang, and L. Lei et al. Increasing eligibility for nipple-sparing mastectomy Ann Surg Oncol 20 2013 3218 3222
23. R.E. Eisenberg, J.S. Chan, A.J. Swistel, and S.A. Hoda Pathological evaluation of nipple-sparing mastectomies with emphasis on occult nipple involvement: the Weill-Cornell experience with 325 cases Breast J 20 2014 15 21
24. S. Sood, E. Elder, and J. French Nipple-sparing mastectomy with implant reconstruction: the Westmead experience ANZ J Surg 2014 Apr 29 [Epub ahead of print]
25. K.E. Poruk, J. Ying, and J.R. Chidester et al. Breast cancer recurrence after nipple-sparing mastectomy: one institution's experience Am J Surg 2014 May 4 [Epub ahead of print]
26. M.W. Kissin, and A.E. Kark Nipple preservation during mastectomy Br J Surg 74 1987 58 61
27. J. Luttges, H. Kalbfleisch, and P. Prinz Nipple involvement and multicentricity in breast cancer. A study on whole organ sections J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 113 1987 481 487
28. C.K. Christian, J. Niland, and S.B. Edge et al. A multi-institutional analysis of the socioeconomic determinants of breast reconstruction: a study of the national comprehensive cancer network Ann Surg 243 2006 241 249
29. G. Abdoli, M. Bottai, and T. Moradi Cancer mortality by country of birth, sex, and socioeconomic position in Sweden, 1961-2009 PLoS ONE 9 3 2014 e93174
30. P.H. Lahmann, K. Hoffmann, and N. Allen et al. Body size and breast cancer risk: findings from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer And Nutrition (EPIC) Int J Cancer 111 5 2004 762 771
31. M.E. Lippman, J.C. Allegra, and E.B. Thompson et al. The relation between estrogen receptors and response rate to cytotoxic chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer N Engl J Med 298 1978 1223 1228
32. V.J. Bardou, G. Arpino, R.M. Elledge, C.K. Osborne, and G.M. Clark Progesterone receptor status significantly improves outcome prediction over estrogen receptor status alone for adjuvant endocrine therapy in two large breast cancer databases J Clin Oncol 21 2003 1973 1979
33. I. Fredriksson, G. Liljegren, and L.G. Arnesson et al. Local recurrence in the breast after conservative surgery - a study of prognosis and prognostic factors in 391 women Eur J Cancer 38 2002 1860 1870