The use of electromagnetic induction to monitor changes in soil moisture profiles beneath different wheat genotypes

Soil Science Society of America Journal

Volumn 79, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 459-466

  Shanahan, Peter W ^a   Binley, Andrew ^a   Whalley, W Richard ^b   Watts, Christopher W ^b  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b ROTHAMSTED RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CROPS; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRIC VARIABLES MEASUREMENT; ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTION; EXTRACTION; FREQUENCY DOMAIN ANALYSIS; GEOPHYSICS; MOISTURE CONTROL; SOIL MOISTURE; TEXTURES; WATER CONTENT;

APPARENT ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY TOMOGRAPHY; ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTIONS (EMI); LABORATORY MEASUREMENTS; POSITIVE CORRELATIONS; SOIL MOISTURE PROFILES; WINTER WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.);

SOIL SURVEYS;

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY; ELECTROMAGNETIC METHOD; EMERGENCE; FIELD METHOD; GENOTYPE; GEOPHYSICAL METHOD; LABORATORY METHOD; RHIZOSPHERE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SOIL MOISTURE; SOIL TEXTURE; SOIL WATER; TOMOGRAPHY; WHEAT;

TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 84925018016     PISSN: 03615995     EISSN: 14350661     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2014.09.0360     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ackerson, J.P., C.L.S. Morgan, M.E. Everett, and K.J. McInnes. 2014. The role of water content in electrical resistivity tomography of a Vertisol. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 78:1552-1562. doi:10.2136/sssaj2014.01.0032
2. Araus, J.L., and J.E. Cairns. 2014. Field high-throughput phenotyping: The new crop breeding frontier. Trends Plant Sci. 19:52-61. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2013.09.008
3. Archie, G.E. 1942. The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Trans. Am. Inst. Min. Metall. Pet. Eng. 146:54-61.
4. Bengough, A.G., B.M. McKenzie, P.D. Hallett, and T.A. Valentine. 2011. Root elongation, water stress, and mechanical impedance: A review of limiting stresses and beneficial root tip traits. J. Exp. Bot. 62:59-68. doi:10.1093/jxb/erq350
5. Binley, A. 2013. R2 version 2.7a February 2013. Lancaster Environ. Ctr., Lancaster Univ., Lancaster, UK. http://www.es.lancs.ac.uk/people/amb/Freeware/R2/R2.htm
6. Binley, A., and A. Kemna. 2005. DC resistivity and induced polarization methods. In: Y. Rubin and S.S. Hubbard, editors, Hydrogeophysics. Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands. p. 129-156.
7. Brevik, E.C., T.E. Fenton, and A. Lazari. 2006. Soil electrical conductivity as a function of soil water content and implications for soil mapping. Precis. Agric. 7:393-404. doi:10.1007/s11119-006-9021-x
8. Callegary, J.B., T.P.A. Ferré, and R.W. Groom. 2007. Vertical spatial sensitivity and exploration depth of low-induction-number electromagnetic-induction instruments. Vadose Zone J. 6:158-167. doi:10.2136/vzj2006.0120
9. Campbell, R.B., C.A. Bower, L.A. Richards. 1949. Change of electrical conductivity with temperature and the relation of osmotic pressure to electrical conductivity and ion concentration for soil extracts. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 13:66-69. doi:10.2136/sssaj1949.036159950013000C0010x
10. Cassiani, G., N. Ursino, R. Deiana, G. Vignoli, J. Boaga, M. Rossi, et al. 2012. Noninvasive monitoring of soil static characteristics and dynamic states: A case study highlighting vegetation effects on agricultural land. Vadose Zone J. 11(3). doi:10.2136/vzj2011.0195
11. Corwin, D.L., and S.M. Lesch. 2005. Apparent soil electrical conductivity measurements in agriculture. Comput. Electron. Agric. 46:11-43. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2004.10.005
12. Dodd, I.C., W.R. Whalley, E.S. Ober, and M.A.J. Parry. 2011. Genetic and management approaches to boost UK wheat yields by ameliorating water deficits. J. Exp. Bot. 62:5241-5248. doi:10.1093/jxb/err242
13. Furman, A., A. Arnon-Zur, and S. Assouline. 2013. Electrical resistivity tomography of the root zone. In: S.H. Anderson and J.W. Hopmans, editors, Soil-water-root processes: Advances in tomography and imaging. SSSA Spec. Publ. 61. SSSA, Madison, WI. p. 221-242. doi:10.2136/sssaspecpub61.c11
14. Gregory, P.J., C.J. Atkinson, A.G. Bengough, M.A. Else, F. Fernández-Fernández, R.J. Harrison, and S. Schmidt. 2013. Contributions of roots and rootstocks to sustainable, intensified crop production. J. Exp. Bot. 64:1209-1222. doi:10.1093/jxb/ers385
15. Hilhorst, M.A. 2000. A pore water conductivity sensor. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64:1922-1925. doi:10.2136/sssaj2000.6461922x
16. JafarGandomi, A., and A. Binley. 2013. A Bayesian trans-dimensional approach for the fusion of multiple geophysical datasets. J. Appl. Geophys. 96:38-54. doi:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2013.06.004
17. Lavoué, F., J. van der Kruk, J. Rings, F. André, D. Moghadas, J.A. Huisman, et al. 2010. Electromagnetic induction calibration using apparent electrical conductivity modelling based on electrical resistivity tomography. Near Surface Geophys. 8:553-561. doi:10.3997/1873-0604.2010037
18. McNeill, D.J. 1980. Electromagnetic terrain conductivity measurement at low induction numbers. Tech. Note TN-6. Geonics Ltd., Mississauga, ON, Canada.
19. Mester, A., J. van der Kruk, E. Zimmermann, and H. Vereecken. 2011. Quantitative two-layer conductivity inversion of multi-configuration electromagnetic induction measurements. Vadose Zone J. 10:1319-1330. doi:10.2136/vzj2011.0035
20. Parasnis, D.S. 1988. Reciprocity theorems in geoelectric and geoelectromagnetic work. Geoexploration 25:177-198. doi:10.1016/0016-7142(88)90014-2
21. Roose, T., and A.C. Fowler. 2004. A model for water uptake by plant roots. J. Theor. Biol. 228:155-171. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2003.12.012
22. Srayeddin, I., and C. Doussan. 2009. Estimation of the spatial variability of root water uptake of maize and sorghum at the field scale by electrical resistivity tomography. Plant Soil 319:185-207. doi:10.1007/s11104-008-9860-5
23. Vanderborght, J., J.A. Huisman J. van der Kruk, and H. Vereecken. 2013. Geophysical methods for field-scale imaging of root zone properties and processes. In: S.H. Anderson and J.W. Hopmans, editors, Soil-water-root processes: Advances in tomography and imaging. SSSA Spec. Publ. 61. SSSA, Madison, WI. p. 247-282. doi:10.2136/sssaspecpub61.c12
24. Vereecken, H., J.A. Huisman, Y. Pachepsky, C. Montzka, J. van der Kruk, H. Bogena, et al. 2014. On the spatio-temporal dynamics of soil moisture at the field scale. J. Hydrol. 516:76-96. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.061 von
25. Hebel, C., S. Rudolph, A. Mester, J.A. Huisman, P. Kumbhar, H. Vereecken, and J. van der Kruk. 2014. Three-dimensional imaging of subsurface structural patterns using quantitative large-scale multiconfiguration electromagnetic induction data. Water Resour. Res. 50:2732-2748. doi:10.1002/2013WR014864
26. Whalley, W.R., M. Jenkins, and K. Attenborough. 2012. The velocity of shear waves in unsaturated soil. Soil Tillage Res. 125:30-37. doi:10.1016/j.still.2012.05.013
27. Whalley, W.R., C.W. Watts, P.J. Gregory, S.J. Mooney, L.J. Clark, and A.P. Whitmore. 2008. The effect of soil strength on the yield of wheat. Plant Soil 306:237-247. doi:10.1007/s11104-008-9577-5