Quantifying uncertainty of measuring gully morphological evolution with close-range digital photogrammetry

Soil Science Society of America Journal

Volumn 79, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 650-659

  Gesch, Karl R ^a   Wells, Robert R ^b   Cruse, Richard M ^a   Momm, Henrique G ^c   Dabney, Seth M ^b  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b USDA ARS NATIONAL SEDIMENTATION LABORATORY   (United States)

^c MIDDLE TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL INSTRUMENTS; GEOMORPHOLOGY; LANDFORMS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; SURVEYING;

CLOSE RANGE DIGITAL PHOTOGRAMMETRY; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; ELEVATION DATA; EPHEMERAL GULLIES; GEOMORPHIC EVOLUTION; MORPHOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; PHOTOGRAMMETRIC TECHNIQUE; VERTICAL ACCURACY;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; CLOUD; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; DIGITAL PHOTOGRAMMETRY; GEOMORPHOLOGY; GULLY EROSION; LANDFORM; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84924944053     PISSN: 03615995     EISSN: 14350661     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2014.10.0396     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Abd Aziz, S., B.L. Steward, A. Kaleita, and M. Karkee. 2012. Assessing the effects of DEM uncertainty on erosion rate estimation in an agricultural field. Trans. ASABE 55(3):785-798. doi:10.13031/2013.41514
2. Ackermann, F. 1996. Techniques and strategies for DEM generation. In: C.W. Greve, editor, Digital photogrammetry: An addendum to the manual of photogrammetry. Am. Soc. of Photogrammetry and Remote Sens., Bethesda, MD. p. 135-141.
3. Aguilar, M.A., F.J. Aguilar, and J. Negreiros. 2009. Off-the-shelf laser scanning and close-range digital photogrammetry for measuring agricultural soils microrelief. Biosystems Eng. 103(4):504-517. doi:10.1016/j. biosystemseng.2009.02.010
4. Bird, S., D. Hogan, and J. Schwab. 2010. Photogrammetric monitoring of small streams under a riparian forest canopy. Earth Surf. Processes Landforms 35(8):952-970. doi:10.1002/esp.2001
5. Brasington, J., B.T. Rumsby, and R.A. McVey. 2000. Monitoring and modelling morphological change in a braided gravel-bed river using high resolution GPS-based survey. Earth Surf. Processes Landforms 25(9):973-990. doi:10.1002/1096-9837(200008)25:9<973::AID-ESP111>3.0.CO;2-Y
6. Brasington, J., and R.M.A. Smart. 2003. Close range digital photogrammetric analysis of experimental drainage basin evolution. Earth Surf. Processes Landforms 28(3):231-247. doi:10.1002/esp.480
7. Castillo, C., R. Pérez, M.R. James, J.N. Quinton, E.V. Taguas, and J.A. Gómez. 2012. Comparing the accuracy of several field methods for measuring gully erosion. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 76(4):1319-1332. doi:10.2136/sssaj2011.0390
8. Dubois, P.F., K. Hinsen, and J. Hugunin. 1996. Numerical Python. Comput. Phys. 10(3):262-267. doi:10.1063/1.4822400
9. Eos Systems. 2012. Quantifying the accuracy of dense surface modeling within PhotoModeler Scanner. www.photomodeler.com/applications/documents/DSMAccuracy2012.pdf (accessed 26 July 2014).
10. Eos Systems. 2014. PhotoModeler Scanner (64-bit). Eos Syst., Vancouver, BC, Canada.
11. Fonstad, M.A., J.T. Dietrich, B.C. Courville, J.L. Jensen, and P.E. Carbonneau. 2013. Topographic structure from motion: A new development in photogrammetric measurement. Earth Surf. Processes Landforms 38(4):421-430. doi:10.1002/esp.3366
12. Fuller, I.C., A.R.G. Large, M.E. Charlton, G.L. Heritage, and D.J. Milan. 2003. Reach-scale sediment transfers: An evaluation of two morphological budgeting approaches. Earth Surf. Processes Landforms 28(8):889-903. doi:10.1002/esp.1011
13. Gessesse, G.D., H. Fuchs, R. Mansberger, A. Klik, and D.H. Rieke-Zapp. 2010. Assessment of erosion, deposition and rill development on irregular soil surfaces using close range digital photogrammetry. Photogramm. Rec. 25(131):299-318. doi:10.1111/j.1477-9730.2010.00588.x
14. Gómez-Gutiérrez, A., S. Schnabel, F. Berenguer-Sempere, F. Lavado-Contador, and J. Rubio-Delgado. 2014. Using 3D photo-reconstruction methods to estimate gully headcut erosion. Catena 120:91-101. doi:10.1016/j. catena.2014.04.004
15. Gordon, L.M., S.J. Bennett, and R.R. Wells. 2012. Response of a soil-mantled experimental landscape to exogenic forcing. Water Resour. Res. 48:W10514. doi:10.1029/2012WR012283
16. Hancock, G., and G. Willgoose. 2001. The production of digital elevation models for experimental model landscapes. Earth Surf. Processes Landforms 26(5):475-490. doi:10.1002/esp.187
17. Heng, B.C.P., J.H. Chandler, and A. Armstrong. 2010. Applying close range digital photogrammetry in soil erosion studies. Photogramm. Rec. 25(131):240-265. doi:10.1111/j.1477-9730.2010.00584.x
18. Heritage, G.L., D.J. Milan, A.R.G. Large, and I.C. Fuller. 2009. Influence of survey strategy and interpolation model on DEM quality. Geomorphology 112(3-4):334-344. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.06.024
19. Hugenholtz, C.H., K. Whitehead, O.W. Brown, T.E. Barchyn, B.J. Moorman, A. LeClair, K. Riddell, and T. Hamilton. 2013. Geomorphological mapping with a small unmanned aircraft system (sUAS): Feature detection and accuracy assessment of a photogrammetrically-derived digital terrain model. Geomorphology 194:16-24. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.03.023
20. Iowa Department of Transportation. 2014. Iowa Real-Time Network: Frequently asked questions. http://www.iowadot.gov/rtn/faq.html (accessed 13 Aug. 2014).
21. James, M.R., and S. Robson. 2012. Straightforward reconstruction of 3D surfaces and topography with a camera: Accuracy and geoscience application. J. Geophys. Res. 117:F03017. doi:10.1029/2011JF002289.
22. Kaiser, A., F. Neugirg, G. Rock, C. Müller, F. Haas, J. Ries, and J. Schmidt. 2014. Small-scale surface reconstruction and volume calculation of soil erosion in complex Moroccan gully morphology using structure from motion. Remote Sens. 6(8):7050-7080. doi:10.3390/rs6087050
23. Kasser, M., and Y. Egels. 2002. Digital photogrammetry. Taylor & Francis, New York.
24. Lane, S.N., R.M. Westaway, and D.M. Hicks. 2003. Estimation of erosion and deposition volumes in a large, gravel-bed, braided river using synoptic remote sensing. Earth Surf. Processes Landforms 28:249-271. doi:10.1002/esp.483
25. Lowe, D.G. 2004. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 60(2):91-110. doi:10.1023/B:VISI.0000029664.99615.94
26. Luhmann, T., S. Robson, S. Kyle, and I. Harley. 2006. Close range photogrammetry: Principles, methods and applications. Whittles, Hoboken, NJ.
27. Marzolff, I., and J. Poesen. 2009. The potential of 3D gully monitoring with GIS using high-resolution aerial photography and a digital photogrammetry system. Geomorphology 111:48-60. doi:10.1016/j. geomorph.2008.05.047
28. Mikhail, E.M., J.S. Bethel, and J.C. McGlone. 2001. Introduction to modern photogrammetry. John Wiley, New York.
29. Momm, H.G., R.L. Bingner, R.R. Wells, J.R. Rigby, and S.M. Dabney. 2013. Effect of topographic characteristics on compound topographic index for identification of gully channel initiation locations. Trans. ASABE 56(2):523-537. doi:10.13031/2013.42673
30. Nachtergaele, J., and J. Poesen. 1999. Assessment of soil losses by ephemeral gully erosion using high-altitude (stereo) aerial photographs. Earth Surf. Processes Landforms 24(8):693-706. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9837(199908)24:8<693::AID-ESP992>3.0.CO;2-7
31. Nouwakpo, S.K., and C. Huang. 2012. A simplified close-range photogrammetric technique for soil erosion assessment. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 76(1):70-84. doi:10.2136/sssaj2011.0148
32. Paparoditis, N., and O. Dissard. 2002. 3D data acquisition from visible images. In: M. Kasser and Y. Egels, editors, Digital photogrammetry. Taylor & Francis, New York. p. 168-220.
33. R Core Team. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
34. Rieke-Zapp, D.H., and M.A. Nearing. 2005. Digital close range photogrammetry for measurement of soil erosion. Photogramm. Rec. 20(109):69-87. doi:10.1111/j.1477-9730.2005.00305.x
35. Schenk, A.F. 1996. Automatic generation of DEMs. In: C.W. Greve, editor, Digital photogrammetry: An addendum to the manual of photogrammetry. Am. Soc. of Photogrammetry and Remote Sens., Bethesda, MD. p. 145-150.
36. Stojic, M., J. Chandler, P. Ashmore, and J. Luce. 1998. The assessment of sediment transport rates by automated digital photogrammetry. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 64(5):387-395.
37. Taylor, J.R. 1997. An introduction to error analysis: The study of uncertainties in physical measurements. Univ. Sci. Books, Sausalito, CA.
38. Thomas, A.W., R. Welch, and T.R. Jordan. 1986. Quantifying concentrated-flow erosion on cropland with aerial photogrammetry. J. Soil Water Conserv. 41:249-252.
39. Trimble Navigation. 2013. Trimble R8 GNSS system: Datasheet. trl.trimble. com/dscgi/ds.py/Get/File-140079/022543-079M-TrimbleR8GNSS- DS-0413-LR.pdf (accessed 30 June 2014).
40. van der Walt, S., S.C. Colbert, and G. Varoquaux. 2011. The NumPy array: A structure for efficient numerical computation. Comput. Sci. Eng. 13(2):22-30. doi:10.1109/MCSE.2011.37
41. Warner, W.S. 1995. Mapping a three-dimensional soil surface with hand-held 35 mm photography. Soil Tillage Res. 34(3):187-197. doi:10.1016/0167-1987(95)00462-2
42. Welch, R., T.R. Jordan, and A.W. Thomas. 1984. A photogrammetric technique for measuring soil erosion. J. Soil Water Conserv. 39(3):191-194.
43. Wheaton, J.M., J. Brasington, S.E. Darby, and D.A. Sear. 2010. Accounting for uncertainty in DEMs from repeat topographic surveys: Improved sediment budgets. Earth Surf. Processes Landforms 35(2):136-156.