Robotic surgery for benign gynaecological disease

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Volumn 2014, Issue 12, 2014, Pages

  Liu, Hongqian ^a   Lu, Donghao ^b   Shi, Gang ^a   Song, Huan ^b   Wang, Lei ^c  

^a SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^c SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GYNECOLOGIC DISEASE; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; ROBOT ASSISTED SURGERY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; GENITAL DISEASES, FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPY; META ANALYSIS; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); ROBOTICS; TIME;

FEMALE; GENITAL DISEASES, FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; ROBOTICS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84925224683     PISSN: 14651858     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008978.pub3     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Frick AC, Barber MD, Jelovsek JE, Fu Z, Chen G, Paraiso MR. Cost analysis of laparoscopic versus robotic sacrocolpopexy in a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Pelvic Medicine and Surgery 2011;17 Suppl 1(2):17. [: 37th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, SGS 2011 San Antonio, TX United States]
2. Paraiso M, Chen C, Jelovsek JE, Frick A, Barber MD. Conventional laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacral colpopexy: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Pelvic Medicine and Surgery 2010;16 Suppl 2(5):58-9. [: 31st Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Urogynecologic Society, AUGS Long Beach, CA United States]
3. Paraiso MF, Chen CC, Jelovsek JE, Frick A, Barber MD. Conventional laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacral colpopexy: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2010;17 Suppl 1(6):25. [: 39th Global Congress of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, AAGL 2010 Las Vegas, NV United States]
4. Paraiso MF, Jelovsek JE, Frick A, Chen CC, Barber MD. Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2011;118(5):1005-13.
5. Paraiso MF, Jelovsek JE, Frick A, Chen CCG, Barber MD. Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacral colpopexy: A randomized controlled trial. Neurourology and Urodynamics 2010;29(6):964-5. [: Joint Annual Meeting of the International Continence Society, ICS and International Urogynecological Association, IUGA Toronto, ON Canada]
6. Sarlos D, Kots LV, Stevanovic N, Schar G. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: Costs and preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2010;282 Suppl:11-2. [: 58th Congress of the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Gynakologie und Geburtshilfe, DGGG) Munich Germany]
7. Culligan PJ, Salamon C, Priestley JL, Scherer J, Shariati A. A double-blind randomized clinical trial comparing porcine dermis and polypropylene mesh for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Journal of Pelvic Medicine and Surgery 2010;16 Suppl 2(5):93. [: 31st Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Urogynecologic Society, AUGS Long Beach, CA United States]
8. Lonnerfors C, Persson J. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy: A feasible technique for removal of unfavorably localized myomas. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2009;88(9):994-9.
9. Reza M, Maeso S, Blasco JA, Andradas E. Meta-analysis of observational studies on the safety and effectiveness of robotic gynaecological surgery. The British Journal of Surgery 2010;97(12):1772-83.
10. Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With and Without Robotic Assistance: a Randomized Prospective Trial. Ongoing study March 2007.
11. A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Conventional vs. Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. Ongoing study June 2007.
12. Advincula AP, Song A, Burke W, Reynolds RK. Preliminary experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy. The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists 2004;11:511-8.
13. Advincula AP, Xu X, Goudeau St Ransom SB. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy. A comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2007;14:698-705.
14. Barber HRK. Ovarian cancer diagnosis and management. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1984;150:910-6.
15. Bell MC, Torgerson J, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Suttle AW, Hunt S. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques. Gynecologic Oncology 2008;11(3):407-11.
16. Bulun SE. Endometriosis. The New England Journal of Medicine 2009;175:225-34.
17. Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Germay O, et al. Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases. World Journal of Surgery 2001;25:1467-77.
18. Degueldre M, Vandromme J, Huong PT, Cadiere GB. Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: A feasibility study. Fertility and Sterility 2000;74:1020-3.
19. Dharia Patel SP, Steinkampf MP, Whitten SJ, et al. Robotic tubal anastomosis:surgical technique and cost effectiveness. Fertility and Sterility 2008;90:1175-9.
20. Sarlos D, Kots L, Stevanovic N, Schaer G. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: Outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 2010;150:92-6.
21. De Ridder D. Vesicovaginal fistula: a major healthcare problem. Current Opinion in Urology 2009;19:358-61.
22. Eltabbakh GH, Bower NA. Laparoscopic surgery in endometriosis. Minerva Ginecologica 2008;60(4):323-30.
23. Falcone T, Goldberg JM, Margossian H, Stevens L. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis: a human pilot study. Fertility and Sterility 2000;73(5):1040-2.
24. Giudice LC, Swiersz LM, Burney RO. Endometriosis. Endocrinology. NEW YORK: Elsevier, 2010:2356-70.
25. Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Fusai G, Davidson BR. Robot assistant for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006578.pub2]
26. Hemal AK, Kolla SB, Wadhwa P. Robotic reconstruction for recurrent supratriginal vesicovaginal fistulas. Journal of Urology 2008;180:981-5.
27. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557-60.
28. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
29. Holloway RW, Patel SD, Ahmad S. Robotic surgery in gynecology. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery 2009;98(2):96-109.
30. Johnson K. Incontinence in Malawi: analysis of a proxy measure of vaginalfistula in a national survey. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 2007;99 Suppl 1:122-9.
31. Kho RM, Hilger WS, Hentz JG, Magtibay PM, Magrina JF. Robotic hysterectomy: Technique and initial outcomes. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2007;113:1-4.
32. Kho RM, Akl MN, Cornella JL, et al. Incidence and characteristics of patients with vaginal cuffdehiscence after robotic procedures. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2009;114:231-5.
33. Lenihan JP, Kovanda C, Sheshadri-Kreaden U. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynaecologic surgery?. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2008;15:589-94.
34. Lu D, Liu Z, Shi G, Liu D, Zhou X. Robotic assisted surgery for gynaecological cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008640.pub2]
35. Melamud O, Eichel L, Turbow B, Shanberg A. Laparoscopic vesicovaginal fistula repair with robotic reconstruction. Urology 2005;65:163-6.
36. Mettler L, Ibrahim M, Jonat W. One year of experience working with the aid of a robotic assistant (the voice-controlled optic holder AESOP) in gynaecological endoscopic surgery. Human Reproduction 1998;3(10):2748-50.
37. Nezhat C, Saberi NS, Shahmohamady B, Nezhat F. Robotic-assisted laparoscopy in gynecological surgery. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 2006;10:317-20.
38. Nezhat C, Lavie O, Hsu S, et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic myomectomy compared with standard laparoscopic myomectomy - a retrospective matched control study. Fertility and Sterility 2009;91:556-9.
39. Payne TN, Dauterive FR. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2008;15:286-91. [: OTHER]
40. Reynolds RK, Advincula AP. Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: Technique and initial experience. American Journal of Surgery 2006;191:555-60.
41. Rodgers AK, Goldberg JM, Hammel JP, Falcone T. Tubalanastomosis by robotic compared with outpatient minilaparotomy. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2007;109:1375-80.
42. Schimpf MO, Morgenstern JH, Tulikangas PK, Wagner JR. Vesicovaginal fistula repair without intentional cystotomy using the laparoscopic robotic approach: A case report. Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2007;11:378-80.
43. Sener A, Chew BH, Duvdevani M, Brock GB, Vilos GA, Pautler SE. Combined transurethral and laparoscopic partial cystectomy and robot-assisted bladder repair for the treatment of bladder endometrioma. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2006;13:245-8.
44. Sundaram BM, Kalidasan G, Hemal AK. Robotic repair of vesicovaginal fistula: Case series of five patients. Urology 2006;67:970-3.
45. Young TK, Sang WK, Yong WJ. Robotic surgery in gynecologic field. Yonsei Medical Journal 2008;49(6):886-90. [: OTHER]