Situation awareness measures for simulated submarine track management

Human Factors

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 298-310

  Loft, Shayne ^a   Bowden, Vanessa ^a   Braithwaite, Janelle ^a   Morrell, Daniel B ^a   Huf, Samuel ^b   Durso, Francis T ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b DEFENCE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ORGANISATION   (Australia)

^c GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

situation awareness; Situation Awareness Global Assessment Technique (SAGAT); Situation Awareness Present Method (SPAM); submarine track management

Indexed keywords

FORECASTING; NASA; PERSONNEL TRAINING; UNDERWATER ACOUSTICS;

DISPLAY INTERFACES; DISRUPTIVE EFFECTS; PREDICTED PERFORMANCE; SITUATION AWARENESS; SITUATION AWARENESS GLOBAL ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUES; SITUATION PRESENT ASSESSMENT METHODS; SUBJECTIVE WORKLOAD; TRACK MANAGEMENT;

SUBMARINES;

ADULT; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AWARENESS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SHIP; WORKLOAD; YOUNG ADULT;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AWARENESS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SHIPS; WORKLOAD; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84924891279     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: 15478181     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0018720814545515     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bacon L. P., Strybel T. Z.. Assessment of the validity and intrusiveness of online-probe questions for situation awareness in a simulated air-traffic-management task with student air-traffic controllers. Safety Science. 2013 ; 56: 89-95
2. Durso F. T., Bleckley M. K., Dattel A. R.. Does situation awareness add to the validity of cognitive tests?. Human Factors. 2006 ; 48: 721-733
3. Durso F. T., Dattel A. R. A cognitive approach to situation awareness: Theory and application. Banbury S. Tremblay S., ed. Hampshire, UK: Ashgate ; 2004: 137-154.
4. Durso F. T., Hackworth C. A., Truitt T. R., Crutchfield J., Nikolic D., Manning C. A.. Situation awareness as a predictor of performance for en route air traffic controllers. Air Traffic Control Quarterly. 1998 ; 6: 1-20
5. Endsley M. R.. Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT). Proceedings of the National Aerospace and Electronics Conference ; 1988 New York, NY: IEEE ; 1988. 789.
6. Endsley M. R.. Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors. 1995 ; 37: 65-84
7. Endsley M. R. Situation awareness analysis and measurement. Endsley M. R. Garland D. J., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum ; 2000: 147-173.
8. Hart S. G., Staveland L. E. Advances in psychology. Peter A. H. Najmedin M., ed. Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland ; 1988: 139-183.
9. Jones D. G., Endsley M. R.. Sources of situation awareness errors in aviation. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine. 1996 ; 67: 507-512
10. Jones D. G., Endsley M. R.. Use of real-time probes for measuring situation awareness. International Journal of Aviation Psychology. 2004 ; 14: 343-367
11. Jones D. G., Kaber D. B. Handbook of human factors and ergonomics methods. Stanton N. A. Hedge A. Brookhuis K. SalasHal E. Hendrick W., ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press ; 2005 :
12. Kirschenbaum S. S. Informed by knowledge: Expert performance in complex situations. Mossier K. Fischer U. M., ed. New York, NY: Psychology Press ; 2011: 189-199.
13. Loft S., Bolland S., Humphreys M. S., Neal A.. A theory and model of conflict detection in air traffic control: Incorporating environmental constraints. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. 2009 ; 15: 106-124
14. Loft S., Morrell D. B., Huf S.. Using the situation present assessment method to measure situation awareness in simulated submarine track management. International Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics. 2013 ; 2: 33-48
15. Loft S., Sanderson P., Neal A., Mooij M.. Modeling and predicting mental workload in en route air traffic control: Critical review and broader implications. Human Factors. 2007 ; 49: 376-399
16. Manzey D., Luz M., Mueller S., Dietz A., Meixensberger J., Strauss G.. Automation in surgery: The impact of navigated-control assistance on performance, workload, situation awareness, and acquisition of surgical skills. Human Factors. 2011 ; 53: 584-599
17. Morgan C., Chiappe D., Kraut J., Strybel T., Vu K. L. Advances in human aspects of aviation. Landry S., ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press ; 2012: 623-631.
18. Pierce R. S.. The effect of SPAM administration during a dynamic simulation. Human Factors. 2012 ; 54: 838-848
19. Salmon P., Stanton N., Walker G., Green D.. Situation awareness measurement: A review of applicability for C4i environments. Journal of Applied Ergonomics. 2006 ; 37: 225-238
20. Salmon P. M., Stanton N. A., Walker G. H., Jenkins D., Ladva D., Rafferty L., Young M.. Measuring situation awareness in complex systems: Comparison of measures study. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2009 ; 39: 490-500
21. Selcon S. J., Taylor R. M. Situational awareness in aerospace operations. Neuilly-Sur-Seine, France: Advisory Group for Aerospace Research & Development ; 1990: 5/1-5/8.
22. Selcon S. J., Taylor R. M., Koritsas E.. Workload or situation awareness? TLX vs SART for aerospace systems design evaluation. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting ; 1991 Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society ; 1991. 62.
23. St. John M., Smallman H. S.. Staying up to speed: Four design principles for maintaining and recovering situation awareness. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making. 2008 ; 2: 118-139
24. Stein E. S. Air traffic controller workload: An examination of workload probe. Atlantic City International Airport, NJ: U.S Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration ; 1985 :
25. Strybel T. Z., Vu K. L., Kraft J., Minakata K.. Assessing the situation awareness of pilots engaged in self spacing. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 52nd Annual Meeting ; 2008 Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ; 2008. 11.
26. Sulistyawati K., Wickens C. D., Chui Y. P.. Prediction in situation awareness: Confidence bias and underlying cognitive abilities. International Journal of Aviation Psychology. 2011 ; 21: 153-174
27. Tharanathan A., Bullemer B., Laberge J., Reising D. V., Mclain R.. Impact of functional and schematic overview displays on console operators' situation awareness. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making. 2012 ; 6: 141-164
28. Tremblay S., Vachon F., Lafond D., Kramer C.. Dealing with task interruptions in complex dynamic environments: Are two heads better than one?. Human Factors. 2012 ; 54: 70-83
29. Vu K. L., Strybel T. Z., Battiste V., Lachter J., Dao A. V., Brandt S., Ligda S., Johnson W.. Pilot performance in trajectory-based operations under concepts of operation that vary separation responsibility across pilots, air traffic controllers, and automation. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 2012 ; 28: 107-118