Pathology of embolic debris in carotid artery stenting

Acta Neurologica Scandinavica

Volumn 131, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 197-202

  Matsukawa, H ^a   Fujii, M ^a   Uemura, A ^a   Suzuki, K ^a   Yamamoto, D ^a   Takahashi, O ^a   Niimi, Y ^a  

^a ST LUKE'S INTERNATIONAL HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Carotid artery stenting; Debris; Pathology; Plaque imaging

Indexed keywords

AGED; ANESTHESIA; ARTICLE; BRADYCARDIA; BRAIN EMBOLISM; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; CALCIFICATION; CAROTID ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CAROTID ARTERY STENTING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; ELASTIC FIBER; EMBOLIC DEBRIS; EMBOLIC PROTECTION DEVICE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; INFLAMMATORY CELL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE PLAQUE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; THROMBOSIS; CAROTID STENOSIS; INTRACRANIAL EMBOLISM; MIDDLE AGED; STENT;

AGED; CAROTID STENOSIS; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; EMBOLIC PROTECTION DEVICES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRACRANIAL EMBOLISM; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; STENTS;

EID: 84925137432     PISSN: 00016314     EISSN: 16000404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ane.12303     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Choi JH, Pile-Spellman J, Brisman JL. US nationwide trends in carotid revascularization: hospital outcome and predictors of outcome from 1998 to 2007. Acta Neurol Scand 2014;129:85-93.
2. Veselka J, Cerna D, Zimolova P et al. Thirty-day outcomes of direct carotid artery stenting with cerebral protection in high-risk patients. Circ J 2007;71:1468-72.
3. Choi JH, Pile-Spellman J, Brisman JL. US nationwide trends in carotid revascularization: is there a clinical opportunity cost associated with the introduction of novel medical devices? Acta Neurol Scand 2014;129:94-101.
4. Altaf N, MacSweeney ST, Gladman J, Auer DP. Carotid intraplaque hemorrhage predicts recurrent symptoms in patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. Stroke 2007;38:1633-5.
5. Yamada K, Yoshimura S, Kawasaki M et al. Embolic complications after carotid artery stenting or carotid endarterectomy are associated with tissue characteristics of carotid plaques evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging. Atherosclerosis 2011;215:399-404.
6. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 2007;370:1453-7.
7. Rothwell PM, Eliasziw M, Gutnikov SA et al. Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet 2003;361:107-16.
8. Michael DW, John RM, Murray G et al. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. JAMA 1995;273:1421-8.
9. Yuan C, Mitsumori LM, Beach KW, Maravilla KR. Carotid atherosclerotic plaque: noninvasive MR characterization and identification of vulnerable lesions. Radiology 2001;221:285-99.
10. Saam T, Ferguson MS, Yarnykh VL et al. Quantitative evaluation of carotid plaque composition by in vivo MRI. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2005;25:234-9.
11. Streifler JY, Eliasziw M, Fox AJ et al. Angiographic detection of carotid plaque ulceration. Comparison with surgical observations in a multicenter study. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Stroke 1994;25:1130-2.
12. Roffi M, Greutmann M, Schwarz U, Luscher TF, Eberli FR, Amann-Vesti B. Flow impairment during protected carotid artery stenting: impact of filter device design. J Endovasc Ther 2008;15:103-9.
13. van Laanen JH, Hendriks JM, Verhagen HJ, van Beusekom HM. Quantity, particle size, and histologic composition of embolic debris collected in a distal protection filter after carotid angioplasty and stenting: correlation with patient characteristics, timing of carotid artery stenting, and procedural details. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013;146:492-5.
14. Theron JG, Payelle GG, Coskun O, Huet HF, Guimaraens L. Carotid artery stenosis: treatment with protected balloon angioplasty and stent placement. Radiology 1996;201:627-36.
15. Angelini A, Reimers B, Della Barbera M et al. Cerebral protection during carotid artery stenting: collection and histopathologic analysis of embolized debris. Stroke 2002;33:456-61.
16. Henry M, Amor M, Henry I et al. Carotid stenting with cerebral protection: first clinical experience using the PercuSurge GuardWire system. J Endovasc Surg 1999;6:321-31.
17. Martin JB, Pache JC, Treggiari-Venzi M et al. Role of the distal balloon protection technique in the prevention of cerebral embolic events during carotid stent placement. Stroke 2001;32:479-84.
18. Maleux G, Demaerel P, Verbeken E et al. Cerebral ischemia after filter-protected carotid artery stenting is common and cannot be predicted by the presence of substantial amount of debris captured by the filter device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1830-3.
19. Schluter M, Tubler T, Steffens JC, Mathey DG, Schofer J. Focal ischemia of the brain after neuroprotected carotid artery stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:1007-13.
20. Jaeger HJ, Mathias KD, Hauth E et al. Cerebral ischemia detected with diffusion-weighted MR imaging after stent implantation in the carotid artery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:200-7.
21. van Heesewijk HPM, Vos JA, Louwerse ES et al. New brain lesions at MR imaging after carotid angioplasty and stent placement. Radiology 2002;224:361-5.
22. Topol EJ, Yadav JS. Recognition of the importance of embolization in atherosclerotic vascular disease. Circulation 2000;101:570-80.
23. Williams DO. Carotid filters: new additions to the interventionist's toolbox. Circulation 2001;104:2-3.
24. Sorimachi T, Kakita A, Morita K et al. Routine aspiration method during filter-protected carotid stenting: histological evaluation of captured debris and predictors for debris amount. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2011;153:2159-67.
25. Sorimachi T, Nishino K, Morita K, Takeuchi S, Ito Y, Fujii Y. Blood flow changes caused by distal filter protection and catheter aspiration in the internal carotid artery during carotid stenting: evaluation using carotid Doppler sonography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:288-93.
26. Sorimachi T, Nishino K, Shimbo J, Morita K, Ito Y, Fujii Y. Routine use of debris aspiration before retrieval of distal filter protection devices in carotid arterial stenting: analysis of captured debris and evaluation of clinical results. Neurosurgery 2010;67:1260-7; discussion 7.
27. Finol EA, Siewiorek GM, Scotti CM, Wholey MH. Wall apposition assessment and performance comparison of distal protection filters. J Endovasc Ther 2008;15:177-85.
28. Faggioli G, Ferri M, Rapezzi C, Tonon C, Manzoli L, Stella A. Atherosclerotic aortic lesions increase the risk of cerebral embolism during carotid stenting in patients with complex aortic arch anatomy. J Vasc Surg 2009;49:80-5.
29. Macdonald S, Evans DH, Griffiths PD et al. Filter-protected versus unprotected carotid artery stenting: a randomised trial. Cerebrovasc Dis 2010;29:282-9.
30. Giannakopoulos TG, Moulakakis K, Sfyroeras GS et al. Association between plaque echogenicity and embolic material captured in filter during protected carotid angioplasty and stenting. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2012;43:627-31.
31. Rosenkranz M, Wittkugel O, Waiblinger C et al. Cerebral embolism during carotid artery stenting: role of carotid plaque echolucency. Cerebrovasc Dis 2009;27:443-9.
32. Rosenkranz M, Russjan A, Goebell E et al. Carotid plaque surface irregularity predicts cerebral embolism during carotid artery stenting. Cerebrovasc Dis 2011;32:163-9.
33. Yamada K, Yoshimura S, Kawasaki M et al. Prediction of silent ischemic lesions after carotid artery stenting using virtual histology intravascular ultrasound. Cerebrovasc Dis 2011;32:106-13.
34. Hsu LC, Chang FC, Kuo TB, Wong WJ, Hu HH. Cerebral hemodynamics and baroreflex sensitivity after carotid artery stenting. Acta Neurol Scand 2013;127:46-52.