Aristotle on homonymy: Dialectic and science

Aristotle on Homonymy: Dialectic and Science

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1-220

  Ward, Julie K ^a  

^a LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925217332     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511663697     Document Type: Book

References (158)

1. Ackrill, J. L. 1979. Categories and De Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
2. Ackrill, J. L. 1981. “Aristotle's Theory of Definition: Some Questions on Posterior Analytics II. 8-10.” In E. Berti, ed., Aristotle on Science: The Posterior Analytics, 359-84. Padova: Antenore.
3. Alexander, A. 1891a. In Aristotelis Metaphysica Commentaria. In M. Hay-duck, ed., Commentaria in Aristotelum Graeca. I. Berlin: G. Reimer.
4. Alexander, A. 1891b. In Aristotelis Topicorum Libri Octo Commentaria. In M. Wallies, ed., Commentaria in Aristotelum Graeca, vol. 2. Berlin: G. Reimer.
5. Allen, Reginald. 1963. “Participation and Predication in Plato's Middle Dialogues.” In R. Allen, ed., Studies in Plato's Metaphysics, 43-60. London: Routledge andKegan Paul.
6. Annas, Julia. 1994. “Plato the Skeptic.” In Paul A. Vander Waerdt, ed., The Socratic Movement, 309-40. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
7. Annas, Julia. 1999. “Aristotle on Human Nature and Political Virtue.” In Lloyd Gerson, ed., Aristotle Critical Assessments, vol. 4, 48-66. London and New York: Routledge.
8. Anton, John. 1968. “The Aristotelian Doctrine of Homonuma in the Categories and its Platonic Antecedents.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 6: 315-26.
9. Anton, John. 1969. “Ancient Interpretations of Aristotle's Doctrine of Homonuma.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 7:1-18.
10. Ashworth, E.J. 1995. “Suarez on the Analogy of Being: Some Historical Background.” Vivarium 33: 50-75.
11. Aubenque, Pierre. 1962. Le Probleme de L’Etre chez Aristote. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
12. Balme, D. M. 1972. Aristotle's De Partibus Animalium I & De Generatione Animalium I. Translated with Notes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
13. Balme, D. M. 1987. “Aristotle's Use of Division and Differentiae.” In A. Gotthelf and J. Lennox, eds., PhilosophicalIssues in Aristotle's Biology, 69-89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Barnes, Jonathan. 1971. “Homonymy in Aristotle and Speusippus.” Classical Quarterly 21: 65-80.
15. Barnes, Jonathan. 1975. “Aristotle's Theory of Demonstration.” In Barnes, J., M. Schofield, and R. Sorabji, eds., Articles on Aristotle, vol. 1: Science, 65-87. London: Duckworth.
16. Barnes, Jonathan. 1980. “Aristotle and the Methods of Ethics.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 34: 490-51.
17. Barnes, Jonathan. 1981. “Proof and the Syllogism.” In E. Berti, ed., Aristotle on Science: The Posterior Analytics. Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium Aristotelicum, 17-59. Padova: Antenore.
18. Barnes, Jonathan. 1994. Aristotle: Posterior Analytics. Translated with Commentary. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
19. Barnes, Jonathan. 1999. “An Introduction to Aspasius.” In A. Alberti, and R. Sharples, eds., Aspasius: The Earliest Extant Commentary on Aristotle's Ethics, 1-50. Berlin: De Gruyter.
20. Barnes, Jonathan, M. Schofield, and R. Sorabji, eds. 1979. Articles on Aristotle, vol. 3: Metaphysics. London: Duckworth
21. Bayer, Greg. 1998. “Classification and Explanation in Aristotle's Theory of Definition.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 36: 487-504.
22. Berti, Enrico. 1971. “Multiplicite et Unite du Bien selon EE8.” In P. Moreaux and D. Harlfinger, eds., Untersuchungen surEudemischen Ethik, 157-84. Berlin: De Gruyter.
23. Berti, Enrico. 1996. “Does Aristotle's Conception of Dialectic Develop?” In W. Wians, ed., Aristotle's Philosophical Development, 105-30. Lanham, Md: Rowman and Littlefield.
24. Berti, Enrico. 1999. “Amecizia e ‘Focal Meaning’” In A. Alberti and R. Sharples, eds., Aspasius: The Earliest Extant Commentaries, 176-90. Berlin: De Gruyter.
25. Berti, Enrico. 2001. “Multiplicity and Unity of Being in Aristotle.” Proceedings of the Aristotle Society 101: 185-207.
26. Blackson, Thomsas. 1991. “Plato and the Senses of Words.” Journal of the History of Philosophy (April): 169-82.
27. Bloom, Allan. 1991. Plato: Republic. Translated with Commentary. 2nd ed. New York: Basic Books.
28. Bluck, R. S. 1955. Plato: Phaedo. Translated with Introduction and Notes. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
29. Bolton, Robert. 1976. “Essentialism and Semantic Theory in Aristotle: Posterior Analytics. 7-10.” Philosophical Review 85: 514-44.
30. Bolton, Robert. 1978. “Aristotle's Definitions of the Soul: De Anima II, 1-3.” Phronesis 23: 258-78.
31. Bolton, Robert. 1985. “Aristotle on the Signification of Names.” In Language and Reality in Greek Philosophy, 153-62. Second International Philosophy Symposium. Athens: Hellenike Philosophike Hetaireia.
32. Bolton, Robert. 1987. “Definition and Scientific Method in Aristotle's Posterior Analytics and Generation of Animals.” In A. Gotthelf, and J. Lennox, eds., Philosophical Issues in Aristotle's Biology, 120-66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Bolton, Robert. 1990. “The Epistemological Basis of Aristotelian Dialectic.” In D. Devereaux and P. Pellgrin, eds., Biologie, Logique, et Métaphysique Chez Aristote, 185-236. Paris: Editions du CNRS.
34. Bolton, Robert. 1995. “Science and the Science of Substance in Aristotle's Metaphysics Z.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 76: 419-69.
35. Bolton, Robert. 1999. “The Epistemological Basis of Aristotelian Dialectic.” In Christopher Shields, ed., The Blackwell Guide to Ancient Philosophy, 57-109. New York: Lexington Books.
36. Bonitz, Hermann. 1848-49. Aristotelis Metaphysica: Commentarius, 2 vols. Bonn. Rpt., Hildesheim: G. Olms, 1960.
37. Bostock, David. 1994. Aristotle: Metaphysics Books Zeta and Eta. Translated with commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
38. Brentano, Franz. 1862. Von der mannigfachen Bedeutung des Seienden nach Aristoteles Freiburg im Breisgau. Translated as On the Several Senses of Being in Aristotle, ed. and trans. Rolf George. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1975.
39. Burnet, John. 1900. The Ethics of Aristotle. Edited with Introduction and Notes. London: Methuen.
40. Burnet, John. 1911. Plato: Phaedo. Edited with Introduction and Notes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41. Burnyeat, M. F. et. al. 1979. Notes on Book Zeta of Aristotle's “Metaphysics.''" Study Aids Monograph No. 1. Oxford: Sub-faculty of Philosophy.
42. Burnyeat, M. F. et. al. 1981. “Aristotle on Understanding Knowledge. In E. Berti, ed., Aristotle on Science: The Posterior Analytics, 97-139. Padova: Antenore.
43. Burnyeat, M. F. et. al. 2002. “De AnimaII 5.” Phronesis 48, no. 1: 28-90.
44. Cajetan, Tommaso de Vio. 1589-90. Summa Sacrae Theologicae; in trespartes divisa, et quattor distincta tomis. Bergamo: Comini Venturae.
45. Cajetan, Tommaso de Vio. 1934. De Nominum Analogia. Rome.
46. Charles, David. 1990. “Natural Kinds and Natural History.” In D. Devereaux and P. Pellgrin, eds., Biologie, Logique, et Métaphysique chez Aristote, 145-67. Paris: Edition du CNRS.
47. Charleton, W. 1970. Aristotle's Physics I, II. Translated with Introduction and Notes. Rpt., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985.
48. Cherniss, Harold. 1944. Aristotle's Criticism of Plato and the Academy. Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press.
49. Code, Alan. 1984. “The Aporematic Approach to Primary Being in Metaphysics Z.” In F. J. Pelletier and J. K. Farlow, eds., New Essays on Aristotle. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. Supplementary vol. 10, pp. 1 -20.
50. Code, Alan. 1985. “On the Origins of Some Aristotelian Theses about Predication.” In James Bogen, ed., How Things Are, 101-32. Boston: Reidel.
51. Code, Alan. 1986. “Aristotle's Investigation of a Basic Logical Principle.” CanadianJournal of Philosophy 16: 314-57.
52. Code, Alan. 1997. “Aristotle's Metaphysics as a Science of Principles.” Revue Internationale deFilosophie 201: 345-66.
53. Cooper, John. 1977. “Aristotle on the Forms of Friendship.” Review of Metaphysics 30: 619-48.
54. Cooper, John. 1984. “Aristotle on Friendship.” In A. Rorty, ed., Essays on Aristotle's Ethics, 301-40. Berkeley: University of California Press.
55. De Rijk, L. M. 2002. Aristotle: Semantics and Ontology. 2 vols. Leiden: Brill.
56. DeMoss, David, and Devereaux, Daniel. 1988. “Essence, Existence, and Nominal Definition in Aristotle's Posterior Analytics 8-10.” Phronesis 33, no. 2: 133-54.
57. Devereaux, Daniel. 1990. “Comments on Robert Bolton's ‘The Epistemological Basis of Aristotelian Dialectic.’” In D. Devereaux and P. Pellegrin, eds., Biologie, Logique, et Métaphysique chez Aristote, 263-86. Paris: Edition du CNRS.
58. Deslauriers, Marguerite. 1990. “Aristotle's Four Types of Definition.” Apeiron 23: 1 -26.
59. Dexippus, D. 1888. Aristotelis Categorias Commentarium. In A. Busse, ed., Commentaria in Aristotelum Graeca, vol. 4, part 2. Berlin: G. Reimer.
60. Evans, J. D. G. 1978. Aristotle's Concept of Dialectic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61. Everson, Stephen, 1997. Aristotle on Perception. New York: Clarendon Press.
62. Ferejohn, Michael. 1980. “Aristotle on Focal Meaning and the Unity of Science.” Phronesis 25: 117-28.
63. Ferejohn, Michael. 1991. The Origins of Aristotelian Science. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
64. Fine, Gail. 1995. On Ideas: Aristotle's Criticism of Plato's Theory of Forms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
65. Fortenbaugh, W. W. 1975a. “Aristotle's Analysis of Friendship: Function and Analogy, Resemblance and Focal Meaning.” Phronesis 20: 51-62.
66. Fortenbaugh, W. W. 1975b. Aristotle on Emotion. New York: Harper & Row.
67. Frede, Michael. 1983. “Titel, Einheit und Echtheit der Aristotelischen Kategorienschrift.” In P. Moreaux and J. Weisner, eds., Zweifelhaftes im Corpus Aristotelicum, 1-29. Berlin. Translated as “The Title, Unity, and Authenticity of the Aristotelian Categories.” In M. Frede, Essays in Ancient Philosophy, 11 -28. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987.
68. Frede, Michael. 1987. “The Unity of Special and General Metaphysics.” In M. Frede, Essays in Ancient Philosophy, 81-95. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
69. Goldin, Owen. 1996. Explaining an Eclipse: Aristotle's Posterior Analytics 2.1-10. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
70. Hambruch, Ernst. 1904. Logische Regeln der Platonischen Schule in der Aristotelischen Topik. Berlin: Weidmann.
71. Hamlyn, D. W. 1977-78. “Focal Meaning.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 78: 1-18.
72. Hamlyn, D. W. 1990. “Aristotle on Dialectic.” Philosophy 65: 465-76.
73. Heath, Sir Thomas. 1908. Euclid: The Thirteen Books of the Elements. Translated with Introduction and Commentary. Rpt., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press1956.
74. Heath, Sir Thomas. 1921. A History of Greek Mathematics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
75. Heath, Sir Thomas. 1949. Mathematics in Aristotle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
76. Hicks, R. D. 1907. Aristotle: De Anima. With Translation, Introduction, and Notes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
77. Hintikaa, Jaakko. 1971. “Different Kinds of Equivocation in Aristotle.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 9: 368-72.
78. Hintikaa, Jaakko. 1996. “On the Development of Aristotle's Ideas of Scientific Method and the Structure of Science.” In W. Wians, ed., Aristotle's Philosophical Development, 83-104. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.
79. Hirschenberger, J. 1959. “Paronymie und Analogie bei Aristoteles.” Philosophisches Jahrbuch 68: 191-203.
80. Huby, Pamela. 1962. “The Date of Aristotle's Topics and Its Treatment of the Theory of Ideas.” Classical Quarterly n.s., 12: 72-80.
81. Irwin, Terence. 1981. “Homonymy in Aristotle.” Review of Metaphysics 34: 52344.
82. Irwin, Terence. 1988. Aristotle's First Principles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
83. Kenny, Antony. 1978. The Aristotelian Ethics: A Study of the Relationship Between the Eudemian and Nicomachean Ethics ofAristotle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
84. Kirwan, Christopher. 1993. Aristotle: Metaphysics Books T, A, and E. Translated with notes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
85. Kraut, Richard, ed. 1995. The Cambridge Companion to Plato. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
86. Lang, Paul. 1911. De Speusippi Academici Scriptis. Accedunt Fragmenta. Rpt., Frankfurt: Minerva, 1964.
87. Le Blond, J. M. 1979. “Aristotle on Definition.” In Barnes, et al. (1979, 63-70).
88. Lennox, J. G. 1987. “Divide and Explain: The Posterior Analytics in Practice.” in A. Gotthelf, andJ. G. Lennox, eds., Philosophical Issues in Aristotle's Biology, 90-119. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
89. Leszl, Walter. 1970. Logic and Metaphysics in Aristotle. Padova: Antenore.
90. Levin, Susan. 2001. The Ancient Quarrel Between Philosophy and Poetry Revisited: Plato and the Greek Literary Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
91. Lewis, Frank. 2004. “Aristotle on the Homonymy of Being.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68, no. 1: 1-35.
92. Liddell, Henry, and Robert Scott. 1968. A Greek-English Lexicon. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
93. Lloyd, A. C. 1962. “Genus, Species, and Ordered Series in Aristotle.” Phronesis 7: 67-90.
94. MacDonald, Scott. 1989. “Aristotle and the Homonymy of the Good.” Archiv fur die Geschicte derPhilosophie 71, no.2: 150-74.
95. Malcolm, John. 1991. Plato and the Self-Predication of the Forms: The Early and Middle Dialogues. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
96. McInerny, Ralph. 1992. “Aquinas and Analogy: Where Cajetan Went Wrong.” Philosophical Topics 20: 103-24.
97. McKirahan, Richard. 1992. Principles and Proofs: Aristotle's Theory ofDemonstrative Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
98. Meinwald, Constance. 1995. “Goodbye to the Third Man.” In Richard Kraut, ed., Cambridge Companion to Plato, 365-96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
99. Mirus, Christopher V. 2004. “Aristotle's Agathon.” Review of Metaphysics 57, no. 3: 515-536.
100. Modrak, Deborah. 2001. Aristotle's Theory ofLanguage and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
101. Nehamas, Alexander. 1979. “Self-Predication and Plato's Theory of the Forms.” American Philosophical Quarterly 16: 93-103.
102. Nussbaum, Martha. 1982. “Saving Aristotle's Appearances.” In M. Schofield and M. Nussbaum, eds., Language and Logos: Studies in Ancient Greek Philosophy Presented to G. E. L. Owen, 267-94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
103. Nussbaum, Martha. 1986a. TheFragility of Goodness: Luck andEthics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
104. Nussbaum, Martha. ed. 1986b. Logic, Science and Dialectic. Collected Papers in Greek Philosophy. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
105. Owen, G. E. L. 1957. “A Proof in the Peri Ideon.”Journal of Hellenic Studies 77: 103-11; Rpt., Nussbaum (1986b, 165-79).
106. Owen, G. E. L. 1960. “Logic and Metaphysics in Some Earlier Works of Aristotle.” In I. During and G. E. L. Owen, eds., Aristotle and Plato in the Mid-Fourth Century, 163-90. Goteborg: Elanders. Reprinted in J. Barnes, M. Schofield, R. Sorabji, eds., Articles on Aristotle, vol. 3: Metaphysics (London: Duckworth, 1979), 13-32, and Nussbaum (1986b, 180-99).
107. Owen, G. E. L. 1961. “Tithenai Ta Phainomena.” In S. Mansion, ed., Aristote et les Problèmes deMethode, 83-105. Louvain: Publications Universitaires. Rpt., Nussbaum (1986b, 239-51).
108. Owen, G. E. L. 1965. “Aristotle on the Snares of Ontology.” In J. R. Bambrough, ed., New Essays on Plato and Aristotle, 69-75. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Rpt., Nussbaum (1986b, 259-78).
109. Owen, G. E. L. 1966a. “The Platonism of Aristotle.” Proceedings of the British Academy 50: 125-50. Rpt., Nussbaum (1986b, 200-220).
110. Owen, G. E. L. 1966b. “Plato and Parmenides on the Timeless Present.” Monist 50: 317-40.
111. Owen, G. E. L. 1968. “Dialectic and Eristic in the Treatment of the Forms.” In G. E. L. Owen, ed., Aristotle on Dialectic: The Topics. Proceedings of the Third Symposium Aristotelicum, 103-25. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Rpt., Nussbaum (1986b, 221-38).
112. Owens, Joseph. 1963. The Doctrine of Being in the Aristotelian Metaphysics. Toronto: Pontifical Institute.
113. Owens, Joseph. 1971. “Aristotle's Definitions of the Soul.” In R. Palmer and R. Hamerton-Kelly, eds., Philomathes: Studies and Essays in the Humanities in Memory of Philip Merlan, 124-45. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
114. Pakaluk, Michael. 1992. “Friendship and the Comparison of Goods.” Phronesis 37: 111-30.
115. Pakaluk, Michael. 1998. Nicomachean Ethics Books VIII and IX. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
116. Patzig, Gunther. 1979a. “Logical Aspects of Some Arguments in Aristotle's Metaphysics.” In R. Aubenque, ed., Etudes sur la Métaphysique d’Aristote, 37-46. Paris: Vrin.
117. Patzig, Gunther. 1979b. “Theology and Ontology in Aristotle's Metaphysics.” In J. Barnes, M. Schofield, R. Sorabji, eds., Articles on Aristotle, vol. 3: Metaphysics, 33-49. London: Duckworth.
118. Porphyry, P. 1897. In Aristotelis Categoria Commentaria In M. Hayduck, ed., Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, vol. 4 part 1 Berlin: Reimer. Translated as On Aristotle's Categories by S. Strange. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1992.
119. Price, A. W. 1989. Love and Friendship in Plato and Aristotle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
120. Rapp, Christof. 1992. “Ahnlichkeit, Analogie, und Homonymie bei Aristoteles.” Zeitschrift fur philosophische Forschung 46: 526-44.
121. Robin, Leon. 1963. La Théorie Platonicienne des Idées et des Nombres d’apres Aristote. Paris: Alcan.
122. Ross, W. D. 1924. Aristotle Metaphysics. A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary, 2 vols. Rpt., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.
123. Ross, W. D. 1936. Aristotle Physics. A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary. Rpt., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.
124. Ross, W. D. 1949a. Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
125. Ross, W. D. 1949b. Aristotle's Prior and Posterior Analytics. A Revised Text With Introduction and Commentary. Rpt., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1965.
126. Rowe, C. J. 1971. The Eudemian and Nicomachean Ethics: A Study in the Development of Aristotle's Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge Philological Society.
127. Shields, Christopher. 1999. Order in Multiplicity: Homonymy in the Philosophy of Aristotle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
128. Silverman, Allan. 1989. “Color and Color Perception in Aristotle's De Anima.” Ancient Philosophy 9, no. 2:271-92.
129. Simplicius, S. 1897. In Aristotelis Categorias Commentarium. In M. Wallies, ed., Commen-taria in Aristotelum Graeca, vol. 8. Berlin: G. Reimer.
130. Slakey, Thomas J. 1961. “Aristotle on Sense Perception.” Philosophical Review 70: 47084.
131. Smith, Robin. 1993. “Aristotle on the Uses of Dialectic.” Synthese 96: 335-58.
132. Smith, Robin. 1997. Aristotle: Topics Books I and VIII. Translated with a Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
133. Smith, Robin. 1999. “Dialectic and Method in Aristotle.” In M. Sim, ed., From Puzzles to Principles, Essays on Aristotle's Dialectic, 39-55. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books.
134. Solmsen, Friedrich. 1929. DieEntwicklung der Aristotelischen Logik und Rhetorik. Berlin.
135. Solmsen, Friedrich. 1968. “Dialectic Without the Forms.” In G. E. L. Owen, ed., Aristotle on Dialectic: The Topics, 49-68. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
136. Sorabji, Richard. 1972. “Aristotle, Mathematics and Colour.” Classical Quarterly 22: 63-98.
137. Sorabji, Richard. 1974. “Body and Soul in Aristotle.” Philosophy 49: 63-89. Reprinted in J. Barnes et al., Articles on Aristotle, vol. 4: Psychology and Aesthetics, 42-64. London: Duckworth, 1979.
138. Sorabji, Richard. 1992. “Intentionality and Physiological Processes: Aristotle's Theory of Sense-Perception.” In M. Nussbaum and A. Rorty, eds., Essays on Aristotle's De Anima, 195-226. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
139. Stenzel, J. 1929. “Speusippos (2).” In A. Pauly and G. Wissowa, eds., Realencyclopaedie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft III A, cols. 1636-69. Stuttgart.
140. Strauss, Leo. 1978. The City and the Man. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
141. Taran, Leonardo. 1978a. Anonymous Commentary on Aristotle's De Interpretation. Codex Parisinus Graecus 20-64.
142. Taran, Leonardo. 1978b. “Speusippus and Aristotle on Homonymy and Synonymy.” Hermes 106: 73-99.
143. Taran, Leonardo. 1981. Speusippus of Athens: A Critical Study with a Collection of the Related Texts and Commentary. Leiden: Brill.
144. Taylor, A. E. 1962. A Commentary on Plato's Timaeus. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
145. Vlastos, Gregory. 1954. “The Third Man Argument in the Parmenides.” Philosophical Review 63: 319-49.
146. Walker, A. D. M. 1979. “Aristotle's Account of Friendship in the Nicomachean Ethics.” Phronesis 24: 180-96.
147. Ward, Julie K. 1988. “Perception and Logos in De Anima ii. 12.” Ancient Philosophy 8: 183-205.
148. Ward, Julie K. 1995. “Focal Reference in Aristotle's Account of QiXia: Eudemian Ethics VII 2.” Apeiron 28: 183-205.
149. Ward, Julie K. 1996. “Souls and Figures: Defining the Soul in De Anima ii 3.” Ancient Philosophy 16: 113-28.
150. Ward, Julie K. 2005. “Aristotle on Physis: Human Nature in the Ethics and Politics.” Polis: Journal of the Society for GGreek Political Thought 22: 287-308.
151. Waterlow, Sarah. 1988. Nature, Change, and Agency in Aristotle's Physics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
152. Wedin, Michael. 2000. Aristotle's Theory of Substance: The Categories and Metaphysics Zeta. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
153. Wians, William, ed. 1996. Aristotle's Philosophical Development. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.
154. Wieland, Wolfgang. 1962. Die Aristotelische Physik. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
155. Witt, Charlotte. 1996. “The Evolution of Development Interpretations in Aristotle.” In William Wians, ed., Aristotle's Philosophical Development: Problems and Prospects, 67-82. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.
156. Wuellner, Bernard. 1956. Dictionary of Scholastic Philosophy. Milwaukee, Wis.: Bruce Publishing.
157. Yu, Jiyuan. 2001. “What is the Focal Meaning of Being in Aristotle?” Apeiron 34, no. 3: 205-31.
158. Yu, Jiyuan. 2003. The Structure of Being in Aristotle's Metaphysics. NewSynthese Histroical Library, vol. 52. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.