Oriented matrix promotes directional tubulogenesis

Acta Biomaterialia

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 264-273

  Soucy, Patricia A ^a,b   Hoh, Maria ^c   Heinz, Will ^a,c   Hoh, Jan ^a   Romer, Lewis ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b University of Louisville   (United States)

^c Intelligent Substrates Inc ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Anisotropy; Endothelial morphogenesis; Extracellular matrix; Micropattern substrate

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; ASPECT RATIO; BIOMATERIALS; BLOOD VESSELS; CELL CULTURE; ENDOTHELIAL CELLS; FIBROBLASTS; SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY); TISSUE; TUBES (COMPONENTS);

ENDOTHELIAL MORPHOGENESIS; ENGINEERED TISSUES; EXTRACELLULAR MATRICES; FIBROBLAST-DERIVED MATRIX; MICRO PATTERN; MICROPATTERN SUBSTRATE; MICROPATTERNED SUBSTRATES; ORIENTED MATRIX; STRUCTURAL ORGANIZATION; TUBULOGENESIS;

SUBSTRATES;

FIBRONECTIN; BIOMIMETIC MATERIAL;

ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL GROWTH; CELL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOTHELIAL TUBULOGENESIS; ENDOTHELIUM CELL; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FETUS; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; LUNG FIBROBLAST; MORPHOGENESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TISSUE ENGINEERING; ANGIOGENESIS; CELL CULTURE; CELL LINE; CELL POLARITY; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; DEVICE FAILURE ANALYSIS; DEVICES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FIBROBLAST; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROVASCULATURE; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SURFACE PROPERTY; SYNTHESIS; TISSUE REGENERATION; TISSUE SCAFFOLD; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANISOTROPY; BIOMIMETIC MATERIALS; CELL LINE; CELL POLARITY; CELLS, CULTURED; ENDOTHELIAL CELLS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FIBROBLASTS; GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROVESSELS; NEOVASCULARIZATION, PHYSIOLOGIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 84924967887     PISSN: 17427061     EISSN: 18787568     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.08.037     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Fung Y-C. Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues. New York: Springer Verlag; 1993.
2. Isenberg BC, Tsuda Y, Williams C, Shimizu T, Yamato M, Okano T, et al. A thermoresponsive, microtextured substrate for cell sheet engineering with defined structural organization. Biomaterials 2008;29:2565-72.
3. Schmedlen RH, Elbjeirami WM, Gobin AS, West JL. Tissue engineered small-diameter vascular grafts. Clin Plast Surg 2003;30:507-17.
4. Li WJ, Mauck RL, Cooper JA, Yuan X, Tuan RS. Engineering controllable anisotropy in electrospun biodegradable nanofibrous scaffolds for musculoskeletal tissue engineering. J Biomech 2007;40:1686-93.
5. Manwaring ME, Walsh JF, Tresco PA. Contact guidance induced organization of extracellular matrix. Biomaterials 2004;25:3631-8.
6. Rivron NC, Liu JJ, Rouwkema J, de Boer J, van Blitterswijk CA. Engineering vascularised tissues in vitro. Eur Cell Mater 2008;15:27-40.
7. Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang YL. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 2005;310:1139-43.
8. Engler A, Bacakova L, Newman C, Hategan A, Griffin M, Discher D. Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. Biophys J 2004;86:617-28.
9. Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 2006;126:677-89.
10. Georges PC, Janmey PA. Cell type-specific response to growth on soft materials. J Appl Physiol 2005;98:1547-53.
11. Pelham Jr RJ, Wang YL. Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by the mechanical properties of the substrate. Biol Bull 1998;194:348-9. discussion 9-50.
12. Soucy PA, Romer LH. Endothelial cell adhesion, signaling, and morphogenesis in fibroblast-derived matrix. Matrix Biol 2009;28:273-83.
13. Kutys ML, Doyle AD, Yamada KM. Regulation of cell adhesion and migration by cell-derived matrices. Exp Cell Res 2013;319:2434-9.
14. Cukierman E, Pankov R, Stevens DR, Yamada KM. Taking cell-matrix adhesions to the third dimension. Science 2001;294:1708-12.
15. Mao Y, Schwarzbauer JE. Stimulatory effects of a three-dimensional microenvironment on cell-mediated fibronectin fibrillogenesis. J Cell Sci 2005;118:4427-36.
16. Chen CS, Mrksich M, Huang S, Whitesides GM, Ingber DE. Micropatterned surfaces for control of cell shape, position, and function. Biotechnol Prog 1998;14:356-63.
17. Thery M, Pepin A, Dressaire E, Chen Y, Bornens M. Cell distribution of stress fibres in response to the geometry of the adhesive environment. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 2006;63:341-55.
18. Thery M, Racine V, Pepin A, Piel M, Chen Y, Sibarita JB, et al. The extracellular matrix guides the orientation of the cell division axis. Nat Cell Biol 2005;7:947-53.
19. Feng J, Chan-Park MB, Shen J, Chan V. Quick layer-by-layer assembly of aligned multilayers of vascular smooth muscle cells in deep microchannels. Tissue Eng 2007;13:1003-12.
20. Sarkar S, Dadhania M, Rourke P, Desai TA, Wong JY. Vascular tissue engineering: microtextured scaffold templates to control organization of vascular smooth muscle cells and extracellular matrix. Acta Biomater 2005;1:93-100.
21. Doyle AD, Wang FW, Matsumoto K, Yamada KM. One-dimensional topography underlies three-dimensional fibrillar cell migration. J Cell Biol 2009;184:481-90.
22. Ingber DE, Folkman J. Mechanochemical switching between growth and differentiation during fibroblast growth factor-stimulated angiogenesis in vitro: role of extracellular matrix. J Cell Biol 1989;109:317-30.
23. Kolodziej CM, Kim SH, Broyer RM, Saxer SS, Decker CG, Maynard HD. Combination of integrin-binding peptide and growth factor promotes cell adhesion on electron-beam-fabricated patterns. J Am Chem Soc 2012;134:247-55.
24. Miyoshi H, Ju J, Lee SM, Cho DJ, Ko JS, Yamagata Y, et al. Control of highly migratory cells by microstructured surface based on transient change in cell behavior. Biomaterials 2010;31:8539-45.
25. Thery M, Racine V, Piel M, Pepin A, Dimitrov A, Chen Y, et al. Anisotropy of cell adhesive microenvironment governs cell internal organization and orientation of polarity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006;103:19771-6.
26. Thiery JP. Cell adhesion in development: a complex signaling network. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2003;13:365-71.
27. Soucy PA, Werbin J, Heinz W, Hoh JH, Romer LH. Microelastic properties of lung cell-derived extracellular matrix. Acta Biomater 2011;7:96-105.
28. Babensee JE. Interaction of dendritic cells with biomaterials. Semin Immunol 2008;20:101-8.
29. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP. Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992.
30. Yang Z, Penczek PA. Cryo-EM image alignment based on nonuniform fast Fourier transform. Ultramicroscopy 2008;108:959-69.
31. Aubin H, Nichol JW, Hutson CB, Bae H, Sieminski AL, Cropek DM, et al. Directed 3D cell alignment and elongation in microengineered hydrogels. Biomaterials 2010;31:6941-51.
32. Charest JL, Eliason MT, Garcia AJ, King WP. Combined microscale mechanical topography and chemical patterns on polymer cell culture substrates. Biomaterials 2006;27:2487-94.
33. Hassanzadeh P, Kharaziha M, Nikkhah M, Shin SR, Jin J, He S, et al. Chitin nanofiber micropatterned flexible substrates for tissue engineering. J Mater Chem B, Mater Biol Med 2013;1.
34. Hosseini V, Ahadian S, Ostrovidov S, Camci-Unal G, Chen S, Kaji H, et al. Engineered contractile skeletal muscle tissue on a microgrooved methacrylated gelatin substrate. Tissue Eng Part A 2012;18:2453-65.
35. Dike LE, Chen CS, Mrksich M, Tien J, Whitesides GM, Ingber DE. Geometric control of switching between growth, apoptosis, and differentiation during angiogenesis using micropatterned substrates. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 1999;35:441-8.
36. Lei Y, Zouani OF, Remy M, Ayela C, Durrieu MC. Geometrical microfeature cues for directing tubulogenesis of endothelial cells. PLoS ONE 2012;7:e41163.
37. Armentano I, Dottori M, Fortunati E, Mattioli S, Kenny JM. Biodegradable polymer matrix nanocomposites for tissue engineering: a review. Polym Degrad Stab 2010;95:2126-46.
38. Beachley V, Wen X. Polymer nanofibrous structures: fabrication, biofunctionalization, and cell interactions. Prog Polym Sci 2010;35:868-92.
39. Dunne LW, Iyyanki T, Hubenak J, Mathur AB. Characterization of dielectrophoresis-aligned nanofibrous silk fibroin-chitosan scaffold and its interactions with endothelial cells for tissue engineering applications. Acta Biomater 2014.
40. Nogueira GM, Swiston AJ, Beppu MM, Rubner MF. Layer-by-layer deposited chitosan/silk fibroin thin films with anisotropic nanofiber alignment. Langmuir 2010;26:8953-8.
41. Ayres C, Bowlin GL, Henderson SC, Taylor L, Shultz J, Alexander J, et al. Modulation of anisotropy in electrospun tissue-engineering scaffolds: analysis of fiber alignment by the fast Fourier transform. Biomaterials 2006;27:5524-34.
42. Yang F, Murugan R, Wang S, Ramakrishna S. Electrospinning of nano/micro scale poly(L-lactic acid) aligned fibers and their potential in neural tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2005;26:2603-10.
43. Baker BM, Mauck RL. The effect of nanofiber alignment on the maturation of engineered meniscus constructs. Biomaterials 2007;28:1967-77.
44. Lanfer B, Seib FP, Freudenberg U, Stamov D, Bley T, Bornhauser M, et al. The growth and differentiation of mesenchymal stem and progenitor cells cultured on aligned collagen matrices. Biomaterials 2009;30:5950-8.
45. Raghavan S, Nelson CM, Baranski JD, Lim E, Chen CS. Geometrically controlled endothelial tubulogenesis in micropatterned gels. Tissue Eng Part A 2010;16:2255-63.
46. Liu Z, Vong QP, Liu C, Zheng Y. Borg5 is required for angiogenesis by regulating persistent directional migration of the cardiac microvascular endothelial cells. Mol Biol Cell 2014;25:841-51.
47. Outeda P, Huso DL, Fisher SA, Halushka MK, Kim H, Qian F, et al. Polycystin signaling is required for directed endothelial cell migration and lymphatic development. Cell Rep 2014;7:634-44.
48. Paradise RK, Whitfield MJ, Lauffenburger DA, Van Vliet KJ. Directional cell migration in an extracellular pH gradient: a model study with an engineered cell line and primary microvascular endothelial cells. Exp Cell Res 2013;319:487-97.