Day care compared with inpatient management of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy: A randomized controlled trial

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 124, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 743-748

  McCarthy, Fergus P ^a   Murphy, Aileen ^b   Khashan, Ali S ^b   McElroy, Brendan ^b   Spillane, Niamh ^b   Marchocki, Zibi ^b   Sarkar, Rupak ^b   Higgins, John R ^b  

^a Irish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research   (Ireland)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLIENT SATISFACTION QUESTIONNAIRE SCORE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAY CARE; FEMALE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NAUSEA AND VOMITING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREGNANCY; PREGNANT WOMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCORING SYSTEM; FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; FIRST TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITALIZATION; IRELAND; LENGTH OF STAY; MORNING SICKNESS; NAUSEA; PATIENT SELECTION; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PROCEDURES; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TEACHING HOSPITAL; TERTIARY CARE CENTER; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VOMITING;

ANTIEMETIC AGENT;

ANTIEMETICS; DAY CARE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HOSPITALIZATION; HOSPITALS, TEACHING; HUMANS; INPATIENTS; IRELAND; LENGTH OF STAY; MORNING SICKNESS; NAUSEA; PATIENT SELECTION; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY TRIMESTER, FIRST; RISK ASSESSMENT; TERTIARY CARE CENTERS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL; VOMITING;

EID: 84925221807     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: 1873233X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000449     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Gazmararian JA, Petersen R, Jamieson DJ, Schild L, Adams MM, Deshpande AD, et al. Hospitalizations during pregnancy among managed care enrollees. Obstet Gynecol 2002;100:94-100.
2. Gadsby R, Barnie-Adshead AM, Jagger C. A prospective study of nausea and vomiting during pregnancy. Br J Gen Pract 1993; 43:245-8.
3. Jarvis S, Nelson-Piercy C. Management of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy. BMJ 2011;342:d3606.
4. World Health Organization. International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, 10th Revision. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2007.
5. McCarthy FP, Khashan AS, North RA, Moss-Morris R, Baker PN, Dekker G, et al. A prospective cohort study investigating associations between hyperemesis gravidarum and cognitive, behavioural and emotional well-being in pregnancy. PloS One 2011;6:e27678.
6. Bailit JL. Hyperemesis gravidarium: epidemiologic findings from a large cohort. Am J Obst Gynecol 2005;193:811-4.
7. Chin RK, Lao TT. Low birth weight and hyperemesis gravidarum. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1988;28:179-83.
8. Verberg MF, Gillott DJ, Al-Fardan N, Grudzinskas JG. Hyperemesis gravidarum, a literature review. Hum Reprod Update 2005;11:527-39.
9. Dodds L, Fell DB, Joseph KS, Allen VM, Butler B. Outcomes of pregnancies complicated by hyperemesis gravidarum. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:285-92.
10. Weigel RM, Weigel MM. Nausea and vomiting of early pregnancy and pregnancy outcome. A meta-analytical review. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989;96:1312-8.
11. Gross S, Librach C, Cecutti A. Maternal weight loss associated with hyperemesis gravidarum: a predictor of fetal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;160:906-9.
12. Tuffnell DJ, Lilford RJ, Buchan PC, Prendiville VM, Tuffnell AJ, Holgate MP, et al. Randomised controlled trial of day care for hypertension in pregnancy. Lancet 1992;339:224-7.
13. Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, et al. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2001;134:663-94.
14. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 2001;357:1191-4.
15. Larsen DL, Attkisson CC, Hargreaves WA, Nguyen TD. Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: development of a general scale, Eval Program Plann 1979;2:197-207.
16. Attkisson CC, Greenfield TK. The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) scales and the Service Satisfaction Scale-30 (SSS-30). In Sederer LI, Dickey B, editors. Outcomes assessment in clinical practice. Baltimore (MD): Williams & Wilkins; 1995. p. 120-7.
17. Attkisson CC, Greenfield TK. The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 and the Service Satisfaction Scale-30. In: Maruish M, editor. The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcome assessment. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1994. p. 402-20.
18. Jewell D, Young G. Interventions for nausea and vomiting in early pregnancy. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue 9. Art. No.: CD000145. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000145.pub2.
19. Ismail SK, Kenny L. Review on hyperemesis gravidarum. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2007;21:755-69.
20. Holmgren C, Aagaard-Tillery KM, Silver RM, Porter TF, Varner M. Hyperemesis in pregnancy: an evaluation of treatment strategies with maternal and neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198:56.e1-4.
21. Källén B. Use of antihistamine drugs in early pregnancy and delivery outcome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2002;11: 146-52.
22. Magee LA, Mazzotta P, Koren G. Evidence-based view of safety and effectiveness of pharmacologic therapy for nausea and vomiting of pregnancy (NVP). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186(5 suppl understanding):S256-61.
23. Mazzotta P, Magee LA. A risk-benefit assessment of pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments for nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. Drugs 2000;59:781-800.
24. Bland M. An introduction into medical statistics. 3rd ed. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; 2000.