Lung biodurability and free radical production of cellulose nanomaterials

Inhalation Toxicology

Volumn 26, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 733-749

  Stefaniak, Aleksandr B ^a   Seehra, Mohindar S ^b   Fix, Natalie R ^a   Leonard, Stephen S ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH   (United States)

^b WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biodurability; Cellulose nanocrystals and nanofibrils; Free radicals; Microcrystalline cellulose; Pulmonary inflammation; X ray diffraction

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSE; CELLULOSE NANOCRYSTAL; CELLULOSE NANOFIBRIL; FREE RADICAL; HYDROXYL RADICAL; MICROCRYSTALLINE CELLULOSE; NANOMATERIAL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; NANOFIBER; NANOPARTICLE;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL LUNG; BIODURABILITY; BIOSYNTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROPHORETIC MOBILITY; FENTON REACTION; HYDRODYNAMICS; HYDROGEN BOND; LUNG ALVEOLUS MACROPHAGE; LUNG CLEARANCE; PARTICLE SIZE; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION INDEX; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPIN TRAPPING; THERMOGRAVIMETRY; THERMOSTABILITY; X RAY DIFFRACTION; ZETA POTENTIAL; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DRUG EFFECTS; EXPOSURE; IMMUNOLOGY; LUNG; LUNG LAVAGE; METABOLISM; MOUSE; MUCOCILIARY CLEARANCE; PHAGOCYTOSIS; RESPIRATORY BURST; RESPIRATORY EXCRETION; RESPIRATORY TRACT MUCOSA; SECRETION (PROCESS); SURFACE PROPERTY; TRANSFORMED CELL LINE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANIMALS; BRONCHOALVEOLAR LAVAGE FLUID; CELL LINE, TRANSFORMED; CELLULOSE; FREE RADICALS; INHALATION EXPOSURE; LUNG; MACROPHAGES, ALVEOLAR; MICE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MUCOCILIARY CLEARANCE; NANOFIBERS; NANOPARTICLES; NANOSTRUCTURES; PARTICLE SIZE; PHAGOCYTOSIS; PULMONARY ELIMINATION; RESPIRATORY BURST; RESPIRATORY MUCOSA; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 84925070284     PISSN: 08958378     EISSN: 10917691     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/08958378.2014.948650     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Agarwal UP, Reiner RS, Ralph SA. (2010). Cellulose I crystallinity determination using FT-Raman spectroscopy: univariate and multivariate methods. Cellulose 17:721-33.
2. Alexandrescu L, Syverud K, Gatti A, Chinga-Carrasco G. (2013). Cytotoxicity tests of cellulose nanofibril-based structures. Cellulose 20:1765-75.
3. ASTM International. (2008a). D4239-08: standard test method for sulfur in the analysis sample of coal and coke using high-Temperature tube furnace combustion methods. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM standards and publications.
4. ASTM International. (2008b). D5373-08: standard test methods for instrumental determination of carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen in laboratory samples of coal. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM standards and publications.
5. Bai W, Holbery J, Li KC. (2009). A technique for production of nanocrystalline cellulose with a narrow size distribution. Cellulose 16:455-65.
6. Beck S, Bouchard J, Berry R. (2012). Dispersibility in water of dried nanocrystalline cellulose. Biomacromolecules 13:1486-94.
7. Buettner GR. (1987). Spin trapping: ESR parameters of spin adducts. Free Radic Biol Med 3:259-303.
8. Cullen RT, Searl A, Miller BG, et al. (2000). Pulmonary and intraperitoneal inflammation induced by cellulose fibres. J Appl Toxicol 20:49-60.
9. Dahlgren C, Karlsson A, Bylund J. (2007). Measurement of respiratory burst products generated by professional phagocytes. Methods Mol Biol 412:349-63.
10. Donaldson K, Murphy F, Schinwald A, et al. (2011). Identifying the pulmonary hazard of high aspect ratio nanoparticles to enable their safety-by-design. Nanomedicine 6:43-156.
11. Donaldson K, Schinwald A, Murphy F, et al. (2013). The biologically effective dose in inhalation nanotoxicology. Acc Chem Res 46:723-32.
12. Fenoglio I, Tomatis M, Lison D, et al. (2006). Reactivity of carbon nanotubes: free radical generation or scavenging activity?. Free Radic Biol Med 40:1227-33.
13. Finch GL, Mewhinney JA, Eidson AF, et al. (1988). In vitro dissolution characteristics of beryllium oxide and beryllium metal aerosols. J Aerosol Sci 19:333-42.
14. French AD, Bertoniere NR, Brown RM, et al. (2003). Cellulose. In: Kroschwitz JI. (ed) Kirk-Othmer encyclopedia of chemical technology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 360-94.
15. Future Markets Inc. (2012). Nanocellulose: a technology and market study. Belfast, UK: Future Markets Inc.
16. Habibi Y, Lucia LA, Rojas OJ. (2010). Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-Assembly, and applications. Chem Rev 110:3479-500.
17. Hubbe M, Rojas O, Lucia L, Sain M. (2008). Cellulosic nanocomposites: a review. BioResources 3:929-80.
18. Janzen EG, Blackburn BJ. (1968). Detection and identification of short-lived free radicals by an electron spin resonance trapping technique. J Am Chem Soc 90:5909-10.
19. Kanapilly GM, Raabe OG, Goh CH, Chimenti RA. (1973). Measurement of in vitro dissolution of aerosol particles for comparison to in vivo dissolution in the lower respiratory tract after inhalation. Health Phys 24:497-507.
20. Krusic PJ, Wasserman E, Keizer PN, et al. (1991). Radical reactions of C60. Science 254:1183-5.
21. Lee KY, Tammelin T, Schulfter K, et al. (2012). High performance cellulose nanocomposites: comparing the reinforcing ability of bacterial cellulose and nanofibrillated cellulose. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:4078-86.
22. Lehnert BE, Morrow PE. (1985). Association of 59iron oxide with alveolar macrophages during alveolar clearance. Exp Lung Res 9:1-16.
23. Leonard SS, Chen BT, Stone SG, et al. (2010). Comparison of stainless and mild steel welding fumes in generation of reactive oxygen species Part Fibre Toxicol 7:32. doi:10.1186/1743-8977-7-32.
24. Leonard SS, Wang S, Zang L, et al. (2000). Role of molecular oxygen in the generation of hydroxyl and superoxide anion radicals during enzymatic Cr (IV) reduction and its implication to Cr (VI)-induced carcinogenesis. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol 19:49-60.
25. Male KB, Leung ACW, Montes J, et al. (2012). Probing inhibitory effects of nanocrystalline cellulose: inhibition versus surface charge. Nanoscale 4:1373-9.
26. Mansikkamaki P, Lahtinen M, Rissanen K. (2007). The conversion from cellulose I to cellulose II in NaOH mercerization performed in alcohol-water systems: an X-ray powder diffraction study. Carbohydr Polym 68:35-43.
27. Martinez KF, Eastlak A, Rudie A, Geraci C. (2013). Occupational exposure characterization during the manufacture of cellulose nanomaterials. In: Postek M, Moon RJ, Rudie AW, Bilodeau MA. (eds) Production and applications of cellulose nanomaterials. Peachtree Corners, GA: TAPPI Press, 61-4.
28. Mathew AP, Oksman K, Pierron D, Harmand MF. (2013). Biocompatible fibrous networks of cellulose nanofibres and collagen crosslinked using genipin: potential as artificial lgament/tendons. Macromol Biosci 13:289-98.
29. Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, et al. (2011). Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40: 3941-94.
30. Muhle H, Ernst H, Bellmann B. (1997). Investigation of the durability of cellulose fibres in rat lungs. Ann Occup Hyg 41:184-8.
31. Park S, Baker JO, Himmel ME, et al. (2010). Cellulose crystallinity index: measurement techniques and their impact on interpreting cellulase performance. Biotechnol Biofuels 3:10. doi:10.1186/1754-6834-3-10.
32. Pereira MM, Raposo NR, Brayner R, et al. (2013). Cytotoxicity and expression of genes involved in the cellular stress response and apoptosis in mammalian fibroblast exposed to cotton cellulose nanofibers. Nanotechnology 24:075103. doi:10.1088/0957-4484/24/7/075103.
33. Qi WH, Wang MP. (2002). Size effect on the cohesive energy of nanoparticle. J Mater Sci Lett 21:1743-5.
34. Riddick T. (1968). Control of colloid stability through zeta potential: with a closing chapter on its relationship to cardiovascular disease. Wynnewood, PA: Livingston Publishing Company.
35. Roser M, Fischer D, Kissel T. (1998). Surface-modified biodegradable albumin nano-And microspheres. II: effect of surface charges on in vitro phagocytosis and biodistribution in rats. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 46:255-63.
36. Ruiz MM, Cavaille JY, Dufresne A, et al. (2000). Processing and characterization of new thermoset nanocomposites based on cellulose whiskers. Composite Interf 7:117-31.
37. Saito T, Hirota M, Tamura N, et al. (2009). Individualization of nanosized plant cellulose fibrils by direct surface carboxylation using TEMPO catalyst under neutral conditions. Biomacromolecules 10: 1992-6.
38. Seehra MS, Akkineni LP, Yalamanchi M, et al. (2012). Structural characteristics of nanoparticles produced by hydrothermal pretreatment of cellulose and their applications for electrochemical hydrogen generation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 37: 9514-23.
39. Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE, Conrad CM. (1959). An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Textile Res J 29:786-94.
40. Sehaqui H, Zhou Q, Ikkala O, Berglund LA. (2011). Strong and tough cellulose nanopaper with high specific surface area and porosity. Biomacromolecules 12:3638-44.
41. Siqueira G, Bras J, Follain N, et al. (2013). Thermal and mechanical properties of bio-nanocomposites reinforced by Luffa cylindrica cellulose nanocrystals. Carbohydr Polym 91:711-17.
42. Stefaniak AB, Guilmette RA, Day GA, et al. (2005). Characterization of phagolysosomal simulant fluid for study of beryllium aerosol particle dissolution. Toxicol In Vitro 19:123-34.
43. Sun CQ, Wang Y, Tay BK, et al. (2002). Correlation between the melting point of a nanosolid and the cohesive energy of a surface atom. J Phys Chem B 106:10701-5.
44. Tatrai E, Adamis Z, Bohm U, et al. (1995). Role of cellulose in wood dust-induced fibrosing alveo-bronchiolitis in rat. J Appl Toxicol 15: 45-8.
45. Taurozzi JS, Hackley VA, Wiesner MR. (2011). Ultrasonic dispersion of nanoparticles for environmental, health and safety assessment-issues and recommendations. Nanotoxicology 5:711-29.
46. Vallyathan V, Blake T, Leonard S, et al. (1999). In vitro toxicity of silica substitutes used for abrasive blasting. Am J Ind Med (Suppl. 1):158-60.
47. Vartiainen J, Pohler T, Sirola K, et al. (2011). Health and environmental safety aspects of friction grinding and spray drying of microfibrillated cellulose. Cellulose 18:775-86.
48. Wittmaack K. (2006). In search of the most relevant parameter for quantifying lung inflammatory response to nanoparticle exposure: particle number, surface area, or what?. Environ Health Perspect 114:187-94.
49. Zoppe JO, Peresin MS, Habibi Y, et al. (2009). Reinforcing poly(epsiloncaprolactone) nanofibers with cellulose nanocrystals. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 1:1996-2004.