Responsiveness of patient reported outcome measures in total joint arthroplasty patients

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 176-191

  SooHoo, Nelson F ^a   Li, Zhongmin ^b   Chenok, Kate E ^c   Bozic, Kevin J ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c Pacific Business Group on Health   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Functional outcomes; Patient reported outcome measures; Registry; Total hip arthroplasty; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CAUCASIAN; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMAL CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE ASSESSMENT; OBESITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSICAL COMPONENT SUMMARY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; SEX DIFFERENCE; SHORT FORM 12; SURGICAL PATIENT; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; WESTERN ONTARIO AND MCMASTER UNIVERSITIES OSTEOARTHRITIS INDEX; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; MIDDLE AGED; REGISTER; SELF REPORT; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; CALIFORNIA; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; REGISTRIES; SELF REPORT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84925092296     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.09.026     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Inpatient surgery [Accessed 2013 August 19]. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/insurg.htm.
2. California Joint Replacement Registry California Joint Replacement Registry [Accessed 2013 August 19]. http://www.caljrr.org/.
3. Kazis L.E., Anderson J.J., Meenan R.F. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care 1989, 27(3 Suppl.):S178.
4. Middel B., Stewart R., Bouma J., et al. How to validate clinically important change in health-related functional status. Is the magnitude of the effect size consistently related to magnitude of change as indicated by a global question rating?. J Eval Clin Pract 2001, 7(4):399.
5. Wells G., Beaton D., Shea B., et al. Minimal clinically important differences: review of methods. J Rheumatol 2001, 28(2):406.
6. Finch E., Walsh M., Thomas S.G., et al. Functional ability perceived by individuals following total knee arthroplasty compared to age-matched individuals without knee disability. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998, 27(4):255.
7. Naal F.D., Impellizzeri F.M., Leunig M. Which is the best activity rating scale for patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009, 467(4):958.
8. Clement N.D., Macdonald D., Simpson A.H. The minimal clinically important difference in the Oxford knee score and Short Form 12 score after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014 Aug, 22(8):1933-1939. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24253376.
9. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Technical Expert Panel (TEP) Nomination/Disclosure/Agreement Form [Accessed 2014 March 9]. http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/MMS/Downloads/Patient-Reported-Outcomes-Call-for-TEP.pdf.
10. Hamel M.B., Toth M., Legedza A., et al. Joint replacement surgery in elderly patients with severe osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: decision making, postoperative recovery, and clinical outcomes. Arch Intern Med 2008, 168(13):1430.
11. Schamber E.M., Takemoto S.K., Chenok K.E., et al. Barriers to completion of patient reported outcome measures. J Arthroplasty 2013, 28(9):1449.
12. Franklin P.D., Harrold L., Ayers D.C. Incorporating patient-reported outcomes in total joint arthroplasty registries: challenges and opportunities. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013, 471(11):3482.