Applying close range digital photogrammetry in soil erosion studies

Photogrammetric Record

Volumn 25, Issue 131, 2010, Pages 240-265

  Peter Heng, B C ^a   Chandler, Jim H ^b   Armstrong, Alona ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Close range digital photogrammetry; Dome effects; Morphology; Oblique imagery; Precision; Soil surface measurement

Indexed keywords

CLOSE RANGE DIGITAL PHOTOGRAMMETRY; CONTROL POINT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS; EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES; GEOMETRIC CONFIGURATIONS; HIGH-RESOLUTION MEASUREMENTS; INDEPENDENT MEASUREMENT; LARGE OBJECTS; OBLIQUE IMAGERY; OVERLAND FLOW; PRECISION; SOIL EROSION; TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNERS; TOPOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION;

DOMES; EROSION; IMAGE PROCESSING; MORPHOLOGY; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; SOILS; SURFACE MEASUREMENT; SURFACE MORPHOLOGY; SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY; SURVEYING;

SOIL SURVEYS;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; DIGITAL PHOTOGRAMMETRY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GEOMETRY; GEOMORPHOLOGY; OVERLAND FLOW; PRECISION; SOIL EROSION; SOIL SURFACE;

EID: 77956633917     PISSN: 0031868X     EISSN: 14779730     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-9730.2010.00584.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Abd Elbasit M A M, Anyoji H, Yasuda H, Yamamoto S. Potential of low cost close-range photogrammetry system in soil microtopography quantification. Hydrological Processes 2009, 23(10):1408-1417.
2. Aguilar M A, Aguilar F J, Negreiros J. Off-the-shelf laser scanning and close-range digital photogrammetry for measuring agricultural soils microrelief. Biosystems Engineering 2009, 103(4):504-517.
3. Armstrong A, Quinton J N, Heng B C P, Chandler J H. Variability of interrill soil erosion at low slopes. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
4. Blaes X, Defourny P. Characterizing bidimensional roughness of agricultural soil surfaces for SAR modeling. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2008, 46(12):4050-4061.
5. Brown D C. Close-range camera calibration. Photogrammetric Engineering 1971, 37(8):855-866.
6. Bryan R, Luk S-H. Laboratory experiments on the variation of soil erosion under simulated rainfall. Geoderma 1981, 26(4):245-265.
7. Chandler J H, Fryer J G, Jack A. Metric capabilities of low-cost digital cameras for close range surface measurement. Photogrammetric Record 2005, 20(109):12-26.
8. Fraser C S. Network design. Close Range Photogrammetry and Machine Vision 1996, Atkinson K B. Ed, Whittles, Caithness, Scotland, pages: 256-281
9. Fraser C S, Shortis M R. Variation of distortion within the photographic field. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 1992, 58(6):851-855.
10. Fryer J, Brown D. Lens distortion for close-range photogrammetry. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 1986, 52(1):51-58.
11. Helming K, Roth C H, Wolf R, Diestel H. Characterization of rainfall-microrelief interactions with runoff using parameters derived from digital elevation models (DEMs). Soil Technology 1993, 6(4):273-286.
12. Heng B C P, Chandler J H, Armstrong A. Applying close range digital photogrammetry in soil erosion studies. Proceedings of RSPSoc 2009 Annual Conference 2009, Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry Society, Nottingham, pages: 197-206 (on DVD
13. Jester W, Klik A. Soil surface roughness measurement-methods, applicability, and surface representation. CATENA 2005, 64(2-3):174-192.
14. Kraus K. Photogrammetry 1993, Volume 1, Fourth edition, Dümmler, Bonn, Germany, pages
15. Lascelles B, Favis-Mortlock D, Parsons T, Boardman J. Automated digital photogrammetry: a valuable tool for small-scale geomorphological research for the non-photogrammetrist? Transactions in GIS 2002, 6(1):5-15.
16. Leica Photogrammetry Suite Project Manager User's Guide 2005, Leica Geosystems, Leica Geosystems Geospatial Imaging, LLC, Norcross, Georgia, USA, pages
17. Leica ScanStation 2 Data Sheet 2007, Leica Geosystems, Leica Geosystems AG, Heerbrugg, Switzerland, pages
18. Leica Cyclone Version 6·0 2008, Leica Geosystems, Leica Geosystems HDS LLC, San Ramon, California, USA, Online help
19. Luhmann T, Robson S, Kyle S, Harley I. Close Range Photogrammetry: Principles, Methods and Applications 2006, Whittles, Caithness, Scotland, pages
20. Martin L. An assessment of soil roughness parameters using stereophotography. Assessment of Erosion 1980, de Boodt MGabriels D. Eds, John Wiley, Chichester, pages: 237-248
21. Merel A P, Farres P J. The monitoring of soil surface development using analytical photogrammetry. Photogrammetric Record 1998, 16(92):331-345.
22. Mikhail E M, Bethel J S, McGlone J C. Introduction to Modern Photogrammetry 2001, John Wiley, New York, pages
23. Nearing M A, Govers G, Norton L D. Variability in soil erosion data from replicated plots. Soil Science Society of America Journal 1999, 63(6):1829-1835.
24. Rieke-Zapp D H, Nearing M A. Digital close range photogrammetry for measurement of soil erosion. Photogrammetric Record 2005, 20(109):69-87.
25. Rieke-Zapp D H, Rosenbauer R, Schlunegger F. A photogrammetric surveying method for field applications. Photogrammetric Record 2009a, 24(125):5-22.
26. Rieke-Zapp D, Tecklenburg W, Peipe J, Hastedt H, Haig C. Evaluation of the geometric stability and the accuracy potential of digital cameras-comparing mechanical stabilisation versus parameterisation. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2009b, 64(3):248-258.
27. Shortis M R, Robson S, Beyer H A. Extended lens model calibration of digital still cameras. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 1998a, 32(5):159-164.
28. Shortis M R, Robson S, Beyer H A. Principal point behaviour and calibration parameter models for Kodak DCS cameras. Photogrammetric Record 1998b, 16(92):165-186.
29. Stojic M, Chandler J H, Ashmore P, Luce J. The assessment of sediment transport rates by automated digital photogrammetry. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 1998, 64(5):387-395.
30. Taconet O, Ciarletti V. Estimating soil roughness indices on a ridge-and-furrow surface using stereo photogrammetry. Soil and Tillage Research 2007, 93(1):64-76.
31. Takken I, Jetten V, Govers G, Nachtergaele J, Steegen A. The effect of tillage-induced roughness on runoff and erosion patterns. Geomorphology 2001, 37(1-2):1-14.
32. Toy T J, Foster G R, Renard K G. Soil Erosion: Processes, Prediction, Measurement, and Control 2002, John Wiley, New York, pages
33. Wackrow R, Chandler J H. A convergent image configuration for DEM extraction that minimises the systematic effects caused by an inaccurate lens model. Photogrammetric Record 2008, 23(121):6-18.
34. Wendt R C, Alberts E E, Hjelmfelt A T. Variability of runoff and soil loss from fallow experimental plots. Soil Science Society of America Journal 1986, 50(3):730-736.
35. Wiley A G, Wong K W. Geometric calibration of zoom lenses for computer vision metrology. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 1995, 61(1):69-74.
36. Zribi M, Ciarletti V, Taconet O, Paille J, Boissard P. Characterisation of the soil structure and microwave backscattering based on numerical three-dimensional surface representation: analysis with a fractional Brownian model. Remote Sensing of Environment 2000, 72(2):159-169.