Erratum : Genetic differentiation of hypothalamus parentally biased transcripts in populations of the house mouse implicate the prader-willi syndrome imprinted region as a possible source of behavioral divergence (Mol Biol Evol. (2014) 31:12 (3240-3249) DOI:10.1093/molbev/msu257);Genetic differentiation of hypothalamus parentally biased transcripts in populations of the house mouse implicate the prader-willi syndrome imprinted region as a possible source of behavioral divergence

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 31, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 3240-3249

  Lorenc, Anna ^a,c   Linnenbrink, Miriam ^a   Montero, Inka ^a,d   Schilhabel, Markus B ^b   Tautz, Diethard ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

^c GUY'S AND ST THOMAS' NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

genetic differentiation; hypothalamus; imprinting; liver; Mus domesticus; Mus musculus; RNASeq; vomeronasal organ

Indexed keywords

RNA; MESSENGER RNA; NERVE PROTEIN; PEG13 PROTEIN, MOUSE; TRANSCRIPTOME;

ALLELE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME 15; CHROMOSOME 7; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GENE; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME IMPRINTING; HISTOCOMPATIBILITY GENE; HYPOTHALAMUS; INBRED MOUSE STRAIN; MATE CHOICE; MOUSE; MUS MUSCULUS DOMESTICUS; MUS MUSCULUS MUSCULUS; NONHUMAN; PEG13 GENE; PRADER WILLI SYNDROME; PYROSEQUENCING; RNA SEQUENCE; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; TRAPPC9 GENE; VOMERONASAL ORGAN; X CHROMOSOME; X CHROMOSOME INACTIVATION; ANIMAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETICS; MALE; METABOLISM; PHENOTYPE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

MUS; MUS MUSCULUS; MUS MUSCULUS DOMESTICUS;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; GENETIC DRIFT; GENOMIC IMPRINTING; HYPOTHALAMUS; MALE; MICE, INBRED STRAINS; NERVE TISSUE PROTEINS; PHENOTYPE; PRADER-WILLI SYNDROME; RNA, MESSENGER; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; TRANSCRIPTOME;

EID: 84925012966     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msv108     Document Type: Erratum

References (42)

1. Arnaud P, Monk D, Hitchins M, Gordon E, Dean W, Beechey CV, Peters J, Craigen W, Preece M, Stanier P, et al. 2003. Conserved methylation imprints in the human and mouse GRB10 genes with divergent allelic expression suggests differential reading of the same mark. Hum Mol Genet. 12:1005-1019.
2. Cassidy SB, Schwartz S, Miller JL, Driscoll DJ. 2012. Prader-Willi syndrome. Genet Med. 14:10-26.
3. Chai JH, Locke DP, Ohta T, Greally JM, Nicholls RD. 2001. Retrotransposed genes such as Frat3 in the mouse Chromosome 7C Prader-Willi syndrome region acquire the imprinted status of their insertion site. Mamm Genome. 12:813-821.
4. Chao W, D'Amore PA. 2008. IGF2: epigenetic regulation and role in development and disease. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 19: 111-120.
5. Court F, Camprubi C, Garcia CV, Guillaumet-Adkins A, Sparago A, Seruggia D, Sandoval J, Esteller M, Martin-Trujillo A, Riccio A, et al. 2014. The PEG13-DMR and brain-specific enhancers dictate imprinted expression within the 8q24 intellectual disability risk locus. Epigenetics Chromatin 7:5.
6. Curley JP. 2011. Is there a genomically imprinted social brain? Bioessays 33:662-668.
7. DeVeale B, van der Kooy D, Babak T. 2012. Critical evaluation of imprinted gene expression by RNA-Seq: a new perspective. PLoS Genet. 8:e1002600.
8. Drake NM, DeVito LM, Cleland TA, Soloway PD. 2011. Imprinted Rasgrf1 expression in neonatal mice affects olfactory learning and memory. Genes Brain Behav. 10:392-403.
9. Garfield AS, Cowley M, Smith FM, Moorwood K, Stewart-Cox JE, Gilroy K, Baker S, Xia J, Dalley JW, Hurst LD, et al. 2011. Distinct physiological and behavioural functions for parental alleles of imprinted Grb10. Nature 469:534-538.
10. Gregg C, Zhang JW, Butler JE, Haig D, Dulac C. 2010. Sex-specific parent-of-origin allelic expression in the mouse brain. Science 329: 682-685.
11. Gregg C, Zhang JW, Weissbourd B, Luo SJ, Schroth GP, Haig D, Dulac C. 2010. High-resolution analysis of parent-of-origin allelic expression in the mouse brain. Science 329:643-648.
12. Horsthemke B, Wagstaff J. 2008. Mechanisms of imprinting of the Prader-Willi/Angelman region. Am J Med Genet A. 146A: 2041-2052.
13. Ihle S, Ravaoarimanana I, Thomas M, Tautz D. 2006. An analysis of signatures of selective sweeps in natural populations of the house mouse. Mol Biol Evol. 23:790-797.
14. Janotova K, Stopka P. 2011. The level of major urinary proteins is socially regulated in wild Mus musculus musculus. J Chem Ecol. 37:647-656.
15. Jiang YH, Pan YZ, Zhu L, Landa L, Yoo J, Spencer C, Lorenzo I, Brilliant M, Noebels J, Beaudet AL. 2010. Altered ultrasonic vocalization and impaired learning and memory in Angelman syndrome mouse model with a large maternal deletion from Ube3a to Gabrb3. PLoS One 5:e12278.
16. Kakar N, Goebel I, Daud S, Nurnberg G, Agha N, Ahmad A, Nurnberg P, Kubisch C, Ahmad J, Borck G. 2012. A homozygous splice site mutation in TRAPPC9 causes intellectual disability and microcephaly. Eur J Med Genet. 55:727-731.
17. Karn RC, Laukaitis CM. 2012. The roles of gene duplication, gene conversion and positive selection in rodent Esp and Mup pheromone gene families with comparison to the Abp family. PLoS One 7: e47697.
18. Leinders-Zufall T, Ishii T, Mombaerts P, Zufall F, Boehm T. 2009. Structural requirements for the activation of vomeronasal sensory neurons by MHC peptides. Nat Neurosci. 12:1551-U1598.
19. Logan DW, Marton TF, Stowers L. 2008. Species specificity in major urinary proteins by parallel evolution. PLoS One 3:e3280.
20. Marangi G, Leuzzi V, Manti F, Lattante S, Orteschi D, Pecile V, Neri G, Zollino M. 2013. TRAPPC9-related autosomal recessive intellectual disability: report of a new mutation and clinical phenotype. Eur J Hum Genet. 21:229-232.
21. Meeks JP, Holy TE. 2009. An ex vivo preparation of the intact mouse vomeronasal organ and accessory olfactory bulb. J. Neurosci Methods. 177:440-447.
22. Montero I, Teschke M, Tautz D. 2013. Paternal imprinting of mating preferences between natural populations of house mice (Mus musculus domesticus). Mol Ecol. 22:2549-2562.
23. Mott R, Yuan W, Kaisaki P, Gan XC, Cleak J, Edwards A, Baud A, Flint J. 2014. The architecture of parent-of-origin effects in mice. Cell 156: 332-342.
24. Nelson AC, Cauceglia JW, Merkley SD, Youngson NA, Oler AJ, Nelson RJ, Cairns BR, Whitelaw E, Potts WK. 2013. Reintroducing domesticated wild mice to sociality induces adaptive transgenerational effects on MUP expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 110:19848-19853.
25. Neumann LC, Feiner N, Meyer A, Buiting K, Horsthemke B. 2014. The imprinted NPAP1 gene in the Prader-Willi syndrome region belongs to a POM121-related family of retrogenes. Genome Biol Evol. 6: 344-351.
26. Rapkins RW, Hore T, Smithwick M, Ager E, Pask AJ, Renfree MB, Kohn M, Hameister H, Nicholls RD, Deakin JE, et al. 2006. Recent assembly of an imprinted domain from non-imprinted components. PLoS Genet. 2:1666-1675.
27. Resnick JL, Nicholls RD, Wevrick R. 2013. Recommendations for the investigation of animal models of Prader-Willi syndrome. Mamm Genome. 24:165-178.
28. Roberts SA, Simpson DM, Armstrong SD, Davidson AJ, Robertson DH, McLean L, Beynon RJ, Hurst JL. 2010. Darcin: a male pheromone that stimulates female memory and sexual attraction to an individual male's odour. BMC Biol. 8:75.
29. Staubach F, Lorenc A, Messer PW, Tang K, Petrov DA, Tautz D. 2012. Genome patterns of selection and introgression of haplotypes in natural populations of the house mouse (Mus musculus). PLoS Genet. 8:e1002891.
30. Stockley P, Bottell L, Hurst JL. 2013. Wake up and smell the conflict: odour signals in female competition. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 368:20130082.
31. Swaney WT, Curley JP, Champagne FA, Keverne EB. 2008. The paternally expressed gene Peg3 regulates sexual experience-dependent preferences for estrous odors. Behav Neurosci. 122:963-973.
32. Teschke M, Mukabayire O, Wiehe T, Tautz D. 2008. Identification of selective sweeps in closely related populations of the house mouse based on microsatellite scans. Genetics 180:1537-1545.
33. von Merten S, Hojer S, Pfeifle C, Tautz D. 2014. A role for ultrasonic vocalisation in social communication and divergence of natural populations of the house mouse (Mus musculus domesticus). PLoS One 9(5):e97244.
34. Wang X, Clark AG. 2014. Using next-generation RNA sequencing to identify imprinted genes. Heredity 113(2):156-166.
35. Wang X, Soloway PD, Clark AG. 2010. Paternally biased X inactivation in mouse neonatal brain. Genome Biol. 11:R79.
36. Weir BS, Cockerham CC. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population-structure. Evolution 38:1358-1370.
37. Wilkins JF, Haig D. 2003. What good is genomic imprinting: the function of parent-specific gene expression. Nat Rev Genet. 4: 359-368.
38. Wolf JB, Cheverud JM, Roseman C, Hager R. 2008. Genome-wide analysis reveals a complex pattern of genomic imprinting in mice. PLoS Genet. 4:e1000091.
39. Wolf JB, Hager R. 2009. Selective abortion and the evolution of genomic imprinting. J Evol Biol. 22:2519-2523.
40. Wood AJ, Oakey RJ. 2006. Genomic imprinting in mammals: emerging themes and established theories. PLoS Genet. 2:1677-1685.
41. Wood AJ, Schulz R, Woodfine K, Koltowska K, Beechey CV, Peters J, Bourc'his D, Oakey RJ. 2008. Regulation of alternative polyadenylation by genomic imprinting. Genes Dev. 22:1141-1146.
42. Yang T, Adamson TE, Resnick JL, Leff S, Wevrick R, Francke U, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG, Brannan CI. 1998. A mouse model for Prader-Willi syndrome imprinting-centre mutations. Nat Genet. 19:25-31.