Blood flow changes caused by distal filter protection and catheter aspiration in the internal carotid artery during carotid stenting: Evaluation using carotid Doppler sonography

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 288-293

  Sorimachi, Takatoshi ^a   Nishino, K ^a   Morita, K ^a   Takeuchi, S ^b   Ito, Y ^a   Fujii, Y ^a  

^a NIIGATA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b Nagaoka Chuo General Hospital   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CAROTID ARTERY STENTING; CATHETER ASPIRATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOPPLER ECHOGRAPHY; FILTER; HUMAN; INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY OCCLUSION; MALE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOPLASTY; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CAROTID ARTERY DISEASES; CEREBROVASCULAR CIRCULATION; EMBOLIC PROTECTION DEVICES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRACRANIAL EMBOLISM; LASER-DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; STENTS; SUCTION; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER;

EID: 79951598343     PISSN: 01956108     EISSN: 1936959X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2276     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Maleux G, Demaerel P, Verbeken E, et al. Cerebral ischemia after filter-protected carotid artery stenting is common and cannot be predicted by the presence of substantial amount of debris captured by the filter device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1830-33
2. Jansen O, Fiehler J, Hartmann M, et al. Protection or nonprotection in carotid stent angioplasty: the influence of interventional techniques on outcome data from the SPACE Trial. Stroke 2009;40:841-46
3. Katzen BT, Criado FJ, Ramee SR, et al, for the CASES-PMS Investigators. Carotid artery stenting with emboli protection surveillance study: thirty-day results of the CASES-PMS study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007;70:316-23
4. Schofer J, Arendt M, Tübler T, et al. Late cerebral embolization after emboliprotected carotid artery stenting assessed by sequential diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2008;1:571-77
5. Casserly IP, Abou-Chebl A, Fathi RB, et al. Slow-flow phenomenon during carotid artery intervention with embolic protection devices: predictors and clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:1466-72
6. Sorimachi T, Nishino K, Shimbo J, et al. Routine use of debris aspiration before retrieval of distal filter protection devices in carotid arterial stenting: analysis of captured debris and evaluation of clinical results. Neurosurgery. In press
7. Hendriks JM, Zindler JD, van der Lugt A, et al. Embolic protection filters for carotid stenting: differences in flow obstruction depending on filter construction. J Endovasc Ther 2006;13:47-50
8. Siewiorek GM, Wholey MH, Finol EA. In vitro performance assessment of distal protection devices for carotid artery stenting: effect of physiological anatomy on vascular resistance. J Endovasc Ther 2007;14:712-24
9. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis: North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 1991:325:445-53
10. Roffi M, Greutmann M, Schwarz U, et al. Flow impairment during protected carotid artery stenting: impact of filter device design. J Endovasc Ther 2008;15:103-09
11. Finol EA, Siewiorek GM, Scotti CM, et al. Wall apposition assessment and performance comparison of distal protection filters. J Endovasc Ther 2008;15:177-85
12. Siewiorek GM, Wholey MH, Finol EA. In vivo performance of distal protection filters: pulsatile flow conditions. J Endovasc Ther 2009;16:735-43