Are visual texture-selective areas recruited during haptic texture discrimination?

NeuroImage

Volumn 94, Issue , 2014, Pages 129-137

  Podrebarac, Samantha K ^a   Goodale, Melvyn A ^a   Snow, Jacqueline C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

Collateral sulcus; Haptics; Lateral occipital complex; Shape; Texture; Vision

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; COLLATERAL SULCUS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATERAL OCCIPITAL COMPLEX; MALE; MEDIAL OCCIPITOTEMPORAL CORTEX; NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL RECRUITMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TACTILE DISCRIMINATION; TEMPORAL CORTEX; VENTROMEDIAL TEMPORAL CORTEX; VISION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; TASK PERFORMANCE; TOUCH; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NERVE NET; RECRUITMENT, NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TOUCH; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84925225680     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.013     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Allen H.A., Humphreys G.W. Direct tactile stimulation of dorsal occipito-temporal cortex in a visual agnosic. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19(12):1044-1049. 10.1016/j.cub.2009.04.057.
2. Amedi A., Malach R., Hendler T., Peled S., Zohary E. Visuo-haptic object-related activation in the ventral visual pathway. Nat. Neurosci. 2001, 4:324-330.
3. Amedi A., Jacobson G., Hendler T., Malach R., Zohary E. Convergence of visual and tactile shape processing in the human lateral occipital complex. Cereb. Cortex 2002, 12:1202-1212. 10.1093/cercor/12.11.1202.
4. Amedi A., Von Kriegstein K., Van Atteveldt N., Beauchamp M.S., Naumer M.J. Functional imaging of human cross modal identification and object recognition. Exp. Brain Res. 2005, 166:559-571. 10.1007/s00221-005-2396-5.
5. Arnott S.R., Cant J.S., Dutton G.N., Goodale M.A. Crinkling and crumpling: an auditory fMRI study of material properties. Neuroimage 2008, 43:368-378. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.07.033.
6. Bjorkman M. Relations between intra-modal and cross-modal matching. Scand. J. Psychol. 1967, 8:65-76. 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1967.tb01375.x.
7. Bonda E., Petrides M., Evans A. Neural systems for tactual memories. J. Neurophysiol. 1996, 75:1730-1737.
8. Bradley J.V. Complete counterbalancing of immediate sequential effects in a Latin square design. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1958, 53:525-528. 10.1080/01621459.1958.10501456.
9. Cant J.S., Goodale M.A. Attention to form or surface properties modulates different regions of human occipitotemporal cortex. Cereb. Cortex 2007, 17:713-731. 10.1093/cercor/bhk022.
10. Cant J.S., Arnott S.R., Goodale M.A. fMR-adaptation reveals separate processing regions for the perception of form and texture in the human ventral stream. Exp. Brain Res. 2009, 192:391-405. 10.1007/s00221-008-1573-8.
11. Carter C.S., Braver T.S., Barch D.M., Botvinick M.M., Noll D., Cohen J.D. Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science 1998, 280(5364):747-749. 10.1093/cercor/11.9.825.
12. Cavina-Pratesi C., Kentridge R.W., Heywood C.A., Milner A.D. Separate channels for processing form, texture, and color: evidence from fMRI adaptation and visual object agnosia. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20(10):2319-2332. 10.1093/cercor/bhp298.
13. Deibert E., Kraut M., Kremen S., Hart J. Neural pathways in tactile object recognition. Neurology 1999, 52:41-58.
14. Eck J., Kaas A.L., Goebel R. Crossmodal interactions of haptic and visual texture information in early sensory cortex. Neuroimage 2013, 15:123-135.
15. Field D.J., Hayes A., Hess R.F. Contour integration by the human visual system: evidence for a local "association field". Vision Res. 1993, 33(2):173-193.
16. Gallivan J.P., Chapman C.S., McLean D.A., Flanagan J.R., Culham J.C. Activity patterns in the category-selective occipitotemporal cortex predict upcoming motor actions. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2013, 38(3):2408-2424. 10.1111/ejn.12215.
17. Grefkes C., Weiss P.H., Zilles K., Fink G.R. Cross modal processing of object features in human anterior intraparietal cortex, an fMRI study implies equivalencies between humans and monkeys. Neuron 2002, 35:173-184.
18. Grill-Spector K., Malach R. The human visual cortex. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2004, 27:649-677.
19. Guest S., Spence C. What role does multisensory integration play in the visuotactile perception of texture?. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2003, 50:63-80.
20. Heller M.A. Visual and tactual texture perception: intersensory cooperation. Percept. Psychophys. 1982, 31:339-344.
21. Hollins M., Faldowski R., Rao S., Young F. Perceptual dimensions of tactile surface texture: a multidimensional scaling analysis. Percept. Psychophys. 1993, 54(6):697-705.
22. James T.W., Humphrey K., Gati J.S., Servos P., Menon R.S., Goodale M.A. Haptic study of three-dimensional objects activates extrastriate visual areas. Neuropsychologia 2002, 40:1706-1714.
23. Kaas J.H., Collins C.F. The organization of somatosensory cortex in anthropoid primates. Adv. Neurol. 2003, 93:57-67.
24. Kassuba T., Klinge C., Holig C., Menz M.M., Ptito M., Roder B., Siebner H.R. The left fusiform gyrus hosts trisensory representations of manipulable objects. Neuroimage 2011, 56(3):1566-1577.
25. Kourtzi Z., Kanwisher N. Representation of perceived object shape by the human lateral occipital complex. Science 2001, 293:1506-1509. 10.1126/science.1061133.
26. Lacey S., Tal N., Amedi A., Sathian K. A putative model of multisensory object representation. Brain Topogr. 2009, 21:269-274. 10.1007/s10548-009-0087-4.
27. Lacey S., Flueckiger P., Stilla R., Lava M., Sathian K. Object familiarity modulates the relationship between visual object imagery and haptic shape perception. Neuroimage 2010, 49:1977-1990. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.081.
28. Lederman S.J., Abbott S.G. Texture perception: studies of intersensory organization using a discrepancy paradigm, and visual versus tactual psychophysics. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1981, 7:902-915.
29. Loomis J.M., Klatzky R.L., Lederman S.J. Similarity of tactual and visual picture recognition with limited field of view. Perception 1991, 20(2):167-177.
30. Lucan J.N., Foxe J.J., Gomez-Ramirez M., Sathian K., Molholm S. Tactile shape discrimination recruits human lateral occipital cortex during early perceptual processing. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2010, 11:1813-1821. 10.1002/hbm.20983.
31. Merabet L.B., Swisher J.D., McMains S.A., Halko M.A., Amedi A., Pascual-Leone A., Somers D.C. Combined activation and deactivation of visual cortex during tactile sensory processing. J. Neurophysiol. 2007, 97:1633.
32. Miquee A., Xerri C., Rainville C., Anton J.-L., Nazarian B., Roth M., Zennou-Azogui Y. Neuronal substrates of haptic shape encoding and matching: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neurosci. 2007, 152(1):29-39.
33. Murata A., Gallese V., Luppino G., Kaseda M., Sakata H. Selectivity for the shape, size, and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of monkey parietal area AIP. J. Neurophysiol. 2000, 83:2580-2601.
34. Naumer M.J., Ratz L., Yalachkov Y., Polony A., Doehrmann O., van de Ven V., Muller N.G., Kaiser J., Hein G. Visuohaptic convergence in a corticocerebellar network. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2010, 31(10):1730-1736. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07208.x.
35. Nelson A.J., Staines W.R., Graham S.J., McIlroy W.E. Activation in SI and SII: the influence of vibrotactile amplitude during passive and task-relevant stimulation. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 2004, 19:174-184.
36. Ono M., Kubik S., Abernathey C.D. Atlas of the Cerebral Sulci 1990, Thieme Medical Publishers, New York.
37. O'Sullivan B.T., Roland P.E., Kawashima R. A PET study of somatosensory discrimination in man. Microgeometry versus macrogeometry. Eur. J. Neurosci. 1994, 6(1):137-148.
38. Peltier S., Stilla R., Mariola E., LaConte S., Hu X., Sathian K. Activity and effective connectivity of parietal and occipital cortical regions during haptic shape perception. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:476-483.
39. Petit L., Haxby J.V. Functional anatomy of pursuit eye movements in humans as revealed by fMRI. J. Neurophysiol. 1999, 82(1):463-471.
40. Peuskens H., Claeys K.G., Todd J.T., Norman J.F., Van Hecke P., Orban G.A. Attention to 3-D shape, 3-D motion, and texture in 3-D structure from motion displays. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2004, 16:665-682.
41. Picard D. Tactual, visual, and cross-modal transfer of texture in 5- and 8-year-old children. Perception 2007, 36:722-736.
42. Pietrini P., Furey M.L., Ricciardi E., Gobbini M.I., Wu W.H.C., Cohen L., Guazzelli M., Haxby J. Beyond sensory images: object-based representation in the human ventral pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2004, 101:5658-5663.
43. Prather S.C., Votaw J.R., Sathian K. Task-specific recruitment of dorsal and ventral visual areas during tactile perception. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42:1079-1087.
44. Puce A., Allison T., Asgari M., Gore J.C., McCarthy G. Differential sensitivity of human visual cortex to faces, letter strings and textures: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J. Neurosci. 1996, 16:5005-5215.
45. Reed C.L., Shoham S., Halgren E. Neural substrates of tactile object recognition: an fMRI study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2004, 21(4):236-246.
46. Robinson C.J., Burton H. Somatic submodality distribution within the second somatosensory (SII), 7b, retroinsular, postauditory and granular insular cortical areas of M. fascicularis. J. Comp. Neurol. 1980, 192:93-108.
47. Sathian K., Zangaladze A., Hoffman J.M., Grafton S.T. Feeling with the mind's eye. NeuroReport 1997, 8:3877-3881.
48. Sathian K., Lacey S., Stilla R., Gibson G.O., Deshpanae G., Hu X., LaConte S., Glielmi C. Dual pathways for haptic and visual perception of spatial and texture information. Neuroimage 2011, 57:462-475. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.001.
49. Schifferstein H.N.J., Cleiren M.P.H.D. Capturing product experiences: a split-modality approach. Acta Psychol. (Amst.) 2005, 118:293-318.
50. Servos P., Lederman S., Wilson D., Gati J. fMRI-derived cortical maps for haptic shape, texture and hardness. Cogn. Brain Res. 2001, 12:307-313.
51. Simões-Franklin C., Whitaker T.A., Newell F.N. Active and passive touch differentially activate somatosensory cortex in texture perception. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2011, 32:1067-1080. 10.1002/hbm.21091.
52. Snow J.C., Strother L., Humphreys G.W. Haptic shape processing in visual cortex. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2014, (in press), http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00548.
53. Stilla R., Sathian K. Selective visuo-haptic processing of shape and texture. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2008, 29:1123-1138. 10.1002/hbm.20456.
54. Stoesz M.R., Zhang M., Weisser V.D., Prather S.C., Mao H., Sathian K. Neural networks active during tactile form perception: common and differential activity during macrospatial and microspatial tasks. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2003, 50:41-49.
55. Tal N., Amedi A. Multisensory visual-tactile object related network in humans: insights gained using a novel cross modal adaptation approach. Exp. Brain Res. 2009, 198(2-3):165-182. 10.1007/s00221-009-1949-4.
56. Talairach J., Tournoux P. Co-planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain 1988, Thieme Medical Publishers, New York.
57. Tanaka J., Weiskopf D., Williams P. The role of color in high-level vision. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2001, 5:211-215.
58. Weissman D.H., Woldorff M.G. Cereb. Cortex 2005, 15(6):870-876.
59. Whitaker T.A., Simões-Franklin C., Newell F.N. Vision and touch: independent or integrated systems for the perception of texture?. Brain Res. 2008, 25(1242):59-72.
60. Zhang M., Weisser V.D., Stilla R., Prather S.C., Sathian K. Multisensory cortical processing of object shape and its relation to mental imagery. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2004, 4:251-259.