Pathological evaluation of nipple-sparing mastectomies with emphasis on occult nipple involvement: The Weill-Cornell experience with 325 cases

Breast Journal

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 15-21

  Eisenberg, Rachel E K ^a   Chan, Joanna S Y ^a   Swistel, Alexander J ^a   Hoda, Syed A ^a  

^a WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

breast; breast cancer; mastectomy; nipple

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST AREOLA; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST CARE; BREAST METASTASIS; CANCER STAGING; CARCINOGENESIS; CELLULAR PARAMETERS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FROZEN SECTION; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; INVASIVE CARCINOMA; LYMPH NODE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MASTECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; NIPPLE; NIPPLE SPARING MASTECTOMY; ONCOGENESIS AND MALIGNANT TRANSFORMATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TUMOR INVASION; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

BREAST; BREAST CANCER; MASTECTOMY; NIPPLE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; FEMALE; HUMANS; LYMPH NODES; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MASTECTOMY, SUBCUTANEOUS; MIDDLE AGED; NIPPLES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84892774596     PISSN: 1075122X     EISSN: 15244741     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12199     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Jensen JA, Orringer JS, Giuliano AE,. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in 99 patients with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18: 1665-70.
2. Rusby JE, Smith BL, Gui GP,. Nipple-sparing mastectomy. Br J Surg 2010; 97: 305-16.
3. Toth BA, Lappert P,. Modified skin incisions for mastectomy; the need for plastic surgical input in preoperative planning. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991; 87: 1048-53.
4. Gerber B, Krause A, Reimer T, et al,. Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areolar complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure. Ann Surg 2003; 238: 120-7.
5. Reynolds C, Davidson JA, Lindor NM, et al,. Prophylactic and therapeutic mastectomy in BRCA mutation carriers: can the nipple be preserved? Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18: 3102-9.
6. Stolier AJ, Wang J,. Terminal duct lobular units are scarce in the nipple: implications for prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2008; 15: 438-42.
7. Rosen PP, Tench W,. Lobules in the nipple: frequency and significance for breast cancer treatment. Pathol Annu 1985; 20: 317-21.
8. Petit JY, Veronesi U, Rey P, et al,. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: risk of nipple-areolarr recurrences in a series of 579 cases. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009; 114: 97-101.
9. Petit JY, Veronesi U, Lohsiriwat V, et al,. Nipple-sparing mastectomy-is it worth the risk? Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2011; 8: 742-7.
10. Verma GR, Kumar A, Joshi K,. Nipple involvement in peripheral breast carcinoma: a prospective study. Indian J Cancer 1997; 34: 1-5.
11. Menon RS, van Geel AN,. Cancer of the breast with nipple involvement. Br J Cancer 1989; 74: 58-61.
12. Laronga C, Kemp B, Johnston D, et al,. The incidence of occult nipple-areolar complex involvement in breast cancer patients receiving a skin sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 1999; 6: 609-13.
13. Morimoto T, Komaki K, Inui K, et al,. Involvement of nipple and areolar in early breast cancer. Cancer 1985; 55: 2459-63.
14. Maxwell GP, Storm-Dickerson T, Whitworth P, et al,. Advances in nipple-sparing mastectomy: oncological safety and incision selection. Aesthet Surg J 2011; 31: 310-9.
15. Sakamoto N, Fukuma E, Higa K, et al,. Early results of an endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2009; 16: 3406-13.
16. Murthy V, Chamberlain RS,. Defining a place for nipple sparing mastectomy in modern breast care: an evidence based review. Breast J 2012; doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2011.01220.x. [Epub ahead of print].
17. Babiera G, Simmons R,. Nipple-areolar complex-sparing mastectomy: feasibility, patient selection and technique. Ann Surg Oncol 2010; 17: 245-8.
18. Billar JA, Dueck AC, Gray RJ, et al,. Preoperative predictors of nipple-areolar complex involvement for patients undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18: 3123-8.
19. Brachtel EF, Rusby JE, Michaelson JS, et al,. Occult nipple involvement in breast cancer: clinicopathologic findings in 316 consecutive mastectomy specimens. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 4948-54.
20. Rusby JE, Brachtel EF, Othus M, et al,. Development and validation of a model predictive of occult involvement in women undergoing mastectomy. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 1356-61.
21. Weidong L, Shuling W, Xiaojing G, et al,. Nipple involvement in breast cancer: retrospective analysis of 2323 consecutive mastectomy specimens. Int J Surg Pathol 2011; 19: 328-34.
22. Luo D, Ha J, Latham B, et al,. The accuracy of intraoperative subareolarr frozen section in nipple-sparing mastectomies. Ochsner J 2010; 10: 188-92.
23. Going JJ, Moffat DF,. Escaping from flatland: clinical and biological aspects of human mammary duct anatomy in three dimesions. J Pathol 2004; 203: 538-44.
24. Lohsiriwat V, Martella S, Rietjens M, et al,. Paget's Disease as a local recurrence after nipple-sparing mastectomy: clinical presentation, treatment, outcome, and risk factor analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 19: 1850-5.
25. Mastracci TL, Shadeo A, Colby SM, et al,. Genomic alterations in lobular neoplasia: a microarray comparative genomic hybridization signature for early neoplastic proliferation in the breast. Genes Chromosom Cancer 2006; 45: 1007-17.
26. Chuba PJ, Hamre MR, Yap J, et al,. Bilateral risk for subsequent breast cancer after lobular carcinoma in situ: analysis of surveillance, epidemiology, and end results data. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 5534-41.
27. Benediktsson KP, Perbeck DG, Mirsky D,. Survival in breast cancer after nipple-sparing subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with implants: a prospective trial with 13 years medial follow-up in 216 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 2008; 34: 134-8.
28. Voltura AM, Tsangaris TN, Rosson GD, et al,. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: critical assessment of 51 procedures and implications for selection criteria. Ann Surg Oncol 2008; 15: 3396-401.
29. Crowe JP Jr, Kim JA, Yetman R, et al,. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: technique and results of 54 procedures. Arch Surg 2004; 139: 148-50.
30. Sacchini V, Pinnotti JA, Banos AC, et al,. Nipple sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk reduction: oncologic or technical problem? J Am Coll Surg 2006; 203: 704-14.
31. Paepke S, Schmid R, Fleckner S, et al,. Subcutaneous mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areolar skin: broadening the indications. Ann Surg 2009; 250: 288-92.
32. Harness JK, Vetter TS, Salibian AH,. Areolar and nipple-areolar-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer treatment and risk reduction: report of an initial experience in a community hospital setting. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18: 917-22.
33. Spear SL, Willey SC, Feldman ED, et al,. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for prophylactic and therapeutic indications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128: 1005-14.
34. de Alcantara Filho P, Capko D, Barry JM, et al,. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk-reducing surgery: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18: 3117-22.
35. Garcia-Etienne CA, Cody HS III, Disa JJ, et al,. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: initial experience at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre and a comprehensive review of the literature. Breast J 2009; 15: 440-9.
36. Petit JY, Veronesi U, Orecchia R, et al,. Risk factors associated with recurrence after nipple-sparing mastectomy for invasive and intraepithelial neoplasia. Ann Oncol 2012; 23: 2053-8.
37. Kneubil MC, Lohsiriwat V, Curigliano G, et al,. Risk of locoregional recurrence in patients with false-negative frozen section or close margins of retroareolar specimen in nipple-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 19: 4117-23.